Orgone, also known as prana, life force, ki, chi, mana, or universal energy, is a form of energy that is present in everything. Dr. Wilhelm Reich, a visionary scientist, rediscovered this energy and found that layering organic and non-organic materials can act as a magnet for it. Reich used this discovery to help cure patients of various illnesses, including advanced stages of cancer, leading to conflict with the medical establishment.
Today, Reich’s orgone work is being rediscovered as a healing tool that helps the body and subtle bodies become whole. Orgone is also known as orgone devices or generators or orgonite, which is a combination of metal particles and resin that creates the orgone matrix. People from around the world are making their own orgone devices and adding gemstones and crystals to amplify the energy of orgone. Water, particularly charged water, is an important component of the orgone matrix.
The elements of fire, air, earth, and water can also be added to the orgone matrix using shamanic techniques for added power. The benefits of orgone include improved health, increased plant growth, transmutation of negative energy into positive vibes, increased prosperity, and a general state of well-being. DOR, or deadly orgone, is a form of orgone that has “turned stale” and is often associated with strong electromagnetism, such as from power lines and cell phones.
However, DOR can be transformed into OR, or healthy orgone, using orgonite devices.
Dr. Elizabeth Eads is on the frontline of medicine, treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is now seeing first-hand Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS. Let that sink in. Dr. Eads explains, “Yes, we are seeing vaccine related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxed. . . . It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. . . . .We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse or calamity of this immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”
Dr. Eads says it is particularly bad in the double CV19 vaxed and boosted. She calls the third injection “The Kill Shot, the Money Ball or whatever you want to call it. It is just devastating to the immune system, and I’ll tell you why. If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the CV19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the Lentivirus. The Lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS. In the Stanford study, the best-known Lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the Covid 19 (Vax) especially the booster. . . . It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”
There is a similar report out last week by the UK government that also points to the triple vaxed getting AIDS. So, the CV19 vaccines are actually injecting people with AIDS? Dr. Eads says, “That is exactly what I am telling you. That is what the Spike Lentivirus is. It is made up of HIV and AIDS along with SARS and MERS. That’s why the vaccinated and boosted are so sick. That’s why they dominate the hospitalizations regarding Covid illness as well.”
Because the immune system is depleted, many kinds of disease such as cancer can spread like wildfire. Dr. Ryan Cole says he’s seeing cancer up as much as 2,000% from the vaccines. Eads says, “I have some stunning numbers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) . . . . I am just going to read a few cancers: malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus up 794%. malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas up 524%. Breast cancer up 387%. . . . Ovarian cancer up 537%, Testicular cancer up 269%. These are numbers from 2021. . . . When they found out attorney Thomas Renz and the whistleblower had the data, they scrubbed the data and altered it, which is totally against the law.”
Dr. Eads is treating vaxed and unvaxed in her practice. She will tell you what you can do to help yourself, especially if you have been vaxed. Dr. Eads talks about the ongoing propaganda to get you to take the so-called boosters. Dr. Eads explains why you should stop all CV19 shots now. Dr. Eads also contends there is a huge disinformation campaign going on to make you think the CV19 shots are safe and not causing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, cancer and a host of other diseases–including AIDS.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads as she continues to highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 bioweapons and the dangerous lies by Big Pharma, the FDA, CDC and mainstream media.
(There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 53-minute interview 3.22.22.)
After the Interview:
You can follow Dr. Elizabeth (Betsy) Eads on Twitter or you can follow her on Telegram.
Ordinary people need not apply. Indeed there is no way to ask to join. You simply have to be very, very rich and very, very ‘generous’… on a global scale.
This is the Good Club, the name given to the tiny global elite of billionaire philanthropists who recently held their first and highly secretive meeting in the heart of New York City.
The names of some of the members are familiar figures:
business giants Eli and Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All told, its members are worth $125bn.
The meeting – called by Gates, Buffett and Rockefeller – was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe. It was, in some ways, a summit to save the world.
No wonder that when news of the secret meeting leaked, via the seemingly unusual source of an Irish-American website, it sent shock waves through the worlds of philanthropy, development aid and even diplomacy.
Handmade Orgone Devices & Shungite
“It is really unprecedented. It is the first time a group of donors of this level of wealth has met like that behind closed doors in what is in essence a billionaires’ club,” said Ian Wilhelm, senior writer at the Chronicle of Philanthropy magazine.
The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword.
On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works.
Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.
Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already ‘improved’ the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world.
But can the richest people on earth actually ‘save’ the planet?
The President’s House of Rockefeller University is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The university’s private campus, full of lush green trees, lies behind guarded entrances and a metal fence. It overlooks the East River, only a few blocks away from the United Nations.
It was here, at 3pm on 5 May (2009), that the Good Club gathered.
The university’s chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.
The president’s house is frequently used for university events, but rarely can it have played host to such a powerful conclave.
“The fact that they pulled this off, meeting in the middle of New York City, is just absolutely amazing,” said Niall O’Dowd, an Irish journalist who broke the story on the website irishcentral.com.
For six hours, the assembled billionaires discussed the crises facing the world.
Each was allowed to speak for 15 minutes.
The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease.
One of the themes was new ways to get ordinary people to donate small amounts to global issues.
Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.
“He tried to dominate, which I think annoyed some of the others,” said one source.
Winfrey, meanwhile, was said to have been in a contemplative, listening mood.
That the group should have met at all is indicative of the radical ways in which philanthropy has changed over the past two decades. The main force behind that change is Gates and his decision to donate almost all his fortune to ‘bettering’ the world…
Unlike the great philanthropists of former ages, Gates is young enough and active enough to take a full hands-on role in his philanthropy and craft it after his own ideas.
