The UK government has been accused of wasting over 100 billion pounds on Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as on the HS2 railway line that has yet to be built. In addition, the government is facing criticism for its involvement in the ongoing war in the Ukraine, which has seen billions of pounds of taxpayer money being spent on a conflict that many believe the Ukraine will not win.
According to reports, many politicians in Parliament and the House of Lords are profiting from the sale of arms, with some of these weapons being resold on the black market to terrorist and guerrilla groups. The President of Nigeria has even gone on record to state that these weapons are causing instability in his country.
There are also allegations of corruption within the Conservative Party over PPE contracts, with Baroness Mone and Matt Hancock accused of profiting from the abuse of privilege and VIP lanes without any scrutiny. Baroness Mone has been accused of ripping off taxpayers to the tune of 29 million pounds and laundering the money, yet she has not been arrested for fraud and embezzlement. Hancock, meanwhile, has been accused of insider dealing and involvement in the mass murder of the elderly.
Critics have also pointed out that Hancock and other politicians and peers have shares in companies that supply drugs to the NHS, with doctors and nurses being paid to inject and murder people. The safety of the COVID-19 vaccines has also been called into question, with many claiming that they are unsafe and cause death.
Overall, the government has been accused of being a crime syndicate and being complicit in mass murder and corporate greed. It is not seen as the party of small business and enterprise, but rather as a criminal crime party that is inflicting the highest post-war tax demands on the electorate while making billions for hedge funds and doing nothing for the country or its people. Many have described the politicians involved as vile and evil, profiting from war and genocide while ordinary people watch their loved ones being euthanized on grounds of cost.
The Central Bank of Russia has officially announced that, as of March 28, 2022, the Russian Ruble currency is BOUND to Gold.
The rate is 5,000 Rubles per gram of gold bullion.
This story has been corrected to report “TROY” ounces as opposed to ‘dry’ ounces, and the values recomputed to reflect there are more grams per TROY ounce than in a dry ounce.
There are 32 grams in each TROY ounce. 32 grams times 5,000 rubles per Gram is 160,000 Rubles.
Are you with me so far?
The conversion rate of Rubles to U.S. Dollars is 100 Rubles, 90 Kopecs, to each U.S. Dollar.
If Rubles are bound to Gold at 5000 Rubles per gram, and there are 32 grams per TROY ounce, meaning one ounce of gold would cost 160,000 Rubles, then converting that to U.S. Dollars means Gold is $1600 per ounce when using Rubles, instead of $1,928 per ounce using Dollars.
Russia just wiped out about thirty percent (30%) of the value of the U.S. Dollar, worldwide, when it comes to Gold Bullion.
Worse, because Russia will only sell its oil and gas in Rubles, and Rubles are now fixed at 5,000 Rubles per gram, anyone wishing to buy Oil or Gas will need to either pay in Rubles or pay in Gold, and they won’t get the U.S. Dollar value for the gold they tender as payment!
People around the world will be literally THROWING their money at the Ruble and DUMPING Dollars and EUROS to do it.
What Russia just did is the financial equivalent of detonating a nuclear bomb.
FWIW, the last guy on this planet who tried to back a currency with Gold, was Muammar Kaddafi of Libya.
NATO went into Libya, bombed the shit out of it, until the people of Libya grabbed Kaddafi on the street, beat him bloody, and put a bullet in his head.
As of this hour, 10:39 PM EDT, I suspect Bankers all over the world are on the phones with each other and with heads of state, instructing them that what Russia has done will totally smash both the U.S. Dollar and the EURO, and those Bankers will be telling the heads of State that World War 3 must commence ‘immediately’…
Let me explain why.
Today, the Russian Central Bank pegged Rubles to Gold.
Last week, Russia declared they would only sell OIL and GAS in… Rubles.
This means Russian OIL and GAS are pegged to Gold with Rubles as the proxy for Gold.
Europe (that needs Russian Gas and Oil) will now have to buy Rubles from Putin using Gold, or pay for the Oil and Gas with Gold itself.
Currently, the FOREX Rate for Rubles to Dollars is about 100:1
BUT… with 5,000 Rubles now equaling one gram of Gold, and oil being priced directly in Gold, we are going to see a MASSIVE price disruption in FOREX markets, in terms of how much Gold a Dollar can still buy.
Foreign countries holding our Dollar Debt Notes in Reserve, will see an immediate, and far less use for them and will want to start dumping them in favor of something more stable; something which holds its value.
Basically, any currency pegged to Gold will fit the bill, which means countries like that – like Japan – will start dumping their Dollar Debt as fast as they can – they are NOT going to go down with the ship!
They will move into more stable currencies, like… the Ruble.
This will have a DE-flationary effect on the Ruble, making it more valuable over time.
This also means Putin can re-peg the Ruble any time he wants, to like 500, or 50, or 10. IT just keeps getting more valuable for him.
The instant result is that all those foreign countries dumping their Dollar Reserves will cause all those excess Dollars to start coming home, triggering worse hyper-inflation than we already have now in the USA.
Is it any wonder why Biden was on stage last week calling for Regime change in Russia…?
He is about to have masses of angry and literally starving Americans marching through the streets here at home demanding answers.
