There are some things you need to watch and take in…this is one of them!
Lots of truth, lots of info about everything to do with the matrix and how it affects us all.
There are some things you need to watch and take in…this is one of them!
Lots of truth, lots of info about everything to do with the matrix and how it affects us all.
What Is REALLY Happening In
FROM SOMEONE WHO IS THERE:
I got online for the first time in days and one of the very first things I saw was an out and out lie about the government’s response to the crisis I am in the middle of. I don’t care if you hate or love Trump, using the crisis in Puerto Rico to spread political lies is disgusting! I am literally across the street from the airport, and the hotel I am in is where many of the first responders are staying, so here is what is going on from someone who is actually here seeing it.
The government is here and has been here! Every single day plane after plane full of FEMA, FBI, homeland security, army, Air Force, Marines, and extra police officers from all over the country shows up.
Cargo plane after cargo plane and ship after ship full of supplies shows up. There is a hospital ship off the coast that I can see from the beach.
The response was quick and it keeps coming! They are out every day from sun up until sun down.
Roads have been completely destroyed in many areas, especially the remote one. The military and FEMA are going out to these places on foot with 100 lbs + packs on their backs. It is requiring them to cut their way through flooded areas to get there. It will take time to reach everyone when conditions are as bad as they are.
This isn’t a political issue, it is a humanitarian one. The lies being spread about the response aren’t helping the people here, it is just fueling hate based on lies! If you want to help Puerto Rico, donate money or supplies and pray. If you want to play politics find something else to argue about! Not like there aren’t hundreds of topics for you to choose from!
Before any fraud can be revealed, a simple understanding of what fraud actually is is critical to grasp the enormity of the fraud placed on humanity overall. Fraud is simply a knowing attempt to deceive another to steal from them. Plain and simple, a fraud is hidden theft. What humanity is finding difficult to accept is the actual level of theft that has been achieved over every man, woman and child on what we call earth. Humanity has been duped into In-dependence upon the very thing that is draining their very souls of life and, literally, feeding it to the hounds of Hell. Not one part of humanity’s day to day activities escape this perfect net if you’re still willing to be their fishies. Every aspect of what you THINK of as a normal kinda day is soaked and dripping in this venom that has permeated the very mind of consciousness rendering it unconscious and thus, dead. All evil had to do was make being dead legally, fun enough to quell and lull the masses, and make sure you can’t imagine any other kind of normal day besides the matrix you’re spinning in. I’ll outline a few parables of this during this essay where it is my hope to be able to convey, in the simplest terms, the magnitude of this ruse while keeping your panic to a dull roar. Yes, this is serious business since your very soul is on THEIR lien/line/ligne until YOU un-Hook your Peter Pan and Tinkerbell but, the answer AND truth beyond in the living reality are so simple, you simply won’t believe it.
It’s because EVERY part of your life in what the masses of humanity think of as “normal” is affect-dead and in-fect-dead and THIS is the pole shift of 180 degrees spoke of in folklore. Yes, the physical ones occur but only for those that choose the dead physical, all there is reality whereas I and countless others chose the 180 degree about face and marched right out of Babyloan out from under their excrutiatingly relentless eyes until we literaly “went dark” on their radar screens. This is the Celestine Prophecy effect of the invisible shields go up and render you untouchable for standing in truth.
When pair-ents (two minds) or payer-rents choose to REGISTER their children, they are LITERALLY trading off the life source of the being that is SUCKED into that body in this reality for the whore of Baby-loans LEGAL NAME dead child, in essence, ADOPTING Satan’s child in LLEU of heaven’s child. The Laws-R-us effect, raising the dead NAME DEMON and razing the living consciousness you THINK of as YOU and every other human being as well as all sentient life in this reality. In short, YOU offer up your living child as a sacrifice to Satan while your living child commits sign after sign (sin upon sin) and ADOPT the dead LEGAL DEMON literally breathing life into evil with every creation thenceforth.
Have a look again at the Solomon story where two mothers were contesting one child where one mother (whore of Babyloan) who killed her child (smothering it in bed while she was sleeping is one version) and swapped babies with the living child of the other mother (living creation) claiming the living child as hers and the dead one belonging to the mother who is now fighting to save her kidnapped child. Solomon’s answer to this quarrel was to simply cut the living child in two and each could have half to which the real mother said no and to allow the liar to have the child versus halve the child. Solomon knew the real mother would never allow her child to be harmed while the whore of Babyloan stayed silent and happy with the outcome of cutting the child in two. The old “if I can’t steal your child, you’re not getting them back psychopathy” and this is exactly what’s going on in this reality. The child is life itself, the life in you, your child to protect and your child is owned, locked, stalked and B.A.R.-ruled whilst gleefully consenting to play along in the dead whore commerce kingdumb as nothing more than a minor subject in the book of the dead REGISTRARS, a page for their black night Sat-El-ite. Demons are also called El-ites, Graft-ites, Paris-ites etc…..
People will walk in circles within the matrix until they decide, once and for all, they’re not a legal anything….only the absolute removal of the literal idea of being a legal anything will finally put you out side of the box of this boxed legal matrix. Here’s an example of how 180 degrees opposite of the truth legally mind-dead people “evaluate” spiritual signs and clues with literal legal nonsense. If you’re talking in legal devil tongue in legal literal reality, you’re an El-ite just like the other El-ites that like to burroe underground as any wormwould do: THAT’S the real wormwood wiggling around in the grey clay called brain matter which is in fact, the dead and divided heart and why only following your true heart, to do what is right regardless of illusional consequence. In that walk, creation carries you.
I’ll post this segment and another segment to show how circular legal reality the mind goes, round and round only talking about the world reality from the dead legal illusion perspective…..the subject never changes because they are imprisoned in a CROWN SUBJECT I.D.-entity so their OBJECTIVE will always be from the dead legal whirled matrix trapped mined.
from the article (read the whole thing if you can stomach this much delusional programming and this one is a GREAT example of someone nailing their own box shut from the inside)
“The word “Shemitah” is a legal term that comes from the Torah of Moses, the first five books of the Scriptures. Shemitah in the Hebrew means a “legally permanent release”. The root idea of the word Shemitah in the Hebrew means to “violently throw something down with force—to utterly destroy something”. To a biblical court of Law, the Shemitah was a time-sensitive, permanent legal release that was to absolutely abolish whatever legal issue was at stake.””
back to me now…..the word Shemitah is Hebrew for the latin phrase Clausula Rebis Sic Stantibus or the CRSS to bear, bare or B’heir. The Invocation of the CRSS was on December 25th, 2012….the CRSS is commonly referred to as “the escape clause/the S-cape Claus”…..the writers of the article missed the point entirely because they’re deluded into a one way only literal way of thinking, basing their whole reality that was built on the legal name fraud deception. humanity, in short, lives the lie until they know who, not watt, they truly are.
here’s my essay:
and here’s the link to the Shemitah article literal nonsense explained:
They’ll never know the real why speaking in devil’s tongue legal sorcery matricks…..
in laymen’s terms, the clausula rebis sic stantibus is the escape clause where a FUNDAMENTAL change in circumstances renders contracts/treaties etc. null and void…the fundamental change moment?….it’s illegal to be legal anything, mind, body, spirit. The original Birth Certificate contract is the PROOF and EVIDENCE of a clear and present INTENT to deceive another by it’s mere existence….registry buildings are proof of intent to foment this deception…everything created to put this fraud into practice is proof of fraud intent ab initio (since before it was ACT-DEAD upon where you are ACT-DEAD until truth is ACT-DEED…..when you throw down, with force, the dead legal name (all ideas ATTACHED/attacked to it), with intent to destroy that from your reality, the real Shemitah/CRSS comes into full force and effect.
You are trapped in the legal mate-tricks until YOU aren’t. Only you can utterly destroy that….and all it is, is an idea you need to 180 degree your mind on and yes, this will take your breath away when you see the full magnitude of the matrix and why BABY steps are all that’s required. The more you walk the baby steps, the sooner you’ll be running and jumping can-yans.
“Clausula rebus sic stantibus/CRSS/the “cross to bare”: A treaty provision
stating that the treaty is binding only as long as the circumstances in existence when the treaty was signed remain substantially the same. Therefore, every contract created with their Trademark is fraudulent, ab initio, ad infinitum, nunc pro tunc.”
These literal reality, because of legal dead I.D.ea of themselves, types can only interpret from a dead literal, same as always, reality and will go in circles. In this whirled filled with false jews/ewes/use/ you must become the living yew/you/U tree and you can’t do that while you still hold on to any dead idea of WHO you are based on WATT someone else NAMED/SEXED you in the physical. If you want to know about me, ask me, not the meatstick illusional idea of who you BELIEVE I am based on socio-pathic stereo-tip-eye-cull PHYSICAL ass-sumped-eye-ons/pre-sumped-eye-ons….you will find out very quickly WHO I am and how quickly I destroy any/all physical reality assumptions/presumptions thinking that somehow they know me better than myself.
The allegory of the swan is that it has a long neck and I have stuck my neck out a loooong way every time it was needed for truth to prevail, regardless of “physical threats” from systemic baboons, wolves, hyenas or any manner of predator/parasiti-cull types. You can tell a chicken by the shortness of its neck and the depth of the deep fryer it’s cooking itself in. You choose to be cygnus the swan not sign-us the boiler chickens….psi-genius….where the genie-us is found only in truth together with your dauntless position to stand, immovable from truth once found. Until you REAL-EYES the legal name fraud trap, you’ll be forever trapped in a separate from you, separate from creation box, bound by the evil you won’t, not can’t let go.
Canter-bury is what the dead whorse you’re “can’t ink, can tink” is racing to-wards and all that whorse will find is a grave because it lost the urge to fight for life based on a bluffing sorcerer’s whims. Bury that canter before it buries you….only the dead bury the dead in this world. The anogogic tie-ins prove what the Shemitah really is and folks, we’ve passed over that long ago and these I.D.-e-oughts (Identity conscious zeroes aka zombies/zoom-bees with stingers and B.A.R-B’s) still haven’t a clue as to who they are and this is a classic example. They try to prove their spiritual “beliefs” with legal literal reality schizophrenic delusions.
A classic example of this schizophrenia freemen and paid-riots and legal goo-ruse of men go to jail and it’s easy to know why….legal is about minding everybody else’s business but your own and gone are the daze where we needed to do this legal challenge thing at all….that was before the fundamental change in the contracts all humanity is bound in where the knowledge of legal name fraud and, the legal fact that it’s illegal to use a legal name from any all birth certificates bares the clasula rebis sic stantibus escape clause into view. People like Notaries (not ari’s/knot-our-eyes) insist on schizophrenia where nothing can be not-arised without presenting your willingness to commit fraud by using a legal name that doesn’t belong to you but you think it does. Then the emotions kick in with “but my mummy and daddy gave me that name!!!!” as they stomp their widdle feet screaming like banshees vowing vengeance where the simple truth is all the vengeance you need. You’ll never get burned at the B.A.R. and be Cued again. Remember, evil won’t give up without a fight but it can’t harm you, only bluff you to extremes to try and coerce or trick you back into you being their hollow-wean tree-Te’s. It’s illegal to be a legal anything stops them in their tracks.
It’s sadly obvious that people don’t mind being brain-dead/brand-dead criminals but then this LEGAL FACT was never mentioned to them by those that enslave humanity via forced REGISTRATIONS into contracts IN-TEN-DEAD to DE-SEE-EVE another. It’s only AFTER THE FACT, once this LEGAL FACT is shared with anyone does it become a CRIME KNOWINGLY to continue simply going along with evil. Just ask gurus like Santo Bonacci and Dean Clifford about that, unfortunately, they’re both in jail along with a few other legal be-gulls still dancing with the devil in the houses of Satan commonly called court houses more aptly whored souses. You’re the meat in the soup of the broth-El filled with vegetative ramblings of circular saw mineds. Of all the legal gurus, these two heard me and ignored me the most regarding this legal and spiritual fact.
The truth is much simpler. The fight only continues while one thinks there IS a fight where none exists unless you pick one. We’ve all picked all the necessary battles to set ourselves free and in the case of those of the beligerent stance, to keep them away from humanity where only B.A.R. members are allowed to pick pockets through “legal laws” and they don’t like competition from freeman guru types where you’re making these pair-a-sites work versus being a typical roll-over human monster. If you want to play legal then I’d suggest you join them because it’s illegal to even try to beat them since you’re going to have to use a legal name to enter Satan’s realm. The only way to beat them is to not join in their silly little reigned-ear games and that’s easy because you’ll have to insist you’re a dead legal name to do that and well, that’s a crime ab initio (since before the beginning) since now you know legal names are illegal contra-banned. It’s easy to spot any demons, they all in-cyst on legal names, Satan’s membership consent and they’ll push you to your limitbut forbidden to pass the Rubicon of truth: it’s illegal to use a legal name. Know that fact and stand there? Nothing in Satan’s realm can enter yours.
Essay notes: add-end-dumbs
con, with or without…..phi, creation…..de, of or to undo…..ents, mind….with or without creation of or to undo the mind….a confidence game…con gmae
life is a con game…with life or against it….the confidence game is to see how pro life or not one is….creation’s version of the shell game….in life’s game, there is a pea under every walnut shell no matter how many times the shells are rearranged….
legal name reality is the against life con, full of con-victs etc….the game of feeding off life versus creating it….when one has the con-phi-de-ents to overcome the legal reality, one has literally overcome death….THAT’S the test…..so easy really….but so few choose the real confidence game….I only use “common speak” to convey literal concepts…everyone knows what “illegal” means, it equates to wrong doings….unfortunately, legal reality makes it legal to murder, they call it war….so I have to walk between common understandings in the literal to expand the concepts into spiritual anogogics….when in Rome, speak Roman until others can learn Phoenician
we don’t ever have to explain ourselves, just clear up the illusions and misconceptions of others so they can understand their own wrong doings thinking it’s ok because it’s legal, not ok if it’s illegal….it’s wrong to kill others period…people can grasp that much……if they are truly good people, it doesn’t take them long to see through that veil of deception.
Here’s an example of a literal spell and some pieces of the inner chamber/spell revealed: Helsinki, pronounced hell-sink-key, standard common speak HEARD/herd
Phonics concepts: Think “How many things can I RELATE to what is known as the literal SPELLED city of Helsinki and all of its PIECES (i.e. Hell, El, Lucifer, sync,sink, quay, X, che etc….and there are MANY) within?” What you begin to see when you do this, is the corelation of stories merging into one story but you have to have the objective of KNOWING THYSELF. This is the objective of humanity where the vastness of humanity is blind in their own mirror here. Phonics is using every rule to break every rule singularity code where EVERY letter, syllable, number spell can be MORPHED into either good intention or evil intention where the SPELLS default to evil, tipping the scales in its favour. You literally empowered evil with every word uttered unknowingly. All you need to do is let every letter be sounded EVERY way it can be, combinations of two letters, same thing and consonants where a “C” can sound like an “S” so a “K” can be replaced there as well since Kat works to SOUND the same idea. A SOUND mind hears ALL SOUND ideas as THEY define what INTENTION they carry beyond the COMMONLY ACCEPTED definitions of the masses. Phonics is the Phoenix of unified singularity where all things must, come back to YOU but what is the common denominator you need to see that objective? It has to be something that ties everyone together into thinking they are who somebody else says they are, and that YOU, didn’t create for yourself but defend it like you did. It has to be able to control every aspect of your life and so obvious, you’ll miss it because you’ve based your whole reality where your idea of what your life is, is fully dependent on it.
2. Norse Mythology
3. Hades, Hell, Plutos, Astrotheological (all Zodiacs), Religion (all variations)
4. Written and spoken language using sound/spells
5. Humans inhabit buildings there (commonalities are things like blood, pain, joy, human bodies, males, females, religions etc.)
6. Atlas drawn, flat earth, 2 dimensional
7. Education, banking, military, policing, taxing, government systems
For all those still seeking vengeance in any way whatsoever in any/all man made for-Um’s…..legal, common law, vigilante’, patriots, freemen, cops, lawyers, judges, priests, popes, false kings and queens, presidents and poly-tic-Sions….et fucking cetera ad infapukum…..apparently, YOU know better than creation….that’s called blaze-for-me and you burn for that…true story
I hate to tell you but you are crazy if you think you can do anything “legal”/ “common law (man’s law still legal reality called vengeance) without first committing a felony act yourself by using ANYTHING DEEMED LEGAL BY YOUR CONSENT, regardless if the “name” you use is on ANY legal paper ANYWHERE. You are contracting with COMMERCE/LEGAL entities that render you LEGAL TENDER long pork. The word “prosecute” means DO NOT PURSUE which is EXACTLY what everyone that doesn’t trust the REAL COMMON LAW which is the the law of natural order where any justice creation wants to allow on your behalf is BLOCKED by everyone(YOU) that seeks their OWN vengeance like somehow they/you know better than creation’s law/truth/natural order/god whatever you want to call it to make is visible…..In short, you trust Satan’s legal more than you trust creation’s law itself…..the LEGAL TRUST (Satan & the Harlot, Whore of Babyloan a.k.a. LEGAL/COMMERCE reality mate-tricks) VERSES (writes, creates, establishes etc.) trusting in creation, the truth and EVERY ACT of vengeance reflects back DOUBLED in that Satanic TRUST mirror…..
