A recent article by the Wall Street Journal has raised concerns about the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccines and the failure of health officials and the media to fully inform the public. According to the article, politics, not science, is behind this lack of information, and clinical trials often do not tell the full story about the safety of medications.
Big Pharma has been known to use various strategies to make potentially dangerous and ineffective drugs appear like a miracle of modern science. Only 32% of studies are positive, and many of those studies are “shortened” to limit long-term findings. This can lead to an overestimation of the effectiveness of the study drug and miss dangerous side effects by an average of 30%.
The media and health officials have not been fully informing the public about the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccines. This failure is being driven by politics, not science. Clinical trials often do not enroll patients who are representative of the general population, and more is learned about drug safety from real-world evidence.
The large clustering of side effects following COVID-19 vaccines is concerning, as is the silence around these potential signals of harm. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are ignoring reported serious COVID-19 vaccine side effects.
In certain populations, such as children, the risks of COVID-19 vaccines may outweigh the benefits. No studies have demonstrated that vaccines prevent the transmission of COVID-
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
Click Image for Details
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
Corona viruses are a large family of viruses which may cause illness in animals or humans. In humans, several corona viruses are known to cause respiratory infections ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). The most recently discovered corona virus causes corona virus disease COVID-19.
What if you are using aspartame? It has many names from NutraSweet and 951 to Neotame, Advantame, Benevia, Canderel, AminoSweet, Spoonful, etc. By law, it requires a PKU warning for those who cannot metabolize phenylalanine which is 50% of the molecule. So, if you see “contains phenylalanine” and warnings that phenylketonurics must not use it, it’s a dead giveaway it probably has aspartame in it.
Aspartame is an excitoneurotoxic, carcinogenic, genetically-engineered drug, an adjuvant and teratogen. As neurosurgeon Dr. Russell Blaylock once said in a lecture: “Understand the reactions are not allergic but toxic like arsenic and cyanide.” It damages the mitochondria, the power house of the cell and interacts with drugs and vaccines.
Symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, tiredness and dry cough. Some patients may have aches and pains, nasal congestion, runny nose, sore throat or diarrhea. Around 1 out of every 6 people who gets COVID-19 becomes seriously ill and develops difficulty breathing..
So, the LAST thing someone with the virus needs to be consuming is a product that causes shortness of breath. It is my personal opinion it may not only make the virus worse but people on aspartame who become infected with this coronavirus may not make it. I’ve seen many cases that appeared to be aspartame cases…and the patient died of the virus. Or, WITH the virus and not because of it.
World expert H. J. Roberts, M.D. has passed on but left a treasury of medical documents. Here is his information on shortness of breath from the medical text, “Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic”, 1000 pages of diseases and horrors, page 404 through 406:
SHORTNESS OF BREATH
“The frequency of “shortness of breath” (dyspnea) in patients consuming aspartame who did not have underlying heart or lung disorders was surprising. Specifically, 110 (9 percent) experienced this symptom. It predictably abated when they avoided aspartame products. For example, a 72 year old woman reported, “My chest felt like it was stuffed,” after using ATS for two weeks. She “felt almost back to normal” within several days after stopping this product.
Several observations are noteworthy.
“Several aspartame reactors described the prompt onset of choking and shortness of breath after chewing aspartame gum (“choker gum”). This was mistaken for a “seizure” in one instance.
“One patient was observed to have swelling of the larynx.
“Decreased secretions in the upper respiratory passages, comparable to “dry eyes” (Chapter IV) and “dry mouth” (Chapter IX-F, may contribute tothe pulmonary symptoms.
“An aspartame reactor developed severe choking while drinking a diet soda on a plane as it climbed to high attitude.
“The occurrence of sleep apnea in aspartame users was discussed in Chapter VI-K
“The FDA noted receiving complaints of “difficulty breathing” from 112 consumers in its April 20, 1995 report.