That example has been followed by others, most notably Soros, Turner and Buffett. Indeed, this new form of philanthropy, where retired elite businessmen try to change the world, has even been dubbed,
“Billanthropy” after Gates.
Another description is “philanthro-capitalism”.
Yet the implications of the development of philanthro-capitalism are profound.
It was fitting that the Good Club was meeting near the UN. The club members’ extreme wealth makes it as powerful as some of the nations with seats inside that august chamber.
Proponents of philanthro-capitalism would argue that they are also more effective in doing good for ordinary people. Indeed the club’s members have given away about $70bn in the past 12 years.
That is far beyond what many individual countries can afford to do with their own social policies and aid budgets.
“They have assets that rival the social spending budgets of many countries,” said Professor Paul Schervish, director of Boston College’s Centre on Wealth and Philanthropy.
There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with a current endowment of more than $30bn, is the biggest philanthropic organization ever. Just one of its projects, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is estimated by the WHO to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.
The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.
These ‘titans’ of philanthropy have also started a trend among the slightly less wealthy.
While Gates’s and Soros’s efforts bestride the world, major philanthropists have emerged in specific regions like India or Latin America funding their own pet ideas and projects.
Gayle Peterson, co-founder of Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services, recently gave advice to a businessman who wanted to set up a foundation to give away $280m annually in south-east Asia.
“He told us: I want to be just like Bill Gates,” she said.
But there is a potential downside to the growth of these “über donors”, especially if the whims of individuals start to take precedence over the expertise of professionals.
The strange truth is that giving away billions of dollars is difficult and fraught with risk.
There can be waste, mismanagement and poor investment.
At the same time it can actually do harm.
“If you are putting enormous amounts of money into a community that can’t cope with it, then you can implode that community,” Peterson said.
Others are even more outspoken at the growing dominance of a tiny handful of billionaires in the development sector.
“The problem with any Good Club is that all the people might not be ‘good’.
Or at least not ‘good’ in universal definitions,” said Louise Uwacu, the Rwandan-born founder of the Canadian education charity Positivision.
There is also the issue of accountability.
Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure.
But who votes for the Good Club?
Such skeptical sentiments might spring from the Good Club‘s decision to meet in such secrecy in New York. In many ways that was understandable.
All its members are sensitive about privacy because of their unique mixes of fame and wealth.
The covert nature of the discussion also allowed them to speak freely about sensitive issues.
“I think they just wanted to be able to be candid. The secrecy allowed that,” said Wilhelm.
But some people are crying conspiracy.
The cloak-and-dagger aspect of the meeting has prompted some to accuse the Good Club of being a sort of Bilderberg Group for philanthropy, with an equally,
nefarious agenda of global power politics…
That idea has particular power on the christian right of America, which has reacted angrily to the idea that the club discussed birth control and overpopulation.
Experts in the philanthropy field think that this negative image can be countered by more openness for future Good Club meetings.
“If they do hold more meetings, and every indication is that they will, I think people would want them to be more public. After all, they can make decisions that affect millions of peoples’ lives,” said Wilhelm.
That is true…
If the members of the Good Club wish to wield their undoubted power, they may have to get used to the idea of doing it more openly.
The American tradition of great donors
Bill Gates The co-founder of Microsoft is the biggest philanthropist the world has ever seen.
Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he controls more than $30bn in assets – not bad for a computer geek from Seattle.
Often ranked as the world’s richest man, he has donated virtually his entire fortune to philanthropy, focusing on combating diseases in the developing world.
Henry Ford As well as being the father of the US car industry and the inventor of the modern production line, Ford has been a major force in philanthropy.
He made a vast fortune and left virtually all of it to the Ford Foundation, which by 2007 had more than $13bn in assets.
George Soros Hungarian-born Soros is a hugely successful US currency speculator and financier.
But he is also well known for his philanthropic works. Focusing on political democratization and creating an independent media, he has funded projects mainly in the former Soviet republics.
A political liberal, he is also a funder of the Centre for American Progress.
Andrew Carnegie This Scottish-born American industrialist made a huge fortune in steel and industry at the end of the 19th century.
He devoted the rest of his life to philanthropy, especially education, founding libraries, museums and universities in Britain and America.
He wrote of the responsibilities of the wealthy in two books, Triumphant Democracy and the Gospel of Wealth.
John D Rockefeller The man whose name became a byword for unimaginable wealth made his fortune in oil.
Often regarded as the richest person in history, Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in effective retirement, setting up various foundations and funding philanthropic causes.
His special interests were in the fields of science and medicine.
The Team Bubba Podcast Episode 5 – Chat shit no shit Full house.
This week, all 4 of the team discuss the ongoing developments in canada and around the world, where are we and where do we see it going.
Mandates revoked, climate change, Ukraine, narrative changes, the world Economic Forum, artificial intelligence,the link between programmable digital currencies and the technology in kung flu vials etc etc.
It has been called “Nuremberg 2.0” by many, as expectations have been that there would be some kind of trial in an international court of law where these criminals would be prosecuted.
Dr. Füellmich recently revealed much of what his Corona Investigative Committee has found in a meeting in Poland, and he made clear the same thing I have been saying for many months now, that the judicial system is owned and controlled by the Globalists, and justice will not be found in today’s courts, whether it is Germany or the U.S., or any other country.
He stated:
The only way to end this is by the people rising up and telling the authorities that this is the end of the line.
It is not the courts of law. The courts of law, maybe we can use them to clean things up. But I am afraid that they are not even good for that.
