Eva Kaili, the Vice President of the European Parliament, has been charged with corruption. She is one of four suspects who have been charged and detained in relation to a police investigation into alleged lobbying by World Cup hosts Qatar. Belgian police are investigating allegations that figures working on behalf of Qatar have paid European politicians large bribes to influence the Brussels policy debate.
Euranet plus debate – Citizen’s corner
Mrs Kaili was arrested on Friday and has now been charged, along with three others. Two more have been released and the house of at least one more MEP has been searched by investigators. The Belgian federal prosecutor’s office did not identify the four by name, but a judicial source confirmed that Mrs Kaili was among those charged.
Mrs Kaili has been stripped of her responsibilities as vice president of the parliament, but remains an MEP. She would normally enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution but there is an exception in cases where a suspect is caught red-handed in the act of committing an alleged crime. Belgian police detained Mrs Kaili in possession of “bags of cash” and so she was brought before a judge.
The former MEP Pier-Antonio Panzeri and his fellow Italian Luca Visentini were also among the six arrested. The center-left Socialists and Democrats group in the European Parliament said that it has suspended Mrs Kaili’s membership of the group with immediate effect. Mrs Kaili has also been suspended by her party at home – the Greek Socialist party, Pasok-Movement for Change.
Questions of corruption are now expected to hang over this week’s European Parliament plenary session in Strasbourg. The scandal erupted during the 2022 football World Cup, an event Qatar had hoped would boost its reputation but which has been dogged by allegations of mistreatment of the migrant workers who built the host’s new stadiums.
The arrest of Mrs Kaili and the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption have raised serious questions about the integrity of the European Parliament and the conduct of its members. It remains to be seen how the allegations will impact the reputation of the institution and the trust of its constituents.
The UK government has been accused of wasting over 100 billion pounds on Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as on the HS2 railway line that has yet to be built. In addition, the government is facing criticism for its involvement in the ongoing war in the Ukraine, which has seen billions of pounds of taxpayer money being spent on a conflict that many believe the Ukraine will not win.
According to reports, many politicians in Parliament and the House of Lords are profiting from the sale of arms, with some of these weapons being resold on the black market to terrorist and guerrilla groups. The President of Nigeria has even gone on record to state that these weapons are causing instability in his country.
There are also allegations of corruption within the Conservative Party over PPE contracts, with Baroness Mone and Matt Hancock accused of profiting from the abuse of privilege and VIP lanes without any scrutiny. Baroness Mone has been accused of ripping off taxpayers to the tune of 29 million pounds and laundering the money, yet she has not been arrested for fraud and embezzlement. Hancock, meanwhile, has been accused of insider dealing and involvement in the mass murder of the elderly.
Critics have also pointed out that Hancock and other politicians and peers have shares in companies that supply drugs to the NHS, with doctors and nurses being paid to inject and murder people. The safety of the COVID-19 vaccines has also been called into question, with many claiming that they are unsafe and cause death.
Overall, the government has been accused of being a crime syndicate and being complicit in mass murder and corporate greed. It is not seen as the party of small business and enterprise, but rather as a criminal crime party that is inflicting the highest post-war tax demands on the electorate while making billions for hedge funds and doing nothing for the country or its people. Many have described the politicians involved as vile and evil, profiting from war and genocide while ordinary people watch their loved ones being euthanized on grounds of cost.
A recent article by the Wall Street Journal has raised concerns about the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccines and the failure of health officials and the media to fully inform the public. According to the article, politics, not science, is behind this lack of information, and clinical trials often do not tell the full story about the safety of medications.
Big Pharma has been known to use various strategies to make potentially dangerous and ineffective drugs appear like a miracle of modern science. Only 32% of studies are positive, and many of those studies are “shortened” to limit long-term findings. This can lead to an overestimation of the effectiveness of the study drug and miss dangerous side effects by an average of 30%.
The media and health officials have not been fully informing the public about the potential risks of COVID-19 vaccines. This failure is being driven by politics, not science. Clinical trials often do not enroll patients who are representative of the general population, and more is learned about drug safety from real-world evidence.
The large clustering of side effects following COVID-19 vaccines is concerning, as is the silence around these potential signals of harm. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are ignoring reported serious COVID-19 vaccine side effects.
In certain populations, such as children, the risks of COVID-19 vaccines may outweigh the benefits. No studies have demonstrated that vaccines prevent the transmission of COVID-
Throughout history, the necessity to control mass population in order to execute a political agenda has been a familiar concept. During the 20th century, for example, both National Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union understood that indoctrinating the youth of their nations was the key to regime success.
Today, it appears that the youth have been similarly brainwashed into being terrified of Covid-19, despite the fact that the virus has little effect on young people. Children under 17 account for only 12% of total cases in the U.S., yet they are the ones most likely to scold, chase, or harass those who defy unnecessary local mandates.
The Media’s Role in Fear-Mongering
The media has played a significant role in this fear-mongering. Rather than seeking the truth and holding power accountable, the media has abandoned these principles and is now in active collusion with power. Fear creates higher engagement and retention, and in an era of infinite fragmentation, securing attention is more important than ever. The media has also become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democrats, moving lock-step with whatever messaging is propagated by politicians, regardless of whether or not it makes sense.
