Dr. Elizabeth Eads is on the frontline of medicine, treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is now seeing first-hand Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS. Let that sink in. Dr. Eads explains, “Yes, we are seeing vaccine related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxed. . . . It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. . . . .We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse or calamity of this immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”
Dr. Eads says it is particularly bad in the double CV19 vaxed and boosted. She calls the third injection “The Kill Shot, the Money Ball or whatever you want to call it. It is just devastating to the immune system, and I’ll tell you why. If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the CV19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the Lentivirus. The Lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS. In the Stanford study, the best-known Lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the Covid 19 (Vax) especially the booster. . . . It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”
There is a similar report out last week by the UK government that also points to the triple vaxed getting AIDS. So, the CV19 vaccines are actually injecting people with AIDS? Dr. Eads says, “That is exactly what I am telling you. That is what the Spike Lentivirus is. It is made up of HIV and AIDS along with SARS and MERS. That’s why the vaccinated and boosted are so sick. That’s why they dominate the hospitalizations regarding Covid illness as well.”
Because the immune system is depleted, many kinds of disease such as cancer can spread like wildfire. Dr. Ryan Cole says he’s seeing cancer up as much as 2,000% from the vaccines. Eads says, “I have some stunning numbers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) . . . . I am just going to read a few cancers: malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus up 794%. malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas up 524%. Breast cancer up 387%. . . . Ovarian cancer up 537%, Testicular cancer up 269%. These are numbers from 2021. . . . When they found out attorney Thomas Renz and the whistleblower had the data, they scrubbed the data and altered it, which is totally against the law.”
Dr. Eads is treating vaxed and unvaxed in her practice. She will tell you what you can do to help yourself, especially if you have been vaxed. Dr. Eads talks about the ongoing propaganda to get you to take the so-called boosters. Dr. Eads explains why you should stop all CV19 shots now. Dr. Eads also contends there is a huge disinformation campaign going on to make you think the CV19 shots are safe and not causing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, cancer and a host of other diseases–including AIDS.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads as she continues to highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 bioweapons and the dangerous lies by Big Pharma, the FDA, CDC and mainstream media.
(There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 53-minute interview 3.22.22.)
After the Interview:
You can follow Dr. Elizabeth (Betsy) Eads on Twitter or you can follow her on Telegram.
Ordinary people need not apply. Indeed there is no way to ask to join. You simply have to be very, very rich and very, very ‘generous’… on a global scale.
This is the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists who recently held their first and highly secretive meeting in the heart of New York City.
The names of some of the members are familiar figures:
business giants Eli and Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All told, its members are worth $125bn.
The meeting – called by Gates, Buffett and Rockefeller – was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe. It was, in some ways, a summit to save the world.
No wonder that when news of the secret meeting leaked, via the seemingly unusual source of an Irish-American website, it sent shock waves through the worlds of philanthropy, development aid and even diplomacy.
Handmade Orgone Devices & Shungite
“It is really unprecedented. It is the first time a group of donors of this level of wealth has met like that behind closed doors in what is in essence a billionaires’ club,” said Ian Wilhelm, senior writer at the Chronicle of Philanthropy magazine.
The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword.
On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works.
Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.
Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already ‘improved’ the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world.
But can the richest people on earth actually ‘save’ the planet?
The President’s House of Rockefeller University is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The university’s private campus, full of lush green trees, lies behind guarded entrances and a metal fence. It overlooks the East River, only a few blocks away from the United Nations.
It was here, at 3pm on 5 May (2009), that the Good Club gathered.
The university’s chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.
The president’s house is frequently used for university events, but rarely can it have played host to such a powerful conclave.
“The fact that they pulled this off, meeting in the middle of New York City, is just absolutely amazing,” said Niall O’Dowd, an Irish journalist who broke the story on the website irishcentral.com.
For six hours, the assembled billionaires discussed the crises facing the world.
Each was allowed to speak for 15 minutes.
The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease.
One of the themes was new ways to get ordinary people to donate small amounts to global issues.
Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.
“He tried to dominate, which I think annoyed some of the others,” said one source.
Winfrey, meanwhile, was said to have been in a contemplative, listening mood.
That the group should have met at all is indicative of the radical ways in which philanthropy has changed over the past two decades. The main force behind that change is Gates and his decision to donate almost all his fortune to ‘bettering’ the world…
Unlike the great philanthropists of former ages, Gates is young enough and active enough to take a full hands-on role in his philanthropy and craft it after his own ideas.
That example has been followed by others, most notably Soros, Turner and Buffett. Indeed, this new form of philanthropy, where retired elite businessmen try to change the world, has even been dubbed,
“Billanthropy” after Gates.
Another description is “philanthro-capitalism”.
Yet the implications of the development of philanthro-capitalism are profound.
It was fitting that the Good Club was meeting near the UN. The club members’ extreme wealth makes it as powerful as some of the nations with seats inside that august chamber.
Proponents of philanthro-capitalism would argue that they are also more effective in doing good for ordinary people. Indeed the club’s members have given away about $70bn in the past 12 years.
That is far beyond what many individual countries can afford to do with their own social policies and aid budgets.
“They have assets that rival the social spending budgets of many countries,” said Professor Paul Schervish, director of Boston College’s Centre on Wealth and Philanthropy.
There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with a current endowment of more than $30bn, is the biggest philanthropic organization ever. Just one of its projects, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is estimated by the WHO to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.
The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.