Because they are so infiltrated by the other side that we’re going to have to setup a whole new judicial system.
That doesn’t mean that they are not going to proceed with a trial that will be similar to the original Nuremberg trials.
He states that there will be a real judge, real lawyers, and real witnesses, but the jury will be “the people” who will watch it via live stream. And he expects this to happen soon, before the end of the year.
I was very pleased to watch his presentation, and how he fielded questions, in this presentation in Poland.
I had been concerned for some time now that his work was giving people a false sense of hope that there was some kind of International Court out there somewhere that would try this case and arrest all the criminals responsible.
But he made it very clear that justice would NOT happen through the current court system, especially in Germany.
His years of experience in litigating in these corrupt courts have also taught him that the politicians are merely puppets, and that the real criminals are a small group of very wealthy people who are actually calling the shots, and these are the people that need to be tried.
And the original Nuremberg trials after WWII did NOT bring justice against the Globalists who funded both sides of the war, as the rich leaders of corporations like IBM and Ford were never tried, let alone convicted for their crimes against humanity that allowed Hitler and Nazism to rise to power.
Some of the Nazi doctors who were just “following orders” were tried, convicted, and executed, but the ones giving the orders were not.
But this is very important work that Dr. Füellmich and his team have been doing, nevertheless, because they are exposing the entire COVID conspiracy, and as he stated,
“There are no more conspiracy theories left. They have all become true and are no longer theories.”
One of the questions posed to him was the fact that many claim that the virus does not exist, as it has never been isolated.
His response was that from a legal standpoint, it really doesn’t matter.
The fraud has occurred with the PCR tests, and that is what will be exposed legally.
I do not want to get into this fight (about whether the virus has been isolated or not), because it really doesn’t matter.
I think we can do without answering this question.
If we know that the virus is no more dangerous than the flu, and if we also know that we don’t have a corona ‘pandemic‘, but only a PCR test ‘pandemic’, let’s go after the people who put out these lies.
And then, as the Americans say, let’s follow the evidence.
From one person to the next. And I am sure that many of these people, who are just puppets, many of these people are cowards, and sooner or later they will lead us to who is really in charge, and really responsible.
From what we learned from Catherine Austin Fitts, of course, there is a very small group of very rich people who are running the who behind the scenes, who are using these puppets.
I don’t know, maybe 300, maybe 3000 very rich families who invest their money into large vehicles, like Blackrock and Vanguard, and some of the others.
And through these investments, or through these vehicles they then reinvest their money.
In Deutsche Bank for example, 10% of the shares of Deutsche Bank are owned by Blackrock. Thereby, they control it. Together with maybe the Chinese and people from Qatar.
So in essence, the big question of course is why are they doing this?
The answer, I think, is because they are afraid of us, because there are so few of them, maybe 10,000, maybe 3000, we don’t know.
But they have a lot of money.
Why do they have this money?
Because they stole it from us, through their corporations. And they’re afraid that we have found out about it, and we have found out a lot about it.
So they needed something to distract our attention. And that is how they invented Corona.
They want control, complete control, because they are psychopaths and sociopaths.
They are trying to scare everyone, so that no one can think anymore, and that everyone in the end agrees to vaccinations with something that is not a vaccine, but it kills.
Regarding a Nuremberg 2.0 trial, this is what he said:
The difference between the original Nuremberg trial and what we are thinking of, is that when they conducted the Nuremberg trials, it was not one, but many trials after the war, it was after the war.
The war had ended…
What we are doing right now, and what we’re planning to do, is going to happen while the war is probably still going on.
We hope it is going to be over soon. It won’t really be over, because there is lots of clean-up work to be done. But I hope that it is only going to take maybe a few more weeks, maybe 2 or 3 more months, because they really have over-played their hands.
They’re going wild. They’re running amok right now.
But we’re planning on having and conducting an international trial with maybe the 40 lawyers who we have been in touch with, including one of the lawyers here from this country, and the plan is to do this towards the end of the year.
And it is only going to be a trial for… it’s a real trial. But, it’s… with a real judge, with real experts and with real witnesses, and real lawyers of course, from every country.
The most important message that this trial is going to send, is the one that is being sent through the witnesses who will explain what happened to them, what kind of damage they suffered, how their businesses were destroyed, how they lost a loved one, how they lost a kidney maybe, because of the side effects, the adverse effects.
But, there will be a verdict too. But this will only go on for 6 days maybe. Just to give the other side a taste of what is to come.
Because we are ready. We have the people, we have the lawyers who are educated, and who understand what this is all about.
So the actual trial, this will just be a first trial. There will be more than just one trial.
The jury will be the people. The people who watch this, through a live stream. And they will ultimately…. they are the ones who will hand down the verdict.
But again, we’re going to need many more than just this one trial.
There’s many more such trials that are actually being filed right now, in the United States in particular, because there are still many judges who are really independent, many of them who were elected by the people they work with, in their region.
But as I said, the only way to turn this around, is not through the courts of law, that takes too long. It’s by the people.
Rise up, and tell them to go to hell.
Because that’s where they come from…
He makes it clear that justice will never be found in the judiciary, especially in Germany.
The courts, at least at the highest government levels, are all controlled by corporate Globalists.
We’re going to have to setup our own legal systems, and we will.
I think we have to setup our own… well, what do you call this? I guess we have to setup our own parallel universe.
And we should start now. In many cases, we have started already. Because the current system, cannot be saved. It’s beyond repair. You can’t fix anything.
We have to setup our system of economics, of education, of law, and mostly education, because education is so important.
If people don’t learn what this is all about, if they don’t learn that they need to ask questions, then they’re going to be turned into robots. And that’s what they are trying to do with our children.