“The cause and significance of this feature remain puzzling. In the absence of asthma and other allergic features (Chapter VIII) the dyspnea presumably reflects neurotransmitter dysfunction within the brain’s respiratory center.
Representative Case Reports
Case IX-C-1
“A 40-year-old woman stressed that she previously did “not have any problems I cannot handle”. She wrote:
“Help! Last week, I was fortunate to hear you on WWDB radio. I just came home from the hospital. I was in intensive care for two days. (They said I may have a clot on my lung.) After two days they said I did not have a clot, and did not know what was wrong with me. They gave me many tests.
“My symptoms over the last three months have been shortness of breath (I get up in the middle of the night gasping), blurred vision, dizziness, headache, falling (I fell in Center City drunk). I have been to many doctors, and they cannot seem to find what is wrong.
“I called my family doctor when I heard you last week because I drank six to eight glasses of diet cola each day for three years. He said he would look into it.”
Case IX-C-16
“A 35-year-old woman developed “shortness of breath” that persisted. She consulted a number of physicians who variously told her that the cause was stress (despite an exemplary personal and professional life), atypical asthma, and a swollen larynx. Other symptoms included weight gain, hair loss, dizziness, irritability, fatigue, heavy menstrual bleeding, abdominal pain, and dryness of the skin. See also had hypothyroidism.
“The patient probed every aspect of her diet and environmental contacts as her breathing problem intensified. She wrote, “Can you imagine my anxiety at waking up and still not being able to breath? The only unusual aspect of her routine was the daily use of a gum flavored with aspartame. She wrote
“I already spent a small fortune on tests that included asthma studies, upper/lower GIs, ultrasounds, x-rays, blood work, cholesterol, and heart, lung and gynecologic testing. I even considered seeing a psychiatrist. I then stopped using this gum, and felt relief almost immediately. I retested myself numerous times to see if I had really found the answer. I am completely assured that the aspartame caused all my problems. At one later time, I consumed a diet soda, not knowing that they had switched from saccharin to aspartame. Within the hour, I could not catch my breath.”
Case IX-C-17
A female athlete had run from five to 13 miles daily for eight years without incident. Concerned about her weight, she began drinking diet sodas. She then experienced difficulty in breathing while on the treadmill. A physician diagnosed asthma. When numerous x-rays and other studies failed to reveal a cause, the issue of “stress” was raised… to her dismay. Other features included severe headache, memory loss, impairment of vision, numbness/tingling in the extremities, a rapid heart rate, and pain in the joints.
This patient happened to see a flyer on the aspartame disease when she went to purchase a 24 pack of diet soda. As she read the convincing details, “I almost began to cry.”
This is the end of Dr. Robert’s discussion on shortness of breath.
Former FDA Commissioner Herbert L. Lay, Jr., once said: “I am not going to tell you that the FDA has not devised the perfect system for keeping hazardous chemicals out of our foods. You’ll simply have to live with it.”
For over 30 years, I’ve warned on the dangers of aspartame. The horror stories would make you weep and been a victim myself. I went to the hospital for one thing and given probably 30 medications a day for which I protested. One powder said sucrose which is sugar so I thought it was safe. I took it and they sent me home where I stopped breathing. It’s horrible because you can’t get your breath or move to get to a phone. My husband called 911 just in time and they used an oxygen mask. The powder was vanilla flavored. Consider, I would seriously doubt the pharmaceutical industry would use expensive pure vanilla. They use vanillin which is genetically engineered with aspartame. Then the FDA allows Advantame on the market which is a half a molecule of aspartame with a half a molecule of vanillin which studies have shown interaction. Once a victim has used aspartame, they usually are chemically hypersensitive for life. Many carry epi-pens as they may go into anaphylactic shock.
It is difficult to get victims off because of the addiction. Methanol is classified as a narcotic. It causes chronic methanol poisoning which affects the dopamine system of the brain and causes the addiction.