The Role of Technology and the Education System
However, the media’s influence on the youth would not be possible without the second trend: the youth’s increasing reliance on electronic interaction, as opposed to genuine in-person human connection. Society has collectively created a golden calf in the smartphone, and it is the teenagers who have elevated this technology to divine status. Content from the smartphone is given extraordinary weight, which, coupled with the lack of critical thinking instruction, renders all other voices irrelevant.
The third trend is the education system’s failure to teach critical thinking. The education system’s focus on social justice has led to a lack of focus on critical thinking, history, economics, science, literature, the arts, and philosophy. This has resulted in a generation of young people who are unable to think for themselves and are easily influenced by fear-mongering media.
In conclusion, the combination of media fear-mongering, reliance on technology, and the lack of critical thinking in the education system has led to the brainwashing of today’s youth into being terrified of Covid-19. Unless these trends are addressed, we may continue to see young people blindly following authority and being susceptible to manipulation.
He was worried that the scientific establishment, which he called the scientific-technical elite, would warp science to influence government policy for its own benefit.
Eisenhower was a greatly underestimated President.
His practical insight into human nature is illustrated by the fact that he made loads of money playing poker while in the Army.
He also graduated first in his class out of 240 senior officers at the Army War College.
Although President Eisenhower was usually depicted as a lightweight by the media, his insights were uncannily accurate.
Today’s ‘climate crisis’ is a modern example of public policy being ruined by the self-interested scientific-technological elite. World governments are spending trillions to avoid an imaginary climate crisis.
Bizarrely, the methods selected to avoid the crisis – windmills and solar panels – can’t possibly accomplish much, even if the crisis were real.
Climate scientists think they are engaged in one of the ‘hard’ sciences…
But climate science is actually a soft science because its conclusions depend on the statistical analysis of noisy and dubious data using complicated and opaque computerized models.
It is the perfect setup for confirmation bias, the tendency for scientists to arrive at conclusions that support their preconceived prejudices.
Worse than confirmation bias is lying and fakery in the pursuit of money and power, also not unknown.
They are employees of large institutions and they have families and mortgages.
The scientists that speak out are either retired or have impregnable positions due to exceptional scientific accomplishment.
Among professional climate scientists, public opposition to the climate doom theory is rare, but it does happen – I know of one climate scientist that forged a successful career as a denier, running over his opponents with raw courage and entrepreneurial talent.
Much of the opposition to the climate-doom narrative comes from amateur scientists [aka citizen scientists].
These are typically politically savvy individuals with scientific backgrounds.
Their credibility is limited by their lack of official professional qualifications, but they are immune to the establishment’s retaliations.
Usually, they are retired, have their own businesses, or are wealthy.
The Internet makes it possible for them to speak to the world.
They are reviving a tradition of amateur scientists that was dominant prior to the twentieth century.
Here are some examples of amateur scientists:
Stephen McIntyre a retired Canadian mining expert runs the website climateaudit.org.
The book is an accessible and powerful indictment of the climate crisis.
The MIT scientist Richard Lindzen, a climate scientist who made important discoveries, exposed the reality of climate science and environmentalism from an insider’s viewpoint in his profound essay:
Donna Laframboiseexposed the unbelievable corruption within the supposedly authoritative United Nations International Panel on Climate Change with her book:
Many dislike the term “climate denier” because it is intended as a smear against anyone who even questions the climate crisis.
My own feeling is that it is better to wear this label as a badge of honor and thus play jiu-jitsu with the climate establishment’s organs of propaganda.
We live in an age encapsulated by Romans 1:22:
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools.”
Formerly respectable medical institutions are trying to change boys into girls and vice versa with drugs and surgery.
Most big media present the climate crisis as if it is a solid scientific finding. They depict deniers as crackpots or paid spokesmen for oil companies. This is the arrogance of people who think they know everything but live in a sea of ignorance.
The real investigative reporters work for minor, independent mediawithout the vast money-laden resources of big media.
Establishment climate science has become infatuated by its own imagined expertise and importance. Like many things in human history, arrogance is nothing new.
We should remember the persecution of Galileo for suggesting that the Earth revolves around the sun, not vice versa.
Robert O Young CPT, MSc, DSc, PhD, Naturopathic Practitioner, Commissioner International Tribunal of Natural Justice
Question One: Has the SARS CoVid – 2 or now known as SARS CoVid – 19 ever been scientifically isolated and identified under the scientific method?
Answer to question One: NO! Please see the links below from government health departments and research institutes announcing that ‘SARS-COV-2 or 19’ has never been isolated, purified, identified and shown to exist or to be contagious according to the accepted scientific methods of Koch Postulates or Rivers Postulates!