These ‘titans’ of philanthropy have also started a trend among the slightly less wealthy.
While Gates’s and Soros’s efforts bestride the world, major philanthropists have emerged in specific regions like India or Latin America funding their own pet ideas and projects.
Gayle Peterson, co-founder of Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services, recently gave advice to a businessman who wanted to set up a foundation to give away $280m annually in south-east Asia.
“He told us: I want to be just like Bill Gates,” she said.
But there is a potential downside to the growth of these “über donors”, especially if the whims of individuals start to take precedence over the expertise of professionals.
The strange truth is that giving away billions of dollars is difficult and fraught with risk.
There can be waste, mismanagement and poor investment.
At the same time it can actually do harm.
“If you are putting enormous amounts of money into a community that can’t cope with it, then you can implode that community,” Peterson said.
Others are even more outspoken at the growing dominance of a tiny handful of billionaires in the development sector.
“The problem with any Good Club is that all the people might not be ‘good’.
Or at least not ‘good’ in universal definitions,” said Louise Uwacu, the Rwandan-born founder of the Canadian education charity Positivision.
There is also the issue of accountability.
Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure.
But who votes for the Good Club?
Such skeptical sentiments might spring from the Good Club‘s decision to meet in such secrecy in New York. In many ways that was understandable.
All its members are sensitive about privacy because of their unique mixes of fame and wealth.
The covert nature of the discussion also allowed them to speak freely about sensitive issues.
“I think they just wanted to be able to be candid. The secrecy allowed that,” said Wilhelm.
But some people are crying conspiracy.
The cloak-and-dagger aspect of the meeting has prompted some to accuse the Good Club of being a sort of Bilderberg Group for philanthropy, with an equally,
nefarious agenda of global power politics…
That idea has particular power on the christian right of America, which has reacted angrily to the idea that the club discussed birth control and overpopulation.
Experts in the philanthropy field think that this negative image can be countered by more openness for future Good Club meetings.
“If they do hold more meetings, and every indication is that they will, I think people would want them to be more public. After all, they can make decisions that affect millions of peoples’ lives,” said Wilhelm.
That is true…
If the members of the Good Club wish to wield their undoubted power, they may have to get used to the idea of doing it more openly.
The American tradition of great donors
Bill Gates The co-founder of Microsoft is the biggest philanthropist the world has ever seen.
Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he controls more than $30bn in assets – not bad for a computer geek from Seattle.
Often ranked as the world’s richest man, he has donated virtually his entire fortune to philanthropy, focusing on combating diseases in the developing world.
Henry Ford As well as being the father of the US car industry and the inventor of the modern production line, Ford has been a major force in philanthropy.
He made a vast fortune and left virtually all of it to the Ford Foundation, which by 2007 had more than $13bn in assets.
George Soros Hungarian-born Soros is a hugely successful US currency speculator and financier.
But he is also well known for his philanthropic works. Focusing on political democratization and creating an independent media, he has funded projects mainly in the former Soviet republics.
A political liberal, he is also a funder of the Centre for American Progress.
Andrew Carnegie This Scottish-born American industrialist made a huge fortune in steel and industry at the end of the 19th century.
He devoted the rest of his life to philanthropy, especially education, founding libraries, museums and universities in Britain and America.
He wrote of the responsibilities of the wealthy in two books, Triumphant Democracy and the Gospel of Wealth.
John D Rockefeller The man whose name became a byword for unimaginable wealth made his fortune in oil.
Often regarded as the richest person in history, Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in effective retirement, setting up various foundations and funding philanthropic causes.
His special interests were in the fields of science and medicine.
Ok. Let’s cut to chase here with regards the Russia v. Ukraine conflict.
It’s all about G.O.D. Gold, Oil and Drugs basically.
Gold is a scarce commodity that is used by the likes of the Federal Reserve (fed) and the Bank of England (b of e) as a form collateral when things go a bit wayward on the stock markets. But, just think for a moment who controls the fed and the b of e? Who controls the markets? Who’s always embroiled in the background – protected by layers of agents and accomplices? The secret society.
Map of Ukraine.
You probably don’t need me to tell you that there is collection of elite families and organisations who pull the strings that their puppets dance to, and it’s just the same situation you’ll find here where the likes of Bo and Jo (Johnson and Biden) will try and put pressure on ex KGB agent Vladimir Putin to see who crumbles first. But, Putin is a smart cookie well versed in self defence and capable of looking after himself. He’s corrupt, don’t get me wrong. But, show me a politician that isn’t.
The central banks want us to think of the Russian leader as a “big bad monster.” They’ll have the papers and the tv publish a narrative to make him appear as a brutish thug whose only intent is total domination of a neighbouring country which is rich in natural resources. That is the key here.
Ukraine today holds the second biggest known gas reserves in Europe and around 400 million barrels of proven oil reserves, ranking 51st in the world and accounting for the world’s total oil reserves of 1,650,585,140,000 barrels, give or take a few.
Ukraine has proven reserves equivalent to 4.4 times its annual consumption. That’s not to be sniffed at.
Is it any wonder, therefore, that both the Yanks and the Ruskies want a bit of it? That’s also why Germany is getting itchy feet because if things start getting a bit heavy then its banking cartel and its security will be tested to the max. That’s why Germany is treading carefully so as not to step on Putin’s toes.
Ukraine is heavily dependent on fossil fuels and nuclear power for its energy needs, but who can forget about the Chernobyl nuclear disaster? It occurred in the Ukraine. Nuclear power stations produce waste product in the form of plutonium that can be used in bombs for submarines and planes of course.