You enslave yourself by trusting that some human is going to look out for you more than creation itself…..that’s the short cut to Hell and the long rode home….the long and short of it..the common law is the calm-one law that allows creation to settle all accounts of evil for you….but then, you’d have to trust the truth more than the liars you already do and have been screwed over by…yeah, that’s insane…..kate
p.s. just call evil into the light and leave it at that….here’s the trumpet call, the seventh sign, trumpet, seal and crown…..seven deadly words to evil…..IT IS ILLEGAL TO USE A LEGAL NAME…..that’s the GOD-SPELL GO-SPELL breaker right there…..not one false profit expert can diffuse that thy-me bomb
Kim Jong-Un, “pictured above left, took part in his school musical, Grease.”
Kim Jong-Un is most likely a CIA asset.
All the children of Kim Jong-il are said to have lived in Switzerland, as well as the mother of the two youngest sons, who lived in Geneva for some time.
“Kim is receiving these bribe funds in exchange for his playing a role in a scripted ‘black op’ that is designed to effect worldwide financial markets.”
Continued here: Tom Heneghan’s EXPLOSIVE Intelligence Briefing’s Blog – Myspace
“When I was a little boy, my father, Kim Jong il, got me to watch Disney cartoons for hours every day.”
And what about Berne?
“I was enrolled as the son of the chauffeur of the North Korean Embassy,” explains Kim.
Kim has been photographed with Kobe Bryant and Toni Kukoč.
|Since the dawn of history, mankind has always quailed helplessly before the elemental forces of nature. For at least the past ten millennia, history depicts us as either worshipping these formidable forces or viewing them as the work of wrathful gods – raining down retribution upon their awestruck and trembling flock.
The rise of technology has helped us little in this regard, other than giving us tools to observe their origin and behavior. By means of seismological tools we can now, more or less precisely, track the origin, trajectory and force of earthquakes – and dodge them if we are lucky. Satellites give us similar data and warning about ocean storms – and at least a chance to escape. The same is true of other natural disasters, such as flooding, droughts, and forest and steppe fires. (Our measures to fight the latter are deemed successful only if the fire is not really heavy).
Our struggle against natural disasters and whatever successes we achieve require huge human and technical resources and the outlay of sizeable amounts of money. All of our attempts to combat such disasters are extremely limited. For example, the attempt to influence storms and fires through dispersion of chemical substances has no serious impact upon them. Then, too, aside from the expense, such substances are chemically aggressive and only worsen the ecology, leaving much to be desired in terms of their usage.
Moreover, our understanding of the nature of such disasters is rather far from reality. How we interpret the nature of hurricanes – the main protagonists of our “novel” – remains at the conceptual level of someone saying, “The wind blows because the trees are swaying”. No one has ever attempted to explain why air masses move in one particular direction rather than another. The current hypothesis about the heating and cooling of air masses does not have the answer. When molecules of air absorb the infrared radiation of heated earth or heated ocean water, their kinetic energy changes as well as the atmosphere pressure.
However, the explanation of the nature of change of the atmospheric pressure is not good at all. The atmosphere is a gaseous medium, composed of molecules that move chaotically. As each atmospheric molecule absorbs a photon of infrared radiation, it continues to move just as chaotically as it did before the absorption. Therefore, according to the theory of Brownian movement, the general configuration of atmospheric molecular motion should not change at all.
This is true whether the molecules either speed up or slow down – in other words, the principle of the chaotic movement remains the same. However, the air masses get into motion resulted in a mere breeze, a wind, or a hurricane. Certainly, we run into breezes almost daily, and from time to time we come across strong winds. And fortunately, the average person only seldom has to deal with a hurricane. However, regardless of the speed of the air masses in motion, we come across with this phenomenon every day.
Yet, existing theories cannot explain a phenomenon that any child can readily identify – namely, the blowing of the wind. Pressure gradients registered by tools does not explain why air masses start to move precisely in one given, specific, direction rather than in any other. After all, the concept of vertical atmospheric pressure and temperature gradient is a measurable phenomenon perfectly well-known for everybody.
Perhaps many people had the possibility to observe around a campfire how heated air and its accompanying smoke raised in an upward vertical path and not horizontally nor extensively. The heated air rises upward where the air is colder, and the higher it goes, the lower the air temperature. Airplane passengers may also remember messages about the temperature overboard at the altitude, for example, of 10,000 meters. Usually it reaches 40-50 degrees centigrade below zero. Only ten thousand meters from the surface of the earth and the temperature gradient becomes 70-80 degrees centigrade.
Such a sharp temperature gradient does not exist along the surface of the earth, even at considerable areas of hundreds of kilometers. It amounts to 20-30 degrees centigrade at most. However, the air masses start to move horizontally, parallel to the surface of the planet and not vertically, which logically simply cannot happen.
What is the reason of such discrepancy? T
his problem is complacently ignored, however, as are many other similar problems. And the single cause for this is the inability to give a reasonable explanation of this phenomenon from the viewpoint of contemporary physics. Why, when we heat the air in a balloon, it rises upward, that is – it is elevated. However, the air heated over a large surface, “for some reason”, starts to move along the surface instead of upward.
There is no discrepancy if we consider this phenomenon from an absolutely different position based on our understanding of the fact that the Universe is anisotropic (i.e., non-uniform or non-homogeneous).
The anisotropy of the Universe means that qualities and properties of space are not identical in the different directions and the matter in any of its forms is also non-uniform as well as its qualities and properties. The anisotropy of space and matter is backed by numerous scientific studies employing the most exact tools the contemporary science ever had.
The reason of our planet’s strange atmospheric behavior is the following: at the micro level a heated molecule (which absorbs a photon of thermal radiation) and the cold molecule (which does not absorb a photon of thermal radiation) differs from each other qualitatively. That is, two atmosphere molecules identical in all physical and chemical characteristics known to a modern science differ qualitatively from each other by the degree of their influence on the surrounding microspace.
And this difference is a result of absorption of a photon of infrared (thermal) radiation by one of these two molecules.
When a molecule of air absorbs or releases thermal photons, the level of self-dimentionality (the degree of influence which a given molecule exerts on its surrounding microspace) changes. The level of self-dimentionality increases when the molecule absorbs a photon and decreases when it releases the photon. Thus, when we heat air molecules within a limited space (such as a balloon) we produce a floating effect: that is, the masses of cold air that surround the heated molecules within the balloon all maintain the same level of self-dimensionality. At the same time, the heated molecules inside the balloon exert an additional effect on the microspace introduced by the thermal photons.
This produces a vertical dimensionality gradient directed upward and a partial antigravity effect. As a result, the molecules caught inside the balloon perform the work of forcibly lifting up both the balloon and a basket attached to it. The similar phenomenon occurs when the balloon is filled with the gas, which has greater level of self- dimensionality than the atmosphere. The more dimensionality gradient between the levels of self-dimensionality of gases inside the balloon and the levels of self-dimensionality of atmospheric gases, the greater the lifting force. The partial antigravity effect produced is capable of lifting weight, i.e., of doing work …
Similar phenomena are observable in both liquid and solid substances. For example, processes involved in the formation of lattices occur in a similar way except for some peculiarities. In crystals the antigravity effect occurs only with heating (when atoms of a crystal absorb thermal photons).
When a critical number of thermal photons are absorbed, the antigravity effect becomes commensurate with the nuclear forces that keep the atoms in units of crystal lattices and the substance turns into a state of liquid crystal or simply into liquid. If the process of heating (i.e. absorption of thermal photons) continues, the antigravity effect becomes much stronger than the nuclear interaction and the substance will pass into a gaseous state. Herein lies the mechanism of transition from one aggregate state to another.
The phenomenon of so-called “sublimation” (when, in the process of heating, a substance passes from a solid state to a gaseous) is a perfect confirmation of the above-mentioned. Traditional science has never explained this, though it can be quite easily explained. Atoms absorb thermal radiation in the form of infrared radiation photons. When an atom absorbs one thermal photon, the level of its self-dimensionality changes by a certain discrete amount – this is a stepwise process. In other words, the atom changes its self-dimensionality level every time it absorbs a photon.
In the case of a substance having a self-dimensionality gradient that is less than the amplitude leap of the atom’s self-dimensionality during thermal photon absorption, sublimation occurs, i.e. the substance passes from solid to gaseous, rather than to a liquid. We could go on at length explaining all manner of natural phenomena from the standpoint of space and matter anisotropy. However, our thrust here is the understanding of atmospheric natural phenomena as a particular example of space/matter anisotropy. So let us pass from processes unfolding at the atomic level to processes at work at the atmospheric level.
When the bottom-most layers of an atmosphere overspread an area of considerable size, billions and billions of atmospheric molecules absorb thermal photons. This occurs at the microcosmic level, since each individual molecule undergoes a change in its self-dimensionality. The cumulative effect of the molecular changes leads to a change of dimensionality at the macrocosmic level. Thus, neighboring areas of a planet’s atmosphere acquire different levels of dimensionality. This creates a dimensionality gradient between the these neighboring areas of the atmosphere in a horizontal direction. At the same time a vertical gradient of dimensionality still remains.
The appearance of this additional (horizontal) gradient of dimensionality between adjacent areas of the atmosphere leads to the following: the heated molecules of the atmosphere start to move not only upwards but also sideways, i.e. along the surface of the planet. This movement along the planet’s surface is precisely what is known to everyone as wind.
The force of the wind depends upon the dimensionality gradient produced between adjacent areas of the atmosphere, one of which is heated while the other one is not – or otherwise cooled (when atmospheric molecules release thermal photons). The larger the gradient, the higher the speed of air masses along the surface. Without this gradient, there is no movement of air masses and therefore no wind. The above is crucial for grasping what follows.
Let us now consider the origin of hurricanes, that every year, with greater or lesser intensity, pummel the eastern coast of North America. These hurricanes are born at the turn of two oceans — the Atlantic and the Indian. One washes western Africa, the other — its eastern seaboard. Both oceans merge in one in the south of the African continent. Every ocean has its own distinct currents, possessing their own velocity, direction and water temperature.
Therefore, when cold and warm currents of these oceans collide in the South African coastal waters, conditions arise for triggering abrupt dimensionality gradients between adjasent areas of the atmosphere. The contour of the southern part of the African continent also adds to this effect, since the relatively small length of the southern coast of Africa does not allow the temperature of these ocean currents to even out to some extent.
Thus, several ocean currents with vastly different water temperatures collide with each other in the coastal waters of southern Africa – running parallel to each other for some time. As soon as they hit the Cape of Good Hope, they begin to whirl about and create turbulence. It is exactly the creation of such areas of turbulence that is responsible for forming hurricane storms, which, gaining in strength on their path of destruction fall upon the eastern coast of Central and North America.
The storm season begins when the water in the equatorial and tropical areas of the oceans become considerably heated up. This leads to a rise in the temperature of the warm currents, while concurrently the currents coming from Antarctica in the southern hemisphere (where our summer is their winter) have the lowest temperature.
Sooner or later, depending on the seasonal weather conditions, a temperature gradient of colliding ocean currents reaches a critical value and – superstorms are born, strikingly different from the usual tropical storms that constantly appear in the coastal waters of South Africa.
These superstorms (hurricanes) are huge cloudy formations (some of which reach the size of several European states) reminiscent of anfractuous Galaxies (Fig.1). They are divided into five categories. For example, a category 5 superstorm reaches a speed of 155 m.p.h. (248 kilometers/hour) and can go higher. Such a hurricane, on landfall, sweeps away everything in its path, saturating the ground with billions of tons of water carried in its clouds.
This, in full measure, can be called a natural disaster. Of course, there is no technology that can cope with this. And humans lose heart before this catastrophe, fleeing their homes before a superstorm overtakes them and then goes on a rampage until it gets exhausted. Our technocratic civilization has programmed people to think that man minus his machines is nothing – except a pitiful appendage to civilization’s technical trappings. It is an enormous error.
To accomplish something significant, we need to work at attaining a certain level of development and knowledge. Once enlightened by knowledge and equipped with the requisite level of development and potential, we can achieve the seemingly impossible…
Early in life I became aware that very often all I had to do was wish and the weather would change (e.g., starting or stopping a rainfall). At first, I paid no attention to this and thought I was just terribly lucky.
Every time I planned to go out of town in my day off, the weather was absolutely perfect despite the fact that during the whole week the weather had been inclement and wet. Noticing how often this happened gave me the idea that all I had to do was simply imagine a fine, sunny day for it to materialize.
Conversely, if amongst a summer heat I pictured the sky with heavy cloud formation and raindrops falling down more and more… and in no time the clouds would appear in the sky and would quickly increase, the sky would darken and a wall of warm summer downpour would saturate the ground. Thunder and lighting would then follow, refreshing the air and filling it with ozone. Similar episodes kept happening to me so often that I felt they were more than just simple coincidence at work.
Sometimes I had to do conversely, as it happened in the following episode: In 1985, while serving as an army officer in Ilichevsk (near Odessa), I was granted a leave of absence, just before the New Year. I purchased a ticket to Kharkov and, having reached the Odessa airport, found that my flight had been postponed indefinitely due to inclement weather in Odessa, Kharkov and Sverdlovsk. And our plane had not yet taken off from Sverdlovsk.
Not wishing to spend all my holiday at the airport – and from the first moment I learned about the weather situation – I began willing intensely that the fog blanketing all three airports (Odessa, Kharkov and Sverdlovsk) would disappear. Every hour spent in that airport was like punishment. After several hours, the weather cleared up in Odessa and we were summoned aboard. I spent my leave of absence in Kharkov and upon arriving at the airport, found the same inclement, flight-canceling weather there. However, after several hours, the weather turned fine and … I safely reached Odessa.
Only later I learned that the inclement weather I had encountered lasted for several weeks and that the change to flying weather had appeared only twice, for half a day, during that period – first upon my arrival in Kharkov and second at my departure from it. Following my return home, the inclement weather actually continued for two weeks more.
Among the many examples I have, there is one episode that served as a “clincher” in convincing me of my conscious weather control ability. On December 31, 1991, my wife and I arrived in San Francisco. Early in February, we were invited to the home of a mutual acquaintance, George Orbelian, who later became a close friend. While sitting on his terrace we spoke of many things, including the possibility of controlling the weather.
When I mentioned some experiences of mine, George exclaimed enthusiastically, “That is really great! Make it rain! For the last six years, there hasn’t been a drop of rain here. And scarcely anyone can remember a similar drought in which something like what you do ever happened at all.” I promised to help with the problem, but George insisted, “Why postpone it? Do it now.”
I proceeded to concentrate on this task and in half an hour it was raining. At the beginning the rain was weak, giving rise to much hilarity and joking. I then had to concentrate a little more – and it was pouring cats and dogs. The jokes stopped immediately. However, in retrospect, it would have been better had I not done it. The huge downpour in San Francisco triggered floods in Los Angeles and many houses in southern California were toppled. On the other hand, the situation in San Francisco turned out just fine. It continued to rain non-stop for several days. Since that time, fifteen years ago, California has had no rain or water problem.
Prior to the six-year drought mentioned above, precipitation had been more or less regular up to a certain season, after which it had become very sparse. For the greater part of the year, California could easily be called droughty. Since February of ‘92, it rains all year round in California; the reservoirs are full and the countryside is blooming…
Thanks to above, I had enough real confirmation that it is possible to control weather – that it was not mere fantasy or the ravings of a lunatic. Having dispelled my doubts as to whether this kind of activity was possible, I now faced the challenge of finding the correct “key” to “unlocking” every concrete task – and the deeper understanding, the greater probability of resolving it.
By chance, the decision to interfere with the natural activity of a hurricane came to me quite unexpectedly.
At twelve midnight on the evening of October 3, 2002, I happened to be surfing the TV channels when I caught some news from the U.S. eastern seaboard, where it was already 3:00 a.m. of October 4. According to a reporter on the scene, a hurricane named Lily was bearing down on the region and had already reached the status of category 4. He added that the local inhabitants had already been evacuated from the danger zone, and, that judging by the increased severity of the wind and rain, and the height of the waves battering the coastline, Lily’s approach was imminent.
