New research has shed light on the importance of carbon dioxide (CO2) for human health.
CO2 is not only a byproduct of cellular respiration, but also an essential nutrient for proper body function. It is involved in maintaining the pH balance of blood and tissues, and its deficiency can lead to various health problems, including cancer.
Bicarbonate, a form of CO2, plays a key role in the body’s acid-base balance. When bicarbonate is ingested, the acid in the stomach converts it into CO2.
In the blood, there is a constant and rapid interaction between bicarbonate and CO2. Bicarbonate represents the largest fraction of CO2 in the blood, at around 88%.
Contrary to popular belief, CO2 is not waste, but rather necessary for life on Earth. Plants use CO2 for photosynthesis, and animals rely on plants for their oxygen supply. CO2 and bicarbonate also play a role in maintaining appropriate pH levels in and around living organisms and cells.
Bicarbonate is a valuable medicine based on solid physiology. It is important to understand the role of CO2 in the body in order to appreciate the power and importance of bicarbonate as a medicine. CO2 and bicarbonate are two forms of the same thing, and they work together to support proper metabolic function.
CO2 is essential for human life, and a lack of it can lead to acidosis. It is important to maintain adequate levels of CO2 in the body in order to support overall health and well-being.
It’s Official – Russian Central Bank Announes – Ruble Backed by Gold!!
The Central Bank of Russia has officially announced that, as of March 28, 2022, the Russian Ruble currency is BOUND to Gold.
The rate is 5,000 Rubles per gram of gold bullion.
NOTE:
This story has been corrected to report “TROY” ounces as opposed to ‘dry’ ounces, and the values recomputed to reflect there are more grams per TROY ounce than in a dry ounce.
There are 32 grams in each TROY ounce. 32 grams times 5,000 rubles per Gram is 160,000 Rubles.
Are you with me so far?
The conversion rate of Rubles to U.S. Dollars is 100 Rubles, 90 Kopecs, to each U.S. Dollar.
If Rubles are bound to Gold at 5000 Rubles per gram, and there are 32 grams per TROY ounce, meaning one ounce of gold would cost 160,000 Rubles, then converting that to U.S. Dollars means Gold is $1600 per ounce when using Rubles, instead of $1,928 per ounce using Dollars.
Russia just wiped out about thirty percent (30%) of the value of the U.S. Dollar, worldwide, when it comes to Gold Bullion.
Worse, because Russia will only sell its oil and gas in Rubles, and Rubles are now fixed at 5,000 Rubles per gram, anyone wishing to buy Oil or Gas will need to either pay in Rubles or pay in Gold, and they won’t get the U.S. Dollar value for the gold they tender as payment!
People around the world will be literally THROWING their money at the Ruble and DUMPING Dollars and EUROS to do it.
What Russia just did is the financial equivalent of detonating a nuclear bomb.
FWIW, the last guy on this planet who tried to back a currency with Gold, was Muammar Kaddafi of Libya.
NATO went into Libya, bombed the shit out of it, until the people of Libya grabbed Kaddafi on the street, beat him bloody, and put a bullet in his head.
As of this hour, 10:39 PM EDT, I suspect Bankers all over the world are on the phones with each other and with heads of state, instructing them that what Russia has done will totally smash both the U.S. Dollar and the EURO, and those Bankers will be telling the heads of State that World War 3 must commence ‘immediately’…
Let me explain why.
Today, the Russian Central Bank pegged Rubles to Gold.
Last week, Russia declared they would only sell OIL and GAS in… Rubles.
This means Russian OIL and GAS are pegged to Gold with Rubles as the proxy for Gold.
EFFECT:
Europe (that needs Russian Gas and Oil) will now have to buy Rubles from Putin using Gold, or pay for the Oil and Gas with Gold itself.
Currently, the FOREX Rate for Rubles to Dollars is about 100:1
BUT… with 5,000 Rubles now equaling one gram of Gold, and oil being priced directly in Gold, we are going to see a MASSIVE price disruption in FOREX markets, in terms of how much Gold a Dollar can still buy.
Foreign countries holding our Dollar Debt Notes in Reserve, will see an immediate, and far less use for them and will want to start dumping them in favor of something more stable; something which holds its value.
Basically, any currency pegged to Gold will fit the bill, which means countries like that – like Japan – will start dumping their Dollar Debt as fast as they can – they are NOT going to go down with the ship!
They will move into more stable currencies, like… the Ruble.
This will have a DE-flationary effect on the Ruble, making it more valuable over time.
This also means Putin can re-peg the Ruble any time he wants, to like 500, or 50, or 10. IT just keeps getting more valuable for him.
The instant result is that all those foreign countries dumping their Dollar Reserves will cause all those excess Dollars to start coming home, triggering worse hyper-inflation than we already have now in the USA.
Is it any wonder why Biden was on stage last week calling for Regime change in Russia…?
He is about to have masses of angry and literally starving Americans marching through the streets here at home demanding answers.
UPDATE 10:39 AM EDT
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a public statement on video about what has taken place with binding the Ruble to Gold.
In that statement, he points out that Western Nations have simply STOLEN Russia’s foreign currency reserves and Gold Bullion Reserves, and by doing so, worldwide trust in so-called “First-Class” safety of investing in the West, has been smashed.
He goes on to predict that people will now dump their holdings of Dollars and EUROS to safer investments like,
land, food, and raw materials…
Putin predicting dollar and euros demise and everyone moving to “real reserves of raw materials” like “land, food, and gold”
The impact of what Russia has just done is a literal dagger to the heart of the U.S. Dollar and to the EURO.
No one will want those currencies anymore, and since the U.S. barely manufactures anything domestically, when foreign countries cease accepting the dollar for payment, shortages of everything will slam the U.S. and Europe.
Dr. Elizabeth Eads is on the frontline of medicine, treating patients who have been injected with the experimental CV19 so-called “vaccines.” Dr. Eads is now seeing first-hand Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, commonly referred to as AIDS. Let that sink in. Dr. Eads explains, “Yes, we are seeing vaccine related acquired immunodeficiency in the hospital now from the triple vaxed. . . . It is a vax injury, and we are not really certain how to treat this. We are kind of throwing the kitchen sink at it. . . . .We are trying to use everything we can think of to boost up the CD4 and CD8 counts and reverse this collapse or calamity of this immune collapse. It’s very stunning.”
Dr. Eads says it is particularly bad in the double CV19 vaxed and boosted. She calls the third injection “The Kill Shot, the Money Ball or whatever you want to call it. It is just devastating to the immune system, and I’ll tell you why. If you look at the recent Stanford study, and I am just going to read a couple of sentences from the Stanford study: ‘The spike protein in the CV19 vaccines that everyone is talking about is called the Lentivirus. The Lenti contains a combination of HIV, types one through three, SRV/1, which is AIDS, MERS and SARS. In the Stanford study, the best-known Lentivirus is the human immune deficiency pathogen, which causes AIDS. This is why we are seeing autoimmune and neurodegenerative decline after the Covid 19 (Vax) especially the booster. . . . It permanently changes the genome of the cell. That is why this is so terrifying to us in the medical community. We just don’t know how to attack this.”
There is a similar report out last week by the UK government that also points to the triple vaxed getting AIDS. So, the CV19 vaccines are actually injecting people with AIDS? Dr. Eads says, “That is exactly what I am telling you. That is what the Spike Lentivirus is. It is made up of HIV and AIDS along with SARS and MERS. That’s why the vaccinated and boosted are so sick. That’s why they dominate the hospitalizations regarding Covid illness as well.”
Because the immune system is depleted, many kinds of disease such as cancer can spread like wildfire. Dr. Ryan Cole says he’s seeing cancer up as much as 2,000% from the vaccines. Eads says, “I have some stunning numbers from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED) . . . . I am just going to read a few cancers: malignant neo-plasma of the esophagus up 794%. malignant neo-plasma of the stomach, colon and pancreas up 524%. Breast cancer up 387%. . . . Ovarian cancer up 537%, Testicular cancer up 269%. These are numbers from 2021. . . . When they found out attorney Thomas Renz and the whistleblower had the data, they scrubbed the data and altered it, which is totally against the law.”