Ever wondered why did America and the CIA invaded Afghanistan? For its opium, in a nutshell. It created a psyop so that it could plunder the country into chaos, people would leave and become refugees, and those who remained would either have to fight back or be controlled by the Taliban.
Now China and Russia are teaming up to corner the oil market with a gold back currency via the Chinese Yuan. Bye bye U.S. dollar that fuels the fed’s central bank globally. China has a slough of dark factions too of course, as does Russia.
President Xi of China and Putin of Russia are behind the scenes, on the same page with this push to dethrone the dollar and return the gold standard.
Recently oil dropped to a negative cost for the first time ever, think of what that does to the price of petrol per barrel.
If I charge you negative 5 pounds for a loaf of bread that means I have to give you the bread with 5 quid as well as the loaf of bread too. It’s the same with a barrel of oil. Countries have to pay people to receive oil, and its people have to pay in dollars in order to get oil from the oil kingpin Saudi Arabia, hence it being the petro-dollar and the world reserve currency. No oil, no economic fuel.
It’s been this way since the 1973 Arab-Israeli deal Henry Kissinger made with the Saudi Royal family two years after the gold standard was abolished amidst a fuel crisis and a quadrupling in the price of crude oil and a global demand v. supply concern.
They want the world to believe that the Government will protect the oil reserves with its military and make everyone pay for oil with the fiat paper known as the dollar. Funny money if you like, the kind that they print themselves for their own means when it suits.
Now Saudi has to pay U.S. dollars to people so they take their oil. Redistribution of dollars, etching Saudi’s global ruling via oil out of the equation leaving room for Russia becoming the new oil source leveraging for a gold backed currency.
But, of course, no layman on a minimum wage can afford to buy vasts reserves of gold as a backup when inflation hits and the price of a loaf of bread or petrol gies up…only a wealthy and powerful elite can afford to do that.
(Incidentally, Gold is not that scarce a commodity really. That’s a myth that has been carefully and deliberately constructed to make you believe that it is so that the likes of the De Beers can control the supply and demand of it. It is hard to find, but there’s plenty of it if you know where to look).
May reduce blood uric acid levels and help prevent gout attacks.
Helps prevent iron deficiency.
Boosts immunity.
Protects your memory and thinking as you age.
So, they don’t want you or I to have gold. They don’t want us heading for them hills where there be gold. They want us locked in debt between paydays, basically. They want us tied to chains of debt slavery and usury AKA lending with high interest rates that are impossible to pay off leaving people in more and more debt every time they buy something, even just to survive. This causes the dollar (the current recognised / accepted global currency of exchange) to hyper inflate and the cost of living to rise more and more until the next thing you know you more people are living on the streets or in need of food banks just to get by. If you don’t see that now the way things are going right there’s going to be a massive collapse in the markets and a global financial meltdown just around the corner. I think it’s only a matter of time because it is engineered to happen that way.
Fast forward today and BoJo wants to sanction Russia. He’s only doing what his masters are telling him to do like the static-haired buffoon that he is. He is not daft, but he is dangerous, arguably more so than Putin I would say.
Sanctions undermine the trade deficit that props up the dollar that enslaves the world. But, Putin is ten steps ahead of the game.
Talking of games, Putin has kept ties with a group akin to Abstergo Industries, that which Assassin’s Creed based Abstergo off of.
This real-life group has played a primary role in technological development all across the board and is a Templar organization. Putin is believed to be a Teutonic Knight which is a knight of the German house of Saint Mary of Jerusalem. Their history with Russia is interesting to note. The Templars have been widely (though not completely) corporatized by the Roman papacy ever since they were called to be rounded up by the pope and French crown back in 1307.
“Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal…
The short response is: never.
Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy
that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus ‘pandemic’
marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.” Klaus Schwab
World Economic Forum
20 More Reasons Why a COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ Never Existed
As demonstrated throughout the first article in this series, the so-called ‘pandemic’ that changed the course of human history is nothing like we’ve been told by “official” sources and mainstream media marionettes.
The real ‘pandemic’ being perpetrated against humanity is one of unprecedented tyranny, lies, and corruption.
While the world has been set on fire with the flames of vaccine mandates, food and supply shortages, hyperinflation, unemployment, and police state crackdowns, the global cabal sitting atop this wide-reaching catastrophe is steadily implementing plans to reshape and reset the world to their advantage.
Aided by the current crop of political dictators, Big Tech tyrants, medical mafiosos, and a whole host of public-private partners, the agenda to rob us of everything (remember, you’ll own nothing and be happy) including the right to refuse medicine is happening at warp speed.
They have been planning this for a couple of centuries. We are experiencing the poisonous fruits of their efforts in a real live drill for control of the planet.
Remember, the reason we are in this plight is because of the declared state of emergency issued by President Trump and continued under the Biden regime.
Leaders from many other countries also followed the same script. Again, if the “‘pandemic'” can be proven to be fraudulent, then all emergency executive orders and mandates must be immediately revoked!
It is important that this information is shared so that the ‘pandemic’ illusion can be completely shattered.
These additional 20 facts will further invalidate that this emergency ever truly existed:
#21 – Hydroxychloroquine was sidelined to make sure vaccines were the only available treatment for COVID-19
On March 30, 2020 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the emergency use of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine to treat COVID-19.