At that moment, the idea struck me that I could try and stop this hurricane. The strategy was simple – to even out (i.e., equalize) the self-dimensionality levels of the atmospheric molecules in the vicinity of the superstorm. The easiest way to do so would be to trigger simultaneous (coherent) thermal radiation of photons by the atmospheric molecules in the area of the hurricane. This would eliminate the dimensionality gradient between “heated” and “cold” molecules in the vicinity of the superstorm activity, thereby getting rid of the natural factors giving rise to the creation of a superstorm. In other words, by eliminating its causes I could eliminate the superstorm itself. This is precisely what I tried to accomplish.
After completing the work I set out to do, I retired for the night. First thing in the morning, I switched on my TV and began awaiting some news about Lily. To my great surprise – by the morning there was nothing left of Lily. (Fig.2). As clearly shown on Fig. 2, from the first moment I began my work, the hurricane’s wind velocity abruptly began to abate. Within several hours, Lily had changed from a category 4 to a category 1, then to a simple tropical storm and finally died. (Fig.3).
Stages tracked in Figs.3, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15.
It is noteworthy that Lily’s main destructive force was dissipated long before it reached landfall.
One may protest that such behavior is quite typical of hurricanes. We grant that people are entitled to their own opinions. However, let us listen to the experts who, year after year, have been tracking these natural disasters which destroy countless thousands of lives and wreak multi-billion dollar losses on countries “honored” by their visit:
“Before Lili could blast ashore, the storm encountered too-dry air out of the west and too-cool water near the coastline, where, incidentally, the hottest Louisiana red-pepper sauce is made (Tabasco is bottied on Avery Island in New Iberia parish). That — among a combination of other factors still unknown — bumped Lili down to a Category 2 hurricane, still dangerous but drastically less powerful than official expected.”
“A lot of Ph.D. [dissertation] will be written about this” storm’s rapid loss of strength, said Max Mayfield, director of the National Hurricane Center in Miami.” (Lili Leashed, p.9, October 12, 2002, World).
First, it is obvious from the above, that experts well versed in the nature of hurricanes had never seen such a phenomenon.
Second, from where had this ice-cold water appeared right in the middle of a shallow Mexican gulf? Let us remember that this gulf lies in tropical and sub-equatorial zones where its water undergoes heating all summer long.
Third, from where did the dry air materialize amidst the super-moist air – especially since at the same time, the air surrounding the hurricane usually becomes very moist?
Fourth, what other factors still unknown to specialists may have interfered with the natural behavior of the hurricane?
No one has answered any of these questions. This is hardly surprising if we view this phenomenon from the standpoint of the conventional scientific position. Let us assume that somebody “somehow” could deliberately produce throughout the entire hurricane a synchronous emission of thermal radiation photons from molecules of the atmosphere and molecules of the gulf water: this would easily explain the presence of cold water and very dry air over the gulf.
That is exactly what happens when the self-dimensionality level of the atmospheric molecules are equalized.
An abrupt cooling of the air over the gulf leads to a dehydration of the air masses. As is usual in the cooling process, water vapor of air masses, after reaching the dew point turns to liquid and becomes rainfall over the gulf waters, thereby causing their abrupt cooling. And this is exactly what was observed.
We have already detailed above how the movement of air masses originates, and will therefore recall only the basic principle.
In the presence of the gradient of self-dimensionality levels, a horizontal component of gravity occurs between nearby areas of the atmosphere. This component causes air molecules to move parallel to the surface of the planet.
When the self-dimensionality levels are equalized, the horizontal gravitational component will disappear and that will lead to a cessation of movement of the air masses along the surface. In other words, the lower the dimensionality gradient, the lower the wind velocity.
This is what occurred with hurricane Lily: the wind speed and strength dropped precipitously and extensively, owing to the equalization of the dimensionality level throughout Lily’s entire volume. Three hours later, after reaching the mainland, it settled down to a category 1, became a tropical storm within the next three hours, and then completely died.
But, we may ask, do all hurricanes behave this way over the mainland?
Let us look at the trajectories of some previous hurricanes and their behavior (Fig.4). Figure 4 shows trajectories of category 5 hurricanes up to the year 2000. None of these ever lost an iota of their force before blasting ashore.
Further, the wind velocity has never dropped, even minimally during the six hours of hovering over the mainland, as occurred with hurricane Lily. In fact, all the hurricanes continued moving for several days after reaching the mainland, and many of them returned to the ocean.
Only one — Andrew (1992) — subsided over a mountain range. Rather, those other hurricanes, after taking a “tour” over the mainland, returned back to their watery environment without any significant loss of force, and, reinvigorating themselves, kept on moving.
But could Lily be an anomaly, an exception to the rule? Skeptics will simply counter that there are anomalies in nature that are inexplicable. Obviously when a skeptic acknowledges that something inexplicable is occurring (in other words he or she can not explain it) it just leads to a simple phrase-mongering. Anyone has a right to express an opinion (even an erroneous one) if he or she offers an accurate and full explanation of his position. Otherwise, it is an idle philosophizing.
Moreover, even admitting that skeptics have the right to refer to “anomalies” it won’t be them of much help— if several identical anomalies are observed, they are not really “anomalies” per se, but actually repetitively occurring “regularities”.
In 2003, some friends of mine who knew about my “joust” with Lily, alerted me to a powerful, new hurricane, Isabel, barreling down the Eastern coast and rapidly growing stronger and stronger — even reaching category 4 status while still very far from the coastline.
To tackle Isabel, all I had was satellite photos found on the internet, appearing with a time delay of several hours. Thus, at the very moment I was working on them, Isabel was actually 50-60 miles away from the photographic site. This, in itself, was hardly an optimal condition for work. However, after my first intervention, the wind velocity stopped increasing. During the day and a half the wind velocity did not change at all — which in itself is an impossibility.
The next intervention took place four days later, almost at the very moment that the speed of the hurricane began to accelerate and intensify. And, again, the wind velocity remained the same during an entire day and a half without decreasing.
The strength of Isabell almost reached a category 5 and though, in concordance with all natural laws the force of a hurricane in warm waters is due to continue growing, the strength reached by Isabel was already extremely dangerous.
Therefore, using the same time-lag satellite photographs, I intensified my influence on the hurricane. In other words, a greater degree of influence was now necessary: the intensity of the hurricane began to drop sharply, within the space of two days (October 15 through 16), despite the fact that hurricane intensity always increases over warmer waters. But Isabel’s strength plummeted almost three categories, to a status of category 2.
At this point, I managed to abort and slightly decrease a new resurgence of force; nevertheless, Isabel approached the coast with considerable speed (about 90 miles per hour). Serendipitously I started receiving real-time data (i.e., without a time lag) when direct news bulletins from the east coast became accessible. And this brought immediate results: after several hours of working in real time, Isabel dropped down to a tropical storm and within a few hours thereafter ceased to exist. (Fig.5)
It is important to note that when worked on in real time, Isabel’s reaction to my influence was almost identical to Lily’s. Isabel’s trajectory is shown in Fig.6.
Prior to the hurricane season of 2004, I had approached a producer of documentary films who knew about my work through one of my trainees, Dr. Barbara Koopman. I offered to do a film of my work on hurricane suppression, if he would provide me the opportunity of working through satellites in real time. Initially he seemed interested in such a project, but as time went on – nothing came of it, and hurricanes are not in the habit of waiting.
By the beginning of August, a hurricane named Charley launched the season of 2004. Bearing in mind the relatively meager effect working through time-lag satellite photos, I decided to change my tactics with this hurricane.
Instead of interfering and trying to abort its development, I decided to create a “wall” in its path from which it would have to ricochet off, like a bouncing ball. I alerted some interested spectators of my intention.
My idea was to drive the hurricane back to the ocean by cutting off its access to the land. And this is what I managed to do.
However, because I lacked the exact information, the “bounce” off the wall landed Charley on a sort of “corner” so that instead of dropping down on Louisiana, Charley made a (very unusual) sharp right angled turn, veering from the middle of the Gulf of Mexico towards Florida (Fig.7).
Also, another never-before-occurring event was also recorded: After growing in strength to a category 4, hurricane Charley approached the Florida peninsula – not from the Atlantic Ocean, the usual approach of such hurricanes – but from the Gulf of Mexico instead. And in the warm waters of the gulf, Charley very rapidly gained in strength (Fig.8).
Thus, I manipulated Charley before it could hit the western coast of Florida.
Evacuation actually occurred in Louisiana; in Florida, nobody expected this hurricane, so I had to work very quickly. However, thanks to a weather channel broadcasting directly from the gulf coast, I was able to do so. As with the previous experience, working in real time proved to be the most effective and correct approach.
Before striking the peninsula, the force of the hurricane, within the first several hours, dropped from a category 4 to a category 1 and continued to drop even further. Charley, at this point classified as category 1, proceeded to return to the Atlantic Ocean. This surprised the experts who had warned that over warm water, Charley would regain its strength and again strike the east coast to the northeast of Florida.
I then undertook one more maneuver with the following result: this time, instead of intensifying in strength, Charley weakened rapidly and in the space of several hours became a tropical storm, hitting the northeast as a tropical downpour, then disappearing without a trace.
The next hurricane did not wait very long to show up. A superstorm named Frances was born in the waters of the Atlantic Ocean. It began to intensify rapidly and quickly reached a huge size.
Working with this hurricane, I still had satellite photos, with a time delay of some hours. When the hurricane speed had reached category 4, my intervention resulted in stopping its further acceleration. Throughout the entire day, the speed remained constant and the force of the hurricane began to decline; however, the wind velocity did not decline very long and the hurricane began again to gain in strength (Fig.9).
On the evening of September 1, 2004, the next intervention was made and, again, the wind velocity stopped accelerating and the strength of the hurricane remained at the same level for more than a day. At the same time, I changed my strategy and tactics slightly by focusing more attention on the fundamental cause of hurricane formation – a maneuver that gave positive results immediately.
Within two days, the hurricane started weakening, dropping from a category 4 to the lowest range of a category 3; this contradicted all expectations about “normal” hurricanes, which according to physical laws should strengthen over warmer waters.
Though not as dire as a category 4 or 5, a category 3 hurricane still continues to be quite dangerous and destructive. Therefore, I made my next intervention in the evening of September 3, 2004. And again, following this, wind velocity remained “frozen” (unchanging) as it were, and then the force of the hurricane began plummeting rapidly. As the hurricane neared the coast of Florida, it continued to weaken – contrary to all the laws about the behavior of hurricanes.
Utilizing direct broadcasting from the east coast of the peninsula, I once more exerted influence on hurricane Frances. It was 1500 hours, USA Eastern Time of September 5. Following this, the wind velocity dropped sharply on September 6 and 7, the net result of which Florida actually got hit by a category 1 hurricane which quickly lost its force and turned into a tropical storm. Upon entering the Gulf of Mexico, the tropical storm, which, in principle, should have gained strength over the very warm waters of the gulf, actually continued to lose speed and degenerated into a tropical downpour before it reached the inner coastline of the gulf (Fig.10).
And again an interesting phenomenon was observed.
After my work in real time on September 6 with hurricane Frances, a sharp drop in wind velocity occurred not only to this hurricane, but also to a hurricane named Ivan which was gaining in strength and situated hundreds of miles away from the coast (Fig. 11).
The reaction of Ivan to my work in real time was as strong as that of Frances, but, nevertheless, the force of the hurricane fell from a category 4 to a category 2. Following this, the wind velocity began to pick up very rapidly and by September 9 the hurricane reached a category 5.
Using satellite photos of Ivan, on the latter half of the day of September 9, I made my first intervention. Within two days, the hurricane strength declined a little, when it supposedly should have continued to grow. By September 12, the hurricane again reached category 5, at which time I again intervened. The velocity at first dropped slightly, but, within one day, it again reached category 5.
On September 13, I made my next intervention. This resulted in «freezing» the wind velocity at the same level for one and half days. I then intervened again, this time with revised tactics. And, from the latter half of the day, on September 14, Ivan began to lose strength, but upon approaching the coast it was still a category 4.
The main impact of the hurricane was aimed at the New Orleans coast, which was facing the threat of exposure to catastrophic consequences. In particular, the city would be flooded if the dams were destroyed, to say nothing of the other damage a category 4 could wreak.
On the morning of September 16, I applied influence in real time with the maximum degree allowed, considering the danger of the situation. This resulted in a sharp drop in Ivan’s force before it reached the coast. And what remained of Ivan as it reached the coast was a category 1 hurricane that within several hours became a tropical storm, finally degenerating into a tropical downpour.
During this time frame, a very curious phenomenon occurred with a hurricane named Jeanne which was gaining in strength but began to weaken considerably from the latter half of the day of September 16 to the end of the day of September l8, precisely at the time that Ivan sharply declined after my influence in real time. Jeanne, synchronously with Ivan, reacted to the influence exerted on Ivan in real time. A similar synchronous reaction to influence on Frances in real time was observed also with Ivan. So, rather than two «anomalies» we were really observing “regularities.”
After such a resonant reaction to influence in real time, Jeanne began to gain in its strength slowly and, by September 25 reached category 3.
At this time the first direct intervention on Jeanne was made, after which it lost strength very rapidly and, by September 28, degenerated into a tropical downpour without even coming close to the coast (Fig.12).
It is noteworthy that the trajectories of these two hurricanes, Ivan and Jeanne, practically repeated each other, synchronously changing directions of their movement: Like partners in a pair figure skating performance, they synchronously executed a full 360 degree turn.
Such a phenomenon had never before happened with one hurricane, let alone with two hurricanes simultaneously. (Fig.13). No one even attempted to offer an explanation of this behavior. Only the New York Times reported that “… obstinate hurricanes, having made a full turn reached the land however in the form of a tropical downpour” (“A Stubborn Storms Hangs On In a Busy Hurricane Season”, The New York Times, 9/24/04).
However, among the various hurricanes upon which I exerted influence, hurricane Daniel of 2004, occupies a special place.I had intervened during its formation, when it still had not yet reached its maximal force. Yet, despite predictions of its becoming a huge and powerful hurricane, it “fizzled” utterly during its trajectory to the east coast of North America (Fig.14).
The reason why this happened no one could explain, perhaps because of its incomprehensibility.
It is easier simply to say nothing and “perhaps” no one will notice or ask anything. This happens often enough – not only among meteorologists.
The development of “conventional” hurricanes i.e. not influenced, occurs similar to that of Floyd, 1999. There was no observation reported of any significant loss of its strength before hitting the coast. It was weakening slowly enough, in the process of moving to the north where the colder waters of the Atlantic Ocean could not support its development (Fig.15).
Thus, the behavior of all hurricanes that were not exposed to influences was practically the same, whereas hurricanes subject to influence behaved in an absolutely different way. And all of the “influenced” ones behaved in a surprisingly similar manner, which differed from that of “conventional” hurricanes.
Within the past fifty years, meteorologists have accumulated a large amount of data about the nature of “conventional” hurricanes; however the behavior of “influenced” hurricanes has never been included in these data. No “conventional” hurricane has ever lost a substantial amount of its force before barreling down upon a targeted coast; on the contrary, it generally gains in strength as it approaches landfall.
The closer it is to the coast, the shallower the depth of the ocean and the warmer the water – the stronger the hurricane’s force.
Only very cold water and very dry air can sharply diminish the force of a hurricane. Therefore, a sharp drop in the strength of a hurricane, which is approaching landfall, above the summer-heated waters in the shallow Gulf of Mexico, cannot be explained rationally. Nor can anyone explain why, after the hurricane has passed, the water in the gulf becomes as warm as it was before the arrival of the hurricane, or why this came about without any changes of weather in the region.
So how do we unravel this conundrum? Water beneath the trajectory of a raging hurricane abruptly grows cold, and the ambient air becomes suddenly dry for a period of time-then everything returns back to its initial condition. And this occurs only within the limits of action of the hurricane, while on adjacent sites in the gulf, the water remains warm and the air damp.
Such a natural anomaly can by explained only by some kind of outside intervention in the unfolding process.
Modern civilization has no technical means or resources to cause such anomalies, nor is it likely to have them any time soon. Only two possibilities remain – intervention by aliens or by “higher forces” of a divine nature.
However, no one observed the presence of UFO’s in the vicinity of “unconventional” hurricanes, despite continuous monitoring both from satellites and from special planes accompanying every hurricane moving toward the coast. And if the monitoring of such hurricanes, for any reason, yielded no signs of a UFO presence, we may raise another question as to why these particular hurricanes were chosen for experimentation, rather than any others.
Further – why was nothing like this done earlier?
To anyone capable of rational thought the answers are clear. However, some people of a skeptical bent may clutch at their last straw – God. But “divine straw” cannot give answers, to these two questions too. Regrettably, such “true believers” would be more willing to credit God or the devil than to admit the possibility that someone who has evolved enough – with the requisite knowledge, potential and understanding of nature – is capable of such activity.
And yet such “true believers” know practically nothing about the human being and his capacities.
And if the majority of people are incapable of performing similar feats, this does not mean that they are impossible to do. With proper development one can penetrate new and greater levels of achievement and opportunity.