UPDATE 10:39 AM EDT
Russian President Vladimir Putin has made a public statement on video about what has taken place with binding the Ruble to Gold.
In that statement, he points out that Western Nations have simply STOLEN Russia’s foreign currency reserves and Gold Bullion Reserves, and by doing so, worldwide trust in so-called “First-Class” safety of investing in the West, has been smashed.
He goes on to predict that people will now dump their holdings of Dollars and EUROS to safer investments like,
land, food, and raw materials…
Putin predicting dollar and euros demise and everyone moving to “real reserves of raw materials” like “land, food, and gold”
The impact of what Russia has just done is a literal dagger to the heart of the U.S. Dollar and to the EURO.
No one will want those currencies anymore, and since the U.S. barely manufactures anything domestically, when foreign countries cease accepting the dollar for payment, shortages of everything will slam the U.S. and Europe.
business giants Eli and Edythe Broad, who are equally wealthy but less well known.
All told, its members are worth $125bn.
The meeting – called by Gates, Buffett and Rockefeller – was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe. It was, in some ways, a summit to save the world.
No wonder that when news of the secret meeting leaked, via the seemingly unusual source of an Irish-American website, it sent shock waves through the worlds of philanthropy, development aid and even diplomacy.
“It is really unprecedented. It is the first time a group of donors of this level of wealth has met like that behind closed doors in what is in essence a billionaires’ club,” said Ian Wilhelm, senior writer at the Chronicle of Philanthropy magazine.
The existence of the Good Club has struck many as a two-edged sword.
On one hand, they represent a new golden age of philanthropy, harking back to the early 20th century when the likes of Rockefeller, Vanderbilt and Carnegie became famous for their good works.
Yet the reach and power of the Good Club are truly new. Its members control vast wealth – and with that wealth comes huge power that could reshape nations according to their will.
Few doubt the good intentions of Gates and Winfrey and their kind. They have already ‘improved’ the lives of millions of poor people across the developing world.
But can the richest people on earth actually ‘save’ the planet?
The President’s House of Rockefeller University is on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. The university’s private campus, full of lush green trees, lies behind guarded entrances and a metal fence. It overlooks the East River, only a few blocks away from the United Nations.
It was here, at 3pm on 5 May (2009), that the Good Club gathered.
The university’s chancellor, Sir Paul Nurse, was out of town but, at the request of David Rockefeller, had allowed the club to meet at his plush official residence.
The president’s house is frequently used for university events, but rarely can it have played host to such a powerful conclave.
“The fact that they pulled this off, meeting in the middle of New York City, is just absolutely amazing,” said Niall O’Dowd, an Irish journalist who broke the story on the website irishcentral.com.
For six hours, the assembled billionaires discussed the crises facing the world.
Each was allowed to speak for 15 minutes.
The topics focused on education, emergency relief, government reform, the expected depth of the economic crisis and global health issues such as overpopulation and disease.
One of the themes was new ways to get ordinary people to donate small amounts to global issues.
Sources say Gates was the most impressive speaker, while Turner was the most outspoken.
“He tried to dominate, which I think annoyed some of the others,” said one source.
Winfrey, meanwhile, was said to have been in a contemplative, listening mood.
That the group should have met at all is indicative of the radical ways in which philanthropy has changed over the past two decades. The main force behind that change is Gates and his decision to donate almost all his fortune to ‘bettering’ the world…
Unlike the great philanthropists of former ages, Gates is young enough and active enough to take a full hands-on role in his philanthropy and craft it after his own ideas.
That example has been followed by others, most notably Soros, Turner and Buffett. Indeed, this new form of philanthropy, where retired elite businessmen try to change the world, has even been dubbed,
“Billanthropy” after Gates.
Another description is “philanthro-capitalism”.
Yet the implications of the development of philanthro-capitalism are profound.
It was fitting that the Good Club was meeting near the UN. The club members’ extreme wealth makes it as powerful as some of the nations with seats inside that august chamber.
Proponents of philanthro-capitalism would argue that they are also more effective in doing good for ordinary people. Indeed the club’s members have given away about $70bn in the past 12 years.
That is far beyond what many individual countries can afford to do with their own social policies and aid budgets.
“They have assets that rival the social spending budgets of many countries,” said Professor Paul Schervish, director of Boston College’s Centre on Wealth and Philanthropy.
There is little doubt that members of the Good Club have done amazing work.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, with a current endowment of more than $30bn, is the biggest philanthropic organization ever. Just one of its projects, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization, is estimated by the WHO to have prevented 3.4 million deaths in just eight years.
The Soros Foundation has done valuable work setting up democratic institutions and independent media across the former Soviet bloc.
These ‘titans’ of philanthropy have also started a trend among the slightly less wealthy.
While Gates’s and Soros’s efforts bestride the world, major philanthropists have emerged in specific regions like India or Latin America funding their own pet ideas and projects.
Gayle Peterson, co-founder of Headwaters Group Philanthropic Services, recently gave advice to a businessman who wanted to set up a foundation to give away $280m annually in south-east Asia.
“He told us: I want to be just like Bill Gates,” she said.
But there is a potential downside to the growth of these “über donors”, especially if the whims of individuals start to take precedence over the expertise of professionals.