[2] An updated “no records” FOI reply from the Public Health Agency of Canada where someone is clearly unhinged from reality, admitting that the request “has resulted in a “No Records Exist“” while insinuating that the problem is mine for not accepting an oxymoron (“isolation in culture”) + useless PCR tests + wild assumptions based on a wildly uncontrolled experiment as a substitute for actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/PHAC-follow-up-A2020000110-20210202-redacted.pdf
[6] New Zealand’s crown research institute, the Institute of Environmental Science and Research once again equates “isolation” with culturing and this time admits to having no record re isolation of “SARS-COV-1” or (once again) any “virus” on NZ’s “Immunisation” Schedule. And, they simply ignored a query re isolation of any “common cold coronavirus”: https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ESR-FOI-reply-schedule-SARS-common-cold.pdf]
Question Two: If CoVid 2 or 19 is not the cause for severe acute respiratory syndrome of SARS then what is the cause? Answer to question two: SARS CoVid 2 or 19 is caused by pathological blood coagulation which is caused by chemical and radiation poisoning of the fluids of the body (especially the interstitial fluids of the lung) which leads to the symptoms of a fever, dry cough, loss of taste, shallow breathing, hypoxia, just to name a few and NOT the coronavirus which has never been scientifically proven to exist. Please read my published article on the cause of SARS CoVid 2 or 19: Here is the link to our article: http://sciaeon.org/articles/What-Causes-Oxygen-Deprivation-of-the-Blood-DIC-and-Then-Lungs-SARS-CoV2and12.pdf Citation: Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood (DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 19)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007
Question Three: Does wearing a mask or social distancing reduce the chances of infectivity from the SARS CoVid 2 or 19 virus?
Answer to question three: Since the existence of the SARS CoVid 2 or 19 virus does NOT exist then why wear a mask or social distance other than for the purpose of fear mongering for mind control of the population at large.
Question Four: Is RT PCR testing accurately testing and identifying the presence of SARS CoVid 2 or 19.
Answer to question four: Absolutely NOT! According to nobel laureate Kary Mullis stated that, “the identification of a retrovirus can NOT be identified by a PCR test”. SUMMARY CATALOGUE OF ERRORS FOUND IN THE CORMAN-DROSTEN Scientific PAPER CONCERNING RT PCR TESTING FOR the identification of SARS-CoV-2 Renamed as SARS-CoV-19 Virus
The Corman-Drosten published paper which has been relied upon worldwide contains the following specific errors:
1. There exists no specified reason to use these extremely high concentrations of primers in this protocol. The described concentrations lead to increased nonspecific bindings and PCR product amplifications, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus.
2. Six unspecified wobbly positions will introduce an enormous variability in the real world laboratory implementations of this test; the confusing nonspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus.
3. The test cannot discriminate between the whole virus and viral fragments. Therefore, the test cannot be used as a diagnostic for intact (infectious) viruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus and make inferences about the presence of an infection.
4. A difference of 10° C with respect to the annealing temperature Tm for primer pair1 (RdRp_SARSr_F and RdRp_SARSr_R) also makes the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus
5. A severe error is the omission of a Ct value at which a sample is considered positive and negative. This Ct value is also not found in follow-up submissions making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus
6. The PCR products have not been validated at the molecular level. This fact makes the protocol useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus
7. The PCR test contains neither a unique positive control to evaluate its specificity for SARS-CoV-2 nor a negative control to exclude the presence of other coronaviruses, making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus.
8. The test design in the Corman-Drosten paper is so vague and flawed that one can go in dozens of different directions; nothing is standardized and there is no SOP. This highly questions the scientific validity of the test and makes it unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus.
9. Most likely, the Corman-Drosten paper was not peer-reviewed making the test unsuitable as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 renamed as SARS-CoV-19 virus.
10. We find severe conflicts of interest for at least four authors, in addition to the fact that two of the authors of the Corman-Drosten paper (Christian Drosten and Chantal Reusken) are members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. A conflict of interest was added on July 29 2020 (Olfert Landt is CEO of TIB-Molbiol; Marco Kaiser is senior researcher at GenExpress and serves as scientific advisor for TIB-Molbiol), that was not declared in the original version (and still is missing in the PubMed version); TIB-Molbiol is the company which was “the first” to produce PCR kits (Light Mix) based on the protocol published in the Corman-Drosten manuscript, and according to their own words, they distributed these PCR-test kits before the publication was even submitted;[5] further, Victor Corman & Christian Drosten failed to mention their second affiliation: the commercial test laboratory “Labor Berlin”. Both are responsible for the virus diagnostics there [6] and the company operates in the realm of real time PCR-testing.
Conclusion to my answer to Question Four
In light of my re-examination of the test protocol to identify SARS-CoV-2 and renamed as SARS-CoV-19 described in the Corman-Drosten paper we have identified concerning errors and inherent fallacies which render the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test useless.[7][8][9][10]
References
[1] Young RO, “Pathological Blood Coagulation and the Mycotoxic Oxidative Stress Test (MOST)”. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 2(6): 00048. DOI:10.15406/ijvv.2016.02.00048
[3] Young, R.O., Young, S.R, “The pH Miracle Revised and Updated.” Hachett Publishing, 2010.
[4] Young, R.O., Migalko, G., “Interstitial Fluid Lung Disease (IFLD) of the Interstitium Organ the Cause and Self-Care to a Self-Cure for Lung Disease”. International Journal of Cancer Research & Therapy, https://bit.ly/2xD8VBP, January 20, 2020
[7] Review report Corman-Drosten et al. Eurosurveillance 2020, External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results. https://cormandrostenreview.com/report/
[9] Young RO, Migalko G (2020) What Causes Oxygen Deprivation of the Blood(DIC) and Then Lungs(SARS – CoV 2 & 12)?. Integ Mol Bio Biotechnol 1: 001-007
Question Five: Who are the main culprits behind the coronavirus Plandemic?