This involves no miracles nor “divine essences” but only enlightenment through knowledge and the skill of using new capabilities correctly.
But first we must destroy the slavish programs and brainwash instilled in us. Such programs are literally pounded into our heads from birth, through various religious institutions (including communism) and social institutions including a science which thrusts upon us the idea that we pale into insignificance before the forces of nature…
Nicolai Levashov, July, 2005.
In the interim from 2002 to 2004, while working with category 4 and 5 hurricanes, I was able to demonstrate an ability to influence natural processes without compromising the balance and harmony of nature. The data presented are from the archives of the National Weather Service (NWS) and the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), two impeccable and trustworthy sources.
Following the successful neutralization of hurricanes Lily (2002) and Isabel (2003), I proposed to certain interested authorities a research experiment to be conducted before the onset of the 2004 hurricane season. I suggested filming all my hurricane interventions in real time, working directly through the USA satellite weather monitoring system. I stipulated only one condition – an airing of the photographed documentary of my work on US national television, which was accepted.
The storm season of 2004 lasted four and a half months – replete with very intense hurricanes. At the very least, I neutralized all hurricanes of this season and their consequences – which, as a result, turned out to be largely in the form of heavy precipitations, thereby having relatively little effect on the US economy.
My requirement to disseminate the documentary evidence of my work was not motivated by desire for personal gain or celebrity. Rather, it was to show the world the possibility of a non-technocratic development of civilization, which would avoid the ecological catastrophes and self-destructive behavior of technocratic civilizations.
The authorities involved not only failed to honor their agreement, but also reneged on testing my ability to neutralize a meteorological weapon which they had at their disposal. For this reason, I decided to stop intervening directly with the behavior of hurricanes, as per my admonition to them just prior to the 2005 hurricane season.
Instead, I left in place a stationary system along the coast, designed to achieve partial attenuation of a hurricane’s force. As had been previously shown in operation, this system was able to weaken the force of Katrina from a category 5 to a category 3.
Thanks to the neutralization of hurricanes during those prior three years, the state authorities had practically ceased preparatory measures for prevention of the kind of spontaneous natural phenomena that were unleashed in full measure during hurricane Katrina.
This hurricane not only caused many fatalities but also triggered 300 billion dollar losses and an economic crisis in the USA. Under the circumstances, I do not consider myself obliged to neutralize all the spontaneous natural phenomena that beset the US government.
P. P. S.
In practice, the wall I made along the east coast of North America not only noticeably attenuated the force of active hurricanes, but also prevented their making landfall on US territory. As shown in Fig. 16, not only did Wilma get bumped from a category 5 to a category 1, but was also barred from entering the Gulf of Mexico and forced to move above the ocean along the east coast of North America.
I have created a similar wall for the first time but still do not know whether it will work for as long as I intended. Probably, by the onset of the up-coming hurricane season, I shall either renew it or dispose of it. We shall see but nevertheless – the data show that it really works.
In the history of hurricane tracking, there was never any hurricane documented that executed a 90 degree turn, except for Charley (Fig.7) when I tried for the first time to create a protective wall in the Gulf of Mexico.
Those who wish to see Wilma’s trajectory at an official website, may consult the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) www.weather.gov/storms/wilma/wilma_trak_lg.jpg.
November 30, 2005
P. P. S. 2.
Herewith, the “dying gasp” of the anti-hurricane wall I created along the eastern coast of the USA:
Today, September 4, 2007, I decided to dispose of the wall I had created for keeping hurricanes in check. Regrettably, the presence of the wall caused hurricane Felix, category 5, to collide with it at an angle, executing an almost 90 degree turn and then bearing down on the Yucatan Peninsula. Felix did not get into the Gulf of Mexico, but, nevertheless, its destructive force battered the terrain of the Central American countries.
The restraining wall has been protecting the USA, but not the other countries— and I consider this unacceptable.
My decision also stems from the careless and irresponsible actions of some of the higher echelons of the USA, who therefore carry complete responsibility for it. Today the US nation has lost not only that minimal protection against hurricanes, which it never had before, and which I installed in the Gulf of Mexico on my own initiative.
It has also lost the last hope for a more sophisticated and reliable anti-hurricane system covering the whole of Central America. The latter would not only have made possible keeping the hurricanes’ force to a minimum and barring their entry into the Gulf of Mexico; it would have also solved, in principle and for the foreseeable future, the hurricane problem itself.
I developed a new system, which prevented hurricanes from strengthening and maximizing their destructive force as they traverse their entire course. It also created the conditions for transforming destructive hurricanes into tropical thundershowers, which could then continue bringing sorely needed moisture to many eastern and central US states, without which these lands would have turned into semi-arid or desert terrain.
Graphic material, which will clearly illustrate the last day of “work” on the wall, will be added within the next few days.
September 4, 2007
As promised, herewith is the graphic material relating to the action of the restraining wall. I created the latter in the midst of the 2005 hurricane season after hurricane Katrina had battered the coast of the USA, leaving in its wake its dire after-effects. I had warned beforehand that I would not neutralize hurricanes in the 2005 season owing to reasons specified in my article. Nevertheless, the protection, which I had already created, weakened Katrina’s force from a category 5 to a category 3.
Katrina reached the city of New Orleans, after its force had dropped from a category 5, which it would normally have had without my intervention, to a category 3. Despite this fact, the consequences of Katrina’s strike were catastrophic. Following this, it occurred to me to create a protective anti-hurricane wall. Its first “working demonstration” was Wilma’s neutralization and directional turn.
Thus, already, in 2005, my anti-hurricane wall had produced a considerable result: (www.wxforecasts.com/ameriwx/ameriwx.php?config=&forecast=tropsystems&alt=tropallsystems&hwvmetric=),
After I had created the anti-hurricane wall—starting with Wilma, hurricanes either never reached the US coast at all, or did so only in the form of tropical thundershowers. But the most obvious demonstration is what happened in the 2006 hurricane season:
As demonstrated from the above information, not a single hurricane reached the territory of the USA during the whole season. Hurricanes that were coming from Africa either turned and traced a path along the wall or made landfall in the form of tropical downpours. The wall operated along both the eastern and the western coasts, which is unequivocally clear from the above.
On September 4, 2007 I decided to dispose of the anti-hurricane wall I had created. Up to that moment it continued to perform its task quite effectively.
Hurricane Henriette, the only active hurricane at that time, had an immediate response, and began to move according to the classical scheme, which was the norm prior to my setting up the anti-hurricane wall in 2005.
There are no 90 degrees turns or “rebounds,” which were clearly observed in 2005 and 2006, after I had installed the wall. After the removal of the wall, Henriette did not turn; moreover, it began to gain force and reached the western coast of Mexico in the form of a hurricane.
The NOAA officially predicts about seven hurricanes this season. I only hope that these hurricanes will be weak and will not wreak the devastation that Katrina brought…
Upon receipt of new information, I will amplify my comments.
Nicolai Levashov, September 6, 2007
On September 4, 2007 I disposed of the anti-hurricane wall that I created in August, 2005 which effectively damped incoming hurricanes for two years. The reason for its removal stems from unreasonable actions of some of the higher echelons of the USA about which I have already written before and find no reason to repeat the explanation of the issue. Today, October 2, 2008, a year has already passed since the day of the disposal of the wall. What are the consequences that the USA suffered because of the dishonourableness of its Government circles?
The hurricane season of 2008 is almost over now and we can draw some preliminary conclusions not only about the level of irresponsibility of the higher echelons of the USA, but also about the nature of the anti-hurricane wall phenomenon! I created the restraining wall for the first time. I have never done anything of the kind before. Therefore, it received the most extensive study as a fundamentally new phenomenon. During two years the wall showed its efficiency. Moreover, at the end of August, 2007 I introduced some substantial improvements in it. The necessity to remove that, which I created, strongly disappointed me, but I had no choice. However, this gave me the possibility to get the information about how and what takes place after the removal of the wall which is very important for the study of the nature of this phenomenon. No one has ever had this kind of experience, either I or anyone else. So, the possibility to study in practice the consequences of the removal was the only good that resulted from the careless and irresponsible actions of the USA government. It was noticed that after I disposed of the wall, the hurricanes returned to the natural way of conduct, however, not everything came back immediately to the initial state which had existed before the creation of the wall. The protective field which kept hurricanes out of the Gulf of Mexico stopped functioning almost instantly with the removal of the wall (I wrote about it in the P.P.S. 2a). But the hurricane season of 2007 was almost over and I had to wait for the next season to proceed with observation.
The hurricane season of 2008 did not bring many hurricanes, but those few which came were quite enough for drawing some important conclusions. The first hurricane of 2008 worth of mentioning was Gustav. It originated in the Central America and very quickly reached a category 4. It swept over Cuba, being the category 4 hurricane, and then got into warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Gustav lost its force a little at the place where the restraining wall was before, but continued to move in the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico as the category 3 hurricane. The specialists “predicted” that the hurricane would again gain force in the warm and shallow gulf and became a super-hurricane! However, it did not happen! Gustav remained to be the category 3 hurricane and exactly in such manner it blasted ashore (Fig. 20).
This fell short of the “normal” conduct of a hurricane. The force of the hurricane MUST HAVE GROWN in very warm waters of the gulf! This did not happen, because the “traces” of my pretty intensive work in 2002-2004 still remained! Precisely thanks to them, Katrina dropped its force from a category 5 to a category 3 in the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico and, weakened, swooped upon New Orleans in 2005. It is hard to imagine even now the magnitude of devastation which New Orleans would have had, if this hurricane had gained its force in the warm and shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico, as it normally happens, and hit on this city with all its might being already a super-hurricane!
The systems which I created in 2002-2004 continued to work and this was surprising. That is why Gustav did not gain its force in the waters of the gulf. When I analyzed these facts, I decided to remove the “TRACES” of my work. As it was demonstrated in practice, the systems which I created continued to work already without my intervention, in case I did not DISMANTLE them. Due to clear reasons, I did not have the least desire to observe how many years it would take for the anti-hurricane systems disappear by themselves or remain there FOREVER! In fact, after I carried out the work on cleansing all the waters on the territory of Archangelsk region in the beginning of October, 1991, the WATER TREATMENT PROCESS continues to operate for already SEVENTEEN YEARS. Due to clear reasons, I had no desire whatsoever to leave such a gift for the American government and I removed the old systems from the Gulf of Mexico. If they do not care about the fate of their own country and its citizens, they bear full responsibility for all the consequences of what is going on.
The reason for all this is ambition of both single individuals and the USA foreign policy in general, according to which everyone is indebted to them! However, I owe them nothing; the matter is quite the contrary! The USA’s ambitions showed up also in the fact that one of the necessary conditions for my collaboration with them was their signing of an official contract. They disliked this very much, because it would officially confirm the fact that I could fulfill this work that did not serve their interests! The official acknowledgement of my abilities, about some of which they knew very well, put social parasites which stand behind the USA higher echelons in a very delicate position! But the issue of political intrigues, currents and puppeteers is the story of another day. Let us come back to hurricanes…
The next hurricane worth of attention in the hurricane season of 2008 was Ike. It began its forming in the very middle of the Atlantic Ocean and when it approached Cuba, it was of an enormous size and force – it had reached a category 4. Ike entered the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico being the category 1 hurricane. However, unlike Gustav, it began to gain force again (Fig. 21)! It became the category 2 hurricane and continued to gain force, as it should be, but I spared people and prevented this tremendous hurricane from converting into a real monster (Fig. 22), but even then this hurricane appeared to be incredibly destructive! Let this be my last gift to common people who, regrettably, always and everywhere suffer because of the governments’ carelessness and indifference.
But these two dangerous hurricanes and some more tropical storms already entered the Gulf of Mexico quite freely, without any obstacle and this is an irrefutable fact which confirms that the protective anti-hurricane wall which I had created indeed stopped its functioning after I removed it on September 4, 2007! In 2008 I removed all the “traces” of my systems. I do not know yet how quickly they will disappear, because I removed them very gradually and carefully to avoid very sharp changes to happen in the place of their former location which are quite possible if to remove them too abruptly. Most likely, the sharp removal of the “traces” of the systems would result in serious natural cataclysms, which have never been either my intentions or plans. If the USA governmental circles behave dishonourably, it does not mean that I will answer them in the same manner! Not at all! I can assume that the “soft” disposal of the “traces” of my systems will result in that the hurricanes of the next hurricane season, once getting in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, will gain force in its warm waters, probably not so quickly like it was before the wall had been installed, but considerably quicker than it happened this year, and I will not play the role of Santa Claus with a sack full of gifts anymore! The state of affairs in the Gulf of Mexico will gradually approach the one which was before my intervention in 2002. The unique process the like of which is impossible to find anywhere in the world still requires its subsequent observation…
Nicolai Levashov, October 2, 2008
P.P.S. 4. What did America win by rejecting the restraining wall?!
2008, during which the anti-hurricane wall did not work has already passed. What did America get because of the unreasoning actions of certain higher echelons of government!? It got nothing at all, but lost a great deal! Seventeen tropical storms having been given their proper names made landfall on the East Coast of the USA during the 2008 hurricane season! Eight of them blasted ashore having hurricane status — Hurricane Bertha, Hurricane Dolly, Hurricane Gustav, Hurricane Hanna, Hurricane Ike, Hurricane Kyle, Hurricane Omar, Hurricane Paloma! Eighteen tropical storms made landfall on the Western coast of the USA, seven of which were hurricanes: Hurricane Boris, Hurricane Elida, Hurricane Fausto, Hurricane Genevieve, Hurricane Herman, Hurricane Marie, Hurricane Norbert!
In 2008 all these storms and hurricanes freely attacked the North American continent, and… nothing stood in their way! According to official data, the cost of the damage from only one hurricane — “Ike” — which only slightly brushed the coast is $9.8 billion US. Actually, the sum is higher, as official estimates usually differ dramatically from the real ones. For example, different sources mentioned the officially declared losses from “Katrina” to be $50 billion and 300! The total in lawsuits brought against the US government by citizens and organizations, including the state ones, affected by “Katrina” made up more than three quadrillion US dollars! For example, the authorities of New Orleans claimed $77 billion from the federal government!
So, it seems that the US authorities, to put it mildly, underestimate the damage caused by hurricanes, it is totally clear why! Well, let it be on their conscience. On the other hand, it turns out that everything happening is advantageous to certain circles in the US Government. Otherwise, how can their indifference to the fact that their own people die, hundreds of thousands of families remain roofless and lose everything they have worked for all their lives possibly be explained? Is it possible that their conduct can be explained by their being unable to ask a person to do something, having become accustomed to dictating their conditions to everyone about everything?! Is it possible that they behave the way they do only because they are unable to control me and that which I do!?
But it is a fact, whether they like it or not!
I thought that the new US administration would behave more reasonably, than the former president G.W. Bush’s administration did, which made quite a mess of these things and for which they were reluctant to apologize: indeed, the USA does not apologize for anything, certainly not to a person! In fact, they did not apologize for the occupation of Iraq which they carried out covered by false slogans about the defense of democracy in this country. However, the whole world now knows what “democracy” they protected in Iraq, although, few know what the US ruling circles and their puppeteers planned to perform in reality, but this is the story of another day!..
Regrettably, my hope that the new administration would be wiser was not justified! Oh, yes, they came to me with a request/suggestion at the beginning of February, but when I began to determine specifically what exactly they wanted from me, it again appeared to be just another stale old provocation (as I had supposed). Moreover, they turned everything around so that it apparently was me who was bluffing, and when they had agreed to collaborate, I allegedly made myself scarce! In fact, it was not me who did this, but they, after I had expounded to them what it was necessary to do regarding only one parameter which they wanted me to change.
I expounded everything in detail and reported that I could do all this and that several years were required, not the one month which they “allotted” to me for solving their problems! There is one more thing. I answered that the term of one month would do to destroy, not create something! Most likely, they were terribly aggrieved, because they decided to show “who is the boss” and… on February 8 in the evening an artificially created hurricane pounced on France and did ˆ1.5 billion in damage! The hurricane reached our castle which is several hundred kilometres from the nearest coast!
My wife Svetlana told me about it when the hurricane force wind blasts were already raging around. I succeeded in liquidating it, but several chimney bricks fell and some trees were toppled! Nevertheless, our bicentenary sequoias which had been strengthened by the psi-field generator did not suffer!
It turned out that they failed to punish me, the “intractable”.
The next day another hurricane was approaching France, and the expected wind speed was 170-200 kilometres per hour! This artificial hurricane was much more serious, and I could not allow a lot of innocent people to suffer because of just a few men’s foolishness and narrow-mindedness. Therefore, I decided not to suppress the force, as I did before, but to turn the hurricane created by the American meteorological weapon on them. As one Russian saying goes — don’t dig a pit for someone, you could fall into it!