The only advice I can give you is, don’t play along.
Connect with everyone else. Setup your own parallel universe, connect with all of the people who are on the good side, and then when the time comes, and it will come, I think it will come soon.
We all will rise up and we will send them to hell, where they came from.
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
Click Image for Details
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
As we’ve seen over the past two years, data and statistics can be manipulated and skewed in a wide variety of ways. COVID cases, for example, have clearly been overinflated by including people with no symptoms (likely false positives) and diagnosing anyone entering the hospital for an unrelated issue as a COVID patient if they test positive (again, falsely) for SARS-CoV-2.
One of the most reliable data points we have is all-cause mortality. It’s very hard to massage that statistic, as people are either dead or they’re not. Their inclusion in the national death index database is based on one primary criteria — they’ve died — regardless of the cause.
From there, their cause of death, as identified on their death certificate, is added in to more granular statistics, such as the number of people who died from cancer and heart disease in any given year, for example. But while the cause of any given death can be manipulated and altered, the fact that there was a death is more certain. What’s more, death rates tend to be very stable.
We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business … death rates are up 40% over what they were prepandemic. ~ Scott Davidson, CEO of OneAmerica
As noted in a (not peer-reviewed) study led by scientist Denis Rancourt, who looked at U.S. mortality between March 2020 and October 2021,1 “All-cause mortality by time is the most reliable data for detecting true catastrophic events causing death, and for gauging the population-level impact of any surge in deaths from any cause.”
With that in mind, OneAmerica’s announcement that the death rate of working-age Americans (18 to 64), in the third quarter of 2021, was 40% higher than prepandemic levels is rather stunning. OneAmerica is a national mutual life insurance company based in Indianapolis. During an early January 2022 press conference, CEO Scott Davidson said:2
“We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business — not just at OneAmerica. The data is consistent across every player in that business.
And what we saw just in third quarter, we’re seeing it continue into fourth quarter, is that death rates are up 40% over what they were pre-pandemic. Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic. So, 40% is just unheard of.”
According to Davidson, a majority of the death claims filed are not classified as COVID-19 deaths, so something else is driving up the death rate. As reported by The Center Square:3
“The CDC weekly death counts, which reflect the information on death certificates and so have a lag of up to eight weeks or longer, show that for the week ending Nov. 6, there were far fewer deaths from COVID-19 in Indiana compared to a year ago — 195 verses 336 — but more deaths from other causes — 1,350 versus 1,319.”
Disability Claims Have Also Risen
At the same time, OneAmerica has also noticed an uptick in disability claims. Initially, there was a rise in short-term disability claims, but now most claims are for long-term disabilities. The company expects the rise in claims will cost them “well over $100 million,” an unexpected expense that will be passed on to employers buying group life insurance policies.
During that press conference, Brian Tabor, president of the Indiana Hospital Association, confirmed Indiana hospitals are seeing a dramatic increase in both deaths and hospitalizations for a wide variety of conditions.4
Not only are the number of hospitalizations in Indiana higher than it was before the COVID shots were rolled out in in 2021, it’s the highest it’s been in five years.5 Meanwhile, the daily deaths from COVID-19 are less than half that of 2020.
What’s Killing Younger Healthy Americans?
Since COVID-19 isn’t killing younger, healthy Americans, what is? What changed in 2021 that might have such a devastating effect on people’s health? Well, the most obvious change is that more than 100 million Americans got the experimental COVID shots, and doctors and scientists have elucidated several mechanisms by which these gene transfer technologies might injure or kill. As reported by vaccine safety blogger Steve Kirsch:6
“Normally death rates don’t change at all. They are very stable. It would take something REALLY BIG to have an effect this big. The effect size is 12-sigma.7 That is an event that would happen by pure chance every 2.832 years. That’s very rare. It’s basically never.
The universe is only 14 billion years old which is 1.413. In other words, the event that happened is not a statistical ‘fluke.’ Something caused a very big change … Whatever it is that is causing this, it is bigger and deadlier than COVID and it’s affecting nearly everyone.”
Kirsch lists 14 clues as to what this deadly “something” might be, including the following:8
The rise in deaths began after the rollout of the COVID shots
It’s primarily working age people (18 to 64) who are dying
There are more excess deaths than any time in history, which suggests they’re caused by a novel threat
COVID deaths have significantly diminished, so COVID-19 can be ruled out
People are dying from a wide variety of causes, so most pathogens can be ruled out
To get an effect size this high, the lethal agent must affect massive numbers of people. “It is something new affecting at least half the population,” Kirsch writes, “like a new mandated vaccine for example”
Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb has been, and continues to, push to get everyone injected
Since other life insurance companies are seeing the same trend, the causative factor is national in scope
The dramatic rise in disabilities suggests that many who aren’t killed by this novel threat are seriously injured, often long-term. As mentioned, doctors and scientists have detailed several mechanisms of action by which the COVID shots can maim or kill
Adverse Events May Be More Underreported Than Calculated
Kirsch continues:9
“We know that about 3M people die a year in the U.S.10 75% are over 65 years old, so that leaves us with 750K deaths per year for under 65. If that jumped by 40% from pre-pandemic levels in Q3 and Q4, we should assume that Q2 was the ramp up period (we’ll assume a linear ramp up in Q2).
So that is 75K deaths per quarter for Q3 and Q4 and half of that, 37K deaths in Q2. So that means roughly 187K excess deaths are probably happening for ages 18-64 due to some new cause.”
He then goes on to compare that rough estimate of 187,000 excess deaths to the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) which, as of the December 24, 2021, data release, included 2,156 deaths between the ages of 17 and 65.