As Dr. Roberts says in his medical text, the transformation of phenylalanine to dopamine and dopamine metabolites is highly relevant. Addictive drugs flood synapses with dopamine, which carries a “pleasure message” from one nerve cell to another in the “reward pathway”…thereby creating a “high”. For instance, cocaine blocks the reuptake of dopamine, and acts as an indirect dopamine agonist. Such repeated rushes can result in desensitization of the brain to dopamine, and perhaps a reduction of dopamine receptors.
A study was done showing aspartame depletes brain neurotransmitters up to74%. I wrote an article about it published in the National Health Federation. https://thenhf.com/2019/03/24/aspartame-depletes-brain-neurotransmitters/ I think they should be highly supported since they get out the facts and are international.
Aspartame is causing all kinds of psychiatric and behavioral problems and even little children are committing suicide. Imagine giving children an asthma drug Singulair with aspartame causing such suffering it hurts to read the emails. Dr. Evelyn Higgins is taking care of patients with drug interactions with aspartame giving them back their life. She writes of a case with Singulair including neuropsychiatric problems. Dr. Ralph Walton, psychiatrist did a study and the reactions were so severe they had to stop it when the administrator had a retinal detachment and lost his vision in one eye: Walton, Ralph G., Robert Hudak, Ruth Green-Waite “Adverse Reactions to Aspartame: Double-Blind Challenge in Patients from a Vulnerable Population” Biological Psychiatry, 1993:34:13-17. 19.
How bad can it get? Just read the Trocho Study by Dr. M. Alemany which shows the formaldehyde converted from the free methyl alcohol embalms living tissue and damages DNA. Imagine the formaldehyde seeping into the cells and in the blood stream. Here is that study: http://www.mpwhi.com/formaldehyde_from_aspartame.pdf Dr. Woodrow Monte wrote “While Science Sleeps: A Sweetener Kills” and says the formaldehyde turns the tissues to plastic.
Aspartame destroys the immune system. In the Journal Of The Diabetic Association Of India 1995 : Vol. 35, No. 4. Emerging Facts About Aspartame by Dr. J. Barua, she said:
“Persons with chronic immune system disorders are often very sensitive to low level chemical exposure including formaldehyde. As stated by the National Resource Council (1981, pg177): “In some persons not previously sensitized, repeated exposure to formaldehyde may result in the development of hypersensitivity.” Fujimaki (1992) & Vojdani (1992) have shown immune system alteration from exposure to formaldehyde.
“Dr. Sherry Rogers, an expert in environmental exposure and chemical sensitivity discusses how aldehydes, especially formaldehyde can cause significant damage in the body (Rogers 1990). She lists the following symptoms found for persons exposed to urea foam formaldehyde insulation (UFFI) at levels of formaldehyde as low as 0.12 ppm: Depression, dizzy or spacey, poor memory, burning eyes or throat, fatigue, flushing of face, inability to concentrate, laryngitis, cant think straight, chronic cough, asthma, “like thinking in a fog”, arthritis feel unreal, rashes, headache, heart palpitations, and much more…… Dr. Rogers cites Main (1983) where adverse health effects to formaldehyde exposure were found at levels between 0.12-1.6 ppm.”
Dr. H. J. Roberts writes in his medical text that the extent to which a hyperimmune population has evolved is pertinent and disturbing.
As to the virus here is what Dr. Gary Kohl’s wrote in one of his articles:
“According to the website www.DoctorsInItaly.com , Italy used a “new” and thus untested-for-safety-or- efficacy flu vaccine starting in September 2019. —–
” However, in September 2019 for the first time – Italy made available a cell-based flu shot, called VIQCC or QIVc. This flu vaccine is produced from animal cells rather than eggs!
“VIQCC is a quadrivalent flu vaccine that contains 2 type A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and 2 type B viruses. It is approved for people ages 9 and older. (To find out more, go to: Everything You Need To Know About The Flu Shot In Italy. – January 13, 2020, at: https://www.doctorsinitaly.com/b/flu-shot/
“Flu Shots Found to Increase the Incidence of Coronavirus Infections
“The Department of Defense study was published in the July 2020 issue of the prestigious journal Vaccine that demonstrated that flu shots were significantly associated with an increased incidence of subsequent coronavirus (as well as metapneumovirus) infections.”