The strange truth is that giving away billions of dollars is difficult and fraught with risk.
There can be waste, mismanagement and poor investment.
At the same time it can actually do harm.
“If you are putting enormous amounts of money into a community that can’t cope with it, then you can implode that community,” Peterson said.
Others are even more outspoken at the growing dominance of a tiny handful of billionaires in the development sector.
“The problem with any Good Club is that all the people might not be ‘good’.
Or at least not ‘good’ in universal definitions,” said Louise Uwacu, the Rwandan-born founder of the Canadian education charity Positivision.
There is also the issue of accountability.
Even the most repressive of national governments is on some level beholden to its own people, or has the capacity to change and reform under popular pressure.
But who votes for the Good Club?
Such skeptical sentiments might spring from the Good Club‘s decision to meet in such secrecy in New York. In many ways that was understandable.
All its members are sensitive about privacy because of their unique mixes of fame and wealth.
The covert nature of the discussion also allowed them to speak freely about sensitive issues.
“I think they just wanted to be able to be candid. The secrecy allowed that,” said Wilhelm.
But some people are crying conspiracy.
The cloak-and-dagger aspect of the meeting has prompted some to accuse the Good Club of being a sort of Bilderberg Group for philanthropy, with an equally,
nefarious agenda of global power politics…
That idea has particular power on the christian right of America, which has reacted angrily to the idea that the club discussed birth control and overpopulation.
Experts in the philanthropy field think that this negative image can be countered by more openness for future Good Club meetings.
“If they do hold more meetings, and every indication is that they will, I think people would want them to be more public. After all, they can make decisions that affect millions of peoples’ lives,” said Wilhelm.
That is true…
If the members of the Good Club wish to wield their undoubted power, they may have to get used to the idea of doing it more openly.
The American tradition of great donors
Bill Gates The co-founder of Microsoft is the biggest philanthropist the world has ever seen.
Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, he controls more than $30bn in assets – not bad for a computer geek from Seattle.
Often ranked as the world’s richest man, he has donated virtually his entire fortune to philanthropy, focusing on combating diseases in the developing world.
Henry Ford As well as being the father of the US car industry and the inventor of the modern production line, Ford has been a major force in philanthropy.
He made a vast fortune and left virtually all of it to the Ford Foundation, which by 2007 had more than $13bn in assets.
George Soros Hungarian-born Soros is a hugely successful US currency speculator and financier.
But he is also well known for his philanthropic works. Focusing on political democratization and creating an independent media, he has funded projects mainly in the former Soviet republics.
A political liberal, he is also a funder of the Centre for American Progress.
Andrew Carnegie This Scottish-born American industrialist made a huge fortune in steel and industry at the end of the 19th century.
He devoted the rest of his life to philanthropy, especially education, founding libraries, museums and universities in Britain and America.
He wrote of the responsibilities of the wealthy in two books, Triumphant Democracy and the Gospel of Wealth.
John D Rockefeller The man whose name became a byword for unimaginable wealth made his fortune in oil.
Often regarded as the richest person in history, Rockefeller spent the last 40 years of his life in effective retirement, setting up various foundations and funding philanthropic causes.
His special interests were in the fields of science and medicine.
In 2010, in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, the Rockefeller Foundation, one of Our major “philanthropic” organs, convened what is called a “scenario planning exercise” where future events that we may or may not be planning are “gamed”.
Ostensibly, future and scenario planning is simply prudent, especially as regards public health, so it was not seen as any threat by the masses at large. Nevertheless, Our corollary organs did everything possible to keep this information from them, including high levels of increasing and creeping censorship, especially where health information is concerned.
The exercise was conducted in association with a group called the Global Business Network (GBN), a now-defunct group of very sophisticated and connected Silicon Valley influence peddlers described by Wikipedia as a “global strategy firm that specialized in helping organizations [including businesses, NGOs and governments] to adapt and grow in an increasingly uncertain and volatile world.”
These included “futurist” Peter Schwartz, Stewart Brand, both former members of Students for a Democratic Society, and Jay Ogilvy, an Esalen Institute–associated Statfor board member who has no Wikipedia page but whose family name is the same as one of the biggest names in advertising. (It is unclear if there is a connection.)
All are connected to SRI International, formerly Stanford Research International, and Royal Dutch/Shell. Stanford University’s science departments are well known to be connected with DARPA and US intelligence, and are creators of so-called “artificial intelligence”.
The Narrative: “Lock Step”
Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing.
“A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.
At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.
Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens.
There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own.
Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally.
Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results.
By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.
Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
Here are our key take-aways from the “Lock Step” scenario, including a comparison to the coronavirus (COVID-19) event:
Did the Rockefeller Foundation and Silicon Valley agents really predict the current pandemic? Are antisocial behavior–sensing functional MRI scanners – which would likely be carcinogenic, mandatory health screenings (DNA collection?) and home imprisonment in our future? And is the dream of a World Wide Web of communication and consciousness doomed?