Subtracting the background death rate of 40 from 2,156, multiplied by Kirsch’s calculated underreporting factor (URF) of 4111 gives us 87,000 deaths. In other words, assuming vaccine injuries are underreported by a factor of 41, the real death toll from the COVID jab would be 87,000. However, that’s 100,000 short of the 187,000 excess death rate calculated above.
This means “either there is another effect at play which is actually killing more people 18 to 64 than the vaccine is, (unlikely but possible),” Kirsch writes, or “my URF of 41 is underestimating deaths by a factor of 2.15.” Kirsch is not alone in suspecting the novel COVID shots are the causative factor for this dramatic rise in excess deaths.
A Government Imposed Health Disaster Looms Large
Dr. Robert Malone addressed OneAmerica’s finding in a Substack article, stating:12
“AT A MINIMUM, based on my reading, one has to conclude that if this report holds and is confirmed by others in the dry world of life insurance actuaries, we have both a huge human tragedy and a profound public policy failure of the U.S. Government and U.S. HHS system to serve and protect the citizens that pay for this ‘service.’
IF this holds true, then the genetic vaccines so aggressively promoted have failed, and the clear federal campaign to prevent early treatment with lifesaving drugs has contributed to a massive, avoidable loss of life.
AT WORST, this report implies that the federal workplace vaccine mandates have driven what appears to be a true crime against humanity. Massive loss of life in (presumably) workers that have been forced to accept a toxic vaccine at higher frequency relative to the general population of Indiana.”
Jessica Rose, Ph.D., a research fellow at the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge in Israel, also weighed in on the new data:13
“So what does this tell us? It tells us that we are potentially in a huge steaming pile of shit. To be frank. These indications from our friend at the insurance company are simply that — indications.
If what we are seeing in VAERS, and the other adverse event reporting systems, is the mere reflection of what is actually going on with regards to injuries, which I presume it is, then we ain’t seen nothing yet.
And if what is being reported with regards to immune deficiencies associated with these injections is not simply anecdotal or representative of a small sub-cohort of individuals, we could be looking at a government-imposed complete health disaster.”
The Defender also reported other studies and data suggesting the COVID shots are causing massive harm:14
“In a September study15 described as ‘narrative-shattering,’ Harvard, Tufts and Veterans Affairs researchers reported that approximately half of hospitalized patients ‘showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021’ had likely been admitted ‘for another reason entirely.’
In Ventura County, California, which is witnessing a startling spike in non-COVID-related hospitalizations,16 nurse whistleblowers argue the vaccines should be one of the first explanations considered. Why else, they ask, would otherwise healthy adults be showing up in droves with brain bleeds, heart attacks, autoimmune issues and lung abnormalities?
Autopsies17 of individuals who died following COVID vaccination reveal shocking pathological alterations most frequently affecting the heart and lungs but also the brain and other organs …
Far from being willing to contemplate the elephant in the room, the Indiana insurance executive indicated he plans to require all OneAmerica employees to get vaccinated. Somewhat counterintuitively, the industry’s ability to pass along costs for elevated claims activity by raising premiums now has analysts rosily predicting the insurance industry is ‘buckled up to accelerate growth in 2022’ …
On the consumer side of the fence, the picture is far less rosy — for both the unvaccinated and vaccinated. For example, New York State Assemblyman Patrick Burke (D-Buffalo) proposed punitive legislation that would permit insurers to deny COVID-related treatment coverage for individuals who choose not to get vaccinated.
Adding insult to injury, there are also reports of insurance companies imposing premium increases on employers in counties with low vaccination rates. Meanwhile, many of those injured by COVID vaccines report18 denials of health and disability insurance coverage.”
Same Trend Seen in Many Other States and Countries
As noted by Davidson, OneAmerica is not alone in seeing an unprecedented spike in excess deaths. It’s also not limited to the United States. The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, for example, also reports a 41% rise in death claims in 2021.19 That’s near-identical to the 40% increase reported by OneAmerica.
According to Kirsch, Phoenix, Arizona, is reporting a 100% rise in the death rate among city employees. In 2021, it was double that of the 10-year average.20 “There is clearly something going on that is not unique to Indiana,” he writes, adding:
“Excess mortality figures in Europe21 and the UK seem to show younger people are dying faster than the elderly, and that people 0-14 are dying faster in the second half of 2021 as compared to the first. More evidence showing that the vaccines are killing kids.”
You may recall that at the end of October 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a ridiculous “study”22 that would have even failed a seventh-grade science experiment that claimed to show the COVID shot reduced the risk of death from all causes, including accidents, by 34%.
The CDC can lie up and down all day long and attempt to confuse people with fraudulent studies, but what they are simply unable to do at this point is to manipulate the death rates. Independent third-party insurance carriers are now validating the depth of the CDC cover-up and fraud. The real-world excess deaths we’re now seeing clearly refute the CDC’s attempt to prop up the COVID jab narrative with manipulated data.
Safety Signal Is Indisputable
As cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough has repeatedly stated, we had a clear safety signal all the way back in February 2021, and it’s only gotten more pronounced over time. Despite that, not a single safety review has been conducted, and our health authorities refuse to address the astronomical death toll.
At this point, anyone who says the COVID shots are “safe and effective,” full stop, immediately loses all credibility. There’s not a shred of data to suggest either is true. Everything we have points to these injections being the most lethal drugs ever used in modern medical history.