Answer to question five: Bill Gates, The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, Rockefeller Foundation, United Nations Children’s Fund, WHO, and the World Bank.
Dr. Elizabeth Eads is on the frontline of medicine, treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is now seeing first-hand Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS. Let that sink in. Dr. Eads explains, “Yes, we are seeing vaccine related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxed. . . . It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. . . . .We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse or calamity of this immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”
Dr. Eads says it is particularly bad in the double CV19 vaxed and boosted. She calls the third injection “The Kill Shot, the Money Ball or whatever you want to call it. It is just devastating to the immune system, and I’ll tell you why. If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the CV19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the Lentivirus. The Lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS. In the Stanford study, the best-known Lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the Covid 19 (Vax) especially the booster. . . . It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”
There is a similar report out last week by the UK government that also points to the triple vaxed getting AIDS. So, the CV19 vaccines are actually injecting people with AIDS? Dr. Eads says, “That is exactly what I am telling you. That is what the Spike Lentivirus is. It is made up of HIV and AIDS along with SARS and MERS. That’s why the vaccinated and boosted are so sick. That’s why they dominate the hospitalizations regarding Covid illness as well.”
Because the immune system is depleted, many kinds of disease such as cancer can spread like wildfire. Dr. Ryan Cole says he’s seeing cancer up as much as 2,000% from the vaccines. Eads says, “I have some stunning numbers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) . . . . I am just going to read a few cancers: malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus up 794%. malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas up 524%. Breast cancer up 387%. . . . Ovarian cancer up 537%, Testicular cancer up 269%. These are numbers from 2021. . . . When they found out attorney Thomas Renz and the whistleblower had the data, they scrubbed the data and altered it, which is totally against the law.”
Dr. Eads is treating vaxed and unvaxed in her practice. She will tell you what you can do to help yourself, especially if you have been vaxed. Dr. Eads talks about the ongoing propaganda to get you to take the so-called boosters. Dr. Eads explains why you should stop all CV19 shots now. Dr. Eads also contends there is a huge disinformation campaign going on to make you think the CV19 shots are safe and not causing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, cancer and a host of other diseases–including AIDS.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads as she continues to highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 bioweapons and the dangerous lies by Big Pharma, the FDA, CDC and mainstream media.
(There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 53-minute interview 3.22.22.)
After the Interview:
You can follow Dr. Elizabeth (Betsy) Eads on Twitter or you can follow her on Telegram.
Ordinary people need not apply. Indeed there is no way to ask to join. You simply have to be very, very rich and very, very ‘generous’… on a global scale.
This is the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists who recently held their first and highly secretive meeting in the heart of New York City.
The names of some of the members are familiar figures:
business giants Eli and Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All told, its members are worth $125bn.
The meeting – called by Gates, Buffett and Rockefeller – was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe. It was, in some ways, a summit to save the world.
No wonder that when news of the secret meeting leaked, via the seemingly unusual source of an Irish-American website, it sent shock waves through the worlds of philanthropy, development aid and even diplomacy.
Handmade Orgone Devices & Shungite
“It is really unprecedented. It is the first time a group of donors of this level of wealth has met like that behind closed doors in what is in essence a billionaires’ club,” said Ian Wilhelm, senior writer at the Chronicle of Philanthropy magazine.
The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword.
On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works.
Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.
Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already ‘improved’ the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world.
But can the richest people on earth actually ‘save’ the planet?
The President’s House of Rockefeller University is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The university’s private campus, full of lush green trees, lies behind guarded entrances and a metal fence. It overlooks the East River, only a few blocks away from the United Nations.
It was here, at 3pm on 5 May (2009), that the Good Club gathered.
The university’s chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.
The president’s house is frequently used for university events, but rarely can it have played host to such a powerful conclave.
“The fact that they pulled this off, meeting in the middle of New York City, is just absolutely amazing,” said Niall O’Dowd, an Irish journalist who broke the story on the website irishcentral.com.
For six hours, the assembled billionaires discussed the crises facing the world.
Each was allowed to speak for 15 minutes.
The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease.
One of the themes was new ways to get ordinary people to donate small amounts to global issues.
Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.
“He tried to dominate, which I think annoyed some of the others,” said one source.
Winfrey, meanwhile, was said to have been in a contemplative, listening mood.
That the group should have met at all is indicative of the radical ways in which philanthropy has changed over the past two decades. The main force behind that change is Gates and his decision to donate almost all his fortune to ‘bettering’ the world…
Unlike the great philanthropists of former ages, Gates is young enough and active enough to take a full hands-on role in his philanthropy and craft it after his own ideas.
That example has been followed by others, most notably Soros, Turner and Buffett. Indeed, this new form of philanthropy, where retired elite businessmen try to change the world, has even been dubbed,
“Billanthropy” after Gates.
Another description is “philanthro-capitalism”.
Yet the implications of the development of philanthro-capitalism are profound.
It was fitting that the Good Club was meeting near the UN. The club members’ extreme wealth makes it as powerful as some of the nations with seats inside that august chamber.
Proponents of philanthro-capitalism would argue that they are also more effective in doing good for ordinary people. Indeed the club’s members have given away about $70bn in the past 12 years.
That is far beyond what many individual countries can afford to do with their own social policies and aid budgets.
“They have assets that rival the social spending budgets of many countries,” said Professor Paul Schervish, director of Boston College’s Centre on Wealth and Philanthropy.
