Eva Kaili, the Vice President of the European Parliament, has been charged with corruption. She is one of four suspects who have been charged and detained in relation to a police investigation into alleged lobbying by World Cup hosts Qatar. Belgian police are investigating allegations that figures working on behalf of Qatar have paid European politicians large bribes to influence the Brussels policy debate.
Mrs Kaili was arrested on Friday and has now been charged, along with three others. Two more have been released and the house of at least one more MEP has been searched by investigators. The Belgian federal prosecutor’s office did not identify the four by name, but a judicial source confirmed that Mrs Kaili was among those charged.
Mrs Kaili has been stripped of her responsibilities as vice president of the parliament, but remains an MEP. She would normally enjoy immunity from criminal prosecution but there is an exception in cases where a suspect is caught red-handed in the act of committing an alleged crime. Belgian police detained Mrs Kaili in possession of “bags of cash” and so she was brought before a judge.
The former MEP Pier-Antonio Panzeri and his fellow Italian Luca Visentini were also among the six arrested. The center-left Socialists and Democrats group in the European Parliament said that it has suspended Mrs Kaili’s membership of the group with immediate effect. Mrs Kaili has also been suspended by her party at home – the Greek Socialist party, Pasok-Movement for Change.
Questions of corruption are now expected to hang over this week’s European Parliament plenary session in Strasbourg. The scandal erupted during the 2022 football World Cup, an event Qatar had hoped would boost its reputation but which has been dogged by allegations of mistreatment of the migrant workers who built the host’s new stadiums.
The arrest of Mrs Kaili and the ongoing investigation into alleged corruption have raised serious questions about the integrity of the European Parliament and the conduct of its members. It remains to be seen how the allegations will impact the reputation of the institution and the trust of its constituents.
The UK government has been accused of wasting over 100 billion pounds on Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as on the HS2 railway line that has yet to be built. In addition, the government is facing criticism for its involvement in the ongoing war in the Ukraine, which has seen billions of pounds of taxpayer money being spent on a conflict that many believe the Ukraine will not win.
According to reports, many politicians in Parliament and the House of Lords are profiting from the sale of arms, with some of these weapons being resold on the black market to terrorist and guerrilla groups. The President of Nigeria has even gone on record to state that these weapons are causing instability in his country.
There are also allegations of corruption within the Conservative Party over PPE contracts, with Baroness Mone and Matt Hancock accused of profiting from the abuse of privilege and VIP lanes without any scrutiny. Baroness Mone has been accused of ripping off taxpayers to the tune of 29 million pounds and laundering the money, yet she has not been arrested for fraud and embezzlement. Hancock, meanwhile, has been accused of insider dealing and involvement in the mass murder of the elderly.
Critics have also pointed out that Hancock and other politicians and peers have shares in companies that supply drugs to the NHS, with doctors and nurses being paid to inject and murder people. The safety of the COVID-19 vaccines has also been called into question, with many claiming that they are unsafe and cause death.
Overall, the government has been accused of being a crime syndicate and being complicit in mass murder and corporate greed. It is not seen as the party of small business and enterprise, but rather as a criminal crime party that is inflicting the highest post-war tax demands on the electorate while making billions for hedge funds and doing nothing for the country or its people. Many have described the politicians involved as vile and evil, profiting from war and genocide while ordinary people watch their loved ones being euthanized on grounds of cost.
Throughout history, the necessity to control mass population in order to execute a political agenda has been a familiar concept. During the 20th century, for example, both National Socialist Germany and the Soviet Union understood that indoctrinating the youth of their nations was the key to regime success.
Today, it appears that the youth have been similarly brainwashed into being terrified of Covid-19, despite the fact that the virus has little effect on young people. Children under 17 account for only 12% of total cases in the U.S., yet they are the ones most likely to scold, chase, or harass those who defy unnecessary local mandates.
The Media’s Role in Fear-Mongering
The media has played a significant role in this fear-mongering. Rather than seeking the truth and holding power accountable, the media has abandoned these principles and is now in active collusion with power. Fear creates higher engagement and retention, and in an era of infinite fragmentation, securing attention is more important than ever. The media has also become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democrats, moving lock-step with whatever messaging is propagated by politicians, regardless of whether or not it makes sense.