Perhaps the saddest part of it all is that they’re completely unnecessary. Doctors have identified several effective treatment options that can slash the COVID death rate by 85% or more. There’s no medical reason to include the global population in a novel drug experiment. We could have avoided all these excess deaths by making sure early treatment was given, rather than exclusively relying on an experimental “vaccine.”
Early Treatment Options
While the overall risk of COVID-19 has been grossly exaggerated, early treatment is key, both for preventing severe infection and preventing “long-haul COVID.” Here are a few suggestions:
•Oral-nasal decontamination — The virus, especially the Delta variant, replicates rapidly in the nasal cavity and mouth for three to five days before spreading to the rest of the body, so you want to strike where it’s most likely to be found right from the start.
Research23 has demonstrated that irrigating your nasal passages with 2.5 milliliters of 10% povidone-iodine (an antimicrobial) and standard saline, twice a day, is an effective remedy.
Another option that was slightly less effective was using a mixture of saline with half a teaspoon of sodium bicarbonate (an alkalizer). You can also gargle with these to kill viruses in your mouth and throat. When done routinely, it can be a very effective preventive strategy. You can find printable treatment guides on TruthForHealth.org.
•Nebulized peroxide — A similar strategy is to use nebulized hydrogen peroxide, diluted with saline to a 0.1% solution. Both hydrogen peroxide and saline24,25 have antiviral effects. You can view my previous videos on this on BitChute.
In a May 10, 2021, Orthomolecular Medicine press release,26 Dr. Thomas E. Levy — board-certified in internal medicine and cardiology — discussed the use of this treatment for COVID-19 specifically. Levy has in fact written an entire book on peroxide nebulization called “Rapid Virus Recovery,” which you can download for free from MedFox Publishing.
•Vitamin D optimization — Research has shown having a vitamin D level above 50 ng/mL brings the risk of COVID mortality down to near-zero.27
•Other key nutraceuticals — Vitamin C, zinc, quercetin and NAC all have scientific backing.
•Key drugs — For acute infection, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine or monoclonal antibodies can be used. While monoclonal antibodies and hydroxychloroquine must be used early on in the disease process, ivermectin has been shown to be effective in all stages of the infection.
Doxycycline or azithromycin are typically added as well, to address any secondary bacterial infection, as well as inhaled budesonide (a steroid). Oral steroids are used on and after the fifth day for pulmonary weakness and aspirin or NAC can be added to reduce the risk of clotting.
Full-strength aspirin is also typically recommended, but I believe lumbrokinase and serrapeptase may be a better, at least safer, alternative, as they help break down and prevent blood clots naturally.
100 Reasons the ‘covid pandemic’ is a fraud and a pretext to UN / WEF agenda 2030
1. PCR tests ran above the threshold for accuracy (35 amplification cycles max) – NHS ran up to 45 cycles resulting in up to 98% false positives
2. PCR test was developed without an isolated SARS-COV-2 sample – genetic material from a common cold was used instead
3. A CV death is classified as a death by ANY cause within 28 days of a positive PCR test
4. No discussion about naturally acquired immunity
5. No attempt to establish whether ‘vaccine’ recipient already has antibodies
6. Masks don’t work
7. Lockdowns don’t work
8. Cancelled operations
9. Merriam Webster changed the 15 year long standing definition of the word ‘vaccine’ in January 2021 to include ‘messenger mRNA’ so that the CV gene therapy injections which did not fall within the previous definition could be classified as such, so these experimental treatments could be mandated as ‘vaccines’
10. There is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission
11. CV experimental ‘vaccines’ do not reduce likelihood of infection or transmission
12. CV infection fatality rate is 0.096% according to the UK government
13. CV was classified as a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK in Jan 2020, but then downgraded from HCID status in March 2020
14.’Vaccinating’ children despite survival rate of 99.996%
15. Eat out to help out
16. Doctors and nurses performing choreographed dance routines during ‘height of pandemic’
17. The W.H.O changed their long standing definition of ‘herd immunity from natural infection’, to ‘herd immunity from vaccination’ in December 2020
18. CV experimental ‘vaccines’ all in phase three trials until 2023
19. ‘Vaccine’ manufacturers are exempt from liability for injury or death
20. SARS-COV-2 was manufactured in a laboratory using gain of function
21. Population adjusted mortality rates for the UK from 1990-2020 (inclusive) show 2020 is position 17 for excess deaths
22. Officially recorded vaccine related injuries including death caused by CV ‘vaccines’ higher than for all other vaccines in history combined
23. Main stream media is complicit
24. Fauci warned in 2017 that a ‘surprise outbreak’ was highly likely within the next 5 years
25. Cheap, readily available cures for CV supressed such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
26. Care home residents were denied critical care in hospital and prescribed end of life drugs instead (midazolam / morphine) resulting in over 30,000 deaths
27. 3 weeks to flatten the curve
28. All westernised democracies who are members of WHO / WEF in lock step29. Mass public protests ignored or misrepresented by main stream media
30. UK Cases, hospitalisations and deaths up significantly since the beginning of July in 2021 compared to last year despite ‘vaccine’ rollout
31. Booster shots every 6 months because the ‘vaccine’ protection fades
32. Massive increase in blood clot related injuries, especially in children and young men, following ‘vaccine’ roll out including myocarditis which has an average life expectancy of 5 years after diagnosis
33. All scientists, doctors and nurses who speak out against the narrative are censored – no debate
34. Blanket DNR (do not resuscitate) orders issued in care homes
35. Sweden
36. People who die within 14 days after a second ‘vaccine’ are classified as unvaccinated
37. Government mandated the ‘vaccines’ for care home workers despite no reduction in transmission or infection following vaccination
38. Government have engineered 2021 winter NHS crisis by mandating jabs for care home workers resulting in a shortage of staff and ability for hospitals to discharge patients to care homes