There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with a current endowment of more than $30bn, is the biggest philanthropic organization ever. Just one of its projects, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is estimated by the WHO to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.
The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.
These ‘titans’ of philanthropy have also started a trend among the slightly less wealthy.
While Gates’s and Soros’s efforts bestride the world, major philanthropists have emerged in specific regions like India or Latin America funding their own pet ideas and projects.
Gayle Peterson, co-founder of Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services, recently gave advice to a businessman who wanted to set up a foundation to give away $280m annually in south-east Asia.
“He told us: I want to be just like Bill Gates,” she said.
But there is a potential downside to the growth of these “über donors”, especially if the whims of individuals start to take precedence over the expertise of professionals.
The strange truth is that giving away billions of dollars is difficult and fraught with risk.
There can be waste, mismanagement and poor investment.
At the same time it can actually do harm.
“If you are putting enormous amounts of money into a community that can’t cope with it, then you can implode that community,” Peterson said.
Others are even more outspoken at the growing dominance of a tiny handful of billionaires in the development sector.
“The problem with any Good Club is that all the people might not be ‘good’.
Or at least not ‘good’ in universal definitions,” said Louise Uwacu, the Rwandan-born founder of the Canadian education charity Positivision.
There is also the issue of accountability.
Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure.
But who votes for the Good Club?
Such skeptical sentiments might spring from the Good Club‘s decision to meet in such secrecy in New York. In many ways that was understandable.
All its members are sensitive about privacy because of their unique mixes of fame and wealth.
The covert nature of the discussion also allowed them to speak freely about sensitive issues.
“I think they just wanted to be able to be candid. The secrecy allowed that,” said Wilhelm.
But some people are crying conspiracy.
The cloak-and-dagger aspect of the meeting has prompted some to accuse the Good Club of being a sort of Bilderberg Group for philanthropy, with an equally,
nefarious agenda of global power politics…
That idea has particular power on the christian right of America, which has reacted angrily to the idea that the club discussed birth control and overpopulation.
Experts in the philanthropy field think that this negative image can be countered by more openness for future Good Club meetings.
“If they do hold more meetings, and every indication is that they will, I think people would want them to be more public. After all, they can make decisions that affect millions of peoples’ lives,” said Wilhelm.
That is true…
If the members of the Good Club wish to wield their undoubted power, they may have to get used to the idea of doing it more openly.
The American tradition of great donors
Bill Gates The co-founder of Microsoft is the biggest philanthropist the world has ever seen.
Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he controls more than $30bn in assets – not bad for a computer geek from Seattle.
Often ranked as the world’s richest man, he has donated virtually his entire fortune to philanthropy, focusing on combating diseases in the developing world.
Henry Ford As well as being the father of the US car industry and the inventor of the modern production line, Ford has been a major force in philanthropy.
He made a vast fortune and left virtually all of it to the Ford Foundation, which by 2007 had more than $13bn in assets.
George Soros Hungarian-born Soros is a hugely successful US currency speculator and financier.
But he is also well known for his philanthropic works. Focusing on political democratization and creating an independent media, he has funded projects mainly in the former Soviet republics.
A political liberal, he is also a funder of the Centre for American Progress.
Andrew Carnegie This Scottish-born American industrialist made a huge fortune in steel and industry at the end of the 19th century.
He devoted the rest of his life to philanthropy, especially education, founding libraries, museums and universities in Britain and America.
He wrote of the responsibilities of the wealthy in two books, Triumphant Democracy and the Gospel of Wealth.
John D Rockefeller The man whose name became a byword for unimaginable wealth made his fortune in oil.
Often regarded as the richest person in history, Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in effective retirement, setting up various foundations and funding philanthropic causes.
His special interests were in the fields of science and medicine.
Ok. Let’s cut to chase here with regards the Russia v. Ukraine conflict.
It’s all about G.O.D. Gold, Oil and Drugs basically.
Gold is a scarce commodity that is used by the likes of the Federal Reserve (fed) and the Bank of England (b of e) as a form collateral when things go a bit wayward on the stock markets. But, just think for a moment who controls the fed and the b of e? Who controls the markets? Who’s always embroiled in the background – protected by layers of agents and accomplices? The secret society.
Map of Ukraine.
You probably don’t need me to tell you that there is collection of elite families and organisations who pull the strings that their puppets dance to, and it’s just the same situation you’ll find here where the likes of Bo and Jo (Johnson and Biden) will try and put pressure on ex KGB agent Vladimir Putin to see who crumbles first. But, Putin is a smart cookie well versed in self defence and capable of looking after himself. He’s corrupt, don’t get me wrong. But, show me a politician that isn’t.
The central banks want us to think of the Russian leader as a “big bad monster.” They’ll have the papers and the tv publish a narrative to make him appear as a brutish thug whose only intent is total domination of a neighbouring country which is rich in natural resources. That is the key here.
Ukraine today holds the second biggest known gas reserves in Europe and around 400 million barrels of proven oil reserves, ranking 51st in the world and accounting for the world’s total oil reserves of 1,650,585,140,000 barrels, give or take a few.
Ukraine has proven reserves equivalent to 4.4 times its annual consumption. That’s not to be sniffed at.