What worries me the most is that aspartame is being put in drugs unlabeled. I have stopped breathing 4 times now and am only alive by the grace of Jehovah God. I have been misdiagnosed, treated for diseases I don’t have and spent 3 months in the hospital. They drugged me so much that I couldn’t walk and was transferred to a rehab for 21 days because I could no longer walk. When I came home, nurses and an excellent physical therapist were sent to help me. The nurses couldn’t understand why I refused all the medication. I told them I knew there was aspartame in them and I would prove it by being the guinea pig and show that, without them, I could get well. Today, I am free of the problems I had in the hospital from taking the aspartame-laced drugs, including having a heart attack which aspartame causes. I am able to walk again and, as one nurse said, “You’ve made a believer of me”. One hospital admission was because I almost choked to death. You read above from Dr. Roberts’ medical text how aspartame swells the larynx. Nobody has ever said it better than Dr. James Bowen who got ALS from aspartame when he told them it was mass poisoning of the US and 70 countries of the world, now probably 200.
Remember also that aspartame is a multi-potential carcinogen shown by the Ramazzini Studies by Dr. Morando Soffritti on rats and a Harvard Study on humans. Even the FDA (Dr. Adrian Gross) admitted it to the Senate and said approval of aspartame violated the Delaney Amendment. It was marketed by G. D. Searle who hired Don Rumsfeld to get it on the market after the FDA revoked the petition for approval. See the documentary: “Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World”. Aspartame is now referred to as Rumsfeld’s Plague.
So, that is what happened to me but it doesn’t have to happen to you. I wrote a Hospital Report with the chapter on aspartame and drug interaction from Dr. Roberts medical text. Don’t go to any hospital without it. Print this out and keep it handy. http://www.mpwhi.com/aspartame_hospital_form.htm
I implore anyone who reads this report to send a copy of the above to your local hospitals, to the CEOs and top officials. There is a report where Dr. Russell Blaylock explains what the hospitals can do to get people well, and maybe somebody will have the courage to do what is necessary. Hospitals are under the domination of Big Pharma and even give physicians “pink slips” if they don’t prescribe certain drugs like the dangerous statins. If everyone who reads this report will at least do send it to one hospital, we can make a difference and maybe save thousands. Pass it on to your lists, family and friends and stay safe.
Renowned Dr. Russell Blaylock says, “The evidence strongly suggest that hospitals can easily control this cytokine storm by using very large dose intravenous vitamin C and Curcumin, both of which has shown high levels of rapid recovery from the effects of this virus induced cytokine storm.” A cytokine storm is an overproduction of immune cells and their activating compounds (cytokines), which, in a flu infection, is often associated with a surge of activated immune cells into the lungs. The resulting lung inflammation and fluid buildup can lead to respiratory distress and can be contaminated by a secondary bacterial pneumonia — often enhancing the mortality in patients.
He suggests for those at home to help their immune system use Curcumin and white tea. He is author of many books on aspartame including “Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills”.
The hospitals should listen to Dr. Blaylock. I credit him with saving my life when I had pneumonia many years ago. No antibiotic would work so they were sending me home to die because if a hospital can’t help they can’t keep you. He wanted the doctor to use Vitamin D, 10,000 I.U. Several days later, the pneumonia was gone and the doctor said “he saved your life”. He is not only a retired neurosurgeon but also practiced as a nutritionist for 3 years. His books are truly dynamic knowledge and he is also the author of the Blaylock Report.
I’ll conclude with comments from Stephen Fox, Mission Possible New Mexico who has done a great deal of research on the virus.