These questions are why determining whether the virus is real or not is important. It is not immaterial that the virus itself may be immaterial.There are a myriad of questions to be addressed with regard to how viruses have been scientifically assumed to exist and by whom. There is no doubt that the killer virus, the killer microbe, has ruling class strategic efficacy. Hollywood has been telegraphing this scenario for years in movies like 2011’s Contagion. (Check out the trailer if you have a moment. It’s unbelievably star-studded.) The movie’s star, Gwenyth Paltrow, has been seen wearing a mask to a farmer’s market.
It is further worth noting that Trump-in-law and close Bibi Netanyahu associate Jared Kushner stand to profit from COVID testing mania. As reported by Mint Press News, Kushner’s brother is “co-founder of Oscar Health, a huge medical company that this week launched a test center locator for COVID-19, where users input their data and are directed to one of many locations where they can receive a test.” Oscar Health has been criticized for selling nearly $16,000 Obamacare deductibles. And Bill Gates’s Microsoft will be putting machines in all schools to help with tele-schooling, according to his recent must-read Reddit AMA.
Mainstream Media Follows The Script
Appearing to follow the Rockefeller “narrative” or script, US corporate media, specifically MSNBC, has called for China-like “mitigation” measures for this alleged COVID-19 illness, which is mild and yet responsible for so many unverified deaths, because they were declared cases before testing was available. MSNBC host Rachel Maddow acknowledges the “testing fiasco,” which she then apologizes for, instead making a point of focus on “mitigation.” She suggests avoiding crowds, not flying (you can’t anyway) and “self-quarantining,” questioning whether there ‘needs to be’ “clear federal standards” on self-quarantining.
New York Times science and health writer Don McNiel ups the authoritarian ante, arguing for separation from families, which he claims was necessary in China due to 75% to 80% of infections being “in families”. McNiel also calls for “testing testing testing testing.” But he’s not just talking about going to a designated health clinic. He’s talking about Chinese measures such as body temperature checks:
“If you go into any building, your temperature is taken. I came into this building. Nobody took my temperature. They asked me some silly questions I could have lied about. [McNiel appears to have a senior moment as he tries to remember his script.] Your, your fever taken. You get into a bus, your temperature is taken. You walk into the train station, your temperature is taken. You walk into a building, you walk back to your apartment building, your temperature is taken.” [Note the repetition.]
Of course the real-life Chinese measures, particularly isolation, have resulted in a rise in post-traumatic stress disorder caused by enforced isolation, loss of livelihood and what We might call “viru-noia”. And since, as veteran investigative journalist Jon Rappoport has reported at nomorefakenews.com, China is well known to have a pneumonia epidemic and a sickening level of air pollution, about which its Wuhan residents have protested despite bans on protest in China, one must be suspicious about the number of deaths and causes of deaths in China. Is it not inconceivable those alleged corona isolations and deaths may have included undesirable types.
What we have is Our most prodigious and unheard-of conditioning of the herd yet, to a closed, controlled society, which in the name of public health protection exercises “medical martial law” and performs “syndromic surveillance,”a term you will hear much more of because it is a nearly-20-year official CDC program.
President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy.
Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already.
Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal.
Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse.
These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”.
Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
The invasiveness that Harry Vox so incisively speaks about is a violation of our human persons, consciousnesses and beings. This is what makes it so unpleasant: it is rapist in character. As they say here, the “dragnet”, the “ultimate stop n frisk”. The ultimate power-over.
100 Reasons the ‘covid pandemic’ is a fraud and a pretext to UN / WEF agenda 2030
1. PCR tests ran above the threshold for accuracy (35 amplification cycles max) – NHS ran up to 45 cycles resulting in up to 98% false positives
2. PCR test was developed without an isolated SARS-COV-2 sample – genetic material from a common cold was used instead
3. A CV death is classified as a death by ANY cause within 28 days of a positive PCR test
4. No discussion about naturally acquired immunity
5. No attempt to establish whether ‘vaccine’ recipient already has antibodies
6. Masks don’t work
7. Lockdowns don’t work
8. Cancelled operations
9. Merriam Webster changed the 15 year long standing definition of the word ‘vaccine’ in January 2021 to include ‘messenger mRNA’ so that the CV gene therapy injections which did not fall within the previous definition could be classified as such, so these experimental treatments could be mandated as ‘vaccines’
10. There is no such thing as asymptomatic transmission
11. CV experimental ‘vaccines’ do not reduce likelihood of infection or transmission
12. CV infection fatality rate is 0.096% according to the UK government
13. CV was classified as a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK in Jan 2020, but then downgraded from HCID status in March 2020
14.’Vaccinating’ children despite survival rate of 99.996%
15. Eat out to help out
16. Doctors and nurses performing choreographed dance routines during ‘height of pandemic’
17. The W.H.O changed their long standing definition of ‘herd immunity from natural infection’, to ‘herd immunity from vaccination’ in December 2020
18. CV experimental ‘vaccines’ all in phase three trials until 2023
19. ‘Vaccine’ manufacturers are exempt from liability for injury or death