Is it any wonder, therefore, that both the Yanks and the Ruskies want a bit of it? That’s also why Germany is getting itchy feet because if things start getting a bit heavy then its banking cartel and its security will be tested to the max. That’s why Germany is treading carefully so as not to step on Putin’s toes.
Ukraine is heavily dependent on fossil fuels and nuclear power for its energy needs, but who can forget about the Chernobyl nuclear disaster? It occurred in the Ukraine. Nuclear power stations produce waste product in the form of plutonium that can be used in bombs for submarines and planes of course.
Ever wondered why did America and the CIA invaded Afghanistan? For its opium, in a nutshell. It created a psyop so that it could plunder the country into chaos, people would leave and become refugees, and those who remained would either have to fight back or be controlled by the Taliban.
Now China and Russia are teaming up to corner the oil market with a gold back currency via the Chinese Yuan. Bye bye U.S. dollar that fuels the fed’s central bank globally. China has a slough of dark factions too of course, as does Russia.
President Xi of China and Putin of Russia are behind the scenes, on the same page with this push to dethrone the dollar and return the gold standard.
Recently oil dropped to a negative cost for the first time ever, think of what that does to the price of petrol per barrel.
If I charge you negative 5 pounds for a loaf of bread that means I have to give you the bread with 5 quid as well as the loaf of bread too. It’s the same with a barrel of oil. Countries have to pay people to receive oil, and its people have to pay in dollars in order to get oil from the oil kingpin Saudi Arabia, hence it being the petro-dollar and the world reserve currency. No oil, no economic fuel.
It’s been this way since the 1973 Arab-Israeli deal Henry Kissinger made with the Saudi Royal family two years after the gold standard was abolished amidst a fuel crisis and a quadrupling in the price of crude oil and a global demand v. supply concern.
They want the world to believe that the Government will protect the oil reserves with its military and make everyone pay for oil with the fiat paper known as the dollar. Funny money if you like, the kind that they print themselves for their own means when it suits.
Now Saudi has to pay U.S. dollars to people so they take their oil. Redistribution of dollars, etching Saudi’s global ruling via oil out of the equation leaving room for Russia becoming the new oil source leveraging for a gold backed currency.
But, of course, no layman on a minimum wage can afford to buy vasts reserves of gold as a backup when inflation hits and the price of a loaf of bread or petrol gies up…only a wealthy and powerful elite can afford to do that.
(Incidentally, Gold is not that scarce a commodity really. That’s a myth that has been carefully and deliberately constructed to make you believe that it is so that the likes of the De Beers can control the supply and demand of it. It is hard to find, but there’s plenty of it if you know where to look).
May reduce blood uric acid levels and help prevent gout attacks.
Helps prevent iron deficiency.
Boosts immunity.
Protects your memory and thinking as you age.
So, they don’t want you or I to have gold. They don’t want us heading for them hills where there be gold. They want us locked in debt between paydays, basically. They want us tied to chains of debt slavery and usury AKA lending with high interest rates that are impossible to pay off leaving people in more and more debt every time they buy something, even just to survive. This causes the dollar (the current recognised / accepted global currency of exchange) to hyper inflate and the cost of living to rise more and more until the next thing you know you more people are living on the streets or in need of food banks just to get by. If you don’t see that now the way things are going right there’s going to be a massive collapse in the markets and a global financial meltdown just around the corner. I think it’s only a matter of time because it is engineered to happen that way.
Fast forward today and BoJo wants to sanction Russia. He’s only doing what his masters are telling him to do like the static-haired buffoon that he is. He is not daft, but he is dangerous, arguably more so than Putin I would say.
Sanctions undermine the trade deficit that props up the dollar that enslaves the world. But, Putin is ten steps ahead of the game.
Talking of games, Putin has kept ties with a group akin to Abstergo Industries, that which Assassin’s Creed based Abstergo off of.
This real-life group has played a primary role in technological development all across the board and is a Templar organization. Putin is believed to be a Teutonic Knight which is a knight of the German house of Saint Mary of Jerusalem. Their history with Russia is interesting to note. The Templars have been widely (though not completely) corporatized by the Roman papacy ever since they were called to be rounded up by the pope and French crown back in 1307.
“Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal…
The short response is: never.
Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy
that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus ‘pandemic’
marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.” Klaus Schwab
World Economic Forum
20 More Reasons Why a COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ Never Existed
As demonstrated throughout the first article in this series, the so-called ‘pandemic’ that changed the course of human history is nothing like we’ve been told by “official” sources and mainstream media marionettes.
The real ‘pandemic’ being perpetrated against humanity is one of unprecedented tyranny, lies, and corruption.
While the world has been set on fire with the flames of vaccine mandates, food and supply shortages, hyperinflation, unemployment, and police state crackdowns, the global cabal sitting atop this wide-reaching catastrophe is steadily implementing plans to reshape and reset the world to their advantage.
Aided by the current crop of political dictators, Big Tech tyrants, medical mafiosos, and a whole host of public-private partners, the agenda to rob us of everything (remember, you’ll own nothing and be happy) including the right to refuse medicine is happening at warp speed.
They have been planning this for a couple of centuries. We are experiencing the poisonous fruits of their efforts in a real live drill for control of the planet.
Remember, the reason we are in this plight is because of the declared state of emergency issued by President Trump and continued under the Biden regime.