Dr. Eads is treating vaxed and unvaxed in her practice. She will tell you what you can do to help yourself, especially if you have been vaxed. Dr. Eads talks about the ongoing propaganda to get you to take the so-called boosters. Dr. Eads explains why you should stop all CV19 shots now. Dr. Eads also contends there is a huge disinformation campaign going on to make you think the CV19 shots are safe and not causing blood clots, heart attacks, strokes, cancer and a host of other diseases–including AIDS.
Join Greg Hunter as he talks to 25-year veteran Dr. Elizabeth Eads as she continues to highlight the real unreported effects of the CV19 bioweapons and the dangerous lies by Big Pharma, the FDA, CDC and mainstream media.
(There is much more cutting edge, frontline medical information in the nearly 53-minute interview 3.22.22.)
After the Interview:
You can follow Dr. Elizabeth (Betsy) Eads on Twitter or you can follow her on Telegram.
“Many of us are pondering when things will return to normal…
The short response is: never.
Nothing will ever return to the ‘broken’ sense of normalcy
that prevailed prior to the crisis because the coronavirus ‘pandemic’
marks a fundamental inflection point in our global trajectory.” Klaus Schwab
World Economic Forum
20 More Reasons Why a COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ Never Existed
As demonstrated throughout the first article in this series, the so-called ‘pandemic’ that changed the course of human history is nothing like we’ve been told by “official” sources and mainstream media marionettes.
The real ‘pandemic’ being perpetrated against humanity is one of unprecedented tyranny, lies, and corruption.
While the world has been set on fire with the flames of vaccine mandates, food and supply shortages, hyperinflation, unemployment, and police state crackdowns, the global cabal sitting atop this wide-reaching catastrophe is steadily implementing plans to reshape and reset the world to their advantage.
Aided by the current crop of political dictators, Big Tech tyrants, medical mafiosos, and a whole host of public-private partners, the agenda to rob us of everything (remember, you’ll own nothing and be happy) including the right to refuse medicine is happening at warp speed.
They have been planning this for a couple of centuries. We are experiencing the poisonous fruits of their efforts in a real live drill for control of the planet.
Remember, the reason we are in this plight is because of the declared state of emergency issued by President Trump and continued under the Biden regime.
Leaders from many other countries also followed the same script. Again, if the “‘pandemic'” can be proven to be fraudulent, then all emergency executive orders and mandates must be immediately revoked!
It is important that this information is shared so that the ‘pandemic’ illusion can be completely shattered.
These additional 20 facts will further invalidate that this emergency ever truly existed:
#21 – Hydroxychloroquine was sidelined to make sure vaccines were the only available treatment for COVID-19
On March 30, 2020 the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the emergency use of Hydroxychloroquine and Chloroquine to treat COVID-19.
On May 22, 2020 The Lancet, one of the most reputable medical journals in the world, published a study concluding that Hydroxychloroquine‘kills’ more patientsand is a dangerous drug.
See more about this unprecedented scandal here and here.
Dr. Anthony Fauci continued to insist that Hydroxychloroquine (an FDA approved drug in use for over 60 years) is not an effective treatment for COVID-19, despite numerous worldwide studies that concluded that it is.
Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Rischaccused Fauci of,
running a ‘misinformation campaign’ against Hydroxychloroquine…
Hydroxychloroquine satisfied the criteria for the classification, but would have stood in the way of other lucrative drugs and a vaccine…
The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) even sued the FDA for withholding from the public some 60 million doses of Hydroxychloroquine that were donated by drug manufacturers to treat coronavirus patients.
Please see the following list of studies proving that Hydroxychloroquine is an effective treatment for COVID-19 here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.
#22 – Props were used to make the “‘pandemic'” look worse than it actually was
In March 2020, U.S. states and countries around the world began constructing makeshift hospital facilities to accommodate the expected surge of COVID-19 patients.
New York anticipated needing an extra 87,000 beds as the Javits Center was converted into a hospital by the Army Corp of Engineers.
The U.S.S. Comfort was also deployed to New York City while the U.S.S. Mercy was deployed to Los Angeles. This was all a sham, meant to trick the public into thinking the situation was much more dire than reality.
An article in the Navy Times revealed the truth about these makeshift facilities, stating:
By the time of Comfort’s departure, the approximately 1,200-person crew and 1,000-bed hospital had treated just 182 patients, of which approximately 70 percent had COVID-19, according to Capt. Patrick Amersbach, commanding officer of the Comfort’s Medical Treatment Facility.
Underutilization of added medical resources in New York City is not unique to the Comfort.
Thousands of hospital beds made available in a converted convention center have gone largely unused after quick assembly by the Army Corps of Engineers.
The Javits Center, which was initially envisioned as a 2,500-bed field hospital for non-COVID-19 patients, converted to coronavirus-only hospital shortly after going operational.
Still, the highest number of patients treated at the convention center at one time topped out at close to 500.
Similarly, the U.S.S. Mercy had only treated 77 non-infected patients by the time it departed the port of Los Angeles.
News media were also caught faking stories to stir up fear.
In an interview on CNN, YouTube CEO Susan Wojcickijustified censorship of opinions not supported by “authoritative sources,” stating,
“anything that would go against World Health Organization recommendations would be a violation of our policy. And so, removing information is another really important part of our policy.”
Countless individuals, organizations, medical professionals, and political figures were censored, suspended, or completely de-platformed for expressing opinions or citing factual information that poked holes in the story spun by entities like,
the WHO, CDC, FDA, the White House, and United Nations…
Solving a “‘pandemic'” is not like a mathematical equation where there can only be one right answer.
Censorship of differing views and factual information is not a scientific principle, but a totalitarian one that actually violates the scientific method.
#24 – Surprise! COVID-19 doesn’t just infect humans
Since coronaviruses are very common and were “discovered” in the 1960s,
doesn’t this reinforce that these tests are pointless for diagnosing illness, but perfect for creating hysteria and the justification for draconian measures?
A USA Today article from February 2020 documented Fauci’s original stance on masks:
The only people who need masks are those who are already infected to keep from exposing others.
The masks sold at drugstores aren’t even good enough to truly protect anyone, Fauci said.
“If you look at the masks that you buy in a drugstore, the leakage around that doesn’t really do much to protect you,” he said.
“People start saying, ‘Should I start wearing a mask?’ Now, in the United States, there is absolutely no reason whatsoever to wear a mask.”
In a Dave Rubenstein Show interview in May 2019, Fauci called mask wearing “paranoid” and advised against it as protection against infectious diseases.
An article byBill Hennessy documented the New England Journal of Medicine’s stance on masks, citing:
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection.
Public health authorities define a significant exposure to COVID-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic COVID-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes).
The chance of catching COVID-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal.
In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the ‘pandemic’.
Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.
On April 3, 2020 the initial sentiment around universal masking was reversed when President Trump announced that the CDC recommended that citizens wear cloth face masks in public to stop the spread of the virus.
States then began issuing mask mandates even for children, and the controversy about their usage has never gone away.
There have been hundreds of face mask studies.
One of the best compilations can be found on Life Site News, where they cite 47 studies that confirm masks are ineffective for COVID-19 and 32 additional studies that confirm they have negative health effects.
So, the overwhelming scientific consensus confirms what we were told from the very beginning:
“In this research, we show that 5G millimeter waves could be absorbed by dermatologic cells acting like antennas, transferred to other cells and play the main role in producing Coronaviruses in biological cells.”
Nitrogen Dioxide exposure. A research article in Science Direct, originally published in April 2020, concluded that chronic exposure to Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) could have contributed to COVID-19 fatalities in places like Italy, Spain, France, Germany, and “maybe across the whole world.”
Air Pollution.Harvard scientists discovered that a small increase in long-term exposure to air pollution (fine particulate matter – PM5) led to a large increase in the COVID-19 death rate. Wuhan (China), New York City, Lombardy (Italy), and many of the initial coronavirus hotspots also have extremely high levels of air pollution. Could people who were poisoned by air pollution have been misdiagnosed with COVID-19? See also here.
Vitamin B1 deficiency (beriberi) and tuberculosis. A fascinating series of articles by health journalist Bill Sardi document how COVID-19 symptoms such as,
“racing heart, chronic headache, crushing fatigue and even shortness of breath can only be explained by a deficiency of vitamin B1.
No coronavirus, flu bug, or any other infection produces the symptoms observed with COVID-19.”
Even the world-renowned British Medical Journal said social distancing was based on outdated science.