20. SARS-COV-2 was manufactured in a laboratory using gain of function
21. Population adjusted mortality rates for the UK from 1990-2020 (inclusive) show 2020 is position 17 for excess deaths
22. Officially recorded vaccine related injuries including death caused by CV ‘vaccines’ higher than for all other vaccines in history combined
23. Main stream media is complicit
24. Fauci warned in 2017 that a ‘surprise outbreak’ was highly likely within the next 5 years
25. Cheap, readily available cures for CV supressed such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine
26. Care home residents were denied critical care in hospital and prescribed end of life drugs instead (midazolam / morphine) resulting in over 30,000 deaths
27. 3 weeks to flatten the curve
28. All westernised democracies who are members of WHO / WEF in lock step29. Mass public protests ignored or misrepresented by main stream media
30. UK Cases, hospitalisations and deaths up significantly since the beginning of July in 2021 compared to last year despite ‘vaccine’ rollout
31. Booster shots every 6 months because the ‘vaccine’ protection fades
32. Massive increase in blood clot related injuries, especially in children and young men, following ‘vaccine’ roll out including myocarditis which has an average life expectancy of 5 years after diagnosis
33. All scientists, doctors and nurses who speak out against the narrative are censored – no debate
34. Blanket DNR (do not resuscitate) orders issued in care homes
36. People who die within 14 days after a second ‘vaccine’ are classified as unvaccinated
37. Government mandated the ‘vaccines’ for care home workers despite no reduction in transmission or infection following vaccination
38. Government have engineered 2021 winter NHS crisis by mandating jabs for care home workers resulting in a shortage of staff and ability for hospitals to discharge patients to care homes
39. Nightingale hospitals built with a fanfare, unstaffed, no patients and then quietly dismantled
40. Boris Johnson caught Covid and was hospitalised but recovered resulting in natural immunity. Then he received 2 doses of the ‘vaccine’ – then he caught covid again
41. Government awarded multi-million pound PPE contract to a pub landlord
42. No biohazard bins for used masks
43. Make your own mask out of an old sock or t-shirt
44. All hospital admissions required to take a PCR test, all subsequent deaths following positive test labelled as CV deaths regardless of cause of death
45. No mask when sat down at a restaurant, but must be worn when stood up
46. Celebrity ‘vaccine’ endorsements
47. CV deaths in 2021 correlate with ‘vaccine’ uptake
48. Government funded media campaigns designed to incite fear and create division
49. Free stuff offered as incentives to be ‘vaccinated’
50. Government coercion, manipulation and blackmail
51. Freedom of information requests to local authorities show no excess funerals or cremations for 2020
52. UK government has ordered 517 million doses of experimental ‘vaccines’ for a population of 68 million
53. Mix and match ‘vaccine’ strategy
54. Event 201 – Pandemic preparedness exercise based on a coronavirus held in October 2019, organised by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation
55. Photographs of dead bodies lying in the street in Wuhan January 2020
56. There are already 300 ‘next gen’ (experimental) CV ‘vaccines’ in development
57. ‘Vaccine’ efficacy lies by manufacturers, raw data undisclosed
58. No CV ‘vaccine’ is licensed by the UK government – they are being administered under temporary use authorisation under legislation 174 of the human medicines regulations 2012, which means they are exempt from the governments vaccine injury compensation scheme
59. Government has extended emergency powers for another 6 months resulting in 26 months of continual emergency powers despite no emergency
60. ‘Vaccine’ passports proposed despite no reduction in infection or transmission provided by the ‘vaccines’
61. Average age of a CV death is 82.6 years with several comorbidities (average age of death in UK is 81 years)
62. No discussion about Antibody dependant enhancement potential of CV ‘vaccines’
63. Government advice if you test positive is to stay at home
64. No treatments offered to those with a positive test
65. Backlog of 5.7 million operations
66. NHS overwhelmed as a direct result of government policy (self-isolation even without symptoms)
69. All westernised democracies leaders promoting ‘Build back better’ slogan in lock step
70. World economic forum – ‘The pandemic has provided an opportunity for a great reset’
71. All WHO / WEF member states CV response policies align with UN agenda 21/2030 (the new world order)
72. All CV ‘variants’ are only 0.3% different to the original
73. Significantly higher death toll in wealthy westernised democracies compared to developing countries
74. Funeral directors reported massive spike in deaths following CV ‘vaccine’ roll out
75. Flu disappeared
76. Nobel-prize winning inventor of PCR test stated it is not a diagnostic tool
77. No government study on health impact of lockdowns
78. No scientific evidence provided by government demonstrating the effectiveness of lockdowns, masks, social distancing or ‘vaccine’ passports
79. Chief scientific advisor to the UK government, Dominic Cummings, broke his-own lockdown rules
80. Matt Hancock had an affair with his assistant when we weren’t allowed to sit alone on a park bench
81. Global trading website confirms CV-19 tests were bought & distributed several years in advance
82. Every single SAGE prediction has been wrong
83. Governments own published data contradicts many of their own claims
84. Hospitals were never at full capacity
85. Ventilators killed patients
86. Masks are bad for your health
87. Long term effects from the ‘vaccines’ are unknown
88. The EU was preparing for ‘vaccine passports’ at least a year before the ‘pandemic’ began
89. After the USA and UK government, the two biggest funders of the W.H.O are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation & GAVI (the vaccine alliance) – which is funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation
90. Bill Gates recently met with Boris Johnson to discuss ‘how to prevent future pandemics’
91. Bill gates said ‘vaccines’ are ‘his best investment ever!’
92. The vast majority of CV associated deaths are now in the ‘fully vaccinated’
93. The UK government previously stated ‘no plans to vaccinate children’
94. Children can receive CV ‘vaccine’ without parental consent
95. Plans to vaccinate children as young as 5 years old
96. Health secretary Sajid Javid said ‘no jab, no job’ policy would ‘boost uptake and protect others’ despite the ‘vaccines’ not reducing infection or transmission
97. Doctors, nurses and care home staff who worked through the ‘pandemic’ are now being dismissed for declining the ‘vaccine’ on the basis their patients are at risk, despite the ‘vaccines’ offering zero protection from infection or transmission
98. UK government wasted £37 billion on a failed track and trace application (where did the money go?)
99. The rise of ‘fact checkers’ who are funded by big pharma
100. Increased surveillance and censorship of information contrary to the narrative
The Prime Minister, Theresa May “reserved some of her most strident conference rhetoric for the subject of tax avoidance” at the Tory Party conference, so says Private Eye this week.
Well she could do no better than starting by looking at 80 Sidney Street Folkestone CT19 6HQ.
At this address there are over 4300 companies which are either active or dissolved and the vast majority have direct links to the Panama Papers.
Many of these companies can be found at Companies House and below we have created a excel spread sheet, which you can download and do your own investigations as we have. (do let us know what you find)
There are some strange things about 80 Sidney Street. For example not just one of the owners is dead but both – a Mr Geoffrey Elmer Garret (pictured below) is dead – he died on the 16/03/88, and The Times run a small obituary of his demise on the 18/03/88. Now how can a dead man be on the deeds, for the last 30 years, when the executor of his will should have disposed of his assets? Thesame goes for the other dead person. That’s just one of many questions which need answering.
Another strange thing is that on the 12/04/06 a one Mr valeriy-nikiforovconspired to launder money not once, but twice that is known of, and he was a director of Anda Financial Management Limited, registered at 80 Sidney Street, Folkestone CT19 6HQ.
Another strange thing about 80 Sidney Street is there is a company called Aria Petroleum (UK) Limited registered there. Aria UK is ultimately jointly controlled by Aria Petroleum (Cyprus) Ltd and gunvor-group-limited according to the accounts at Page 25.
Aria Petroleum undertakes “International Development in Afghanistan, Kazakhstan, China, Russia, Iran, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Azerbijan and Georgia. Aria UK’s turnover in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015 amounts to over $2 billion dollars, all going through 80 Sidney Street. It is quite extraordinary.
Alaska Enterprise Limited was owned by Javier Limited who was owned by Centaurus Europe Limited, who are owned by Building Bridges Europe Limited who owned a lot more companies registered at 80 Sidney Street Folkestone CT19 6HQ.
We could go on not hundreds of times but literally thousands of times. But who facilitates all of this?
It was a man called Tonie Manders (his short name) and especially a company called Haags Juristen College that facilitated the vast majority of companies to become set up at 80 Sidney Street. Manders was the former leader of the Dutch Libertarian Party and believes taxation is theft. Manders worked in conjunction with Adriaan Struijk (below) to set up many of the structures, offshore. We’ll talk more about Manders over the coming weeks.
Mr Strujijk along with many others have facilitated a complex web of companies and many of them come back to 80 Sidney Street Folkestone CT19 6HQ.
We have estimated that during the time that all companies which ran or are running, well over £75 billion pounds plus has been moved through 80 Sidney Street and remember, some of these companies are as we said, still active.
“A… company that treats tax laws as an optional extra… I’m putting you on warning. This can’t go on anymore. A change has got to come. And this party – the Conservative Party – is going to make that change.” We will see in time if Mrs May lives up to her promises.
So there you are, 80 Sidney Street Folkestone Kent CT19 6HQ is very strongly connected to the Panama Papers and here is that downloadable excel spread sheet we promised you. but finally…
“In the digital age, secrecy is an illusion, no one, anywhere, who conducts secret transactions leaves a digital trace is safe anymore”(The Panama Papers Bastian Obermayer & Frederik Obermaier)
There are legitimate uses for offshore companies and trusts. We do not intend to suggest or imply that any persons, companies or other entities included in the ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database, or this blog post have broken the law or otherwise acted improperly.
Gary J. Byrne has devoted his life to serving his country, and risked it to do the same — as a member of the US Air Force, a uniformed White House Secret Service officer, and a federal air marshal.
And he believes it is his patriotic duty to do anything he can to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming president of the United States.
As someone who guarded the Oval Office during the Clinton presidency, Byrne, in an exclusive interview with The Post, tells how he witnessed “the Clinton machine leaving a wake of destruction in just about everything they do.”
He says he has also seen Hillary’s “dangerous,” abusive, paranoid behavior.
“It’s like hitting yourself with a hammer every day,” Byrne, pounding a fist into his open hand, says of the former first lady’s explosive anger.
“ ‘America first’ is in my blood,” he writes, sounding very similar to another presidential hopeful.
Byrne says he wants Americans to “vote [their] conscience,” but pledges to make sure “they have all the information that they need.”
For one, he thinks the Clintons’ own behavior bred an immoral White House culture.
Byrne revealed to The Post during the interview that Clinton staffers used cocaine on the job.