On May 22, 2020 The Lancet, one of the most reputable medical journals in the world, published a study concluding that Hydroxychloroquine‘kills’ more patientsand is a dangerous drug.
See more about this unprecedented scandal here and here.
Dr. Anthony Fauci continued to insist that Hydroxychloroquine (an FDA approved drug in use for over 60 years) is not an effective treatment for COVID-19, despite numerous worldwide studies that concluded that it is.
Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Rischaccused Fauci of,
running a ‘misinformation campaign’ against Hydroxychloroquine…
Hydroxychloroquine satisfied the criteria for the classification, but would have stood in the way of other lucrative drugs and a vaccine…
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) even sued the FDA for withholding from the public some 60 million doses of Hydroxychloroquine that were donated by drug manufacturers to treat coronavirus patients.
Please see the following list of studies proving that Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19 here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
#22 – Props were used to make the “‘pandemic'” look worse than it actually was
In March 2020, U.S. states and countries around the world began constructing makeshift hospital facilities to accommodate the expected surge of COVID-19 patients.
New York anticipated needing an extra 87,000 beds as the Javits Center was converted into a hospital by the Army Corp of Engineers.
The U.S.S. Comfort was also deployed to New York City while the U.S.S. Mercy was deployed to Los Angeles. This was all a sham, meant to trick the public into thinking the situation was much more dire than reality.
An article in the Navy Times revealed the truth about these makeshift facilities, stating:
By the time of Comfort’s departure, the approximately 1,200-person crew and 1,000-bed hospital had treated just 182 patients, of which approximately 70 percent had COVID-19, according to Capt. Patrick Amersbach, commanding officer of the Comfort’s Medical Treatment Facility.
Underutilization of added medical resources in New York City is not unique to the Comfort.
Thousands of hospital beds made available in a converted convention center have gone largely unused after quick assembly by the Army Corps of Engineers.
The Javits Center, which was initially envisioned as a 2,500-bed field hospital for non-COVID-19 patients, converted to coronavirus-only hospital shortly after going operational.
Still, the highest number of patients treated at the convention center at one time topped out at close to 500.
Similarly, the U.S.S. Mercy had only treated 77 non-infected patients by the time it departed the port of Los Angeles.
News media were also caught faking stories to stir up fear.
In an interview on CNN, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcickijustified censorship of opinions not supported by “authoritative sources,” stating,
“anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so, removing information is another really important part of our policy.”
Countless individuals, organizations, medical professionals, and political figures were censored, suspended, or completely de-platformed for expressing opinions or citing factual information that poked holes in the story spun by entities like,
the WHO, CDC, FDA, the White House, and United Nations…
Solving a “‘pandemic'” is not like a mathematical equation where there can only be one right answer.
Censorship of differing views and factual information is not a scientific principle, but a totalitarian one that actually violates the scientific method.
#24 – Surprise! COVID-19 doesn’t just infect humans
Since coronaviruses are very common and were “discovered” in the 1960s,
doesn’t this reinforce that these tests are pointless for diagnosing illness, but perfect for creating hysteria and the justification for draconian measures?
A USA Today article from February 2020 documented Fauci’s original stance on masks:
The only people who need masks are those who are already infected to keep from exposing others.
The masks sold at drugstores aren’t even good enough to truly protect anyone, Fauci said.
“If you look at the masks that you buy in a drugstore, the leakage around that doesn’t really do much to protect you,” he said.
“People start saying, ‘Should I start wearing a mask?’ Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.”
In a Dave Rubenstein Show interview in May 2019, Fauci called mask wearing “paranoid” and advised against it as protection against infectious diseases.
An article byBill Hennessy documented the New England Journal of Medicine’s stance on masks, citing:
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes).
The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the ‘pandemic’.
Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.
On April 3, 2020 the initial sentiment around universal masking was reversed when President Trump announced that the CDC recommended that citizens wear cloth face masks in public to stop the spread of the virus.
States then began issuing mask mandates even for children, and the controversy about their usage has never gone away.
There have been hundreds of face mask studies.
One of the best compilations can be found on Life Site News, where they cite 47 studies that confirm masks are ineffective for COVID-19 and 32 additional studies that confirm they have negative health effects.
So, the overwhelming scientific consensus confirms what we were told from the very beginning:
“In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.”
Nitrogen Dioxide exposure. A research article in Science Direct, originally published in April 2020, concluded that chronic exposure to Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) could have contributed to COVID-19 fatalities in places like Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and “maybe across the whole world.”
Air Pollution.Harvard scientists discovered that a small increase in long-term exposure to air pollution (fine particulate matter – PM5) led to a large increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Wuhan (China), New York City, Lombardy (Italy), and many of the initial coronavirus hotspots also have extremely high levels of air pollution. Could people who were poisoned by air pollution have been misdiagnosed with COVID-19? See also here.
Vitamin B1 deficiency (beriberi) and tuberculosis. A fascinating series of articles by health journalist Bill Sardi document how COVID-19 symptoms such as,
“racing heart, chronic headache, crushing fatigue and even shortness of breath can only be explained by a deficiency of vitamin B1.
No coronavirus, flu bug, or any other infection produces the symptoms observed with COVID-19.”
Even the world-renowned British Medical Journal said social distancing was based on outdated science.
Could it really be that social distancing was actually borne from a teenage girl’s science project and adopted as a worldwide policy to keep people apart and afraid of each other?