Could it really be that social distancing was actually borne from a teenage girl’s science project and adopted as a worldwide policy to keep people apart and afraid of each other?
Prominent medical researcher Knutt M. Wittkowski criticized the lockdown approach saying, “With all respiratory diseases, the only thing that stops the disease is herd immunity.About 80% of the people need to have had contact with the virus, and the majority of them won’t even have recognized that they were infected, or they had very, very mild symptoms, especially if they are children.So, it’s very important to keep the schools open and kids mingling to spread the virus to get herd immunity as fast as possible…”
Researchers at Well Being Trust and the Robert Graham Center for Policy Studies in Family Medicine and Primary Care estimated that 75,000 people could die from alcohol, drug abuse and suicide, calling them “deaths of despair.”
The application of lockdowns was arbitrary and inconsistent. Why were liquor and cannabis stores allowed to stay open when churches were forced to close? Why were some businesses (mostly big box stores and major corporations) deemed essential while others were shuttered and forced to apply for government handouts just to survive?
If lockdowns worked, the “pandemic” should have ended as early as summer 2020!
Much more could be said on this topic, but I think you get the point.
#29 – Quarantining healthy people is tyrannical and goes against all conventional wisdom
The Great Barrington Declaration, signed by close to 60,000 scientists and medical professionals and over 800,000 lay people, advised that only the sick should be quarantined.
The declaration states,
“The most compassionate approach that balances the risks and benefits of reaching herd immunity, is to allow those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk.
We call this Focused Protection.”
Focused Protection has been standard practice for every previous epidemic or ‘pandemic’ situation. Healthy people should be free to resume normal life and risk exposure.
National and regional lockdowns which quarantine the healthy with the sick are nonsensical and have only served to prolong the “‘pandemic'” situation.
“children under 10 are less likely to get infected than adults and if they get infected, they are less likely to get seriously ill…even if children do get infected, they are less likely to transmit the disease to others than adults. We have not found a single instance of a child infecting parents.”
Data from WorldOMeter showed that children aged 0-17 years have a 0.02-0.06% share of world COVID-19 deaths, which is essentially zero.
“From a clinical standpoint, most children 1 to 18 years old experience mild or no illness from COVID-19 and are much less likely than adults to face severe consequences from the infection.”
Scott Atlas, former member of Trump’s coronavirus task force, stated,
“We know who is at risk. Only 0.2 percent of U.S. deaths have been people younger than 25, and 80 percent have been in people over 65; the average fatality age is 78.”
A JAMA Pediatrics study of North American pediatric hospitals flatly stated that,
“our data indicate that children are at far greater risk of critical illness from influenza than from COVID-19.”
#31 – Though often vilified, marginalized, and censored, other treatments for COVID-19 exist and are proven to be effective, including:
I have already documented the many exercises, documents, legal proceedings, and conferences that have taken place (please see The Back Story and The Ramp Up from my COVID Chronicles series).
Since all this planning has been taking place for at least 20 years, why did everything go so poorly?
#36 – Governments have tried to inflate illnesses into ‘pandemic’s when not justified before
You would think that with the foreknowledge gathered during the various ‘pandemic’ exercises conducted over the last two decades, something simple like shutting down air travel in the place where the outbreak first occurred would have been one of the first priorities.
However, that did not happen.
Why is that?
#38 – Constant confusion and misinformation from public health and government officials keep people fearful and bewildered
Remember the mantra “order out of chaos” because this is the modus operandi of the “global elite.”
They have purposefully sowed confusion and chaos regarding the nature of the “virus,” where it originated, how it is transmitted, its lethality, how variants emerge, how the tests work, whether one can develop natural immunity, if masks work and if so, how many need to be worn, and on and on.
They continually contradict previous statements that seemed definitive at the time, keeping the naïve public constantly off balance and in a perpetual state of cognitive dissonance.
Why anyone still trusts anything coming out of their constantly lying orifices is completely baffling!
Nevertheless, many still do trust, and their ignorance and obedience serve to perpetuate the “‘pandemic'” and the slippery slope to complete tyranny!
#39 – The “‘pandemic'” ushered in the rise of authoritarian leadership just as predicted in the 2010 Rockefeller Report (see page 18)
Under the guise of public health and safety, governments committed all kinds of atrocities in the name of keeping people safe.
#40 – We were immediately and repeatedly told that only a vaccine could remedy the “‘pandemic'” and get us back to normal.
How in the world did people like Bill Gates, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Zeke Emanuel, and countless others know instantly that a vaccine was the only way out of the “‘pandemic'”?
By now it should be obvious that from the outset, the entire goal of this “‘pandemic'” has been to inoculate the entire planet with a “vaccine.”
Why else would all other treatments (besides Big Pharma-backed ones like Remdesivir) be banned or vilified? Why else would there be so much pressure to roll up one’s sleeve and take the jab?
Why else would there be so much propaganda regarding how “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccines are, when there is so much evidence to the contrary?
Since the vaccination campaigns began, most countries are still not back to normal (especially in places like Australia and Italy). The goalpost keeps getting moved while authoritarian mandates and controls accelerate.
It is just like Rockefeller predicted and Schwab and Ghebreyesus have stated – We will not be returning to normal.
The Joke’s On Us
Unless people wake up and realize that this entire “‘pandemic'” has been an excuse to install global governance and increase authoritarian control, these cabalists may get their wish.
Now that you are armed with the facts, it is your duty to spread this information far and wide!
RESISTANCE IS MANDATORY if you want to live freely.
Even before the ‘pandemic’ hit, I realized that we were in a revolutionary moment where what would be impossible or even inconceivable in normal times had become not only possible, but probably absolutely necessary…
We will not go back to where we were when the ‘pandemic’ started. That is pretty certain…”
The whole world is under the power of an evil spell.
The specters of the past like Nazism, Fascism, Communism, and Technocracy are rapidly converging across the globe and hurling us towards a true prison planet where authoritarian rule is commonplace.
None of this would have been possible without State of Emergency declarations being implemented in countries worldwide to stop the so-called coronavirus “‘pandemic’.”
Authoritarian governments love emergency powers and executive orders because they provide cover to implement all manner of draconian dictates essentially destroying free speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of the press all in the name of keeping people safe.
What if the pretext for declaring a ‘pandemic’ and locking down billions of people was all just a ruse?
What if all that’s happened over the past 18 months had nothing to do with a global health crisis?
What if many of the deaths attributed to COVID-19 could have stemmed from other causes?
What if the reason for declaring a ‘pandemic’ was destroy the current world system and institute a “new normal” New World Order?
There is an abundance of evidence suggesting that the coronavirus “‘pandemic'” is nothing but a global social engineering project meant to get people used to obeying mandates and dictates from local, state, federal, and even international powers.
The following statement from World Economic Forum leaderKlaus Schwab seems to indicate there is indeed another purpose for the crisis:
If it can be proven that there was never a real ‘pandemic’, then all instituted measures including lockdowns, masking, social distancing, contact tracing, vaccination, and vaccine passports are totally unnecessary, unethical, unlawful, and must be stopped immediately!
There have been thousands of articles written about the devastating repercussions each one of these “safety” measures has wrought against humanity.
This two-part article will tie together many facts that when considered together, will destroy the illusion that humanity ever faced a dire “‘pandemic’.”
The list is in no particular order and links to source material are included for reference and further investigation.
Much of this research could not have been achieved without the work of so many independent journalists and alternative media outlets.
Now, let’s begin the journey and delve into the first twenty reasons why a COVID-19 ‘pandemic’ never existed.
#1 – COVID-19 symptoms are largely indistinguishable from symptoms of other common illnesses
The CDC had to recall over 32,000 test kits that had been shipped to state public health labs. In April 2020, CDC officials confirmed that COVID-19 test kits sent out to states in February were tainted with the coronavirus.
The test can only detect the presence of genetic material having a variety of origins.
Positivity levels for COVID-19 depend largely on what cycle threshold tests are set for. Anything above 30-35 cycles is likely to produce false positive results.
According to the New York Times, most U.S. labs set the cycle threshold at 40, meaning test results are highly likely to indicate false positive results.
The CDC even admitted that a positive PCR test result does not necessarily indicate that COVID-19 is the definitive cause of disease and may be other bacterial infections or co-infection with other viruses.