“There were some drug issues,” Byrne says. “Some people would come in to work in the morning, and they were barely walking, they would drop stuff off at the office, and go to the restroom where they would come out minutes later happy as a clown.”
He also exposes the “jogging list” for the first time.
“In the beginning of his first administration, when President Clinton was jogging outside, women who were dressed as if they were going clubbing or working out, started showing up at the southeast gate,” Byrne explains. “The agents . . . would get the women’s names, and run them to see who they were. If the women wouldn’t cooperate, they would be ushered out of the jogging group.
“Agents … insinuated that this list was used by President Clinton to try to meet these women,” Byrne says.
What bothered Byrne more than the infidelity was the way Bill Clinton programmed the entire White House to accommodate his cheating ways.
Hillary, meanwhile, was a human minefield. The Secret Service was convinced Hillary posed a physical threat to her husband, and even gave him a black eye, Byrne writes.
She also cursed out her security detail, and she and Bill would often try to evade the Secret Service, making it difficult to protect them and putting agents at greater risk, Byrne says.
But what sticks most in Byrne’s mind is the personal destruction the Clintons wrought in his own life — the fear and turmoil he had to endure as authorities subpoenaed and harassed him as they investigated the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
It all could have been avoided, Byrne maintains, if Bill Clinton had simply told the truth.
Byrne’s revelations have come under fire recently, with some critics doubting he had the access to the Clintons he claims he had, and that his book details do not align exactly with his testimony to prosecutors nearly two decades ago.
Hillary Clinton’s spokesman has ripped the book, telling Page Six: “Gary Byrne joins the ranks of Ed Klein and other ‘authors’ in this latest in a long line of books attempting to cash in on the election cycle with their nonsense. It should be put in the fantasy section of the bookstore.”
“Anybody who asserts that what I’m saying is not true,” Byrne says, his voice cracking with emotion, “they don’t know any better or they’re flat-out lying.”
Yet, he confesses, “I’m not completely comfortable telling the story, but I am telling it.”
He says a number of people could vouch for his access, including George Stephanopoulos, the former Bill Clinton communications director; John Podesta, Hillary’s campaign chairman, who worked in the Clinton White House; and Jennifer Palmieri, Hillary Clinton’s current campaign communications director, who worked near Byrne in the White House.
As for his testimony during the Ken Starr investigation, Byrne — who never signed a non-disclosure agreement with the Secret Service — says at the time he gave narrow answers to specific questions, as instructed.
“[I]f my testimony wasn’t true, I would end up doing seven years,” he says.
To prove he’s being truthful, he says, he’s willing to undergo a polygraph test — if Hillary takes one too.
Byrne says he is not committed to Donald Trump, despite sharing his slogans.
“The only thing I’ve ever heard about Donald Trump,” says Byrne, “was that he built a lot of buildings and he gave a lot of money away to charity.”
But, he says, he will never vote for a Clinton.
“I know what the public image of the Clintons is and I know what the real image is,” he says. “And the real one’s dangerous.”
No one is immune to debt, and the majority of us are in some form of financial debt (1, 2, 3). Studies show that not having enough money, and especially being in debt, causes serious physical and mental distress (1, 2, 3). This article investigates why banks put people into debt, and uncovers why a world without any debt is completely possible.
The modern word ‘bank’ stems from the word ‘banca‘ used in Italy during the Middle Ages, but the goldsmiths of 17th Century England are often cited as where contemporary banking began (1, 2, 3, 4).
In those days, people would deposit their gold for safe keeping with the goldsmiths who issued a piece of paper (or promissory note) for the gold stored. The goldsmiths then loaned the depositor’s gold out to others in the form of further promissory notes, making good profits from the interest they charged (source).
Today, when you deposit money in your chosen commercial bank, the bank also loans out your deposited money to others. This clever system of making profits out of nothing is called fractional reserve lending and is explained simply in our video here:
However, the very first sophisticated banks can actually be traced back to the very first known civilization, the 6000-year-old ancient culture of Sumer in the area of Mesopotamia, where the Sumerian kings used a kingdom’s bank which issued clay tokens as receipts, or promissory notes, for interest repayments made with silver (1, 2, 3).
Kings using banks as a tool to rule over people obviously paints a much more negative picture of our monetary system than evolution from barter; yet if we critique the use of money from this perspective, it becomes clear that it is now the world’s central banks that have this sovereign power of control over kingdoms, or nations, today.
This is because central banks do not carry out fractional reserve lending of money stored in their vaults like commercial banks; instead, their role is to actually create a nation’s official money (or legal tender).
Central banks then loan out that money to the nation’s government, and the people pay back the government’s debt, as well as the interest the government incurs when it borrows the money, via income tax on wages.
The government’s debt is then expanded by commercial banks through loans to the public with further interest. Since the extra money needed to pay back all this interest does not exist, central banks need to keep creating more money so there is enough money in circulation.
This causes the value of each individual bank note to decrease, so prices go up (inflation) and people now have to work even more hours — not just to pay all the interest back, but now also to buy the things they could afford before.
The central banking system is explained in more detail in our short documentary here:
It was in 1694, when the King of England required funds for a war against France, that incredibly wealthy private individuals provided that money in return for the formation of the Bank of England.