Leaders from many other countries also followed the same script. Again, if the “‘pandemic'” can be proven to be fraudulent, then all emergency executive orders and mandates must be immediately revoked!
It is important that this information is shared so that the ‘pandemic’ illusion can be completely shattered.
These additional 20 facts will further invalidate that this emergency ever truly existed:
#21 – Hydroxychloroquine was sidelined to make sure vaccines were the only available treatment for COVID-19
On March 30, 2020 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the emergency use of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine to treat COVID-19.
On May 22, 2020 The Lancet, one of the most reputable medical journals in the world, published a study concluding that Hydroxychloroquine‘kills’ more patientsand is a dangerous drug.
See more about this unprecedented scandal here and here.
Dr. Anthony Fauci continued to insist that Hydroxychloroquine (an FDA approved drug in use for over 60 years) is not an effective treatment for COVID-19, despite numerous worldwide studies that concluded that it is.
Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Rischaccused Fauci of,
running a ‘misinformation campaign’ against Hydroxychloroquine…
Hydroxychloroquine satisfied the criteria for the classification, but would have stood in the way of other lucrative drugs and a vaccine…
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) even sued the FDA for withholding from the public some 60 million doses of Hydroxychloroquine that were donated by drug manufacturers to treat coronavirus patients.
Please see the following list of studies proving that Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19 here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
#22 – Props were used to make the “‘pandemic'” look worse than it actually was
In March 2020, U.S. states and countries around the world began constructing makeshift hospital facilities to accommodate the expected surge of COVID-19 patients.
New York anticipated needing an extra 87,000 beds as the Javits Center was converted into a hospital by the Army Corp of Engineers.
The U.S.S. Comfort was also deployed to New York City while the U.S.S. Mercy was deployed to Los Angeles. This was all a sham, meant to trick the public into thinking the situation was much more dire than reality.
An article in the Navy Times revealed the truth about these makeshift facilities, stating:
By the time of Comfort’s departure, the approximately 1,200-person crew and 1,000-bed hospital had treated just 182 patients, of which approximately 70 percent had COVID-19, according to Capt. Patrick Amersbach, commanding officer of the Comfort’s Medical Treatment Facility.
Underutilization of added medical resources in New York City is not unique to the Comfort.
Thousands of hospital beds made available in a converted convention center have gone largely unused after quick assembly by the Army Corps of Engineers.
The Javits Center, which was initially envisioned as a 2,500-bed field hospital for non-COVID-19 patients, converted to coronavirus-only hospital shortly after going operational.
Still, the highest number of patients treated at the convention center at one time topped out at close to 500.
Similarly, the U.S.S. Mercy had only treated 77 non-infected patients by the time it departed the port of Los Angeles.
News media were also caught faking stories to stir up fear.
In an interview on CNN, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcickijustified censorship of opinions not supported by “authoritative sources,” stating,
“anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so, removing information is another really important part of our policy.”
Countless individuals, organizations, medical professionals, and political figures were censored, suspended, or completely de-platformed for expressing opinions or citing factual information that poked holes in the story spun by entities like,
the WHO, CDC, FDA, the White House, and United Nations…
Solving a “‘pandemic'” is not like a mathematical equation where there can only be one right answer.
Censorship of differing views and factual information is not a scientific principle, but a totalitarian one that actually violates the scientific method.
#24 – Surprise! COVID-19 doesn’t just infect humans
Since coronaviruses are very common and were “discovered” in the 1960s,
doesn’t this reinforce that these tests are pointless for diagnosing illness, but perfect for creating hysteria and the justification for draconian measures?
A USA Today article from February 2020 documented Fauci’s original stance on masks:
The only people who need masks are those who are already infected to keep from exposing others.
The masks sold at drugstores aren’t even good enough to truly protect anyone, Fauci said.
“If you look at the masks that you buy in a drugstore, the leakage around that doesn’t really do much to protect you,” he said.
“People start saying, ‘Should I start wearing a mask?’ Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.”
In a Dave Rubenstein Show interview in May 2019, Fauci called mask wearing “paranoid” and advised against it as protection against infectious diseases.
An article byBill Hennessy documented the New England Journal of Medicine’s stance on masks, citing:
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes).
The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the ‘pandemic’.
Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.
On April 3, 2020 the initial sentiment around universal masking was reversed when President Trump announced that the CDC recommended that citizens wear cloth face masks in public to stop the spread of the virus.
States then began issuing mask mandates even for children, and the controversy about their usage has never gone away.
There have been hundreds of face mask studies.
One of the best compilations can be found on Life Site News, where they cite 47 studies that confirm masks are ineffective for COVID-19 and 32 additional studies that confirm they have negative health effects.
So, the overwhelming scientific consensus confirms what we were told from the very beginning:
“In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.”
Nitrogen Dioxide exposure. A research article in Science Direct, originally published in April 2020, concluded that chronic exposure to Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) could have contributed to COVID-19 fatalities in places like Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and “maybe across the whole world.”
Air Pollution.Harvard scientists discovered that a small increase in long-term exposure to air pollution (fine particulate matter – PM5) led to a large increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Wuhan (China), New York City, Lombardy (Italy), and many of the initial coronavirus hotspots also have extremely high levels of air pollution. Could people who were poisoned by air pollution have been misdiagnosed with COVID-19? See also here.