Thousands and potentially millions of people tested positive for COVID-19 though they had no symptoms. Officials and the media were complicit in creating a “casedemic” where healthy people were told they were sick because of a positive test!
“Detecting the Delta variant, or other variants, requires a special type of testing called genomic sequencing. Due to the volume of COVID-19 cases, sequencing is not performed on all viral samples.
However, because the Delta variant now accounts for the majority of COVID-19 cases in the United States, there is a strong likelihood that a positive test result indicates infection with the Delta variant.”
Armed with these facts, how can there be an epidemic of “Delta” variant infections when the PCR test can’t detect it and the required genomic sequencing tests aren’t being performed and haven’t yet been federally approved?
According to a Public Health England report (page 8) from June 18, 2021, the case fatality rate for the Delta variant was 0.1%, about the same rate as the flu.
#6 – Asymptomatic transmission is a myth
Before the current state of scientific lunacy, you had to actually have symptoms to be diagnosed as being sick from a disease or virus.
The COVID-19 “‘pandemic'” turned things around 180 degrees where you could test positive for the virus, but never show any symptoms.
A December 2020 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) revealed:
Symptomatic people infect someone else in the house 18% of the time.
Asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic people only infected someone else 0.7% of the time.
The study concluded that,
“these findings are consistent with other household studies reporting asymptomatic index cases as having limited role in household transmission.”
If it’s virtually impossible to contract COVID-19 from someone without symptoms you live with, how is it possible to contract it from interacting with asymptomatic people in public places?
A study by Chinese researchers published by the NIHs National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) revealed that none of the 455 individuals exposed to asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers for 4-5 days later tested positive for the disease.
The study’s conclusion states:
“In summary, all the 455 contacts were excluded from SARS-CoV-2 infection and we conclude that the infectivity of some asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 carriers might be weak.”
In June 2020, Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s Emerging Diseases and Zoonosis unit publicly stated that asymptomatic carriersvery rarely transmit the coronavirus…
As this admission began to make major news, Dr. Van Kerkhove and the WHO quickly backtracked, “reassuring” everyone that asymptomatic people can spread the virus.
So, which is true?
Perhaps the words of Dr. Anthony Fauci (in one of the rare times he’s told the truth) will help clear the confusion, see here.
Case closed…!
#7 – Over 80% of people who were diagnosed with COVID-19 and placed on ventilators died
Last year Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell sparked controversy with a viral video stating that patients being put on ventilators were dying at an alarming rate.
These examples prove that it was medical malpractice that killed thousands of people, not COVID-19.
#8 – Nursing homes and long-term care facilities comprised a large portion of COVID-19 deaths worldwide
Many of the deaths that created the initial “‘pandemic'” panic were elderly patients in nursing homes and long-term care facilities.
In June 2020,USA Today documented 40,600 deaths among nursing home residents and believed this number to be an undercount.
The Atlantic corroborated this total and also pointed out that,
“state and federal officials seem to be doing little to protect the elderly from further devastation.”
Former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo should have been heldpersonally responsible for many of these deaths after issuing an executive order allowing COVID-19 positive and infectious patients to be moved to nursing homes for treatment.
A May 2020 The Guardian article revealed that “90% of the 3,700 people who have died from coronavirus in Sweden were over 70, and half were living in care homes.”
In Belgium, more than half of coronavirus deaths were those in care homes. Spain and Italy also had similar numbers.
How many elderly patients truly died from COVID and not some other underlying cause like cancer? Even worse, how many may have been deliberately killed?
A damning NHS document revealed that many nursing and care facility patients were potentially given a fatal dose of Midazolam, a drug used for sedation therapy in critically ill patients.
#10 – Doctors and hospitals were paid more to diagnose patients with COVID-19
The corruption in our health care system cannot be overstated.
According to S. Senator Dr. Scott Jensen, hospitals were given $13,000 for every COVID-19 diagnosis (up from $5,000 for a typical lump sum payment) and $39,000 for every COVID-19 patient using a ventilator by the NIH.
A CDC memo dated March 24, 2020 from Steven Schwartz, PhD and Director – Division of Vital Statistics advised coroners and medical examiners to report COVID-19 fatalities for those who did not receive a positive test result as long as it was assumedit caused or contributed to the death.
In April 2020, CDC began counting coronavirus cases and deaths not confirmed by lab testing, allowing numbers to be falsely inflated.
A U.S. News & World Report article stated that as a result in the change in guidance from the CDC,
“There was already a big rise in New York City, where officials this week started counting people who had never tested positive for the coronavirus.
That caused the city’s death count to jump by more than 3,700 on Tuesday.”
COVID-19 deaths have been greatly exaggerated from the outset.
The CDC has admitted that people who have died from “COVID-19” have had an average of 4 comorbidities (see Table 3), including conditions such as heart failure, diabetes, and cancer.
Doesn’t it make sense that one or a combination of these other health conditions led to their death?
The CDC data also reveals that only over 5% of deaths recorded on official death certificates were attributed solely to COVID-19 as of Sept. 5, 2021.
This means that around 95% of recorded deaths were not from COVID-19!
Project Veritas exposed the accounts of several directors and workers at New York funeral homes, who admitted that COVID-19 was being written on the death certificate (when it was not the true cause of death) for political and monetary reasons.
“the provisional leading cause-of-death rankings for 2020 indicate that COVID-19 was the third leading cause of death in the U.S. behind heart disease and cancer.”
So, with all of the hype and hoopla about a ‘pandemic’, more people died from heart disease and cancer as is typical of any other year.
In an article from the BMJ, Dr. John Ioannidis indicated there were several other causes for excess deaths stating,
“Under lockdown conditions many patients with acute, treatable conditions (such as coronary syndromes) avoid seeking care.
This disruption may be seen in the excess deaths accruing so far in the COVID-19 lockdown. Patients with cancer whose treatment is delayed have worse outcomes.
And when patients avoid hospitals many health systems suffer financially, furlough personnel, and cut services.
COVID-19 overwhelmed a few dozen hospitals, but COVID-19 Countermeasures have already jeopardized thousands of them.”
“the total amount of excess mortality [attributed to COVID-19] will also depend on the age structure of a population.
Countries with age structures weighted towards an older population will experience higher mortality than a country with an age structure weighted towards a younger population.”
In June 2020, a study revealed that nearly one-third of excess deaths in the early stages of the coronavirus ‘pandemic’ in the United States were linked to causes other than COVID-19.
Study author Dr. Steven Woolf stated,
“People who never had the virus may have died from other causes because of the spillover effects of the ‘pandemic’, such as delayed medical care, economic hardship or emotional distress.”
There is no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers
The total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19
Deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19
The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths.
The WHO altered the ‘pandemic’ definition by deleting “severity of illness” and focusing on the number of cases rather than the number of deaths.
Some WHO scientists responsible for creating ‘pandemic’ policies were being paid by the very pharmaceutical companies creating the vaccines and antivirals that would be used if a ‘pandemic’ was declared.
The 2009 ‘pandemic’ definition.
An influenza ‘pandemic’ occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness.
#15 – WHO deleted the references to naturally acquired immunity from its website
Once known as a basic staple in virology, the definition of herd immunity, also called naturally acquired immunity, was completely redefined by the WHO in a matter of months.
No longer did natural immunity mean that a person could be protected from a viral infection because of previous exposure or vaccination; the new definition only emphasized protection from vaccination!
The new definition serves to benefit vaccine makers and pigeonholes humanity into seeking protection from vaccines only.
Ghebreyesus is the first WHO Director not to have this distinction.
He is a Marxist Communist who had a key role in leading the murderous communist organization known as the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF).
In addition, Ghebreyesus was accused of carrying out genocide through forced vaccination, chemical sterilization and abortion, when holding the post of Ethiopian Minister of Health between 2005 and 2012 by the Amhara Professional Union (APU), an Ethiopian civic organization.
To reiterate, the person responsible for declaring a global ‘pandemic’ and creating mass hysteria and fear to stop an “invisible enemy” is not a medical doctor and is accused of genocide!
During a special session of the WHO’s 34-member executive board on October 5, 2020, WHO officials (inadvertently) revealed that 10% of the world population had been infected with coronavirus.
This totaled to about 780 million cases.
At the time, the global death toll attributed to COVID-19 was 1,061,539. This would equate to a fatality rate of 0.14%, about the same rate as seasonal flu deaths.