And also I destroyed the meteorological weapon!
As for the first part of my actions: the hurricane directed at France with the speed of 170-200 kilometres per hour… struck on the East Coast of the USA:
“… Wild winds with gusts topping 65 mph blew from the Great Lakes to the East Coast on Thursday, knocking out power to hundreds of thousands of customers, disrupting travel and killing at least five people…
Utilities such as Jersey Central Power & Light in New Jersey reported downed power lines from wind-snapped trees. About 250,000 customers remained without power Thursday in Pennsylvania, and 140,000 more in Ohio. There were also about 109,000 outages in West Virginia, 14,900 in Michigan and nearly 14,000 in New Jersey…”
The above information was taken here
As for the second part of my actions: I decided to destroy the whole system of meteorological weapon. Regrettably, its main part is on the surface, in Alaska, where a special complex of electromagnetic radiation emitters was created. The powerful mirrors of the emitters send a burst of electromagnetic radiation to one or another satellite(s) which, in their turn, directly influence the higher layers of the atmosphere which cause the origination of hurricanes. I am not going to explain the principle of action of the meteorological weapon in detail; I would just like to draw a rough sketch of how it works.
Therefore, when I decided to destroy the active system of the meteorological weapon and disabled it, the most active, at that moment, part — a US military satellite — reacted first, in which all the electronic devices were totally deactivated! This piece of iron, already uncontrollable, began to change its trajectory and collided with a Russian military satellite! If it were not for this casual collision, nobody would ever know that an American satellite had been destroyed. The more so, that it was eliminated by one person’s force of thought during just several seconds!
Certainly, technical equipment has achieved certain success. Nevertheless, no technical device can ever achieve that which the reason of a reasoning creature can, being correctly developed and reaching certain levels of this development! Thus, it is possible to destroy all military and “peaceful” satellites of the USA at once, and not only satellites… And if the United States continues to use any meteorological weapon, I shall always destroy it, whether they like it or not!!!
Nicolai Levashov, February 16, 2009
|EYE EYE sailor!|
What is time but the recording method of AQUA SONAL super SONIC ELECTRO MAGNETIC DEN CITY and the perception light and electro-atoms, IONS of EMITING FIELDS or FEELEDS. Especially our FIELDS of VISION which need sunlight in order to perceive anything. The circle with the dot in the centre is a sun symbol and we may have to play DOT-to-D⊙T in order to REAL EYES the REAL LIES.
|The ‘SUN GATE’ of HOUR eye. The SEAT or SEE AT of the SOUL|
The Cestui Que Vie Act 1666, meaning ”LOST BEYOND THE SEE“, was an ‘act’ swept in by Parliament during the great fire of London. We have been hypnotised, mind controlled and deemed to be as good as dead for what APPEARS to be a very long time. There are 24 hours in a day. Symbolically 2 + 4 = 6, and 3 x 6 equals 24. Is this the holy TRINITY ▲ PYRAMID or PEER AMID of666 and which A PEERS before our eyes? Our conical ▲eyes, that is. We are trained clock ‘watchers’ and WATCHER SEE is WATCHER get.
|Be careful how you $PEND your time cos that eye is on our money|
The magic numbers 3, 6 and 9 are the conical angels on the clock too, each containing THREE 5 minute conical sections. 5 x 3 = 15which equals 6 and 60 minutes makes one HOUR around the c-lock Everything about time is divisible by THREE! Are we blindly lost in the WAKE of the big SHIPS at SEE? Are we A-WAKE and WORSHIPPING time, ‘locked’ in a 12 (1 + 1 = 3) hour DAZE? Time, after time, after time? Becoming WEAKER every WEEK and ‘spent’ by $PENDING our precious time and money on an elite’s idea of what is ‘current’, ‘currency’ and CURRENT SEE. Time is PENNED and recorded, but it is always PENDING.
|The WHIRLED or WORLD WHIRLIGIG|
|The EYE of HORUS or HOUR US or HORSE
We have lost our MARBLES under our MARBLE ARCH
For we are PUPILS and EYE ‘GODS’ who create time by believing everything we SEE. This has been known since the “beginning of time” itself by the elite time lords of the ‘EONS’. It is the READ SEE where everything they WRITE becomes RIGHT. We need to do more RE SEE ARCH or research.
|The COLOSSEUM or SEEM in ROME
where all the ROADS or ‘strands’ lead.
|THE BEAU, BOW and ARK of our EYES
CIA = SEER and DIA = GOD
What we see depends on what we are shown and “what we see is what we get”. When we ‘get’ something, it means we see it fully and clearly. However, just as in Plato’s DARK ARCHED CAVE we cannot see the puppet master’s strings through the CONCAVEdome of the inner ARC of the eye.
The HIDDEN eye. If we drop the H from HIDDEN
(in Phoenician H doesn’t exist) the word becomes ID DEN or EDEN
and said like a British cockney… “it’s idden innit!”.
The ID is the EGO or identity – the ID “entity”. The eye dent of the black hole pupil. Cockney rhyming slang was once used by the elite and in everyday speech we say I or EYE many times a day and the phrase “I see!” can be used as an expression of ‘getting it’. We also say I SEE this and EYE SAW that. I might say for example, what an EYE SORE that collossus colosseum is and why didn’t they plant fruit and vegetables there?
|Time to undo ‘living ‘the dream’ of sleepy, sheepy 🐑 time.|
As we are learn not to ‘spell’ at school the ‘new whirled’ SETS–UP for the FOURTH REICH or WRITE. One of pure SEE SAW Margery ‘door’ (an opening, hole or aperture) fantasy and friction. Seeing is BELIEVING and there BELIES the time trick! MATRIX means MY TRICKS and SEE SAW is WAS IS in reverse.
|∞ IS THE BLINDFOLD AND THE ARCH VILLAINS’ MASK|
This is the Age of AQUA–RIUS and the age of missed MIST MESS–AGES being sent to our MISTY watery cloudy EYES via i–CLOUDS where all is not what it SEEMS because everything is ‘mysteriously’ spelled in CODE READ. It has always been a matter of‘arty’ artificial intelligence. It’s all ARTY FISH ALL and AI. “Welcome to a whirled of pure imagination…”.
|Under the ARCH of the OCULUS|
“So let it be written, so let it be done.”
from the KING and I or EYE movie.
|A GOOD WIZARD GNOSIS HOW TO CAST A SPELL|
Right under our NOSES and GNOSIS the CAPSULE ‘captivates’ and CAPS YOU ALL, capturing and encapsulating the idea of time passing us, thus REINFORCING a LINEAR timeline. We are its CAPTIVES. 42 is the number with which ‘God’ creates the UNIVERSE in Kabbalistic tradition. With some wizardry reversal that means 24.
|The green ARC/BOW of the aurora BOREALIS or BO REAL IS/EYES
and BEAU ISRAEL
The CAPTAINS have the REINS on all things and therefore REIGN over us because they can RE IN FORCE time. EYE, EYE CAPTAIN! Time is EMITTED from the Wizard of OZ‘s MAGNETIC North Pole. Time is money (green-backs) to the rich MAGNETS,MAGIS and MAGICIANS, for there lies the GREEN MAG–NET–TICK and ‘magical’ TIMES SQUARE COURTYARD which EMITS our rotary TIME. This place is called the ARCTIC, or ARC TICK, as in TOCK. These magis deal in our CURRENCY and CURRENT SEE.
To be PENNED is also to be CAUGHT. The EYE is the CHRYSTAL (christ all) MAZE. The QUARTZ (CAUGHTS) YARD of PAN’Slabyrinth or PANDORA’S BOX. In other words GREEN-WITCH ‘MEAN’ TIME. Mean time is right near Scotland or SCOTLAND ‘YARD’. Home of the SCOT FREE. SCOT spells TOCS in re-verse, for TICK-TOCK time. A times square (✖◼) capsule can be made to ‘build up’ an illusionary HIS STORY of falsehoods, like a BILDERBERGER.
|When something is DEVILLED it is mixed-up and con-fused
– inciting us with insight
We are caught in and ‘courting’ time, in A-MAZE-MEANT. The first thing the Freemasons needed to do to complete the time trick was to build big ‘cuckoo’ clocks in their town squares and plant CROSSES ‘a-cross’ the earth. Knowing that our eyes had to PAN in on these PANORAMAS on a daily basis made sure to RE-MIND us of dead ‘lines’.
|THE SWIZZ TIMEX DEAD LINE of †IME
† ☨ ✞ ✝ ☥ ☦ ☓ ♁ ☩ 卐 ✖ ◼
These ‘tall fairy storeys’ of Babylon with its alleged high Tower of BABEL, or BABBLE were made by the PHARISEES or FAIRYSEES. Here the art of the FOE, faux, PHOENICIAN PHONETIC spell binding, SEAFARING wizardry began and with it our NET-WORK of mock dates and mind numbing NUMBERS. Given to us by the holey GHOST WRITERS and all ARCH–HIVED for us in HI-STOREY books, like the BUY BULL that TAURUS or TORE US apart. These are the MERCHANTS and RETAILERS, or RE-TALERS. HISTORY is the I or EYE STORY, as HI is really I or EYE because in Phoenician the letter H is always silent.
|‘What is looked at is what is looking’ – ST Francis of A SEE SEE|
HIGH STORIES and LEG-ENDS (yeah, pull the other leg) manufactured by a priest-hood of ‘SAINTS’ (ST means SANTOS orSATAN) and hood-lums who catch fish with their NETTS on this PLANET, PLAN IT or PLAN NET of phony CONEY ISLANDS or EYE LANDS. These HISTRIONICS are quite HYSTERICAL in fact because we can be NOWHERE and NOW HERE at the same time in an eternal nevereverland. It is no mistake that NEW WHIRLED ORDER is an acronym for NWO, which ‘spells’ NOW, OWN andWON, because a ‘spell’ is A-BOUT of time on this MAGI-C ROUND-ABOUT. It’s all about KNOWING this, or NOWING this.
|OUR CONICAL COMICAL PYRAMID VISION
and a WIZARD’S CAP
If you know about time and are a SEER or Cr, you’ve WON and become ‘the ONE‘, or the WON with its eye atop the Freemasons’ pirating pyramid scheme. A pyramid shaped like our triangular EYE CONES. A one-eyed PIRATE who is very C–LOCKWISE. He’sICONIC! UNI means ONE for the UNI–VERSE–ALL ‘god’, or ‘dog’ in reverse, of the ‘UNIVERSE’. This WISE GUY knows that it’s always O clock. Be as WISE as the SERPENT.
|The one UNI VERSE SEE ALL eye. IO means I or EYE in Italian|
The serpents who write the DOG-MA and TENETS or TEN NETS. TEN is NET in re-verse on this PLAN NET. We’ve been EYE-JACKED, not high jacked! Ask one of the “free” MA-SONIC ministers at No IO Downing Street, or someone in the UNION of JACKS, or one of their ASTRO–NAUGHTS or 000Z, or Universal PICTURES even, they’ll tell ya the truth… not! This is the land of OZ and OZ–MOSIS, aka Moses and the TEN commandments and the parting of the READ SEES. VERSES written on STONE and plucked from the aether, or OZ-ONE. Monkey see, monkey do! Well they tell us we originated from ‘apes‘.
|The SATURN CUBE CORNERSTONE of FATHER TIME|
|BEAUTIFUL ARTWORK but a FAKE EARTH|
A BOW is also an ARCH. An ARCH made by the architects. And, they’re running O ‘rings’ around us with ‘black hole’ nonscience because a BEAU is someone we COURT. Etymologically speaking, OS means ‘divine protection’ or ‘a GOD‘. Like the ancient god OS-IRIS, or another name for ‘God’ which is THEO or THE O. THEO means THEORY and we don’t know WHICH theory isWITCH.
|CORNERS – CORNEAS and LOW DEFINITION,
or DEAF PHOENICIAN, CORN EARS render us DEAF and DUMB
Are we of SOUND mind? The CORN is also the MAIZE or MAZE. Time is literally SET in STONE, like the pro-verbial SWORD in theSTONE. King ARTHUR, or King AUTHOR, was set up and OPERATED by the SS secret society MASONIC orders of the OCCULT or the OCULUS. The KNIGHTS TEMP LIARS, or the ‘inner circle’ of the O CULT, know that time is all in the eye of the beholder and that there is O time. OH? Oh yes, they can AUTHORISE any old script(ure) and make it appear AUTHENTIC.and ‘novel’… A RISE SIR ‘LANCE’ A LOT of CAME A LOT! Behold!
The ring of the eye is very impressed with worn down colloseums set IN FINITE ∞. The truth is – it’s the same day everyday with different TEMP-ERA-TURES and CLOUDS. The ‘Order’ of the Templars can pre-order or pre-ordain whatever they fancy because they are the EYE MAGIS of the TEMPLE of SET who fake IMAGES that feed our IMAGINATION or I’M AGING NATION. TheseDAYS, or LATELY, it seems we’re more DAZED than ever on the TEMPLATE of 8 with its dates, dates, D’8s. It’s a FORMAT, or 4MAT, and the magis of the MUSIC industry know how to create a sense of past eras by frequently changing the musical TEMPOSand TONES (link).
These ARC ‘cons’ are having an AR☪H RIOT at our Xpence. Aka, The Royal ARCH CLUB of ROME or ROAM. The old mystery schools, or “my story” clubs of never-ending unsolved MYTHRAS of WONDER, WANDER and MEANDERING. You see, a ‘club’ is a stick, a ROD, or a WAND. Time is faked by the ROTATION of sky spheres, HAARP weather control and the forcible ageing of the physical body via hormones and microbots that live within us (see video below). Everything becomes ‘weathered’ here under the5* senses and elements of the EATHER.
|Doesn’t time DRAG ON sometimes? T for TIME and time for ✞.|
HE who BREWS the story makes history happen – like the HE–BREWS. He/she is a long “taled” fire breathing dragon, puffing out“wind” and “hot air”. Puff the magic dragon lives by the SEE, remember? “TIME for a BREW” in England means time for a cup of ✞ea. This British TEA TIME tea ceremony occurs at 4 o’clock in the afternoon. Now, this may seem very co-incidental and quite baffling at first, until we shift our perspective a little and DE-CYPHER the code. For instance, a floor is a 4 sided STOREY of a building and to be floored means to be baffled. Those slippery puffed-up TORIES and historians are continually “baffled” when it comes toFORETOLD HISTORY, aren’t they?! So, we could say that this is a STORY BOARD of NIGHT DAY, KNIGHT DAY and the 4 (square)SEASONS or SEE SUNS of the 4 CORNERS of the earth. The ‘sun gods’ always have a O halo over their head, don’t they?
|Antique rare early Tiffany & Co Paris SERPENT|
A floor is a stage, like a theatre stage and to ‘flaw’ someone means to deliberately fool them. There is NO/KNOW/NOW time like thePRE SENT, we say, and PRESENT is an anagram of SERPENT. What we think is ‘resent’ is actually RE SENT. Time is indeed SET around the clock hands, one small and one large, making a ✞ at it’s north pole centre. It’s also got us chasing theirTALES, and our own with so called NEWS, or KNEWS, that makes us red red, read and cross, CROSS, X and increasingly RE-SENT-FULL. Animals don’t have this problem because they aren’t constantly re-minded of a fictional and frictional past, based largely on hearsay, from the North, East, West and South NEWS NOOSE bullet ins.
|The OUROBOROS or HOUR/HORA BORE US BOA SNAKE|
A direction ‘penned’ by the ARCHER’S ➼➼➼ BOW and we were told that the PEN is mightier than the SWORD. The same ‘lines’ in their scripts create the constant CON–SCRIPT–ION of ONWARD CHRISTIAN SOUL–DIERS MARCHING into WAR over and over a-gain for the OLIGARCH WARLOCKS. The AUTHORITIES are the AUTHOR$ of our repeated death cult MEMORY-ALL daze. “That’ll get ’em weeping in the AISLES or EYE ALL$ and sell good ‘copy’ in the DAILY NOOSE paper. They can’t HEAR! Do you ‘copy’?”
|CONEY EYE LAND|
ARC de TRIOMPHE and its 8, ATE or ∞ ‘strands’
|EYE CONES – the TIME TUNNEL of our inner CONCAVE EYES|
|The VATICAN V.A.T EYE CAN – CAPTURED IN THE CAN
VATICAN – anagram – VACANT i
What a load of (eye) BALLS! For the time “being” I’m clocking-off.