The Role of Technology and the Education System
However, the media’s influence on the youth would not be possible without the second trend: the youth’s increasing reliance on electronic interaction, as opposed to genuine in-person human connection. Society has collectively created a golden calf in the smartphone, and it is the teenagers who have elevated this technology to divine status. Content from the smartphone is given extraordinary weight, which, coupled with the lack of critical thinking instruction, renders all other voices irrelevant.
The third trend is the education system’s failure to teach critical thinking. The education system’s focus on social justice has led to a lack of focus on critical thinking, history, economics, science, literature, the arts, and philosophy. This has resulted in a generation of young people who are unable to think for themselves and are easily influenced by fear-mongering media.
In conclusion, the combination of media fear-mongering, reliance on technology, and the lack of critical thinking in the education system has led to the brainwashing of today’s youth into being terrified of Covid-19. Unless these trends are addressed, we may continue to see young people blindly following authority and being susceptible to manipulation.
The Central Bank of Russia has officially announced that, as of March 28, 2022, the Russian Ruble currency is BOUND to Gold.
The rate is 5,000 Rubles per gram of gold bullion.
This story has been corrected to report “TROY” ounces as opposed to ‘dry’ ounces, and the values recomputed to reflect there are more grams per TROY ounce than in a dry ounce.
There are 32 grams in each TROY ounce. 32 grams times 5,000 rubles per Gram is 160,000 Rubles.
Are you with me so far?
The conversion rate of Rubles to U.S. Dollars is 100 Rubles, 90 Kopecs, to each U.S. Dollar.
If Rubles are bound to Gold at 5000 Rubles per gram, and there are 32 grams per TROY ounce, meaning one ounce of gold would cost 160,000 Rubles, then converting that to U.S. Dollars means Gold is $1600 per ounce when using Rubles, instead of $1,928 per ounce using Dollars.
Russia just wiped out about thirty percent (30%) of the value of the U.S. Dollar, worldwide, when it comes to Gold Bullion.
Worse, because Russia will only sell its oil and gas in Rubles, and Rubles are now fixed at 5,000 Rubles per gram, anyone wishing to buy Oil or Gas will need to either pay in Rubles or pay in Gold, and they won’t get the U.S. Dollar value for the gold they tender as payment!
People around the world will be literally THROWING their money at the Ruble and DUMPING Dollars and EUROS to do it.
What Russia just did is the financial equivalent of detonating a nuclear bomb.
FWIW, the last guy on this planet who tried to back a currency with Gold, was Muammar Kaddafi of Libya.
NATO went into Libya, bombed the shit out of it, until the people of Libya grabbed Kaddafi on the street, beat him bloody, and put a bullet in his head.
As of this hour, 10:39 PM EDT, I suspect Bankers all over the world are on the phones with each other and with heads of state, instructing them that what Russia has done will totally smash both the U.S. Dollar and the EURO, and those Bankers will be telling the heads of State that World War 3 must commence ‘immediately’…
Let me explain why.
Today, the Russian Central Bank pegged Rubles to Gold.
Last week, Russia declared they would only sell OIL and GAS in… Rubles.
This means Russian OIL and GAS are pegged to Gold with Rubles as the proxy for Gold.
Europe (that needs Russian Gas and Oil) will now have to buy Rubles from Putin using Gold, or pay for the Oil and Gas with Gold itself.
Currently, the FOREX Rate for Rubles to Dollars is about 100:1
BUT… with 5,000 Rubles now equaling one gram of Gold, and oil being priced directly in Gold, we are going to see a MASSIVE price disruption in FOREX markets, in terms of how much Gold a Dollar can still buy.
Foreign countries holding our Dollar Debt Notes in Reserve, will see an immediate, and far less use for them and will want to start dumping them in favor of something more stable; something which holds its value.
Basically, any currency pegged to Gold will fit the bill, which means countries like that – like Japan – will start dumping their Dollar Debt as fast as they can – they are NOT going to go down with the ship!
They will move into more stable currencies, like… the Ruble.
This will have a DE-flationary effect on the Ruble, making it more valuable over time.