“While 2019-nCoV has never been seen before, it’s part of a family of viruses that are well-known both to doctors and the public; the common cold, for example, can be caused by certain coronaviruses.
And while influenza is not a coronavirus, it isn’t so different from 2019-nCoV, either… The things we take for granted actually do work. It doesn’t matter what the virus is.
“So far, there have been an estimated 19 million cases of flu, 180,000 hospitalizations and 10,000 deaths in the U.S. this influenza season – including 68 children.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci and former CDC Director Robert Redfield stated,
“the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a ‘pandemic’ influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively”,
…in a published statement by the New England Journal of Medicine on February 28, 2020.
As early as March 19, 2020, Public Health England (PHE) downgraded COVID-19 from the status of a High Consequence Infectious Disease (HCID).
This is significant because according to the definition of a HCID, COVID-19 was not acutely infectious, did not typically have a high case fatality rate, or require an enhanced individual, population and system response to ensure it was managed effectively, efficiently and safely.
During a press conference on April 30, 2020, British Chief Medical Officer Chris Witty, stated,
“the great majority of people will not die from this… Of those who get symptoms, the great majority, probably 80%, will have a mild or moderate disease.
Might be bad enough for them to have to go to bed for a few days, not bad enough for them to have to go to the doctor.”
One could argue that these statements were made early on before the COVID fatality rate was properly understood.
However, the death rate has remained consistent throughout the entire “‘pandemic'” and proves that it has always been more flu like than anything else.
#18 – Predictions based on false ‘pandemic’ models led to lockdowns and harsh measures to “stop the spread” of the “virus”
In May 2020, this prediction went up in smoke as the mathematical code was deemed sh*tcode.
Neil Ferguson, the author of the code/report resigned his position as it was revealed he violated the lockdown by having his married lover visit his home.
Governments around the world including the U.S. used this fake computer model to justify strict lockdowns that caused extreme economic hardship, depression, unemployment, and “unintended” negative medical consequences.
#19 – Deborah Birx, former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, backed another fraudulent coronavirus model
The IHME (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation) coronavirus model (also funded by Bill Gates) used data from New York and New Jersey (where some of the heaviest concentration of COVID-19 cases were occurring at the time) and applied it to the rest of the U.S., creating a completely false and unrealistic outcome.
This prediction was used to further instill fear that death tolls and hospitalizations would drastically rise, further justifying the continuation of lockdowns.
The same IHME predicted that up to 2,800 daily deaths within 11 days and a final death total as high as 75,000 would occur if Sweden didn’t enact strict social distancing measures.
For Sweden, the daily death peak was actually 75% lower than the baseline prediction and 96% lower than the worst-case prediction.
#20 – The SARS-CoV-2 virus has NEVER BEEN ISOLATED, only sequenced by a computer
Prior to 2015 or 2016, you could still read what you wanted online without much interference. This has since changed, as propagandists have infiltrated the media and, along with other major players, like Big Tech and government, set out to control information. Fact-checking — a once-obscure term that’s since gone mainstream — is one part of the campaign to control what you see online, and therefore what you think and how you perceive reality — but it’s all a ruse.
Speaking with Jan Jekielek, The Epoch Times senior editor and host of the show “American Thought Leaders,” investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson explains how virtually everything you see and hear online has been co-opted, or taken over to serve a greater agenda:1
“One has to understand that nearly every mode of information has been co-opted, if it can be co-opted by some group. Fact checks are no different either, they’ve been coopted in many instances or created for the purpose of distributing narratives and propaganda.
And your common sense is accurate when it tells you that the way they chose this fact check and how they decided to word it so they could say this thing is not true when at its heart it really is true, but the message they’re trying to send is that you shouldn’t believe it, your common sense is right.
That’s been created as part of a propaganda effort by somebody, somewhere, as part of a narrative to distribute to the public so virtually every piece of information that can be co-opted has been.”
The Information Landscape Is Being Controlled
Attkisson calls out several common online sources that are heavily manipulated — Wikipedia, Snopes and most “fact” checkers to name a few, along with HealthFeedback.org, which is a fake science group used by Facebook and other Big Tech companies to debunk science that is actually true.
Fact checkers are often referred to as scientists, but this, too, is “part of a very well-funded, well-organized landscape that dictates and slants the information they want us to have.” While there have always been efforts to shape the information being given out by the media, it used to be that news reporters would push back against organizations to ensure the public had the other side of the story.
Beginning in the early 2000s, Attkisson noted a shift from efforts to simply shape information to those that attempt to keep certain information from being reported at all. This was particularly true among the pharmaceutical companies she was covering at that time. Attkisson described “efforts by these large global PR firms that have been hired by the pharmaceutical industry, by government partners that work with the pharmaceutical industry, to keep the story from being reported at all.”2
Now, suppressing and censoring information that those in charge don’t want to be heard is really common. Attkisson believes the practice really took off in 2015 to 2016, “with Donald Trump proving to be a unique danger perceived by both Democrats and Republicans, and by that I mean by the interests that support and pay for them to be in office and make certain decisions.”3
With a wild card in office, a campaign was organized that exploited a media that was already conflicted and less apt to report what was actually going on. “This all dovetailed together to create this crazy information landscape we have today,” she said. Instead of journalists seeking to uncover the truth, we have “writers seeking to spread whatever establishment scientists or politicians want them to say, uncritically and at the expense, oftentimes, of accuracy.”
Now, instead of real journalists and reporters, the media is infiltrated with propagandists who dictate what’s “fake news” and what’s not. Many believe that fake news is a product of Trump, but Big Tech was brought into the campaign early on. A lobby campaign by behind-the-scenes propagandists met with Facebook and said you’ve got to start censoring and “fact” checking information, Attkisson said.
The term “fake news” was popularized after Trump was elected, but it actually got its start before that — it was an invention of political activist website First Draft News, which is partially funded by Google.4
Inviting Propagandists Into the Newsroom
We’re in the midst of an information war where it’s difficult to tell truth from fiction or lies. Journalists are no longer the watchdogs; instead, they take information from obviously conflicted sources and then try to convince the public to believe that particular viewpoint. Other information that’s in conflict is censored or “debunked.”
It’s an unusual time in history where efforts are even underway to manipulate the public to want their information censored and appreciate third-party “fact”-checkers, which were introduced as a tool to confuse and manipulate the public further.5
Yet, when you only hear one side of the story, and you can’t access other information to the contrary, it’s nearly impossible to uncover the truth — and that’s precisely the point. Is this all just a matter of reporters not knowing how to think critically and ask the right questions, or believing that they’re doing the right thing?
Attkisson states that it goes much deeper. A lot of propagandists have become part of the media, and while there used to be a firewall between reporters and the people they reported on, “that’s long gone.” She says:6
“We’ve not just invited them to influence what we report, but we’ve hired them, not just as pundits and analysts but they are reporters. They are editorial presences within our newsrooms. Now we are one and the same.
It’s hard to say that there’s a distinctive difference in many instances between the people trying to get out a message and the messengers in the media who should be doing a more independent job of reporting accurately.”
The COVID Misinformation Campaign
In early 2020, as the pandemic first started brewing, Attkisson talked to everyone she could, including scientists with the government and outside the government. “Pretty quickly, I could see that certain things that were being said publicly were bearing out as not true, and certain things that other scientists were telling me privately rang true, and in hindsight have actually been proven to be true.”7
Early on, quite a few scientists she talked to were questioning the advice being given by government scientists, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and lead spokesperson for the president’s COVID response. She asked them if they should say something and speak out about their concerns, but they all came back with the same response:8
“They said they dared not speak out for fear of being controversialized and for fear of being called coronavirus deniers, because that phrase was starting to be used in the media. And secondly, they feared contradicting Dr. Fauci, who they said had been kind of lionized or canonized in the press for reasons that they couldn’t understand, because they really didn’t think that his guidance that he was giving publicly was the right guidance.”
Certainly, those scientists’ opinions deserved to be heard, but the fear of speaking out silenced them. They feared losing their grants, as most grants for research are funded by the government. If the government doesn’t like what you say or do, you can get fired or never get a grant again, ending your career and threatening your very livelihood.
“That started to strike me as, this is a really dangerous environment, when esteemed scientists who have valuable information and opinions are afraid to give them, and instead we’re hearing a party line that many of them disagree with but won’t say so,” Attkisson said.9
She mentioned the controversial U.S. government funding of gain-of-function research in China, and the notion that SARS-CoV-2 could have come from a Chinese laboratory — both were glaring issues that no one would talk about.