39. Nightingale hospitals built with a fanfare, unstaffed, no patients and then quietly dismantled
40. Boris Johnson caught Covid and was hospitalised but recovered resulting in natural immunity. Then he received 2 doses of the ‘vaccine’ – then he caught covid again
41. Government awarded multi-million pound PPE contract to a pub landlord
42. No biohazard bins for used masks
43. Make your own mask out of an old sock or t-shirt
44. All hospital admissions required to take a PCR test, all subsequent deaths following positive test labelled as CV deaths regardless of cause of death
45. No mask when sat down at a restaurant, but must be worn when stood up
46. Celebrity ‘vaccine’ endorsements
47. CV deaths in 2021 correlate with ‘vaccine’ uptake
48. Government funded media campaigns designed to incite fear and create division
49. Free stuff offered as incentives to be ‘vaccinated’
50. Government coercion, manipulation and blackmail
51. Freedom of information requests to local authorities show no excess funerals or cremations for 2020
52. UK government has ordered 517 million doses of experimental ‘vaccines’ for a population of 68 million
53. Mix and match ‘vaccine’ strategy
54. Event 201 – Pandemic preparedness exercise based on a coronavirus held in October 2019, organised by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation
55. Photographs of dead bodies lying in the street in Wuhan January 2020
56. There are already 300 ‘next gen’ (experimental) CV ‘vaccines’ in development
57. ‘Vaccine’ efficacy lies by manufacturers, raw data undisclosed
58. No CV ‘vaccine’ is licensed by the UK government – they are being administered under temporary use authorisation under legislation 174 of the human medicines regulations 2012, which means they are exempt from the governments vaccine injury compensation scheme
59. Government has extended emergency powers for another 6 months resulting in 26 months of continual emergency powers despite no emergency
60. ‘Vaccine’ passports proposed despite no reduction in infection or transmission provided by the ‘vaccines’
61. Average age of a CV death is 82.6 years with several comorbidities (average age of death in UK is 81 years)
62. No discussion about Antibody dependant enhancement potential of CV ‘vaccines’
63. Government advice if you test positive is to stay at home
64. No treatments offered to those with a positive test
65. Backlog of 5.7 million operations
66. NHS overwhelmed as a direct result of government policy (self-isolation even without symptoms)
69. All westernised democracies leaders promoting ‘Build back better’ slogan in lock step
70. World economic forum – ‘The pandemic has provided an opportunity for a great reset’
71. All WHO / WEF member states CV response policies align with UN agenda 21/2030 (the new world order)
72. All CV ‘variants’ are only 0.3% different to the original
73. Significantly higher death toll in wealthy westernised democracies compared to developing countries
74. Funeral directors reported massive spike in deaths following CV ‘vaccine’ roll out
75. Flu disappeared
76. Nobel-prize winning inventor of PCR test stated it is not a diagnostic tool
77. No government study on health impact of lockdowns
78. No scientific evidence provided by government demonstrating the effectiveness of lockdowns, masks, social distancing or ‘vaccine’ passports
79. Chief scientific advisor to the UK government, Dominic Cummings, broke his-own lockdown rules
80. Matt Hancock had an affair with his assistant when we weren’t allowed to sit alone on a park bench
81. Global trading website confirms CV-19 tests were bought & distributed several years in advance
82. Every single SAGE prediction has been wrong
83. Governments own published data contradicts many of their own claims
84. Hospitals were never at full capacity
85. Ventilators killed patients
86. Masks are bad for your health
87. Long term effects from the ‘vaccines’ are unknown
88. The EU was preparing for ‘vaccine passports’ at least a year before the ‘pandemic’ began
89. After the USA and UK government, the two biggest funders of the W.H.O are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & GAVI (the vaccine alliance) – which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation
90. Bill Gates recently met with Boris Johnson to discuss ‘how to prevent future pandemics’
91. Bill gates said ‘vaccines’ are ‘his best investment ever!’
92. The vast majority of CV associated deaths are now in the ‘fully vaccinated’
93. The UK government previously stated ‘no plans to vaccinate children’
94. Children can receive CV ‘vaccine’ without parental consent
95. Plans to vaccinate children as young as 5 years old
96. Health secretary Sajid Javid said ‘no jab, no job’ policy would ‘boost uptake and protect others’ despite the ‘vaccines’ not reducing infection or transmission
97. Doctors, nurses and care home staff who worked through the ‘pandemic’ are now being dismissed for declining the ‘vaccine’ on the basis their patients are at risk, despite the ‘vaccines’ offering zero protection from infection or transmission
98. UK government wasted £37 billion on a failed track and trace application (where did the money go?)
99. The rise of ‘fact checkers’ who are funded by big pharma
100. Increased surveillance and censorship of information contrary to the narrative
which could protect those who have been injected with the concoction passing itself off as a COVID vaccine? Dr. Judy Mikovits thinks so. Mikovits, who was featured in the Plandemic film, recently revealed the name of it (which you can hear in this video excerpt): suramin. The disturbing horror stories of the COVID vaxxed never seem to end. Firstly, there are all the numerous adverse effects of those who have taken the COVID non-vaccine including migraines, bruising, heavy and irregular menstruation, miscarriages, potential sterility and potentially lethal blood clotting. (You can read what people are self-reporting at this Reddit group – scary). Then, there is the bizarre phenomenon of the COVID vaxxed transmitting these effects to the unvaccinated just by being around them. On top of that, there is the phenomenon of magnets sticking to the COVID vaxxed at the injection site. The point of the COVID non-vaccine is to program your RNA to make spike proteins so that your body will make antibodies against them, antibodies which will supposedly protect you against SARS-CoV-2. While there are many problems with this theory – including the fact there is no real SARS-CoV-2 and that spike proteins rest on the unfounded assumption of an isolated and purified virus – there is also the distinct danger that these artificially-induced spike proteins will cause you harm. This is where the possible COVID vaccine antidote comes in.