This also means Putin can re-peg the Ruble any time he wants, to like 500, or 50, or 10. IT just keeps getting more valuable for him.
The instant result is that all those foreign countries dumping their Dollar Reserves will cause all those excess Dollars to start coming home, triggering worse hyper-inflation than we already have now in the USA.
Is it any wonder why Biden was on stage last week calling for Regime change in Russia…?
He is about to have masses of angry and literally starving Americans marching through the streets here at home demanding answers.
UPDATE 10:39 AM EDT
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a public statement on video about what has taken place with binding the Ruble to Gold.
In that statement, he points out that Western Nations have simply STOLEN Russia’s foreign currency reserves and Gold Bullion Reserves, and by doing so, worldwide trust in so-called “First-Class” safety of investing in the West, has been smashed.
He goes on to predict that people will now dump their holdings of Dollars and EUROS to safer investments like,
land, food, and raw materials…
Putin predicting dollar and euros demise and everyone moving to “real reserves of raw materials” like “land, food, and gold”
The impact of what Russia has just done is a literal dagger to the heart of the U.S. Dollar and to the EURO.
No one will want those currencies anymore, and since the U.S. barely manufactures anything domestically, when foreign countries cease accepting the dollar for payment, shortages of everything will slam the U.S. and Europe.
Dr. Elizabeth Eads is on the frontline of medicine, treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is now seeing first-hand Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS. Let that sink in. Dr. Eads explains, “Yes, we are seeing vaccine related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxed. . . . It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. . . . .We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse or calamity of this immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”
Dr. Eads says it is particularly bad in the double CV19 vaxed and boosted. She calls the third injection “The Kill Shot, the Money Ball or whatever you want to call it. It is just devastating to the immune system, and I’ll tell you why. If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the CV19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the Lentivirus. The Lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS. In the Stanford study, the best-known Lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the Covid 19 (Vax) especially the booster. . . . It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”
Because the immune system is depleted, many kinds of disease such as cancer can spread like wildfire. Dr. Ryan Cole says he’s seeing cancer up as much as 2,000% from the vaccines. Eads says, “I have some stunning numbers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) . . . . I am just going to read a few cancers: malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus up 794%. malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas up 524%. Breast cancer up 387%. . . . Ovarian cancer up 537%, Testicular cancer up 269%. These are numbers from 2021. . . . When they found out attorney Thomas Renz and the whistleblower had the data, they scrubbed the data and altered it, which is totally against the law.”
Dr. Eads is treating vaxed and unvaxed in her practice. She will tell you what you can do to help yourself, especially if you have been vaxed. Dr. Eads talks about the ongoing propaganda to get you to take the so-called boosters. Dr. Eads explains why you should stop all CV19 shots now. Dr. Eads also contends there is a huge disinformation campaign going on to make you think the CV19 shots are safe and not causing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, cancer and a host of other diseases–including AIDS.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads as she continues to highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 bioweapons and the dangerous lies by Big Pharma, the FDA, CDC and mainstream media.
(There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 53-minute interview 3.22.22.)
After the Interview:
You can follow Dr. Elizabeth (Betsy) Eads on Twitter or you can follow her on Telegram.
business giants Eli and Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All told, its members are worth $125bn.
The meeting – called by Gates, Buffett and Rockefeller – was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe. It was, in some ways, a summit to save the world.
No wonder that when news of the secret meeting leaked, via the seemingly unusual source of an Irish-American website, it sent shock waves through the worlds of philanthropy, development aid and even diplomacy.
“It is really unprecedented. It is the first time a group of donors of this level of wealth has met like that behind closed doors in what is in essence a billionaires’ club,” said Ian Wilhelm, senior writer at the Chronicle of Philanthropy magazine.
The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword.
On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works.
Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.
Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already ‘improved’ the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world.
But can the richest people on earth actually ‘save’ the planet?
The President’s House of Rockefeller University is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The university’s private campus, full of lush green trees, lies behind guarded entrances and a metal fence. It overlooks the East River, only a few blocks away from the United Nations.
It was here, at 3pm on 5 May (2009), that the Good Club gathered.
The university’s chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.
The president’s house is frequently used for university events, but rarely can it have played host to such a powerful conclave.