“These are the kinds of things early on that were sort of a red flag to me that says somebody’s trying to shape the information,” she continued. “They’re using reporters to do it. Public health figures are involved in some instances and that makes me want to know what’s really behind it.”10
‘Conspiracy Theory’ Was Devised by the CIA
The term “conspiracy theory” is now used to dismiss narratives that go against the grain. According to Attkisson, this is intentional, as the term itself was devised by the CIA as a response to theories about the assassination of JFK.
“It was shown in documents that there was a suggestion that agents go out and talk to reporters about these things as conspiracy theories — and again, common sense should tell you, as it does me, I’m married to a former law enforcement official who has said to me many times, you know the conspiracy theory phrase in its use doesn’t make sense. Nearly everything is a conspiracy.”11
Anything that involves two or more people is technically a conspiracy, but now when people hear the term, they’re conditioned to think it’s false. “That’s designed to pluck this little part of your brain that says, ‘well that thing’s not true.’” When Attkisson hears the term, however, she thinks that information may well be true. “If somebody’s trying to debunk it, it usually means a powerful interest is behind it and it makes me want to go search for more information on that thing.”
The term “conspiracy theory” has lost meaning now because it’s used so much. “Debunked”, “quackery” and “antivaccine” are all terms that are similarly being used as propaganda tools. “There’s a whole cast of propaganda phrases that I’ve outlined that are cues. When you hear them, they should make you think, ‘I need to find out more about it,’” Attkisson says.
Fact Checkers Pounce on Accurate BMJ Investigation
In another example of the lengths that fact-checkers will go to discredit a story — even if it’s true — take an article published in the BMJ, titled, “COVID-19: Researchers blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial.”12 Written by investigative journalist Paul D. Thacker, it details a series of problems with laboratory management and quality control checks by Pfizer subcontractor Ventavia Research Group, which was testing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
According to a regional director formerly employed by Ventavia, she witnessed falsified data, unblinded patients, inadequately trained vaccinators and lack of proper follow-up on adverse events that were reported. After notifying Ventavia about her concerns, repeatedly, she made a complaint to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — and was fired the same day.13
Soon after Thacker’s investigative piece was published in BMJ, it was “fact checked” by a group called Lead Stories, which referred to the investigation as a “hoax alert” in the related URL. Along with “correcting” statements that Thacker did not make, Lead Stories disparaged the investigation for “missing context,” but as investigative reporter Matt Taibbi explained, “‘Missing context’ has become a term to disparage reporting that is true but inconvenient.”14
Lead Stories took further issue with the BMJ investigation because it was shared by people such as Dr. Robert Malone and Robert F. Kennedy, who themselves have been targeted by fake fact checkers. Taibbi added:15
“The real issue with Thacker’s piece is that it went viral and was retweeted by the wrong people. As Lead Stories noted with marked disapproval, some of those sharers included the likes of Dr. Robert Malone and Robert F. Kennedy. To them, this clearly showed that the article was bad somehow, but the problem was, there was nothing to say the story was untrue.”
Thacker also called the “fact check” against his BMJ investigation “insane,” telling Taibbi:16
“Here’s what they do. They’re not fact checking facts. What they’re doing is checking narratives. They can’t say that your facts are wrong, so it’s like, ‘Aha, there’s no context.’ Or, ‘It’s misleading.’ But that’s not a fact check. You just don’t like the story.”
Reality Is Being Altered in Real Time
As it stands, information is being changed in real time to meet the common agenda. This includes definitions in dictionaries and on official government websites. Examples of definitions that have been changed recently include those for pandemic, herd immunity, vaccines and anti-vaxxer. Attkisson reiterates:17
“Virtually every form of information and sourcing that can be co-opted has been. That includes the dictionary definitions; that includes everything because these are important ways to influence thought. Language is very powerful. People don’t want to be affiliated with certain names and labels.
It reminds me of ‘1984,’ the George Orwell story about the futuristic society, under which history was being rewritten in real time to jive with the version that the government wanted or the party wanted it to be. Definitions now are being rewritten and changed in real time to fit with the vision that the establishment wants people to think.”
For now, you can still use the Internet Archive, commonly known as Archive.org and IA, as a historical archive. In addition to digitally hosting more than 1.4 million books and other documents, Archive.org acts as a historical vault for the Internet, preserving cached versions of websites that are no longer accessible to the public.18
Archive.org’s Wayback machine preserves digital information that has been removed or deleted, whether intentionally or for other reasons, but it, too, could one day disappear. Attkisson says:19
“It’s been a fascinating way to prove the effort to change our perception of how things are and the reality and what we thought we remembered from the other day, because all we really have now is the electronic record, by and large, and if that can be manipulated, there could be a time when — if they get rid of the Wayback machine, for example — that we can’t ever prove that anything was any different.”
Attkisson is maintaining a running list of things the media or public policy got wrong during the pandemic, which can still be verified using the Wayback machine, but which were not acknowledged for being wrong or corrected by the press. They include:20
Claims that the lab theory about the release of coronavirus had been debunked, when it had not been debunked
Public health officials saying masks don’t work, and then saying masks do work
Fauci testifying to congress that the death rate for coronavirus was 10 times worse than the flu, yet Attkisson found a published article by Fauci where he said the opposite, that “the overall clinical consequences of COVID-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza”21
It was wrong to send infected people from hospitals to nursing homes
It was wrong to isolate at home and close down parks and beaches; early data from New York City showed the vast majority of people hospitalized with coronavirus had been isolated at home, while people outside were not getting sick
It was wrong to tell people to wash their groceries off to prevent COVID-19
It was wrong to say COVID-19 shots prevented infection and transmission, and that the shots prevented 100% of hospitalizations and deaths
It was wrong to not focus more on therapeutics prior to shots and also post-shots
You Can Be Controlled if You Live Inside the Box
Attkisson references a whole generation of people who live inside the box, meaning the internet. Those who rely solely on the internet for their information are at serious risk of being controlled. She explains:22
“They didn’t know a time when information was to be gathered elsewhere by looking around and seeing what you hear, and seeing what you saw, and talking to people around you and looking at books and research and so on.
And the people that want to control the information understand that if they can only control really a few basic sources — we’re talking about Google, Twitter, Facebook and Wikipedia — they’ve got a lock on information, because we’ve all been funneled to those few sources, and that’s been the goal.
So if you think of it that way, there’s a whole lot of people that get pretty much everything they know through the internet. And the goal of the people trying to make the narrative is to make people live online and to think that’s reality.”
The danger of this is that the internet paints a picture that’s different from reality. You may read something that doesn’t sound quite right, or that you don’t agree with, but the internet makes you feel like you’re in the minority — even if you’re really not.
“Understand that you may actually be in the majority,” Attkisson says, “… but the goal of what they do online is to make you think you’re an outlier when you’re not, to make you afraid to talk about your viewpoint or what you think, because you may actually be the majority opinion but they want to control that and make you think you’re the one who’s crazy.” The solution? Live outside the box:23
“You can be made to believe that — if you live in the box. So, I’m constantly telling people live outside the box. Yes, you can get information there and do what you do online, but certainly trust your cognitive dissonance, talk to the people around you. If you travel, talk to the people in the places you go. You’ll get a whole different picture, as I do, of what’s really happening out here than if you look online.”
The Truth Finds a Way To Be Told
While there are powerful forces at play to control information, all is not lost. Attkisson is aware of three entities that are actively working on a solution, which include:
Investors who want to invest in independent news organizations
Technical people trying to invent platforms that can’t be controlled and deplatformed by Big Tech
Journalists who want to work or contribute to these efforts
Outlets like Substack newsletters and the video platforms Rumble, Bitchute and Odysee, which don’t censor videos for ideological reasons, are actively getting around the censorship of Big Tech, and Attkisson believes that these efforts will accelerate in the next couple of years.
Further, she says, “The propagandists may have overplayed their hand by being so heavy-handed and obvious about the control of information and the censorship. It’s no longer deniable. Even people who want their information curated, they can’t always be happy with the notion that they’re not going to be able to get the full story, or that they’re only getting one side of something.”24
Ultimately, she adds, “I think the truth finds a way to be told … it may take some time and there may be a lot of people that don’t want the truth out, but we inherently as humans seek it.”25 On a personal level, you can go a long way toward finding the truth by following your own common sense and reason, and Attkisson agrees.