“My comments are limited, because these matters are far beyond the powers of anyone who has no official interrogatory or subpoena powers, nor officially approved academic qualifications, including most of the considerations about how it started, who started it and when, who will benefit economically from this pandemic, and was it truly biological warfare or some freak of nature, or as a predictable accident, as Dr. Francis A. Boyle puts it, a Harvard Law School graduate and professor of Law at the University of Illinois law school. I do know that the Czech Republic weeks ago mandated that everyone wear a mask, and they have had only two deaths from Corona virus, and I do know that my New Mexico Governor, Michelle Grisham Lujan, a former New Mexico Secretary of Health, and the present New Mexico Secretary of Health, Kathy Kunkel, who is also like the Governor a lawyer, have put together fierce restrictions which I believe have kept our death toll to only two, a man in his 70s andanother in his 80s, both with pre-existing pulmonary conditions.
Our stats are way below those of Texas, on a per capita basis, and significantly lower than Utah, Arizona, Colorado, and Nevada. It is quite significant that just a few months ago, Italians were marching in the streets because they objected fiercely to required inoculations for influenza…those dreaded ‘flu shots’ that everyone except me it seems lines up to get in the late fall. The Italian government proceeded to force the people to get them…and now they have very high rates of coronavirus infection. Some are predicting that the US will see 200,000 deaths. All we can do at this point is hope and pray that they are wrong.
Dr. Martini is spot on in proving that anyone with a weakened immune system from their ingesting aspartame regularly, which is metabolized in everyone as formaldehyde and the proven brain tumor causing agent, diketopiperazine, that these people are going to have a tough time if not an impossible time, resisting corona virus in this enlarging epidemic. The epidemiologists are going to have a field day if and when this pandemic runs its course, analyzing corona vs smokers, junk food eaters, those vaccinated with the flu shots, and of course, those who have consumed aspartame. When the equation is stated like that, it makes me wonder whether this pandemic will ever end. Supposedly, it is winding down in China, and certainly the South Koreans have done the best job to curtail the effects of corona virus to date.”
Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum, Founder Mission Possible World Health Intl 9270 River Club Parkway Duluth, Georgia 30097 www.mpwhi.com 770 242-2599
Just as any new technology claims to offer the most advanced development; that their definition of progress will cure society’s ills or make life easier by eliminating the drudgery of antiquated appliances, the Wi-Fi Alliancewas organized as a worldwide wireless network to connect,
“everyone and everything, everywhere” as it promised “improvements to nearly every aspect of daily life.”
The Alliance, which makes no pretense of potential health or environmental concerns, further proclaimed (and they may be correct) that there are,
“more Wi-Fi devices than people on earth”.
It is that inescapable exposure to ubiquitous wireless technologies wherein lies the problem.
Soon after the 1895 discovery of x-rays, the budding new technology was not without its health risks of burns and hair loss.
Yet the use of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) has evolved at a dramatic exponential rate from Marie Curie’s day into a mega-trillion dollar omnipotent industry creating a world totally dependent on its pernicious wireless applications.
The medical and scientific data is overwhelming and irrefutable as the wireless industry, the MSM and government agencies, frequently the last to acknowledge a pervasive health problem, continue to protect the industry from widespread public awareness of the insidious effects of the latest generation of digital by-products.
Even prior to the 1997 introduction of commercially available Wi-Fi devices which has saturated every industrialized country, EMF Wi-Fi hot spots were everywhere.
Today with the addition of cell and cordless phones and towers, broadcast antennas, smart meters and the pervasive computer Wi-Fi, both adults and especially vulnerable children are surrounded 24-7 by an inescapable presence with little recognition that all radiation exposure is cumulative.
Without the expansion of EMF and all its invasive algorithmic gadgets into our personal lives, intelligence gathering would be severely curtailed, without which Big Brother would be relegated to knocking on doors and hand written notes.
Surely with an estimated $21 trillion missing from the Pentagon, there must be one black budget item to lessen the harmful EMF emissions?