Prominent medical researcher Knutt M. Wittkowski criticized the lockdown approach saying, “With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity.About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children.So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible…”
Researchers at Well Being Trust and the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care estimated that 75,000 people could die from alcohol, drug abuse and suicide, calling them “deaths of despair.”
The application of lockdowns was arbitrary and inconsistent. Why were liquor and cannabis stores allowed to stay open when churches were forced to close? Why were some businesses (mostly big box stores and major corporations) deemed essential while others were shuttered and forced to apply for government handouts just to survive?
If lockdowns worked, the “pandemic” should have ended as early as summer 2020!
Much more could be said on this topic, but I think you get the point.
#29 – Quarantining healthy people is tyrannical and goes against all conventional wisdom
The Great Barrington Declaration, signed by close to 60,000 scientists and medical professionals and over 800,000 lay people, advised that only the sick should be quarantined.
The declaration states,
“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.
We call this Focused Protection.”
Focused Protection has been standard practice for every previous epidemic or ‘pandemic’ situation. Healthy people should be free to resume normal life and risk exposure.
National and regional lockdowns which quarantine the healthy with the sick are nonsensical and have only served to prolong the “‘pandemic'” situation.
“children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill…even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”
Data from WorldOMeter showed that children aged 0-17 years have a 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID-19 deaths, which is essentially zero.
“From a clinical standpoint, most children 1 to 18 years old experience mild or no illness from COVID-19 and are much less likely than adults to face severe consequences from the infection.”
Scott Atlas, former member of Trump’s coronavirus task force, stated,
“We know who is at risk. Only 0.2 percent of U.S. deaths have been people younger than 25, and 80 percent have been in people over 65; the average fatality age is 78.”
A JAMA Pediatrics study of North American pediatric hospitals flatly stated that,
“our data indicate that children are at far greater risk of critical illness from influenza than from COVID-19.”
#31 – Though often vilified, marginalized, and censored, other treatments for COVID-19 exist and are proven to be effective, including:
I have already documented the many exercises, documents, legal proceedings, and conferences that have taken place (please see The Back Story and The Ramp Up from my COVID Chronicles series).
Since all this planning has been taking place for at least 20 years, why did everything go so poorly?
#36 – Governments have tried to inflate illnesses into ‘pandemic’s when not justified before
You would think that with the foreknowledge gathered during the various ‘pandemic’ exercises conducted over the last two decades, something simple like shutting down air travel in the place where the outbreak first occurred would have been one of the first priorities.
However, that did not happen.
Why is that?
#38 – Constant confusion and misinformation from public health and government officials keep people fearful and bewildered
Remember the mantra “order out of chaos” because this is the modus operandi of the “global elite.”
They have purposefully sowed confusion and chaos regarding the nature of the “virus,” where it originated, how it is transmitted, its lethality, how variants emerge, how the tests work, whether one can develop natural immunity, if masks work and if so, how many need to be worn, and on and on.
They continually contradict previous statements that seemed definitive at the time, keeping the naïve public constantly off balance and in a perpetual state of cognitive dissonance.
Why anyone still trusts anything coming out of their constantly lying orifices is completely baffling!
Nevertheless, many still do trust, and their ignorance and obedience serve to perpetuate the “‘pandemic'” and the slippery slope to complete tyranny!
#39 – The “‘pandemic'” ushered in the rise of authoritarian leadership just as predicted in the 2010 Rockefeller Report (see page 18)
Under the guise of public health and safety, governments committed all kinds of atrocities in the name of keeping people safe.
#40 – We were immediately and repeatedly told that only a vaccine could remedy the “‘pandemic'” and get us back to normal.
How in the world did people like Bill Gates, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, and countless others know instantly that a vaccine was the only way out of the “‘pandemic'”?
By now it should be obvious that from the outset, the entire goal of this “‘pandemic'” has been to inoculate the entire planet with a “vaccine.”
Why else would all other treatments (besides Big Pharma-backed ones like Remdesivir) be banned or vilified? Why else would there be so much pressure to roll up one’s sleeve and take the jab?
Why else would there be so much propaganda regarding how “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccines are, when there is so much evidence to the contrary?
Since the vaccination campaigns began, most countries are still not back to normal (especially in places like Australia and Italy). The goalpost keeps getting moved while authoritarian mandates and controls accelerate.
It is just like Rockefeller predicted and Schwab and Ghebreyesus have stated – We will not be returning to normal.
The Joke’s On Us
Unless people wake up and realize that this entire “‘pandemic'” has been an excuse to install global governance and increase authoritarian control, these cabalists may get their wish.
Now that you are armed with the facts, it is your duty to spread this information far and wide!
RESISTANCE IS MANDATORY if you want to live freely.
Even before the ‘pandemic’ hit, I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible, but probably absolutely necessary…
We will not go back to where we were when the ‘pandemic’ started. That is pretty certain…”
The whole world is under the power of an evil spell.
The specters of the past like Nazism, Fascism, Communism, and Technocracy are rapidly converging across the globe and hurling us towards a true prison planet where authoritarian rule is commonplace.
None of this would have been possible without State of Emergency declarations being implemented in countries worldwide to stop the so-called coronavirus “‘pandemic’.”
Authoritarian governments love emergency powers and executive orders because they provide cover to implement all manner of draconian dictates essentially destroying free speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of the press all in the name of keeping people safe.
What if the pretext for declaring a ‘pandemic’ and locking down billions of people was all just a ruse?
What if all that’s happened over the past 18 months had nothing to do with a global health crisis?
What if many of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 could have stemmed from other causes?