In the ‘mean’ time enjoy that POP (father) CORN with the video.
|THE DREAM CATCHER WORKS VERY WELL
and RED + BLUE makes PURPLE
POP goes the weasel… that’s a WRAP!
|The BROS do WARN us!|
WHERE HAS THE £19m DONATED TO GRENFELL VICTIMS ACTUALLY GONE? The British people donated enough money to give each Grenfell household around £150,000 – BUT THE MONEY HAS DISAPPEARED. The ‘official’ story is that it has been given to “THE LONDON EMERGENCIES TRUST” which is not a ‘trust’ nor a ‘charity’ but is in fact a PRIVATE COMPANY who calls itself ‘LONDON FUNDERS’ which is listed at HM Government Companies House as having “44 Officers” – however, only 11 people are in active roles – the rest have RESIGNED. The official Companies House listing says there are NO PEOPLE or OFFICERS WHO HAVE SIGNIFICANT CONTROL over the so called “LONDON FUNDERS” private company who started a new ‘front’ organisation in March 2017 called the ‘London Emergencies Trust’. No senior patron – such as a Lord, or a Judge, nor a member of the royal family – not even an accountant is in charge – no one is listed as being ‘in charge’, even though Grenfell residents are being told that the £19m donated to them by members of the public has now mysteriously been given to this private company. Only a tiny fraction of the £19m has been given FOUR MONTHS AFTER THE TRAGEDY. By the way, that £19m generates at least £190,000 per year @ 1% interest, in other words, more than £15,000 per MONTH is generated in interest from these donations – WHERE HAS THE INTEREST GONE? No Grenfell survivor has been asked permission, nor told anything about why this money – which could help all the residents re-boot their lives – is being banked, or who is indeed in charge of it.
— How the Cancer Act 1939 maintains ineffective cancer treatments
THE TOTNES CANCER HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE (TCHCC) took place on Saturday 24th March 2012 at Eden Rise retreat ten minutes drive from the little town of Totnes in sleepy Devonshire, England. It might not have happened at all because it was almost cancelled by the local Trading Standards, which had been egged on by local MP Dr. Sarah Woolaston and the usual mob of campaigning UK skeptics who argued that the conference was promoting cancer treatments and therefore contravened the Cancer Act 1939 which gives the medical establishment a monopoly on cancer treatment and the promotion of cancer treatment. As a consequence, the conference was no longer able to go ahead at its planned venue — Totnes Civic Hall — a venue which had been booked and promoted months in advance.
Both the local and national mainstream media assumed that, with the venue location stopped, the conference was cancelled, and this they reported without checking their facts with the conference organiser, Dr. Stephen Hopwood. True to form, the mainstream media billed the cancellation as a victory for public safety over “irresponsible” cancer treatment claims, highlighting the view of one of the billed speakers — oncologist Tullio Simoncini — that baking soda can be used as a cancer treatment. Because Dr. Simoncini has been struck off the medical register for his views, he provided perfect justification to cancel the conference: baking soda curing cancer… how irresponsible! Of course this was only a pretext to cancel the conference because the Trading Standards did not change their position when Hopwood responded by dropping Simoncini as a speaker.
However, Trading Standards, Sarah Woolaston, the rabble of UK skeptics and the mainstream media underestimated the resolve of the conference organisers and those planning to attend — free speech would not be thwarted — and the skeptics glee at the announced cancellation was short-lived as the event was switched, last minute, to a private venue on a donation basis. This placed it more firmly under the protection of free speech legislation, and the conference ended up being a success with a remarkable turnout considering the blanket media reports that it was cancelled.
The conference organiser, Dr. Stephen Hopwood, is a wholistic medical doctor with 20 years of healthcare experience. He currently runs the Arcturus Clinic (www.arcturusclinic.co.uk) and the Totnes Cancer Help Centre (www.totnescancerhealthcentre.com). Hopwood set up the conference to “discuss potential underlying causes of cancer, offer thoughts on how best to protect yourself and as the day unfolds provide a clear map of how to cultivate your health and immunity.” This was to be a discussion day for those interested in complementary and alternative approaches to cancer survival, “based on the idea that if our body’s immune and endocrine systems are correctly functioning, well supported and balanced physiologically then cancer is less likely to arise and that our body’s own immune system may itself hold the key to prevention.”
This perspective of cancer treatment is actually quasi-respectable, and forms the basis of treatments of a surprising number of orthodox-focused medical doctors and researchers. But this respectability makes no difference to those opposing the conference, and they continued to cite a piece of UK legislation called the Cancer Act 1939 as the reason that this conference should not go ahead, a legal Act, they claim, was put in place to protect the public.
The Cancer Act 1939, which you can read at www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo6/2-3/13, was actually passed into British Law in 1939 to effectively give a monopoly to the emerging radiotherapy industry which believed at the time that the cure for cancer was the radioactive element radium. As radium was hugely expensive to procure and to administer, the Act ensured that the government loan to the National Radium Trust (an independent non-governmental trust) would be secured by eliminating competing cancer treatments — it was the means of securing this business arrangement.
An Act to make further provision for the treatment of cancer, to authorise the Minister of Health to lend money to the National Radium Trust, to prohibit certain advertisements relating to cancer, and for purposes connected with the matters aforesaid. [The first paragraph in the Cancer Act 1939 introduction]
In the original Cancer Act 1939, in Section 3 (since repealed), the condition of the loan to the National Radium Trust was that “no money shall be lent under this section after the expiration of ten years from the commencement of this Act.” So it appears that this legislation was primarily to secure start-up capital the radiotherapy industry, which at that time was nationalized, although the loan did have provision for repayment: “Any sums received by the Minister by way of repayment of a loan under this section or by way of interest thereon shall be paid into the Exchequer.” This was therefore a piece of legislation principally defining a business arrangement, rather than one for public protection — the advertising restrictions are clearly secondary to the loan arrangement.
And anyway, heart disease is just as dangerous as cancer but we do not have a Heart Disease Act because other legislation is perfectly adequate in protecting the public from bogus heart disease remedies and practitioners. Cancer was singled out because of the expense of radium and the need to set up a monopoly to deal with money loaned for that expense.
You also have to remember that back in 1939, cancer was not as common as it is today with only 1 in 30 to 1 in 40 people getting the disease as opposed to today’s rate of between 1 in 2 and 1 in 3. So health practitioners did not have the massive customer base that they have today, making the protection of what was considered at the time to be a promising but expensive treatment commercially essential.
See Dounne Alexander’s proposal for a legal reformation of the Cancer Act 1939: www.grammasintl.com/pdfs/CancerAct_Reformapplication.pdf
The National Radium Trust was abolished soon after the Second World War with the introduction of the National Health Service(NHS) in 1948, and most sections of the original Cancer Act 1939have replaced by the Medicines Act 1968(www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/67/contents). Today, the main part of the Act that remains is Section 4, which prohibits the “advertising” of cancer treatments:
No person shall take any part in the publication of any advertisement containing an offer to treat any person for cancer, or to prescribe any remedy therefor, or to give any advice in connection with the treatment thereof;
An advertisement here is defined as “any notice, circular, label, wrapper or other document, and any announcement made orally or by any means of producing or transmitting sounds.” Cancer treatments, however, can be advertised by local authorities, hospitals and anyone acting with the approval of the Minister of Health (which generally translates as oncologists, research doctors and large cancer research charities):
Nothing in this section shall apply in respect of any advertisement published by a local authority or by the governing body of a voluntary hospital or by any person acting with the sanction of the Minister.
The Act does however allow cancer treatments to be advertised to registered doctors, registered nurses, registered pharmacists and students training in these professions. This allows the medical establishment to maintain its indoctrination on its conventional cancer treatments.
So the Cancer Act 1939 basically affords a monopoly on the medical establishment (which includes government), but as medical establishments around the world tend to be funded and controlled by Big Pharma (which also, as we will see, manipulates government), then that monopoly on cancer treatment and cancer treatment information dissemination is effectively Big Pharma’s monopoly. As we shall see later on, this is not in the interest of cancer patients, because if we are banned from even discussing alternative cancer treatments then patients’ choices are limited almost exclusively to conventional cancer treatments, treatments that we shall see have a dismal success rate.
What is most concerning about the Cancer Act 1939, however, is that it violates Freedom of Speech legislation. This is what makes it so controversial and why so many are now calling for its complete repeal — it is no longer serves the purpose for which it was set up (to kick-start expensive new radium treatments) and it has been superceded by newer legislation like the Medicines Act 1968, legislation which is perfectly adequate for protecting the public against medical scammers and charlatans. Unfortunately, monopolies are not easily given up, especially a monopoly as lucrative as that involving cancer treatment, and so Big Pharma makes sure, through its influence on the medical establishment and government, that full repeal of the Cancer Act 1939 never happens.
With this monopoly in place, the Cancer Act 1939 allowed radiotherapy to flourish, so that today “about half of all cancer patients receive some type of radiation therapy sometime during the course of their treatment.” [The National Cancer Institute – www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Therapy/radiation. Cancer Research UK estimate that 40% of UK cancer patients receive radiotherapy.] And yet, despite its widespread use, it is very difficult to find the actual success rates of radiotherapy for various types of cancer. As cancer consultant and researcher Dr. Ralph Moss (http://cancerdecisions.com) said in a 2008 newsletter: “Many forms of radiation treatment… have simply been ‘grandfathered in,’ – i.e., accepted by default largely on the basis of having been around for a long time.” He goes on to say:
While few would dispute that radiation does have a useful role in the treatment of cancer, the fact remains that in many instances the relative merits of different kinds of radiation treatment, the limits of its usefulness and the extent of its effectiveness have never been clearly established through clinical trials. This has led to a situation where on the one hand the treatment is almost universally available, yet on the other hand there is very little solid evidence comparing the effectiveness of radiation to various other treatment approaches.
Of course, oncologists themselves are most likely to have an idea of radiotherapy’s effectiveness as a cancer treatment, but they are certainly keeping quiet about it. For example, a Harvard study published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) found that “90% of oncologists would never take radiation for lung cancer. 84% would never take chemotherapy for colon cancer,” both standard treatments offered by the medical establishment to those particular cancer-type sufferers. Why would oncologists be recommending treatments to their patients that they would avoid themselves? What is causing this duplicity?
Ralph Moss, the researcher mentioned earlier, remembers the reluctance of a brain cancer specialist, who visited him, to take radiation should he ever develop a brain tumour himself:
“I had a brain cancer specialist sit in my living room and tell me that he would never take radiation if he had a brain tumour. And I asked him, ‘but, do you send people for radiation?’ and he said, ‘of course, I’d be drummed out of the hospital if I didn’t.'”
So the Cancer Act 1939 , which was put in place to nurture a fledgling radiotherapy industry, is actually protecting an industry that those administering its treatment — the medical establishment — have serious doubts about behind closed doors, obviously concerned about their careers if they publicly stand by their opinions.
But of course, these days, orthodox cancer treatment is more than just radiotherapy. Today we also have chemotherapy as the other main orthodox cancer treatment. But this therapy, one that involves intravenously administering highly toxic substances in the hope of poisoning the cancer before poisoning the patient, also has an extremely low overall success rate. For example, a 2004 study by three Australian oncologists, published in the peer-reviewed journal Clinical Oncology (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15630849), concluded that:
“The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA. As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer in Australia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival.”
This is consistent with Ralph Moss’ (http://cancerdecisions.com) meta-studies (studies of studies) on the success rate of chemotherapy. In his ground-breaking book Questioning Chemotherapy (and his subsequent books, which are all extensively documented), Moss provides evidence that chemotherapy is ineffective for most forms of cancer, with a 2% to 4% overall success rate. He also reports the exceptions where this treatment has been shown to be useful, exceptions which include Hodgkin’s disease, lymphocytic leukemia and nonseminomatous testicular cancer, as well as a few extremely rare forms of cancer which include retinoblastoma, choriocarcinoma and Wilm’s tumour. Chemotherapy can also be helpful with State 3 ovarian cancer and small-call lung cancer. But with the vast majority of cancers (96% to 98%), it basically useless, subjecting patients to unnecessary suffering and biological (including immune system) damage.
Part of the problem is that the medical establishment take a very short-term view regarding treatment success. For example, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines a particular chemotherapy treatment as “effective” if it reduces a humour by 50% or more in just 28 days. But this definition falsely implies that there is some correlation between fast tumour reduction and overall survival (which is generally set at a 5-year period). However, If the research is anything to go by, this assumption is false as there is little to no correlation for most cancers. Just because chemotherapy can quickly shrink tumours does NOT make it an effective cancer treatment (except in cases where immediate survival is the only concern). As chemotherapy, like radiotherapy, destroys much of the immune system in the process of destroying cancer cells, it is not only a notoriously torturous treatment but it leaves patients it does not help (almost all of them) in a worse situation than before because, once the immune system is destroyed, the body becomes unresponsive to alternative treatments, many of which rely upon stimulating its innate immune response. As a consequence, orthodox cancer treatment is not only largely useless for most cancer sufferers, causing a great suffering, but it takes patients on an all-or-nothing roller-coaster ride with often lottery odds of survival.
So chemotherapy and radiotherapy, the two cornerstones of modern orthodox cancer treatment, are not effective treatments to the vast majority of cancer patients, and yet these “treatments” are given protected monopoly status by most developed countries around the world, effectively sentencing 96% – 98% of cancer sufferers to hugely destructive and painful treatments which are not to their benefit. In the UK, it is the Cancer Act 1939 that ensures alternatives to chemotherapy and radiotherapy do not see the light of day.
Of course, if chemotherapy and radiotherapy, ineffective as they are, really are the best options for cancer patients, then a case can be made for this sort of monopoly legislation. But with success rates of these treatments being little better than doing nothing for most cancers, the bar has been set so incredibly low for cancer treatment success that you would think that this might encourage an openness by governments and the medical authorities to explore every other possible avenue for cancer treatment in an effort to raise the dismal odds of current cancer survival. But in reality, governments and the medical authorities are still not only closed to alternative cancer treatments, but they take every step to stamp alternatives out without examining them, criminalizing well-meaning scientists and doctors who are trying to raise that bar for cancer survival rates.
How can this be? Surely governments and the medical establishment have the people’s interests at heart? After all, it is the people who elect and pay for their governments to look after their interests, including their health interests, and in those countries with national health services, it is the people who pay for the cancer treatments. So how can any system that is in service to the people be maintaining treatment monopolies that are not in the interest of the people?
There are two responses to these questions, and they separate people into those who want to maintain the fairy tale of benign government and a fatherly healthcare system, and those who look a little deeper and realize that governments do not necessarily act in the interest of the people they represent, and that the medical establishment has loyalties stronger than those to its patients.
If you are in the former group and you believe the fairy tale that your government and your medical establishment are looking out for your interest, then you should probably stop reading here. This article is not for fantasists. If you have an emotional investment in benign patriarchal leaders, then you will have strong resistance to entertaining the possibility that our leaders do not act in the collective interest, and you will probably try to dismiss the statistics outlined above, clinging on to the belief that chemotherapy and radiotherapy are effective cancer treatments, and that their universal use should not be questioned. After all, caring leaders would not allow the suffering of those that they lead, and medical researchers and doctors are 100% objective and would never offer treatments they knew to be ineffective or that they would not take themselves or recommend to their families. So the facts above MUST be false. (Dream on!)
Unfortunately, although blind loyalty to a benign patriarchal vision is a valid emotional response, it is one that can and does lead to mass suffering and slaughter because it is based on entirely false assumptions. (Sometimes fantasies are worth more to many people than life itself because they determine the philosophical foundation of the world that we live in. Take away the fantasy of benign government, for example, and a large portion of society would lose the will to live.) The truth is that our leaders (including medical leaders and doctors) act in ways that are not in our collective interest, and the dismal statistics above indicated that something is very wrong with any health system that gives a monopoly to treatments with such dismal success rates, and even protects that monopoly with the full weight of criminal law.
So why would a government or a health service act in ways that are not in the interest of the people? The short answer is money (and the power that comes with money).
Money skews the whole democratic process, it always has and it always will. If you have money, serious amounts of money, then you can hire lobbyists and buy access to politicians, which allows you to have a disproportionate influence on government and the legislative process, an influence many orders of magnitude greater than that associated with mere voting rights. Money also allows you to influence the media, through advertising and ownership, and this allows you to control general public opinion. After all, people can only vote in their own interests if they know what is really going on and where their interests actually lie. As the mass media has become the eyes and ears for the vast majority of people, those who control the media control how people will vote.
Who has the greatest wealth in the world today? Multi-national big business, which is why legislation is generally so favourable to the interests of big business, which further increases the wealth of big business and further consolidates its power. Today we have a runaway situation whereby the whole modern democratic systems is in service primarily to industry and not the voters, and this situation is rapidly worsening.
Orthodox cancer treatment is HUGE business, estimated to be worth hundreds of billions of dollars each year. In fact, cancer treatment is becoming so expensive that even developed nations are struggling to afford it, as was recently pointed out in The Lancet (www.thelancet.com/commission/delivering-affordable-cancer-care-in-high-income-countries). As approximately 12 million people globally receive a cancer diagnosis, and as this is likely to increase to 22 million by 2030 (which according to the report is due to rising cancer rates in an aging global population and better diagnosis methods), the future outlook for the cancer treatment monopoly is extremely rosy, and orthodox cancer treatment is now one of the fastest growing industries. Indeed, the pharmaceutical industry, which controls most of modern cancer care, is now a trillion dollar global industry and one with some of the highest profit margins.