The National Toxicology Program (NTP), a branch of the US National Institute for Health (NIH), conducted the world’s largest study on radiofrequency radiation used by the US telecommunications industry and found a ‘significantly statistical increase in brain and heart cancers’ in animals exposed to EMF (electromagnetic fields).
The NTP study confirmed the connection between mobile and wireless phone use and human brain cancer risks and its conclusions were supported by other epidemiological peer-reviewed studies.
Of special note is that studies citing the biological risk to human health were below accepted international exposure standards.
Professor Emeritus Martin Pall, PhD with degrees in physics, biochemistry and genetics is uniquely qualified and has been researching EMF health effects for almost twenty years:
Pointing out that a recent FCC Chair was a former lobbyist for the telecom industry,
‘I know how they’ve attacked various people.In the U.S… the funding for the EMF research [by the Environmental Protection Agency] was cut off starting in 1986…
The U.S. Office of Naval Research had been funding a fair amount of research in this area [in the ’70s]. They [also] … stopped funding new grants in 1986…
And then the NIH a few years later followed the same path’…”
As if all was not reason enough for concern or even downright panic,the next generation of wireless technology known as 5G (fifth generation), representing the innocuous sounding Internet of Things, promises a quantum leap in power and exceedingly more damaging health impacts with mandatory exposures.
The immense expansion of radiation emissions from the current wireless EMF frequency band and 5G about to be perpetrated on an unsuspecting American public should be criminal.
Developed by the US military as non lethal perimeter and crowd control, the Active Denial System emits a high density, high frequency wireless radiation comparable to 5G and emits radiation in the neighborhood of 90 GHz.
The current Pre 5G, frequency band emissions used in today’s commercial wireless range is from 300 Mhz to 3 GHZ as 5G will become the first wireless system to utilize millimeter waves with frequencies ranging from 30 to 300 GHz.
One example of the differential is that a current LANS (local area network system) uses 2.4 GHz.
Hidden behind these numbers is an utterly devastating increase in health effects of immeasurable impacts so stunning as to numb the senses.
“on the roll-out of the fifth generation, 5G, for telecommunication until potential hazards for human health and the environment have been fully investigated by scientists independent from industry.”
In its declaration, the EHT asserted that current,
“radio frequency electromagnetic fields has been proven to be harmful to humans and the environment”… “at levels well below most international and national guidelines.”
“making the US the first country in the world to open up higher-frequency millimeter wave spectrum for the development of 5G fifth-generation wireless cellular technology.”
‘higher loads of data more rapidly through wireless transmission and will be effective only over short distance. It is poorly transmitted through solid material.
Construction of many new antennas will be required and full-scale implementation will result in antennas every 10 to 12 houses in urban areas, thus massively increasing mandatory exposure’.”
5G small cell antennas will unleash round-the-clock millimeter, mini and micro wave radiation immensely more powerful than the current EMF wireless system and will no doubt be sold to a gullible American public as an economically beneficial national jobs program.
In addition, 5G is required to create the Internet of Things (IoT) which promises to wirelessly connect all devices able to transfer data over a cohesive network without computer or human interactionincluding homes appliances, every ‘smart’ device, city and vehicle and any embedded electronic system that can exchange data.
The IoT of building a new ‘smart’ grid of communications that will connect, just as the Wi-Fi Alliance once suggested,
AI is a self-aware intelligent computer with an ‘automated reasoning‘ ability that,
“perceives its environment and takes actions that maximize its chance of success.”
Today’s AI’s are able to replace human functions and are capable of doing human things faster and better than any human.
In other words, you may be relieved of all requirements to work or think or function as an engaged human being. All it would take is for an indulgent public to allow IT to do the thinking; make all life decisions until eventually there would be no real purpose in life and humans will be superfluous or extinct.
As AI development is being driven by superstars at Silicon Valley, pre-eminent scientistStephen Hawkingsuggested that,
“AI would be biggest event in human history.Unfortunately it might also be the last” and he feared “the consequences of creating something that can match or surpass humans.”
Stop The Cabal 