“The fact that they pulled this off, meeting in the middle of New York City, is just absolutely amazing,” said Niall O’Dowd, an Irish journalist who broke the story on the website irishcentral.com.
For six hours, the assembled billionaires discussed the crises facing the world.
Each was allowed to speak for 15 minutes.
The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease.
One of the themes was new ways to get ordinary people to donate small amounts to global issues.
Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.
“He tried to dominate, which I think annoyed some of the others,” said one source.
Winfrey, meanwhile, was said to have been in a contemplative, listening mood.
That the group should have met at all is indicative of the radical ways in which philanthropy has changed over the past two decades. The main force behind that change is Gates and his decision to donate almost all his fortune to ‘bettering’ the world…
Unlike the great philanthropists of former ages, Gates is young enough and active enough to take a full hands-on role in his philanthropy and craft it after his own ideas.
That example has been followed by others, most notably Soros, Turner and Buffett. Indeed, this new form of philanthropy, where retired elite businessmen try to change the world, has even been dubbed,
“Billanthropy” after Gates.
Another description is “philanthro-capitalism”.
Yet the implications of the development of philanthro-capitalism are profound.
It was fitting that the Good Club was meeting near the UN. The club members’ extreme wealth makes it as powerful as some of the nations with seats inside that august chamber.
Proponents of philanthro-capitalism would argue that they are also more effective in doing good for ordinary people. Indeed the club’s members have given away about $70bn in the past 12 years.
That is far beyond what many individual countries can afford to do with their own social policies and aid budgets.
“They have assets that rival the social spending budgets of many countries,” said Professor Paul Schervish, director of Boston College’s Centre on Wealth and Philanthropy.
There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with a current endowment of more than $30bn, is the biggest philanthropic organization ever. Just one of its projects, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is estimated by the WHO to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.
The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.
These ‘titans’ of philanthropy have also started a trend among the slightly less wealthy.
While Gates’s and Soros’s efforts bestride the world, major philanthropists have emerged in specific regions like India or Latin America funding their own pet ideas and projects.
Gayle Peterson, co-founder of Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services, recently gave advice to a businessman who wanted to set up a foundation to give away $280m annually in south-east Asia.
“He told us: I want to be just like Bill Gates,” she said.
But there is a potential downside to the growth of these “über donors”, especially if the whims of individuals start to take precedence over the expertise of professionals.
The strange truth is that giving away billions of dollars is difficult and fraught with risk.
There can be waste, mismanagement and poor investment.
At the same time it can actually do harm.
“If you are putting enormous amounts of money into a community that can’t cope with it, then you can implode that community,” Peterson said.
Others are even more outspoken at the growing dominance of a tiny handful of billionaires in the development sector.
“The problem with any Good Club is that all the people might not be ‘good’.
Or at least not ‘good’ in universal definitions,” said Louise Uwacu, the Rwandan-born founder of the Canadian education charity Positivision.
There is also the issue of accountability.
Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure.
But who votes for the Good Club?
Such skeptical sentiments might spring from the Good Club‘s decision to meet in such secrecy in New York. In many ways that was understandable.
All its members are sensitive about privacy because of their unique mixes of fame and wealth.
The covert nature of the discussion also allowed them to speak freely about sensitive issues.
“I think they just wanted to be able to be candid. The secrecy allowed that,” said Wilhelm.
But some people are crying conspiracy.
The cloak-and-dagger aspect of the meeting has prompted some to accuse the Good Club of being a sort of Bilderberg Group for philanthropy, with an equally,
nefarious agenda of global power politics…
That idea has particular power on the christian right of America, which has reacted angrily to the idea that the club discussed birth control and overpopulation.
Experts in the philanthropy field think that this negative image can be countered by more openness for future Good Club meetings.
“If they do hold more meetings, and every indication is that they will, I think people would want them to be more public. After all, they can make decisions that affect millions of peoples’ lives,” said Wilhelm.
That is true…
If the members of the Good Club wish to wield their undoubted power, they may have to get used to the idea of doing it more openly.
The American tradition of great donors
Bill Gates The co-founder of Microsoft is the biggest philanthropist the world has ever seen.
Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he controls more than $30bn in assets – not bad for a computer geek from Seattle.