What if the reason for declaring a ‘pandemic’ was destroy the current world system and institute a “new normal” New World Order?
There is an abundance of evidence suggesting that the coronavirus “‘pandemic'” is nothing but a global social engineering project meant to get people used to obeying mandates and dictates from local, state, federal, and even international powers.
The following statement from World Economic Forum leaderKlaus Schwab seems to indicate there is indeed another purpose for the crisis:
If it can be proven that there was never a real ‘pandemic’, then all instituted measures including lockdowns, masking, social distancing, contact tracing, vaccination, and vaccine passports are totally unnecessary, unethical, unlawful, and must be stopped immediately!
There have been thousands of articles written about the devastating repercussions each one of these “safety” measures has wrought against humanity.
This two-part article will tie together many facts that when considered together, will destroy the illusion that humanity ever faced a dire “‘pandemic’.”
The list is in no particular order and links to source material are included for reference and further investigation.
Much of this research could not have been achieved without the work of so many independent journalists and alternative media outlets.
Now, let’s begin the journey and delve into the first twenty reasons why a COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ never existed.
#1 – COVID-19 symptoms are largely indistinguishable from symptoms of other common illnesses
The CDC had to recall over 32,000 test kits that had been shipped to state public health labs. In April 2020, CDC officials confirmed that COVID-19 test kits sent out to states in February were tainted with the coronavirus.
The test can only detect the presence of genetic material having a variety of origins.
Positivity levels for COVID-19 depend largely on what cycle threshold tests are set for. Anything above 30-35 cycles is likely to produce false positive results.
According to the New York Times, most U.S. labs set the cycle threshold at 40, meaning test results are highly likely to indicate false positive results.
The CDC even admitted that a positive PCR test result does not necessarily indicate that COVID-19 is the definitive cause of disease and may be other bacterial infections or co-infection with other viruses.
Thousands and potentially millions of people tested positive for COVID-19 though they had no symptoms. Officials and the media were complicit in creating a “casedemic” where healthy people were told they were sick because of a positive test!
“Detecting the Delta variant, or other variants, requires a special type of testing called genomic sequencing. Due to the volume of COVID-19 cases, sequencing is not performed on all viral samples.
However, because the Delta variant now accounts for the majority of COVID-19 cases in the United States, there is a strong likelihood that a positive test result indicates infection with the Delta variant.”
Armed with these facts, how can there be an epidemic of “Delta” variant infections when the PCR test can’t detect it and the required genomic sequencing tests aren’t being performed and haven’t yet been federally approved?
According to a Public Health England report (page 8) from June 18, 2021, the case fatality rate for the Delta variant was 0.1%, about the same rate as the flu.
#6 – Asymptomatic transmission is a myth
Before the current state of scientific lunacy, you had to actually have symptoms to be diagnosed as being sick from a disease or virus.
The COVID-19 “‘pandemic'” turned things around 180 degrees where you could test positive for the virus, but never show any symptoms.
A December 2020 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) revealed:
Symptomatic people infect someone else in the house 18% of the time.
Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people only infected someone else 0.7% of the time.
The study concluded that,
“these findings are consistent with other household studies reporting asymptomatic index cases as having limited role in household transmission.”
If it’s virtually impossible to contract COVID-19 from someone without symptoms you live with, how is it possible to contract it from interacting with asymptomatic people in public places?
A study by Chinese researchers published by the NIHs National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) revealed that none of the 455 individuals exposed to asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers for 4-5 days later tested positive for the disease.
The study’s conclusion states:
“In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak.”
In June 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s Emerging Diseases and Zoonosis unit publicly stated that asymptomatic carriersvery rarely transmit the coronavirus…
As this admission began to make major news, Dr. Van Kerkhove and the WHO quickly backtracked, “reassuring” everyone that asymptomatic people can spread the virus.
So, which is true?
Perhaps the words of Dr. Anthony Fauci (in one of the rare times he’s told the truth) will help clear the confusion, see here.
Case closed…!
#7 – Over 80% of people who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and placed on ventilators died
Last year Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell sparked controversy with a viral video stating that patients being put on ventilators were dying at an alarming rate.
These examples prove that it was medical malpractice that killed thousands of people, not COVID-19.
#8 – Nursing homes and long-term care facilities comprised a large portion of COVID-19 deaths worldwide
Many of the deaths that created the initial “‘pandemic'” panic were elderly patients in nursing homes and long-term care facilities.
In June 2020,USA Today documented 40,600 deaths among nursing home residents and believed this number to be an undercount.
The Atlantic corroborated this total and also pointed out that,
“state and federal officials seem to be doing little to protect the elderly from further devastation.”
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo should have been heldpersonally responsible for many of these deaths after issuing an executive order allowing COVID-19 positive and infectious patients to be moved to nursing homes for treatment.
A May 2020 The Guardian article revealed that “90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes.”
In Belgium, more than half of coronavirus deaths were those in care homes. Spain and Italy also had similar numbers.
How many elderly patients truly died from COVID and not some other underlying cause like cancer? Even worse, how many may have been deliberately killed?
A damning NHS document revealed that many nursing and care facility patients were potentially given a fatal dose of Midazolam, a drug used for sedation therapy in critically ill patients.
#10 – Doctors and hospitals were paid more to diagnose patients with COVID-19
The corruption in our health care system cannot be overstated.