“I always say, do your own research, make up your own mind, think for yourself. Trust your cognitive dissonance, use your common sense. You’re going to be right more often than you think, but open up your mind, read a lot, think a lot and don’t buy into the prevailing narrative at face value.”26
Yesterday, the UK media decided to report on the fact that Szilveszter Csollany, an Olympic gymnast from Hungary had died.
What they didn’t highlight was that he had originally chosen NOT to get the Covid vaccine and had questioned the whole Covid-19 agenda on his Facebook page. He only had the vaccine when he was FORCED to have it to keep his job as a gymanstics coach!
Instead they went down the route of claiming that he actually ‘caught covid’ AFTER he ‘finally’ had the vaccine, BUT because he was too late in having it, they claim he hadn’t built up enough immunity to ‘combat’ the disease because he only had the jab 2 weeks before falling ill.
This is known as an adverse reaction to the vaccine.
This is becoming a huge problem with mainstream media. By reporting the deaths this way, they are lying to the people and concealing the FACT that people are dying following the vaccines.
It has been called “Nuremberg 2.0” by many, as expectations have been that there would be some kind of trial in an international court of law where these criminals would be prosecuted.
Dr. Füellmich recently revealed much of what his Corona Investigative Committee has found in a meeting in Poland, and he made clear the same thing I have been saying for many months now, that the judicial system is owned and controlled by the Globalists, and justice will not be found in today’s courts, whether it is Germany or the U.S., or any other country.
He stated:
The only way to end this is by the people rising up and telling the authorities that this is the end of the line.
It is not the courts of law. The courts of law, maybe we can use them to clean things up. But I am afraid that they are not even good for that.
Because they are so infiltrated by the other side that we’re going to have to setup a whole new judicial system.
That doesn’t mean that they are not going to proceed with a trial that will be similar to the original Nuremberg trials.
He states that there will be a real judge, real lawyers, and real witnesses, but the jury will be “the people” who will watch it via live stream. And he expects this to happen soon, before the end of the year.
I was very pleased to watch his presentation, and how he fielded questions, in this presentation in Poland.
I had been concerned for some time now that his work was giving people a false sense of hope that there was some kind of International Court out there somewhere that would try this case and arrest all the criminals responsible.
But he made it very clear that justice would NOT happen through the current court system, especially in Germany.
His years of experience in litigating in these corrupt courts have also taught him that the politicians are merely puppets, and that the real criminals are a small group of very wealthy people who are actually calling the shots, and these are the people that need to be tried.
And the original Nuremberg trials after WWII did NOT bring justice against the Globalists who funded both sides of the war, as the rich leaders of corporations like IBM and Ford were never tried, let alone convicted for their crimes against humanity that allowed Hitler and Nazism to rise to power.
Some of the Nazi doctors who were just “following orders” were tried, convicted, and executed, but the ones giving the orders were not.
But this is very important work that Dr. Füellmich and his team have been doing, nevertheless, because they are exposing the entire COVID conspiracy, and as he stated,
“There are no more conspiracy theories left. They have all become true and are no longer theories.”
One of the questions posed to him was the fact that many claim that the virus does not exist, as it has never been isolated.
His response was that from a legal standpoint, it really doesn’t matter.
The fraud has occurred with the PCR tests, and that is what will be exposed legally.
I do not want to get into this fight (about whether the virus has been isolated or not), because it really doesn’t matter.
I think we can do without answering this question.
If we know that the virus is no more dangerous than the flu, and if we also know that we don’t have a corona ‘pandemic‘, but only a PCR test ‘pandemic’, let’s go after the people who put out these lies.
And then, as the Americans say, let’s follow the evidence.
From one person to the next. And I am sure that many of these people, who are just puppets, many of these people are cowards, and sooner or later they will lead us to who is really in charge, and really responsible.
From what we learned from Catherine Austin Fitts, of course, there is a very small group of very rich people who are running the who behind the scenes, who are using these puppets.
I don’t know, maybe 300, maybe 3000 very rich families who invest their money into large vehicles, like Blackrock and Vanguard, and some of the others.
And through these investments, or through these vehicles they then reinvest their money.
In Deutsche Bank for example, 10% of the shares of Deutsche Bank are owned by Blackrock. Thereby, they control it. Together with maybe the Chinese and people from Qatar.
So in essence, the big question of course is why are they doing this?
The answer, I think, is because they are afraid of us, because there are so few of them, maybe 10,000, maybe 3000, we don’t know.
But they have a lot of money.
Why do they have this money?
Because they stole it from us, through their corporations. And they’re afraid that we have found out about it, and we have found out a lot about it.
So they needed something to distract our attention. And that is how they invented Corona.
They want control, complete control, because they are psychopaths and sociopaths.
They are trying to scare everyone, so that no one can think anymore, and that everyone in the end agrees to vaccinations with something that is not a vaccine, but it kills.
Regarding a Nuremberg 2.0 trial, this is what he said:
The difference between the original Nuremberg trial and what we are thinking of, is that when they conducted the Nuremberg trials, it was not one, but many trials after the war, it was after the war.
The war had ended…
What we are doing right now, and what we’re planning to do, is going to happen while the war is probably still going on.
We hope it is going to be over soon. It won’t really be over, because there is lots of clean-up work to be done. But I hope that it is only going to take maybe a few more weeks, maybe 2 or 3 more months, because they really have over-played their hands.
They’re going wild. They’re running amok right now.
But we’re planning on having and conducting an international trial with maybe the 40 lawyers who we have been in touch with, including one of the lawyers here from this country, and the plan is to do this towards the end of the year.
And it is only going to be a trial for… it’s a real trial. But, it’s… with a real judge, with real experts and with real witnesses, and real lawyers of course, from every country.
The most important message that this trial is going to send, is the one that is being sent through the witnesses who will explain what happened to them, what kind of damage they suffered, how their businesses were destroyed, how they lost a loved one, how they lost a kidney maybe, because of the side effects, the adverse effects.
But, there will be a verdict too. But this will only go on for 6 days maybe. Just to give the other side a taste of what is to come.
Because we are ready. We have the people, we have the lawyers who are educated, and who understand what this is all about.
So the actual trial, this will just be a first trial. There will be more than just one trial.
The jury will be the people. The people who watch this, through a live stream. And they will ultimately…. they are the ones who will hand down the verdict.
But again, we’re going to need many more than just this one trial.
There’s many more such trials that are actually being filed right now, in the United States in particular, because there are still many judges who are really independent, many of them who were elected by the people they work with, in their region.
But as I said, the only way to turn this around, is not through the courts of law, that takes too long. It’s by the people.
Rise up, and tell them to go to hell.
Because that’s where they come from…
He makes it clear that justice will never be found in the judiciary, especially in Germany.
The courts, at least at the highest government levels, are all controlled by corporate Globalists.
We’re going to have to setup our own legal systems, and we will.
I think we have to setup our own… well, what do you call this? I guess we have to setup our own parallel universe.
And we should start now. In many cases, we have started already. Because the current system, cannot be saved. It’s beyond repair. You can’t fix anything.
We have to setup our system of economics, of education, of law, and mostly education, because education is so important.
If people don’t learn what this is all about, if they don’t learn that they need to ask questions, then they’re going to be turned into robots. And that’s what they are trying to do with our children.
The only advice I can give you is, don’t play along.
Connect with everyone else. Setup your own parallel universe, connect with all of the people who are on the good side, and then when the time comes, and it will come, I think it will come soon.
We all will rise up and we will send them to hell, where they came from.
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
Click Image for Details
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
A concerned husband was forced to do his own research about the effects of wearing masks after a local college forced his wife to wear a mask at school.
Based on the data he gathered, he found that bacteria can accumulate on both surgical and more so on cotton face masks if worn for a longer period of time.
Read his findings below:
As per the request of a local college, I researched the masks that my wife is requested to wear for her class, and here is what I have found:
I first visited the CDC website to see which masks would be acceptable and it states “Have two or more layers of washable, breathable fabric. Completely cover your nose and mouth. Fit snugly against the sides of your face and don’t have gap. Have a nose wire toprevent air from leaking out of the top of the mask.”