Often ranked as the world’s richest man, he has donated virtually his entire fortune to philanthropy, focusing on combating diseases in the developing world.
Henry Ford As well as being the father of the US car industry and the inventor of the modern production line, Ford has been a major force in philanthropy.
He made a vast fortune and left virtually all of it to the Ford Foundation, which by 2007 had more than $13bn in assets.
George Soros Hungarian-born Soros is a hugely successful US currency speculator and financier.
But he is also well known for his philanthropic works. Focusing on political democratization and creating an independent media, he has funded projects mainly in the former Soviet republics.
A political liberal, he is also a funder of the Centre for American Progress.
Andrew Carnegie This Scottish-born American industrialist made a huge fortune in steel and industry at the end of the 19th century.
He devoted the rest of his life to philanthropy, especially education, founding libraries, museums and universities in Britain and America.
He wrote of the responsibilities of the wealthy in two books, Triumphant Democracy and the Gospel of Wealth.
John D Rockefeller The man whose name became a byword for unimaginable wealth made his fortune in oil.
Often regarded as the richest person in history, Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in effective retirement, setting up various foundations and funding philanthropic causes.
His special interests were in the fields of science and medicine.
Ok. Let’s cut to chase here with regards the Russia v. Ukraine conflict.
It’s all about G.O.D. Gold, Oil and Drugs basically.
Gold is a scarce commodity that is used by the likes of the Federal Reserve (fed) and the Bank of England (b of e) as a form collateral when things go a bit wayward on the stock markets. But, just think for a moment who controls the fed and the b of e? Who controls the markets? Who’s always embroiled in the background – protected by layers of agents and accomplices? The secret society.
You probably don’t need me to tell you that there is collection of elite families and organisations who pull the strings that their puppets dance to, and it’s just the same situation you’ll find here where the likes of Bo and Jo (Johnson and Biden) will try and put pressure on ex KGB agent Vladimir Putin to see who crumbles first. But, Putin is a smart cookie well versed in self defence and capable of looking after himself. He’s corrupt, don’t get me wrong. But, show me a politician that isn’t.
The central banks want us to think of the Russian leader as a “big bad monster.” They’ll have the papers and the tv publish a narrative to make him appear as a brutish thug whose only intent is total domination of a neighbouring country which is rich in natural resources. That is the key here.
Ukraine today holds the second biggest known gas reserves in Europe and around 400 million barrels of proven oil reserves, ranking 51st in the world and accounting for the world’s total oil reserves of 1,650,585,140,000 barrels, give or take a few.
Ukraine has proven reserves equivalent to 4.4 times its annual consumption. That’s not to be sniffed at.
Is it any wonder, therefore, that both the Yanks and the Ruskies want a bit of it? That’s also why Germany is getting itchy feet because if things start getting a bit heavy then its banking cartel and its security will be tested to the max. That’s why Germany is treading carefully so as not to step on Putin’s toes.
Ukraine is heavily dependent on fossil fuels and nuclear power for its energy needs, but who can forget about the Chernobyl nuclear disaster? It occurred in the Ukraine. Nuclear power stations produce waste product in the form of plutonium that can be used in bombs for submarines and planes of course.
Ever wondered why did America and the CIA invaded Afghanistan? For its opium, in a nutshell. It created a psyop so that it could plunder the country into chaos, people would leave and become refugees, and those who remained would either have to fight back or be controlled by the Taliban.
Now China and Russia are teaming up to corner the oil market with a gold back currency via the Chinese Yuan. Bye bye U.S. dollar that fuels the fed’s central bank globally. China has a slough of dark factions too of course, as does Russia.
President Xi of China and Putin of Russia are behind the scenes, on the same page with this push to dethrone the dollar and return the gold standard.
Recently oil dropped to a negative cost for the first time ever, think of what that does to the price of petrol per barrel.
If I charge you negative 5 pounds for a loaf of bread that means I have to give you the bread with 5 quid as well as the loaf of bread too. It’s the same with a barrel of oil. Countries have to pay people to receive oil, and its people have to pay in dollars in order to get oil from the oil kingpin Saudi Arabia, hence it being the petro-dollar and the world reserve currency. No oil, no economic fuel.