According to S. Senator Dr. Scott Jensen, hospitals were given $13,000 for every COVID-19 diagnosis (up from $5,000 for a typical lump sum payment) and $39,000 for every COVID-19 patient using a ventilator by the NIH.
A CDC memo dated March 24, 2020 from Steven Schwartz, PhD and Director – Division of Vital Statistics advised coroners and medical examiners to report COVID-19 fatalities for those who did not receive a positive test result as long as it was assumedit caused or contributed to the death.
In April 2020, CDC began counting coronavirus cases and deaths not confirmed by lab testing, allowing numbers to be falsely inflated.
A U.S. News & World Report article stated that as a result in the change in guidance from the CDC,
“There was already a big rise in New York City, where officials this week started counting people who had never tested positive for the coronavirus.
That caused the city’s death count to jump by more than 3,700 on Tuesday.”
COVID-19 deaths have been greatly exaggerated from the outset.
The CDC has admitted that people who have died from “COVID-19” have had an average of 4 comorbidities (see Table 3), including conditions such as heart failure, diabetes, and cancer.
Doesn’t it make sense that one or a combination of these other health conditions led to their death?
The CDC data also reveals that only over 5% of deaths recorded on official death certificates were attributed solely to COVID-19 as of Sept. 5, 2021.
This means that around 95% of recorded deaths were not from COVID-19!
Project Veritas exposed the accounts of several directors and workers at New York funeral homes, who admitted that COVID-19 was being written on the death certificate (when it was not the true cause of death) for political and monetary reasons.
“the provisional leading cause-of-death rankings for 2020 indicate that COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in the U.S. behind heart disease and cancer.”
So, with all of the hype and hoopla about a ‘pandemic’, more people died from heart disease and cancer as is typical of any other year.
In an article from the BMJ, Dr. John Ioannidis indicated there were several other causes for excess deaths stating,
“Under lockdown conditions many patients with acute, treatable conditions (such as coronary syndromes) avoid seeking care.
This disruption may be seen in the excess deaths accruing so far in the COVID-19 lockdown. Patients with cancer whose treatment is delayed have worse outcomes.
And when patients avoid hospitals many health systems suffer financially, furlough personnel, and cut services.
COVID-19 overwhelmed a few dozen hospitals, but COVID-19 Countermeasures have already jeopardized thousands of them.”
“the total amount of excess mortality [attributed to COVID-19] will also depend on the age structure of a population.
Countries with age structures weighted towards an older population will experience higher mortality than a country with an age structure weighted towards a younger population.”
In June 2020, a study revealed that nearly one-third of excess deaths in the early stages of the coronavirus ‘pandemic’ in the United States were linked to causes other than COVID-19.
Study author Dr. Steven Woolf stated,
“People who never had the virus may have died from other causes because of the spillover effects of the ‘pandemic’, such as delayed medical care, economic hardship or emotional distress.”
There is no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers
The total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19
Deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19
The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths.
The WHO altered the ‘pandemic’ definition by deleting “severity of illness” and focusing on the number of cases rather than the number of deaths.
Some WHO scientists responsible for creating ‘pandemic’ policies were being paid by the very pharmaceutical companies creating the vaccines and antivirals that would be used if a ‘pandemic’ was declared.
The 2009 ‘pandemic’ definition.
An influenza ‘pandemic’ occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.
#15 – WHO deleted the references to naturally acquired immunity from its website
Once known as a basic staple in virology, the definition of herd immunity, also called naturally acquired immunity, was completely redefined by the WHO in a matter of months.
No longer did natural immunity mean that a person could be protected from a viral infection because of previous exposure or vaccination; the new definition only emphasized protection from vaccination!
The new definition serves to benefit vaccine makers and pigeonholes humanity into seeking protection from vaccines only.
Ghebreyesus is the first WHO Director not to have this distinction.
He is a Marxist Communist who had a key role in leading the murderous communist organization known as the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).
In addition, Ghebreyesus was accused of carrying out genocide through forced vaccination, chemical sterilization and abortion, when holding the post of Ethiopian Minister of Health between 2005 and 2012 by the Amhara Professional Union (APU), an Ethiopian civic organization.
To reiterate, the person responsible for declaring a global ‘pandemic’ and creating mass hysteria and fear to stop an “invisible enemy” is not a medical doctor and is accused of genocide!
During a special session of the WHO’s 34-member executive board on October 5, 2020, WHO officials (inadvertently) revealed that 10% of the world population had been infected with coronavirus.
This totaled to about 780 million cases.
At the time, the global death toll attributed to COVID-19 was 1,061,539. This would equate to a fatality rate of 0.14%, about the same rate as seasonal flu deaths.
“While 2019-nCoV has never been seen before, it’s part of a family of viruses that are well-known both to doctors and the public; the common cold, for example, can be caused by certain coronaviruses.
And while influenza is not a coronavirus, it isn’t so different from 2019-nCoV, either… The things we take for granted actually do work. It doesn’t matter what the virus is.
“So far, there have been an estimated 19 million cases of flu, 180,000 hospitalizations and 10,000 deaths in the U.S. this influenza season – including 68 children.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci and former CDC Director Robert Redfield stated,
“the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a ‘pandemic’ influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively”,
…in a published statement by the New England Journal of Medicine on February 28, 2020.
As early as March 19, 2020, Public Health England (PHE) downgraded COVID-19 from the status of a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID).
This is significant because according to the definition of a HCID, COVID-19 was not acutely infectious, did not typically have a high case fatality rate, or require an enhanced individual, population and system response to ensure it was managed effectively, efficiently and safely.