Vitamin B1 deficiency (beriberi) and tuberculosis. A fascinating series of articles by health journalist Bill Sardi document how COVID-19 symptoms such as,
“racing heart, chronic headache, crushing fatigue and even shortness of breath can only be explained by a deficiency of vitamin B1.
No coronavirus, flu bug, or any other infection produces the symptoms observed with COVID-19.”
Even the world-renowned British Medical Journal said social distancing was based on outdated science.
Could it really be that social distancing was actually borne from a teenage girl’s science project and adopted as a worldwide policy to keep people apart and afraid of each other?
Prominent medical researcher Knutt M. Wittkowski criticized the lockdown approach saying, “With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity.About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children.So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible…”
Researchers at Well Being Trust and the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care estimated that 75,000 people could die from alcohol, drug abuse and suicide, calling them “deaths of despair.”
The application of lockdowns was arbitrary and inconsistent. Why were liquor and cannabis stores allowed to stay open when churches were forced to close? Why were some businesses (mostly big box stores and major corporations) deemed essential while others were shuttered and forced to apply for government handouts just to survive?
If lockdowns worked, the “pandemic” should have ended as early as summer 2020!
Much more could be said on this topic, but I think you get the point.
#29 – Quarantining healthy people is tyrannical and goes against all conventional wisdom
The Great Barrington Declaration, signed by close to 60,000 scientists and medical professionals and over 800,000 lay people, advised that only the sick should be quarantined.
The declaration states,
“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.
We call this Focused Protection.”
Focused Protection has been standard practice for every previous epidemic or ‘pandemic’ situation. Healthy people should be free to resume normal life and risk exposure.
National and regional lockdowns which quarantine the healthy with the sick are nonsensical and have only served to prolong the “‘pandemic'” situation.
“children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill…even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”
Data from WorldOMeter showed that children aged 0-17 years have a 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID-19 deaths, which is essentially zero.
“From a clinical standpoint, most children 1 to 18 years old experience mild or no illness from COVID-19 and are much less likely than adults to face severe consequences from the infection.”
Scott Atlas, former member of Trump’s coronavirus task force, stated,
“We know who is at risk. Only 0.2 percent of U.S. deaths have been people younger than 25, and 80 percent have been in people over 65; the average fatality age is 78.”
A JAMA Pediatrics study of North American pediatric hospitals flatly stated that,
“our data indicate that children are at far greater risk of critical illness from influenza than from COVID-19.”
#31 – Though often vilified, marginalized, and censored, other treatments for COVID-19 exist and are proven to be effective, including:
I have already documented the many exercises, documents, legal proceedings, and conferences that have taken place (please see The Back Story and The Ramp Up from my COVID Chronicles series).
Since all this planning has been taking place for at least 20 years, why did everything go so poorly?
#36 – Governments have tried to inflate illnesses into ‘pandemic’s when not justified before
You would think that with the foreknowledge gathered during the various ‘pandemic’ exercises conducted over the last two decades, something simple like shutting down air travel in the place where the outbreak first occurred would have been one of the first priorities.
However, that did not happen.
Why is that?
#38 – Constant confusion and misinformation from public health and government officials keep people fearful and bewildered
Remember the mantra “order out of chaos” because this is the modus operandi of the “global elite.”
They have purposefully sowed confusion and chaos regarding the nature of the “virus,” where it originated, how it is transmitted, its lethality, how variants emerge, how the tests work, whether one can develop natural immunity, if masks work and if so, how many need to be worn, and on and on.
They continually contradict previous statements that seemed definitive at the time, keeping the naïve public constantly off balance and in a perpetual state of cognitive dissonance.
Why anyone still trusts anything coming out of their constantly lying orifices is completely baffling!
Nevertheless, many still do trust, and their ignorance and obedience serve to perpetuate the “‘pandemic'” and the slippery slope to complete tyranny!
#39 – The “‘pandemic'” ushered in the rise of authoritarian leadership just as predicted in the 2010 Rockefeller Report (see page 18)
Under the guise of public health and safety, governments committed all kinds of atrocities in the name of keeping people safe.
#40 – We were immediately and repeatedly told that only a vaccine could remedy the “‘pandemic'” and get us back to normal.
How in the world did people like Bill Gates, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, and countless others know instantly that a vaccine was the only way out of the “‘pandemic'”?
By now it should be obvious that from the outset, the entire goal of this “‘pandemic'” has been to inoculate the entire planet with a “vaccine.”
Why else would all other treatments (besides Big Pharma-backed ones like Remdesivir) be banned or vilified? Why else would there be so much pressure to roll up one’s sleeve and take the jab?
Why else would there be so much propaganda regarding how “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccines are, when there is so much evidence to the contrary?
Since the vaccination campaigns began, most countries are still not back to normal (especially in places like Australia and Italy). The goalpost keeps getting moved while authoritarian mandates and controls accelerate.
It is just like Rockefeller predicted and Schwab and Ghebreyesus have stated – We will not be returning to normal.
The Joke’s On Us
Unless people wake up and realize that this entire “‘pandemic'” has been an excuse to install global governance and increase authoritarian control, these cabalists may get their wish.
Now that you are armed with the facts, it is your duty to spread this information far and wide!
RESISTANCE IS MANDATORY if you want to live freely.
Stop The Cabal 