It’s been this way since the 1973 Arab-Israeli deal Henry Kissinger made with the Saudi Royal family two years after the gold standard was abolished amidst a fuel crisis and a quadrupling in the price of crude oil and a global demand v. supply concern.
They want the world to believe that the Government will protect the oil reserves with its military and make everyone pay for oil with the fiat paper known as the dollar. Funny money if you like, the kind that they print themselves for their own means when it suits.
Now Saudi has to pay U.S. dollars to people so they take their oil. Redistribution of dollars, etching Saudi’s global ruling via oil out of the equation leaving room for Russia becoming the new oil source leveraging for a gold backed currency.
But, of course, no layman on a minimum wage can afford to buy vasts reserves of gold as a backup when inflation hits and the price of a loaf of bread or petrol gies up…only a wealthy and powerful elite can afford to do that.
(Incidentally, Gold is not that scarce a commodity really. That’s a myth that has been carefully and deliberately constructed to make you believe that it is so that the likes of the De Beers can control the supply and demand of it. It is hard to find, but there’s plenty of it if you know where to look).
May reduce blood uric acid levels and help prevent gout attacks.
Helps prevent iron deficiency.
Protects your memory and thinking as you age.
So, they don’t want you or I to have gold. They don’t want us heading for them hills where there be gold. They want us locked in debt between paydays, basically. They want us tied to chains of debt slavery and usury AKA lending with high interest rates that are impossible to pay off leaving people in more and more debt every time they buy something, even just to survive. This causes the dollar (the current recognised / accepted global currency of exchange) to hyper inflate and the cost of living to rise more and more until the next thing you know you more people are living on the streets or in need of food banks just to get by. If you don’t see that now the way things are going right there’s going to be a massive collapse in the markets and a global financial meltdown just around the corner. I think it’s only a matter of time because it is engineered to happen that way.
Fast forward today and BoJo wants to sanction Russia. He’s only doing what his masters are telling him to do like the static-haired buffoon that he is. He is not daft, but he is dangerous, arguably more so than Putin I would say.
Sanctions undermine the trade deficit that props up the dollar that enslaves the world. But, Putin is ten steps ahead of the game.
Talking of games, Putin has kept ties with a group akin to Abstergo Industries, that which Assassin’s Creed based Abstergo off of.
This real-life group has played a primary role in technological development all across the board and is a Templar organization. Putin is believed to be a Teutonic Knight which is a knight of the German house of Saint Mary of Jerusalem. Their history with Russia is interesting to note. The Templars have been widely (though not completely) corporatized by the Roman papacy ever since they were called to be rounded up by the pope and French crown back in 1307.
Let me see if I understand this properly. Person A feels that they need the vaccine to be protected, so they get vaccinated. However, Person A doesn’t feel protected unless Person B also gets the vaccine. And if Person B refuses to get the vaccine, Person A shames them until they do.
Let’s take this a step further. Person A, who is vaccinated, can still catch and transmit the virus, but is not subjected to going through daily/weekly testing. Person B, who is not vaccinated, and who can catch and transmit the virus, has to go through daily/weekly testing and potential quarantine. Why does Person A not have to go through testing and quarantine if they can still catch and transmit the virus?
And to go even further than that: Person A is vaccinated and, even though they can catch and transmit the virus, can walk into any number of locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside. Person B is not vaccinated and, even though they may test negative for the virus, are not allowed inside any of the locations that state they will only allow the vaccinated inside.
Wanna piece this together now? It boils simply down to segregation and discrimination with no real basis for doing so.
Person A is vaccinated.
Person B is not vaccinated.
Both Person A and Person B can catch and transmit the virus.
Person A does not have to get tested, but Person B does.
Person A can go wherever they want, but Person B cannot.
Person A is allowed to live their lives, while Person B cannot.
Person A perpetuates the shaming of Person B by stating that Person B needs to be vaccinated for Person A to be protected.
Anybody disagree with anything I just said? You do? Then go look this up because this is all fact. Nothing I typed above is untrue; you need only read the news to see that this is exactly what is happening.
If your shot works, why do I need one? If your shot doesn’t work, why should I get one?