Possible COVID Vaccine Antidote: Suramin
Suramin is a drug which has been used as medicine for conditions such as African sleeping sickness and river blindness. It has been know to the medical profession for 100 years. Recently a small randomized clinical trial conducted the University of California San Diego found that a single intravenous dose of suramin produced dramatic improvement of core symptoms of autism, aka autism spectrum disorder (ASD). So what is suramin exactly? It turns out that it’s yet another pharmaceutical drug which is an extract of a natural substance, in this case pine needles. This follow the Big Pharma business model of bio-piracy – find natural plants and substances, isolate a chemical from them, get a patent on it and sell it, while using scientific journals and the media to trash anyone who claims the original plant has medicinal value.
“Here is the trail of science and data that shows the derivative relationship between pine needles and Suramin (“the elist’s antidote” to microbial illnesses) – and which also provides a potential antidote for those affected by the spike protein contagion … Suramin further decreases the activities of a large number of enzymes involved in DNA and RNA synthesis and modification: DNA polymerases (103, 104), RNA polymerases (103, 105, 106), reverse transcriptase (18, 103), telomerase (67), and enzymes involved in winding/ unwinding of DNA (107, 108) are inhibited by suramin, as well as histone- and chromatin-modifying enzymes like chromobox proteins (109), methyltransferases (110), and sirtuin histone deacetylases (111). This is medical-speak for inhibiting the inappropriate replication and modification of RNA and DNA … Suramin also showed inhibitory effects against components of the coagulation cascade (71, 130) … Excessive coagulation causes blood clots, mini-clots, strokes, and unusually heavy menstrual cycles.”
Extremely interesting! It reveals that suramin inhibits blood coagulation or blood clots (a major theme throughout the entire COVID op) – the very issue that caused officials to be wary of the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson COVID vaccines, causing many European nations to ban them, and also causing the US CDC at one point to halt them. Blood coagulation is also a theme of COVID itself, even before the advent of vaccines. What is also very fascinating is that suramin has the reported ability to decrease the activities of enzymes involved in DNA and RNA synthesis. This is exactly what the other 2 COVID vaccines – those made by Moderna and Pfizer – are trying to promote.
So, in plain English, this stuff could potentially slow or stop all the horrible blood clots people are suffering, plus potentially block the inappropriate RNA and DNA replication that the mRNA devices are trying to engender.
Suramin is Derived from Pine Needles
So where does suramin come from? Pine needles. It is one of many phytochemicals or plant chemicals that comes from pine needles, as the above article summarizes:
Trypan blue is derived from toluidine, that is, any of several isomeric bases, C14H16N2, derived from toluene. Trypan blue is so-called because it can kill trypanosomes, the parasites that cause sleeping sickness. An analog of trypan blue, suramin, is used pharmacologically against trypanosomiasis. Trypan blue is also known as diamine blue and Niagara blue… Trypan red and trypan blue were first synthesized by the German scientist Paul Ehrlich in 1904.
Trypan Blue is a derivative of toluene which is a derivative of pine oil.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TolueneThe compound was first isolated in 1837 through a distillation of pine oil by the Polish chemist Filip Walter, who named it rétinnaphte.”
Why Take Suramin when You Could Make and Take Pine Needle Tea?
Why take a synthetic and isolated version when you could take the full-spectrum natural substance?
“Pine needle tea provides a similar, if not superior, benefit, due in part to the fact that it is a direct mild extract of the whole herb leaving many of its properties still intact that might be destroyed by excessive heat during distillation and further dissection of its many nutrient components … Pine needles are high in vitamin C and A among numerous other compounds which provide a long list of benefits:
A 2011 Korean study demonstrated using pine needles in tea was the best way to access the antioxidant benefits from pine needles. The study demonstrated that the hot water extract of pine needle proanthocyanidins and catechins offer the highest levels of antioxidant benefits compared with chemical extract processes. There are other known benefits that pine needle tea and the tea made from other conifers share, which include:
Analgesic
Antibacterial
Antifungal
Anti-inflammatory
Antimicrobial
Antioxidant
Antiseptic
Antitumor
Antitussive
Antiviral
Aromatic
Astringent
Decongestant
Detoxifying
Disinfectant
Diuretic
Expectorant
Immuno-modulating
Improves circulation
Invigorating
Lymphatic
Relaxing
Relieves nervous exhaustion and fatigue
Relieves sore muscles
Restorative
Tonic
Herbalists the world over have known all along about the benefits of this simple natural tea. Pine needle tea has been used medicinally worldwide for thousands of years.”
Final Thoughts
As always, do your own research. I am not claiming suramin and/or pine needle tea is the COVID vaccine antidote, but rather a possible COVID vaccine antidote. More research needs to be done. If you are going to make your own, make sure you research what you’re doing – be careful with the yew pine (which is not a true pine and can be toxic, although it does have some medicinal properties). The cypress is not to be used as an essential oil in high doses, but normally safe otherwise. Overall, however, pine needle tea has amazing health benefits. Being aware of natural substances which can block DNA and RNA replication may be very important knowledge in the years to come as we face an increasing virulent nanotech invasion carried out under the rubric of Operation Coronavirus.
Stop The Cabal 