Businesses, like individuals, naturally protect their interests, doing everything they can to increase their profits and discourage competing industries. When you have billions of dollars behind you to fight your corner, you tend to win your fights, which is how, for example, new healthcare legislation that favours only the pharmaceutical giants at the expense of the public general health is sweeping across developed nations, pushing out natural and alternative therapies with a barrage of red-tape and biased healthcare legislation that favour mass medication. How is this achieved? By the ability of those with money to influence politicians, both through political donations and by hiring an army of full-time lobbyists to influence politicians.
In Brussels, for example, there are 15,000 lobbyists hired by corporations and other organisations specifically to represent their special interests to MEPs in an attempt to influence their decisions and skew the democratic process in their favour. (www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmselect/cmeuleg/361-xv/8070202.htm) How is this in the interest of democracy and the people? It is not. In democracies, special interest groups should not be allowed to influence politicians, period. But they currently are allowed to skew the democratic process, which is why the world is becoming increasingly corporatised. We all know it; we all see it in our local communities; and today an increasing number of people are waking up to this fact and questioning this destructive process. But as long as money is able to buy influence and political access, this undemocratic process will continue unabated.
There is also the massive problem of “revolving door” employment between politicians and big business. Politicians usually have a limited shelf-life, and when their political careers end, they usually end up on the boards of big corporations, basically hiring out their political connections to the highest bidder. So when in office, politicians are naturally extremely accommodating to big business because they know that they will be their future employers; big business is the gravy train they will eventually be catching. And this relationship also works the other way too: heads of business often find themselves in powerful positions of government where they can influence policy. As a consequence of this “revolving door” relationship between politicians and big business, government tends to strongly favour the interests of corporations over those of the electorate. This is further compounded by the influence of political party donations (bribes) and special interest lobbyists mentioned earlier, all of which unduly influence government and the legislative process.
Corporations can also get special treatment, if they are large enough, by threatening to locate or relocate their factories/offices to other states or other countries, which makes government and local government very keen to give them strong incentives, including tax breaks and other special corporate treatment, to keep them employing local people (and possibly giving a hefty backhand). This further adds to the runaway situation we have now in which large corporations are calling all the shots because they basically own the place.
The rapidly increasing power and influence of big business is morphing society to make big business even bigger and therefore more influential. In fact, it would be fair to say that governments now act primarily in the interests of big business, not the people who elect them. And this is why there is now so much public disgust with politicians, who quietly drop their campaign promises as soon as they are elected. (A recent poll in the UK showed that the combined popularity of the main party leaders, including the prime minister, were the lowest they had ever been since polling began.)
Money, however, not only skews the political and legislative processes, it also skews the scientific process. Only those outside the scientific research world believe in the fairy story of scientific objectivity and the foolproof nature of the peer-review process. In reality, research is subject to the influence of its sponsor, and it is very easy to bury studies that do not support the objective of the sponsor. (Do enough studies, select the best of them, and you can usually come up with “positive clinical evidence” for even the most useless treatment).
For example, a 2012 report in the scientific journal Nature (www.nature.com/nature/journal/v483/n7391/full/483531a.html) by Glenn Begley (former head of cancer research at Amgen) and Lee Ellis (surgical oncologist at MD Anderson), describes how 100 Amgen scientists [Amgen is a multinational biopharmaceutical company] could only replicate 6 of the results of 53 widely cited landmark cancer research papers. This means that 47 (89%) of these important research papers, papers which influence how cancer is treated, may well be based on spurious research — they are bad science. And to make matters worse, some of the authors of research questioned by the Amgen scientists insisted on a confidentiality agreement preventing the investigating Amgen scientists from publicly disclosing data at odds with the original findings. So these key cancer medical researchers not only know the spurious nature of their research, but they are quite prepared to cover it up, something which is against public interest because it ultimately costs lives — possibly a huge number. (Under any other name, this is mass murder, but under the conventional cancer treatment banner, this is business as usual.)
Sharon Begley of Reuters also reported in her article (www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-cancer-idUSBRE82R12P20120328) “In cancer science, many ‘discoveries’ don’t hold up,” it is not just Amgen scientists who are aware of this massive problem:
[This Amgen report] echoes a report from scientists at Bayer AG last year. Neither group of researchers alleges fraud, nor would they identify the research they had tried to replicate.
But they and others fear the phenomenon is the product of a skewed system of incentives that has academics cutting corners to further their careers.
George Robertson of Dalhousie University in Nova Scotia previously worked at Merck on neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s. While at Merck, he also found many academic studies that did not hold up.
“It drives people in industry crazy. Why are we seeing a collapse of the pharma and biotech industries? One possibility is that academia is not providing accurate findings,” he said.
The National Academy of Sciences held a panel to discuss these problems, and the fact that “the number of scientific papers that had to be retracted increased more than tenfold over the last decade [while] the number of journal articles published rose only 44 percent.” Panelist, Ferric Fang of the University of Washington, stated:
The surest ticket to getting a grant or job is getting published in a high-profile journal. This is an unhealthy belief that can lead a scientist to engage in sensationalism and sometimes even dishonest behaviour.
So just because research is “peer-reviewed” is no guarantee that it is objective or accurate. (http://jrsm.rsmjournals.com/content/99/4/178.long) Indeed, some prefer to call these journals “peer-controlled” rather than “peer-reviewed” because the peers who are acting as gatekeepers for the journals often have a financial interest in supporting the status quo — their own careers and status are on the line. Just try submitting scientific research on alternative treatments and you soon come up against a brick wall.
The British Medical Journal itself, in its Clinical Evidence journal, reported in 2007 that only 13% of orthodox treatments were in the beneficial category. 23% of treatments were “likely to be beneficial”; 8% were a “trade-off between benefits and harms”, 6% were “unlikely to be beneficial”; 4% were “likely to be ineffective or harmful”; and a full 46% were of “unknown effectiveness”. And these statistics are from a leading mainstream medical journal, and so are likely to be more conservative estimates (from an independent perspective the scientific ineffectiveness of conventional medicine is likely to be worse). This means that doctors haven’t a clue as to the effectiveness of half of the treatments they are giving, and most of the remaining portion are questionable.
The bigger picture that was not covered in Sharon Begley’s Reuters article above is that the massive pharmaceutical industry is the one that is actually funding most of the research. So rather than just being part of the solution in identifying the high levels of bad science, as the Amgen scientists were doing, they are the ones that are funding most of this bad science with their research grants and donations to universities. When big business and science meet, you can be sure that objectivity and ethics are compromised because of the levels of money involved.
Scientists and doctors, Gary Null, Caroyln Dean, Martin Feldman, Deborah Rasio and Dorothy Smith, produced a detailed report entitled “Death by Medicine” in 2006. The authors uncovered the fact that nearly 800,000 people in the United States alone are killed by conventional medicine every year, making it the leading cause of death and injury in the US. You can read the full article here: www.lef.org/magazine/mag2006/aug2006_report_death_01.htm
And this article went on to inspire Gary Null to produce an excellent documentary of the same name which you can watch here:
So going back to cancer treatment, we see an insanely profitable conventional cancer treatment industry not only ineffective for the vast majority of cancer sufferers and based mostly on spurious science, but one that has also been granted a monopoly by our governments to prevent other treatments (which may or may not be more effective) from even being discussed (like blocking the alternative cancer conference in the Totnes public hall). This situation cannot be, by any stretch of the imagination, in the public interest.
The problem with most of the alternative cancer treatments is that they include more natural approaches such as special diets, natural food supplements, herbs, holistic treatments, nutrients and other lifestyle changes, treatments that are not profitable for big business because they cannot be patented and owned. Therefore, giving big business the monopoly on cancer treatment ensures that only treatments that fit its big business model are even considered for cancer sufferers, and these are almost entirely profitable drug and radiation treatments that can be intellectually owned and therefore effectively marketed.
Just suppose, hypothetically if you want, that special diets, natural food supplements, herbs, holistic treatments, nutrients and/or other lifestyle changes do in fact present a more successful way to treat cancer than current conventional methods. If this were the case, the public would be kept almost entirely in the dark about it because those with the monopoly on cancer treatment would never examine these approaches. And not only that, but they would actively discourage media reporting of these approaches as they would be seen as damaging to existing profits. We have to remember that just because pharmaceuticals are dealing with life and death situations does not imply that the healthcare industry is more ethical than other industries in the way they chase profits. Business is business, and when the conventional cancer care industry is worth hundreds of billions of dollars, you can be absolutely sure that current ineffective treatments will be aggressively and often underhandedly defended using effectively unlimited resources. (To see just how Big Pharma deals with competing healthcare systems, read investigative journalist Martin Walker’s excellent exposé called Dirty Medicine in which he thoroughly documents the underhanded assault on natural health care — www.slingshotpublications.com.)
With the massive influence of the pharmaceutical industry on the mainstream media (through ownership, advertising and PR etc.), it is actually a remarkable testimony to the persistence and efficacy of alternative cancer treatments that so many people seek out these alternative treatments and that positive articles still manage to get published in the mainstream media. After all, if a trillion-dollar industry is unable to stamp out the competition, then that competition is certainly worth investigating!
It is important to state at this point that alternative cancer treatments are not necessarily more effective than conventional ones. There is certainly evidence that some might well be, but with practically all research money going to conventional treatment, the necessary studies are just not being done on the same scale. After all, to study any less-profitable treatments requires Government grants, because industry (which supports most clinical research) is not going to be interested if the treatment does not fit its profit-making model. But as Government is so closely allied to the pharmaceutical companies, grants for research into alternative cancer treatments are notoriously hard to procure. (And the large cancer research charities focus their funding almost entirely on conventional cancer treatment, which is why they should not be supported.)
Of course there are token studies undertaken on some aspects of these non-profitable cancer treatment approaches such as lifestyle changes, but the results of those studies, no matter how successful, don’t seem make it into mainstream cancer care. In fact, there is as much as a 50-year gap between the findings of new research and the implementation of those findings by medical doctors. For example, a multitude of studies over the past few decades have shown a strong link between cancer and poor diets, so you would assume that oncologists would make it standard policy to advise cancer patients to avoid junk food and eat healthy diets. But this does not generally happen, despite the research. Indeed, when Kevin Wright, who used to run the charity Kids Integrated Cancer Treatment, took his son to the leading children’s cancer hospital in the UK, for example, he was given a leaflet advising parents on how to feed their sick children. Wright brought the leaflet with him to the Totnes Cancer Healthcare Conference mentioned above and it unambiguously recommends an appalling high sugar, high junk food diet. And that is exactly what the nurses at that hospital were getting for the children in their care. (Fast-food outlets like McDonalds and Burger King are now prevalent in conventional hospitals because those that control the hospitals are unfortunately in healthcare La La Land sponsored by big business. It is not about health, it is about money, and junk food not only makes money, but it will get you more clients for your hospital.)
So the conventional cancer treatment industry maintains the status quo, pushing treatments that it can profit from and discouraging treatments it cannot profit from, irrespective of treatment effectiveness. The word “discouraging” is perhaps a little tame for some of their thuggish behaviour in stamping out the competition. We might feel outrage at the lengths that the medical industry will go to maintain its monopolies and eliminate the competition, but this behaviour is business as usual for all sectors of big business. This is the way that corporations operate. (For more information on corporations, how they operate and how they damage society, watch the following film-documentary that was released a few years back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4ou9rOssPg)
The other major reason for big business rejecting alternative cancer treatments is that they tend to be multi-faceted. Most people who take alternative and complementary treatments usually take a number of them, rather than taking just one in isolation. And often (but not always), alternative treatments are individually tailored to each person, especially with holistic alternative treatments where the person rather than the disease is the focus of treatment. With this approach, it is difficult to turn most alternative treatments into easily-packaged commodities, or indeed into treatments that can be reductively studied scientifically, where the causative factors have to be somewhat limited. After all, if there are too many variables in a study, even the best statistical methods will fail to quantify the relative effectiveness of each component of the treatment — identifying which ones are useful and which ones are not. (This is a problem due to the complexity of both alternative treatment methods and the body: see In Defense of Alternative Medicine – www.realitymaps.com/2012/01-alternativemedicine.html) With 15% to 50% of cancer patients using alternative and complementary treatments (the stats are about 33% in Europe www.europeancancerleagues.eu), even conventional cancer treatment reviews are questionable due to the number of variables involved with such wide scale complementary practices.
This is not, however, a dismissal of conventional medicine; it certainly has its place. Modern conventional medicine is second-to-none with regard to dealing with medical emergencies. If you get run over by a car, your best bet on recovery is your local emergency hospital, not your local homeopathic clinic. Conventional emergency care is called acute medicine, and is tailored for injuries, infections, organ failure etc., in fact any situation that requires urgent and rapid intervention, often to save patients’ lives.
But what plagues society today are often complex chronic diseases like cancer, heart disease, stroke, diabetes, arthritis, respiratory diseases, mental health disorders and the like, which are responsible for 63% of all deaths, and a far larger percentage of treatment cost as treatments tend to be more expensive and longer-term (you are usually in hospital far longer if you have cancer than if you have an infection or an injury). Indeed, The World Economic Forum has estimated that the the global cost of treating the five top chronic diseases — cancer, diabetes, heart disease, lung disease and mental health disorders — could top $47 trillion by 2030.
These complex chronic diseases require a different approach to that of acute conditions. With acute medical issues, the focus has to be on the symptoms of the problem because it is those symptoms that are putting the patient’s life in danger. Infections and injury are obvious examples where the focus is on dealing with the symptoms, and the primary concern is the patient’s immediate stabilization, not how he or she was injured or caught the infection. With chronic diseases, on the other hand, long-term factors such as lifestyle and psychological issues come into play. Usually, if left unchecked with no lifestyle changes made, chronic diseases eventually reach a critical phase — vascular disease can lead to a heart attack and cancer can stop our organs working — and when this happens the situation demands acute conventional medicine, which might well include emergency surgery. This is conventional medicine at its best. But if your heart disease is not at an emergency stage (yet), then your best bet might be to focus on completely modifying your diet, controlling your psychological stress levels and taking gentle exercise. These are not, however, profitable to conventional medicine, and so Big Pharma has instead developed a slew of powerful and profitable drugs such as statins, ACE inhibitors, diuretics, warfarin, and beta-blockers, that patients are often put on for the rest of their lives, drugs that can have some very serious long-term side-effects. In this way, the symptom-focused medical model is used to “treat” a chronic disease, a recipe for quick symptomatic fixes at the expense of long-term health. Statins, for example, are drugs with dangerous side-effects that are routinely prescribed preventively for those with high cholesterol, and yet even The Lancet has suggested that they are almost useless for women and older men. (See www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-432395/Statins-truth.html and the book Food is Better Medicine than Drugs by Holford and Burne.)
The same considerations regarding acute medical mindset being used on chronic disease applies to cancer as well. For instance, if a tumour is pressing against a vital organ, it may need to be surgically removed (if indeed it can be safely removed) as quickly as possible. After this, a course of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to try to kill any remaining cancer cells and possible secondary cancer sites, and possibly hormone therapy. (If a tumour is inoperable then it is usually just blasted with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy — with the oncologist just hoping for the best.) This is an acute medical approach to cancer. The cause of the disease is not a consideration, and the treatment is entirely symptom-focused and aggressive. (Follow-up chemotherapy and radiotherapy, outside of the immediate emergency situation, is however questionable, because damage to the immune system can have deleterious long-term consequences.)
But what if the cancer is not immediately life-threatening and treatment is less immediately urgent? The conventional treatment is pretty much the same acute care response — a combination of surgery, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (and sometimes hormone therapy). But these treatments, all of which can rapidly reduce the size of a tumour (or number of cancer cells in the case of non-tumour cancer), cause a great deal of injury to the body, to such an extent that they usually irreparably damage the immune system causing fatal relapses. (The small number of cancer cells that survive the poisoning and burning of chemotherapy and radiotherapy tend to be the more hardy and virulent ones, so that when/if the cancer recurs, it is significantly more likely to kill the patient.) This short-term view might be considered an acceptable risk if the cancer is immediately life-threatening, but if it is not, then short-term gains in rapid reduction in the number of cancer cells might not actually have any long-term benefit. Indeed, the severity of the treatment usually means that not only is little is actually gained in the longer-term, but it comes at the price of terrible suffering in the short-term. (The question that always needs to be asked is whether the little gained is worth the suffering.)