During a press conference on April 30, 2020, British Chief Medical Officer Chris Witty, stated,
“the great majority of people will not die from this… Of those who get symptoms, the great majority, probably 80%, will have a mild or moderate disease.
Might be bad enough for them to have to go to bed for a few days, not bad enough for them to have to go to the doctor.”
One could argue that these statements were made early on before the COVID fatality rate was properly understood.
However, the death rate has remained consistent throughout the entire “‘pandemic'” and proves that it has always been more flu like than anything else.
#18 – Predictions based on false ‘pandemic’ models led to lockdowns and harsh measures to “stop the spread” of the “virus”
In May 2020, this prediction went up in smoke as the mathematical code was deemed sh*tcode.
Neil Ferguson, the author of the code/report resigned his position as it was revealed he violated the lockdown by having his married lover visit his home.
Governments around the world including the U.S. used this fake computer model to justify strict lockdowns that caused extreme economic hardship, depression, unemployment, and “unintended” negative medical consequences.
#19 – Deborah Birx, former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, backed another fraudulent coronavirus model
The IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) coronavirus model (also funded by Bill Gates) used data from New York and New Jersey (where some of the heaviest concentration of COVID-19 cases were occurring at the time) and applied it to the rest of the U.S., creating a completely false and unrealistic outcome.
This prediction was used to further instill fear that death tolls and hospitalizations would drastically rise, further justifying the continuation of lockdowns.
The same IHME predicted that up to 2,800 daily deaths within 11 days and a final death total as high as 75,000 would occur if Sweden didn’t enact strict social distancing measures.
For Sweden, the daily death peak was actually 75% lower than the baseline prediction and 96% lower than the worst-case prediction.
#20 – The SARS-CoV-2 virus has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED, only sequenced by a computer
Anxiety, depression, and fear ravage so many today, but few pause to consider that in addition to the material influences in our lives, we may be also under the influence of beings which exist in dimensions outside of our ordinary perception…
But there is much more to reality than what we can see. feel, hear, taste and touch.
In fact, an accounting of the matter that makes up the universe reveals that some 73% of it is made up of dark energy, and another 23% is made up of dark matter, neither of which can we see, nor understand.
Furthermore, the human eye is only capable of seeing around 0.0035% of the entire spectrum of electromagnetic (EM) radiation.
When we look into the heavens, 96% of it is invisible to us.
Include in this the spiritual realms.
There is an entire universe of possibilities which exists beyond our five senses.
Very few scientists today are willing to explore metaphysics to examine life beyond ordinary perception in order to make a connection between the seen and the unseen.
Rudolf Steiner, though, one of the most prolific and gifted scientists, philosophers, and esotericists of his time, devoted much of his work to the task of peering behind the veil, sharing his insight into the deeper nature of life and of the world beyond.
Regarding anxiety and depression, Steiner spoke of hostile beings in the spiritual world which influence and feed off of human emotion; a concept flatly rejected by most today.
Yet this also analysis holds true for shamans and others who access the spiritual dimensions in order to alleviate mental suffering for their patients.
On the existence of similar entities which exist in other dimensions, Steiner wrote:
“There are beings in the spiritual realms for whom anxiety and fear emanating from human beings offer welcome food.
When humans have no anxiety and fear, then these creatures starve. People not yet sufficiently convinced of this statement could understand it to be meant comparatively only.
But for those who are familiar with this phenomenon, it is a reality.
Everything that feeds on negative feelings, on anxiety, fear and superstition, despair or doubt, are in reality hostile forces in supersensible worlds, launching cruel attacks on human beings, while they are being fed.
Therefore, it is above all necessary to begin with that the person who enters the spiritual world overcomes fear, feelings of helplessness, despair and anxiety.
But these are exactly the feelings that belong to contemporary culture and materialism.
Because it estranges people from the spiritual world, it is especially suited to evoke hopelessness and fear of the unknown in people, thereby calling up the above mentioned hostile forces against them.”
Rudolf Steiner – GA 56 – Die Erkenntnis der Seele und des Geistes
A concept such as this isn’t readily accepted into the everyday conversation steered by rigid skepticism and scientific materialism.
The traditions of today have sought to expel ancient metaphysical wisdom and its practical application from our lives, and though scientific inquiry is exceptionally valuable, spiritual perception has always been a part of our experience.
“And yet, despite the cynical skepticism, all of the ancient mystery schools, true shamanic insights, and esoteric teachings (much of which have been suppressed and/or distorted over thousands of years for obvious reasons) have conveyed this truth for ‘the ones with eyes to see and ears to hear’, using their own language and symbolism, be it,
Dealings with extra-sensory or hyper-dimensional beings have long been a part of our history, and are directly accessible to any of us when proper practice and attention is given to the matter.
I know this to be true from my experiences with plant medicine shamanism where it is entirely possible to enter into states of consciousness where entire cosmologies of life exist and are available to interact with.
Finding oneself in the rut of spiraling negative self-talk, depression, crippling anxiety, or uncontrollable, irrational fear, is a sign, as Steiner points out, of a disconnection from our true spiritual nature, exacerbated by beings who operate in the spiritual realms.
This is why some consider disorders like this to be spiritual illnesses, and until the rift is healed with proper attention given to the development of spirit, the feelings tend to exacerbate and drive one further into distress.
“When humans have no anxiety and fear, then these creatures starve.”
Stop The Cabal 