Further down it states that “If you have asthma, you can wear a mask. Discuss with your health care provider if you have any concerns about wearing a mask”.
I have concerns. If I have to speak with a medical provider about wearing a mask, it is a medical tool, devise, treatment, or procedure that I am being asked to partake in, against my informed consent.
Under the asthma tab, it says, “Use products safely and correctly. Always read and follow the directions on the product label to ensure you are using safely and effectively”, so I have done my research on the materials they have told me will keep me safe. My findings are as such:
I researched the effectiveness of recommended materials, here is what I have found: recommended 2-layer gaiters by CDC. 2 layers of gaiter only provide 20% protection for particles of .5 microns or larger.
It never addresses the fact that this recommended material (along with all recommended masks) harbor harmful bacteria, as scientifically proven by WDBJ7 news (Spreading Germs: How many bacteria are trapped by masks?)
To further prove my hypothesis; I looked into what caused the main bulk of death in the 1918 flu pandemic outbreak. I found that bacterial pneumonia caused more than half of all deaths.
Bacterial Pneumonia Caused Most Deaths in 1918 Influenza Pandemic
The majority of deaths during the influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 were not caused by the influenza virus acting alone, report researchers from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health. Instead, most victims succumbed to bacterial pneumonia following influenza virus infection. The pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and lungs.
If “pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and the lungs”,
Where did these bacteria come from? The nose and throat. By wearing a mask, you are forcing her to rebreathe these harmful bacteria that her body should be expelling, but are proven science to be captured by masks or all kinds. (Revealed later)
Care providers and experts of the day in epidemiology, pathology, bacteriology, and infectious diseases clearly concurred that pneumonia from secondary bacterial infections caused most deaths during the pandemic (5–14). In his classic review, Jordan summarized the key factors involved in the production of influenza-related pneumonia during the pandemic as follows:
“(1) The influenza virus weakens the resistant power of the pulmonary tissues so that various bacteria are able to play the role of secondary invaders; (2) the precise nature of the secondary—and tertiary—invaders is largely a matter of accident, dependent on the occurrence of particular bacteria in the respiratory tract of persons at the time of infection, and in the case of group outbreaks, on their occurrence in contacts; (3) the character of the resulting pneumonia, clinical and pathologic, is largely determined by the nature of the secondary invaders, whether Pfeiffer bacillus, streptococcus, pneumococcus, or other organisms; (4) there seems little doubt that the influenza virus, besides depressing the general pulmonary resistance, also acts directly on the pulmonary tissues, causing capillary necrosis, edema, and hemorrhage; (5) it seems to be true, therefore, that the fatal outcome of influenza pneumonia is determined partly by the degree to which the influenza virus depresses local and general pulmonary resistance, and partly by the virulence and nature of the bacteria which invade the tissues in the wake of the specific virus” (6).
Which just so happen to be the same bacteria found in masks. Some of the bacteria found on a mask are, but not limited to:
Bacillus, Staphylococcus, and Acinetobacter spp. were mostly cultured from the masks and 43% of these isolates were resistant to ampicillin or erythromycin. Microbial profiling demonstrated a consistent difference between mask types.
Methods and results: Spores from several Bacillus species, including seven strains of B. anthracis and six close neighbours, were prepared and studied using identical media, protocols and instruments. Here, we report the spore length and diameter distributions, as determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). We calculated the aspect ratio and volume of each spore. All the studied strains of B. anthracis had similar diameter (mean range between 0.81 +/- 0.08 microm and 0.86 +/- 0.08 microm). The mean lengths of the spores from different B. anthracis strains fell into two significantly different groups: one with mean spore lengths 1.26 +/- 0.13 microm or shorter, and another group of strains with mean spore lengths between 1.49 and 1.67 microm. The strains of B. anthracis that were significantly shorter also sporulated with higher yield at relatively lower temperature. The grouping of B. anthracis strains by size and sporulation temperature did not correlate with their respective virulence.
Staphylococciare Gram-positive cocci about 0.5 – 1.0 μm in diameter. They grow in clusters, pairs and occasionally in short chains. The clusters arise because staphylococci divide in two planes. The configuration of the cocci helps to distinguish micrococci and staphylococci from streptococci, which usually grow in chains. Observations must be made on cultures grown in broth, because streptococci grown on solid medium may appear as clumps. Several fields should be examined before deciding whether clumps or chains are present.
Acinetobacter sppcinetobacter cells are Gram-negative short rods (coccobacilli), measuring 1.0-1.5 by 1.5-2.5 microns during growth; they often become more coccoid during the stationary phase. Cells are found in pairs or small clusters; the groups form smooth, pale colonies on solid media. All species are strictly aerobic, catalase positive, and oxidase negative; it is the last test which is most used to distinguish Acinetobacter from other infective bacteria. These bacteria can use a varied selection of organic materials as sources of carbon.
These bacteria range from .5 to 2.5 microns. All well larger than can be safely released from a mask.
The general assumption is that both medical and non-medical mask use is safe (23, 24), although this has not yet been monitored or studied in detail. Studies on mask efficacy [e.g., (25–27)] generally do not account for the fact that the microorganisms in human saliva and exhaled breath could form a biosafety concern, especially when masks are worn for too long, not properly stored, or re-used without proper disinfection. In fact, the human saliva contains 100 million bacterial cells per milliliter and harbors a range of pathobionts, including Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida albicans, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Neisseria, Prevotella, and Veillonella spp. (28–31). Furthermore, cotton serves as substrate for microbial growth (32) and is able to retain moisture, making cotton masks more favorable for high microbial contamination than surgical masks. In addition, the reuse of cotton masks, moisture retention and poor filtration may result in increased risks of transmission of respiratory viruses compared to surgical masks (9).
Furthermore, provided by the same NIH study:
While a number of studies have focused on the importance of face masks in the transmissions of respiratory viruses (2, 17, 26), accumulation of pathobionts on the masks due to human saliva and exhaled breath represents a possible underestimated biosafety concern. Microorganisms present on the skin and in the upper respiratory tract could be transferred to the face mask while wearing it. For optimal growth, bacterial cells need a surface to grow on, warmth, moisture, and nutrients, which is the environment created on the face mask due to exhaled air and water vapor (56). Growth of these microorganisms will also increase the amount of bacteria that are inhaled or could be transferred to the skin. This could theoretically cause some disturbance in the skin and nasal microbiome due to for instance the overgrowth of certain pathobionts, which are associated with an increased risk of inflammation and infections (57). For example, research has found that S. aureus is part of a healthy skin microbiome, but can cause skin infections when the abundance of this species increases (58). In several studies, the use of face masks has been associated with acne linked to an accumulation of S. aureus (59–61).
(1)Abuse or threatened abuse of law or legal process
The term “abuse or threatened abuse of the legal process” means the use or threatened use of a law or legal process, whether administrative, civil, or criminal, in any manner or for any purpose for which the law was not designed, in order to exert pressure on another person to cause that person to take some action or refrain from taking some action.
(2)Appropriate congressional committees
The term “appropriate congressional committees” means the Committee on Foreign Relations and the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.
(A) threats of serious harm to or physical restraint against any person;
(B) any scheme, plan, or pattern intended to cause a person to believe that failure to perform an act would result in serious harm to or physical restraint against any person; or
Asking her to wear a mask with risk of being thrown out of class, or possibly illegally jailed, is asking her to consent to an unproven medical treatment that will endanger her health, this constitutes coercion. Coercion is illegal and becomes “Domestic terrorism”. Anyone else is involved in her coercion will also be charged, including but not limited to the police, school security, and staff, etc. Also, institutional fines of up to $100 million may be levied.
Us code 21 section 50.23 and .24 state; it is illegal to make anybody participate in an experimental program using coercion.
Under 18 US code section 2331 and subsection 802. In the definition of “domestic terrorism” is anytime a US citizen or a government in the US is forced to do something that it would not otherwise do. That’s not only coercion but domestic terrorism.
(5) the term “domestic terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State; (B) appear to be intended— (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C) occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States; and
“Are you in fact violating 21 code of federal regulations, section 50.23 and 24?
Are you interested in doing a civil violation of the law?
Are you willing to violate 18 US code section 2331 that says it is illegal to coerce the population, which is a felony that comes with a 99-year prison term?”-David Martin
Stop The Cabal 