On the other hand, alternative approaches to cancer treatment tend to be slower and less aggressive, taking a longer term view of patient survival and not focusing exclusively on goals like the rapidity of tumour shrinkage. Disease-causes are investigated in relation to formulating treatments with view to long-term success rather than short-term symptomatic reduction. Deeper questions are asked such as “Why has the cancer rate increased so enormously over the last century?” to try to understand what the main causes might be, which can lead to preventative measures. This is a more systemic approach that brings together integrated treatments (which may sometimes include elements of conventional cancer treatment) to give the best chance of long-term survival. These approaches might involve changing the diet, removing toxins from the body (which both cause cancer and interfere with the body’s defense mechanisms), taking additional high-nutrient and anti-cancer food supplements, and undertaking various other alternative therapies. (After all, diet changes and a massive toxin increase are hallmarks of modern living recent and so could well be causative factors in the alarming cancer-rate increases.) Usually, no single component of most alternative cancer treatments can be classified or identified as the “active component” — all elements working synergistically together — and this creates a nightmare, mentioned above, of trying to squeeze multi-faceted treatments through cookie-cutter research analysis that requires simpler cause-and-effect mechanisms (procedures and active components that can be more easily isolated to determine their specific roles and effects).
This slower approach does not fit well with the conventional medical model which wants quick results using patentable and therefore profitable treatment programs and drugs. This is why the FDA defines how effective a cancer treatment is by how quickly it can reduce a tumour. In the words of US congressman Ron Paul, at a recent press conference, “the FDA and the drug companies are in bed together.” He went on to ask, “What does the FDA do when it comes to alternative or natural products? The FDA and the drug industry keep them off the market.” (http://youtu.be/fCWN1mNGQ4Q) This is due to the usual revolving door hiring policies between the FDA and the drug companies, policies that ensure that the FDA is working almost exclusively in the interests of Big Pharma, which is why the organisation is working so hard at the moment to outlaw alternative medicine and natural foods. (Check out www.naturalnews.com for updates on the latest FDA assaults on American liberty, assaults that are becoming the hallmark of health regulatory bodies throughout Europe and other countries around the world, including the World Health Organisation itself — see www.rense.com/general88/megawho.htm.)
So today we have a system of medicine that is second to none for acute conditions, but misses the mark completely for most complex chronic conditions such as cancer. But because cancer treatment has become a mammoth cash cow for big business, ineffective but insanely profitable treatments like chemotherapy and radiotherapy enjoy a wholly undeserved monopoly status. We have allowed the profits of private corporations to control how chronic life-and-death diseases are treated. And like any industry given a monopoly, it will not only use its considerable influence to make sure that the monopoly stays in place, but the system itself will naturally tune to profit maximization (as there is no competition) rather than effectiveness. So the dismal success rate of conventional cancer treatments creates little to no incentive to challenge those treatments when they are protected by a monopoly. This is entirely understandable from a big business perspective where profit is the focus, but it is a tragedy from a human perspective.
This means that the whole edifice of modern cancer care is rotten at the core because policy is controlled by big business. This problem of profits coming before people is a universal one across all industries, not just the healthcare sector. For example, you only have to look at the banking system and how corrupt it has become, and how it operates against the interest of society as a whole, to see a classic case of money calling the shots at the expense of everything else. The corruption of the banking system was exposed after the recent financial collapse and bailout fiasco, so that today most people would agree with you if you called the banking industry corrupt, whereas a decade ago, most would dismiss the accusation as conspiracy theory because… well banks and bankers were considered just too respectable!
There are now similar problems with the food industry, where corporate control is ensuring that our food becomes what is most profitable to big business rather than what is most healthy to the individual. As a consequence, profitable foods such as those that are highly processed, high-sugar, high-fat, high-salt, addictive, and genetically modified are being forced onto the population, creating a disease time-bomb which ironically creates more profits for the “healthcare” industry! (It is no coincidence that health insurance companies often have massive stakes in the fast food industry – www.naturalnews.com/028602_health_insurance_fast_food.html.)
Genetic modification of food is particularly concerning because no adequate long-term safety studies are being done, and many of the studies that show the dangers of genetically modified food have been buried, their authors vilified and retired from their research careers. Genetic modification allows corporations to own food sources, including the seeds produced from crops, and only someone extremely naive would think that this was in the interests of the collective. You often hear the argument that genetically modified crops will solve world hunger, but the reality is actually very different. (See www.responsibletechnology.org)
So big business control of any sector of modern civilisation creates problems for the majority of people by its very nature as a profit-focused system. Some make the point that corporations have to service their customers well for them to be successful, but while this applies to smaller and medium sized corporations, it does NOT apply to massive multi-national businesses, especially those like the cancer treatment industry that enjoy a monopoly. These behemoths have too much power and control to be led by consumer interests. Instead, they manipulate people into consuming what is most profitable to them, and they do this through monopolies and other protective legislation, as well as their control over the media and, in the case of healthcare and food production, the entire medical establishment. Most people do not realize that multi-national corporations are not just scaled up versions of smaller corporations, they are an entirely different species, one that is exempt from many of the checks and balances — and taxes — that automatically apply to smaller corporations.
If big business is the root cause of ineffective modern cancer treatment, what can we actually do about it? How do we break this monopoly?
Fortunately, we have not reached a stage (yet) when medical treatment is forced on adults, and so long as we the people have a choice as to how we want our cancer treated, we have the option to avoid Big Pharma solutions if those solutions are not actually in our long-term interest. How would we know? By looking for independent sources of information, and by getting involved with organisations that are fighting for your right to a choice of effective healthcare. Here are some of the things you can do for yourself and anyone you know with cancer to find the most effective way forward:
It can take real courage not to just blindly follow your doctor’s advice. If you refuse chemotherapy in the UK, for example, you can forfeit your right to be seen by an NHS doctor. This is understandably a frightening prospect for most people, and few have the courage to take an alternative path until they have completely failed the conventional route, by which time their chances of success with alternative treatments is low. This is one of the worrying dilemmas faced by cancer patients who are interested in alternative and complementary approaches. Challenging those in authority is very difficult for most people, who have been conditioned by society since birth not to rock the boat. But there is also no better motivation to rock the boat when your life is on the line.
We must all educate ourselves on the different cancer treatments available using independent information outlets which big business has no influence on, and pass that information on to anyone we know suffering from cancer. We have to expose the cancer racket being perpetrated by big business in the name of health, and get the Cancer Act 1939 , and similar protective legislation around the world, repealed because these monopolies are causing untold suffering. This 73-year-old law serves no positive purpose apart from filling Big Pharma’s coffers, allow it to gain even more control over government and society.
Where will this end? As big business gets its tentacles into every aspect of modern life, when it owns and controls everything, we will be living in the Big Brother nightmare that Orwell wrote about in 1984. Some say that nightmare is here already. Had this statement been made a decade or two ago, it would be dismissed as conspiracy theory. But people worldwide are waking up to the the fact that even in so called “free” and “democratic” societies, those in authority are not acting for the collective interest. At best they merely have their noses in the trough, at worst, they are also scheming to centralize power, ridding ordinary people of their freedoms of choice, including healthcare choices, in all but the most superficial aspects of their lives. People have become commodities, pawns in a system that enslaves them — invariably in the name of “safety” and “their own good”. Big Brother knows best and will protect you… so long as you obey him!
The internet is the last bastion of free speech in a corporatised world, which is why governments (especially the US government) and the corporations that control them, are pushing so hard for online censorship and control. As long as there is free speech, we are never going to be completely in the control of big business. But dark clouds are appearing on the horizon as new censorship laws (such as SOPA, PIPA and the like) are being introduced, in the name of public safety and intellectual property protection. Recently in America, for example, the Board of Dietetics / Nutrition in North Caroline have threatened a nutritional blogger with jail for advocating a health diet on his website claiming that he is guilty of the crime of “practicing nutrition without a license.” (For more info, visit: www.naturalnews.com/035691_dieticians_free_speech_nutrition_advice.html) This means that we may get to the stage whereby only those who are licensed (indoctrinated) can disseminate information — in other words, only doctrine will be allowed to be freely expressed. When this happens, we will not be so far off from Orwell’s thought-crimes, and the enslavement of the human race will be complete.
On a slightly different note, what is most disappointing when we campaign for healthcare outside of the big business monopoly is that we invariably end up having to defend ourselves on two fronts: first against big business and its lackeys (government officials, medical doctors, and local trading standard officials) who obediently execute its agendas, and secondly against a motley crew of skeptics — solo or group vigilantes who vigorously defend anything that challenges the monopoly of big business, especially in the areas of healthcare and food manufacture. Some of them act independently to big business, taking upon themselves the responsibility to outlaw anything remotely alternative — alternatives which are always labelled as “bad science”, and those that promote them, as “quacks”, “charlatans” and “scammers”. Others are on the big business payroll, either directly or indirectly, and defend their masters because their living depends upon it.
Skeptics focused on alternative and complementary healthcare actually believe or are paid to believe in the fantasy that big business, with its unlimited financial resources, is unable and/or unwilling to skew science, politics and legislation in pursuit of its corporate agendas. They believe that the influence of money can be held in check by proper government procedures and scientific vetting. In their minds, objectivity can be protected from manipulation, and so the healthcare promoted by big business, which masquerades as scientific (despite the fact that only 15% of conventional medicine is based on science at all), is the only legitimate healthcare, with every other system of healthcare being, by definition, a scam or superstition.
You hear the most ridiculous and unscientific beliefs, beliefs that form the Skeptics’ Creed because they have no scientific backing. Here are a few of the beliefs you can find online on some of the prominent skeptics’ websites:
The list of nonsense goes on and on, despite the fact that these beliefs contradict most independent scientific research. Skeptics take every opportunity to promote their creed as objective science, a creed that offers them a worldview in which they are safely cocooned by Big Brother, where the government and big businesses patriarchies protect, heal and nurture them. It is a comforting illusion, but one that unfortunately masks a terrible reality. But denial is easier to cope with, and the tight ideological strait-jacket of mental bondage is a small price to pay for perceived security. Actually, many skeptics seem to get a positive kick out of denigrating anything and everything outside their tightly controlled worldviews. And their justification is usually public safety. However, if public safety really was the motivating factor, these individuals and organisations would be focusing their attention on Big Pharma which is killing hundreds of thousands of people annually, and maiming countless others. This is the real scam going on.
It is indeed a comforting thought for most people that their doctors are looking out for their best interests, promoting the safest and most effective treatment programs and pharmaceutical drugs. But it is unfortunately (and perhaps shockingly for many) not true. Even the kindest of doctors with the very best intentions have been indoctrinated into a system of medicine cultured to enrich the pharmaceutical industry. We have to awaken to the hijacking of every aspect of our lives by big business, and realize that we are collectively being exploited by the few for the profits of the few. The conventional cancer treatment protection racket is only a small part of a far larger agenda that is rapidly moving modern society towards a Big Brother scenario. Already in Europe, for example, people are waking up to the fact that their governments have sold them out to a non-democratically elected central power base in Brussels, a treason that was masqueraded as economic cooperation before it was realized that it involved the dissolution of basic sovereignty and self-determination.
In today’s uncertain world, we collectively seem so eager to give up our freedom for security, falling for the propaganda that only by forfeiting freedoms can we deal with the perceived dangers ahead. Before he became President of the United States, Dwight Eisenhower gave a speech in 1949 in which he stated:
“If all that Americans want is security, they can go to prison. They will have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over their heads. But if an American wants to preserve his dignity and his equality as a human being, he must not bow his neck to any dictatorial government.”
Freedom is not a luxury to be enjoyed when the world is safer, but is as basic as oxygen to human existence. If we give up our freedom for security, then we dehumanize ourselves. Fear is a potent weapon when it comes to controlling a population and getting it to give up its human rights, rights that get in the way of corporate and political agendas.
Those freedoms can and must include the freedom to determine our own healthcare, including cancer care, and to discuss these topics openly in public venues. If we allow outdated legislation like the Cancer Act 1939 in the UK (and similar legislation in other parts of the world) to interfere with these freedoms, to interfere with Freedom of Speech, then we lose our very humanity, becoming slaves to a system that wants to dictate every aspect of our lives, from how we are treated when we are sick, to the foods we eat — all in the name of profit.
So defending the right to discuss alternative and complementary cancer treatments at Hopwood’s Totnes cancer conference was not just an issue about healthcare, but more importantly was an act of standing up to the control of big business — the same control that allowed draconian legislation like the Cancer Act 1939 to be passed in the first place, legislation that protects treatments that even most oncologists privately reject.
I hope that none of you reading this article will ever get cancer, but if you do, I hope that you have access to ALL the information you need to responsibly make an informed choice that is entirely in your own interest, rather than have a third party with questionable interests make that choice for you. After all, making informed choices in every aspect of our lives, especially health, is a central part of our basic humanity.
Thanks for getting through this one. It is a very long and rambling article I know, but I did want to emphasise the symbiotic relationship between conventional healthcare (in this case cancer care) and the operations of big business. You cannot understand them independently of each other as they are basically one and the same. This is not conspiracy theory, but just what naturally happens as big business takes over the different facets of society. The truth is that democracy and big business are on a collision course, a fact that people all over the world are now waking up to. As long as big business is allowed to influence politicians and the medical establishment with its legal bribes, then this situation of protected ineffective and expensive healthcare will continue unabated, as will the sacrifice of ordinary people to fill the corporate coffers.
Update 20 Oct 2012
Much of the problem with conventional cancer treatments and the blocking of alternative and complementary cancer treatments stem from the misuse of mathematics. It is invalid in disease states to compare the results of large-groups of people using randomized double-blind trials, the so called “gold standard” of medical research. This irrational approach, which is called Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) is mathematically invalid because it assumes a “one-size-fits-all” approach to a problem where each person is actually unique in their expression of different disease states. Research on populations cannot be mindlessly applied to individuals. If you are interested in looking further into the irrationality of EBM, check out the book Tarnished Gold: The Sickness of Evidence-based Medicine by Steve Hickey PhD and Hilary Roberts PhD.
This article is for interest only and should not form the basis of diagnosis or treatment of any medical condition or illness. If you are unwell or have a specific medical condition, please base your healthcare decisions on the advice of a medical doctor or other healthcare practitioner.
Open Your Mind Radio –
Guest – Dean Oliver – Sunday 27th August 2017 – Dean is the architect of Sacred. Following the loss of several beloved family members, Dean became disenchanted with western medicine and was guided towards earth-made solutions for many of the man-made problems we face today. After an exploration of self-healing in 2012, Dean envisaged a world where people became less dis-connected and the healing power of plants was available to all. And how would he do this? By providing access to safe, effective and affordable medicine which facilitate people in self-healing. Dean became passionate in uncovering the truth about dis-ease within the body, predominantly cancer, and immersed himself in scientific study. He continues to question medical indoctrination and is committed to passing on the correct information so that you can live a more empowered life. Ever thankful to the plants for their guidance, Dean continues to regenerate himself to optimum health, and cannot wait to extend the knowledge to you, CBD, Carbon, C60, Borox.
Professor Chang has proposed a rather outrageous theory – “junk Human DNA” is most likely created by some kind of “extraterrestrial programmer” and this fact is actually the missing link for the origins of the human race. The theory has been backed up by the extensive analysis of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars.
According to Professor Chang:
“Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them.”
Then, he goes on stating:
“What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code.”
The Professor is honest about the facts supporting his theory: “First fact is, the complete ‘program’ was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in ‘the game’.”
Professor Chang believes that “Soon or later, we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is.”
The implications of these scientific finds are both severe, yet explicit. But, what’s more, they’d further support claims by other top leading scientists and observers of having contact with ‘off-world’ human looking extra-terrestrials. It’s these human looking extra-terrestrials that are believed to have provided some of the important genetic material for the human evolution. Many of them have also allowed some of their personnel to incarnate as ‘star seeds’ in human families on Earth. “Star seeds“, “star children” or “star people” all indicated that we have possibly derived from the stars.
Human DNA Encoded With Extraterrestrial Signals
In 2013, it was confirmed by leading Kazakhstani scientists that that human DNA was encrypted with an extraterrestrial signal by ancient alien civilizations that stopped at our planet long before our existence. Today, this mathematical code in human DNA, called “biological SETI”, can’t be explained by evolution, which confirms the possibility that the human species is of extraterrestrial origin.
As a team of scientists explained in the scientific journal Icarus, “Once fixed, the code might stay unchanged over cosmological timescales; in fact, it is the most durable construct known. Therefore it represents an exceptionally reliable storage for an intelligent signature.
“Once the genome is appropriately rewritten the new code with a signature will stay frozen in the cell and its progeny, which might then be delivered through space and time.”
According to the scientists, human DNA is thus arranged to precisely disclose an “ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language”. The research has led the team to believe that the human species was created “outside the solar system, already several billion years ago”.
But, even if we were created by aliens, the mystery that remains is who created them.
(Original Source: https://hidden-truth.net)