In this instance, private banking families first gained huge direct influence over king and government (1, 2), and by 1783, when America won its independence from England, the Founding Fathers were well aware of the perils of private central banks (1, 2); for the Bank of England had outlawed the interest-free independent currency that had brought prosperity to the colonies, thus creating the hardship and despair that Benjamin Franklin claimed was the true cause of the American Revolution.
Yet the power and influence of the dominant (also inbreeding) banking families had now become immense (1, 2, 3), and investigations into the causes of the Panic of 1907 suggest that they deliberately triggered bank runs on some of the increasingly successful and profitable smaller trustsby spreading insolvency rumors that would cause several of them to fail (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
In 1910, a secret meeting between these banking elites, Senator Nelson Aldrich, and Assistant Secretary of the Treasury Department A.P. Andrews, was held on Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. It was there that the central banking bill called the Federal Reserve Act was drawn up (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6).
Then, only 16 years after the Federal Reserve was instated, it substantially increased the money supply, increasing unsustainable lending and borrowing. Just like 1907, bank runs, bankruptcy, and systemic collapse occurred (source), but as the USA experienced the Great Depression, the elite “Money Trust” bankers had already pulled their money out of the stock market, using it to buy up cheap stocks and smaller failing banks (1, 2).
As technology develops, the techniques for loaning out and gambling with money have become more convoluted, but the pump and dump scheme continues to consolidate wealth and power with those in the know, while the ordinary working person is literally paying the price (1, 2).
Today, the richest 1% own more than the other 99% put together, and 62 people own as much wealth as the poorest half of the entire world’s population (1, 2); it is essential then to consider, since a person can only spend so much money in one lifetime, why these people are accumulating all this wealth.
What can we do?
It is important to note that the central bank of all central banks is the Bank for International Settlements (1, 2) with its 60 member central banks which work to establish “monetary and financial stability” while also intrinsically involved in the International Monetary Fund along with 189 member countries, as well as the World Bank, whose goal is to “end extreme poverty.”
But the facts demonstrate that the aim of the world’s wealthiest and most secretive individuals has never been to create stability or to end poverty, but rather to control governments and monopolize hunger, deciding who eats and who does not (1, 2).
Not only that, but studies repeatedly show that people are not born greedy, but rather those people who seek wealth and power suffer from psychological personality disorders, including psychopathology and narcissism (1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
But the most important fact of all is perhaps that this central banking elite can only rule over people as long we allow them to do so (1, 2, 3, 4).
The money that central banks produce today is fiat money, or ‘faith’ promissory notes, meaning it is not backed by gold or silver, it cannot be redeemed in any material form, and it actually has no material value.
In other words, the value of money comes entirely from the central banks’ promise that the money itself has some intrinsic value. The use of fiat money, and the necessity to pay bank debt, depends entirely on the people’s belief that they need to actually do so.
WUWE IS A PROJECT TO PROMOTE CRITICAL THINKING AND INSPIRE POSITIVE SYSTEMIC CHANGE BY RAISING AWARENESS OF GLOBAL ISSUES NOT COVERED IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA; PLEASE SUPPORT US ON FACEBOOK, YOUTUBE AND TWITTER, OR SUBSCRIBE FOR THE LATEST UPDATES HERE
Bush, Clinton, C.I.A, Cocaine, Crack and U.S. governmental drug dealing
The ruling elite is mafia. George Bush, Jeb Bush, Bill, Hillary Clinton is the mafia. They run the cociane industry.
They should be in prison.
Text: Carl Grinde Date: 12 December 2012
Text also shared from linked pages
Updated February 8 2016
U.S. government are drug dealing criminals and fascists
There is much to read about how the U.S. government, Cliton’s, Bush’s and CIA’s criminal drug dealing. The U.S. government is a cocaine mafia. They invade poor countries, fund local militia and use military conflicts to hide the drug trade.
When Bill Clinton was governor in Arkansas he helped the CIA to establish themselves there with criminal activities. The Mena airport has been used by the CIA for secret drug operations for a long time.
CIA, State and Justice Departments teamed up to destroy drug investigation
Deep Cover: The Inside Story of How DEA Infighting, Incompetence and Subterfuge Lost Us the Biggest Battle of the Drug War Deep Cover, a New York Times non-fiction bestseller, is a first-hand account of how the CIA, State and Justice Departments teamed up to destroy a DEA undercover sting operation that threatened to expose US government ties to drug-financed governments in Mexico, Panama and Bolivia. Written by the man 60 Minutes called “America’s top undercover cop”Michael Levine http://www.amazon.com/Deep-Cover-Infighting-Incompetence-Subterfuge/dp/0595092640/ref=pd_sim_b_5
The Politics of Heroin: CIA Complicity in the Global Drug Trade
The first book to prove CIA and U.S. government complicity in global drug trafficking, “The Politics of Heroin” includes meticulous documentation of dishonesty and dirty dealings at the highest levels from the Cold War until today. Maintaining a global perspective, this groundbreaking study details the mechanics of drug trafficking in Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and South and Central America. New chapters detail U.S. involvement in the narcotics trade in Afghanistan and Pakistan before and after the fall of the Taliban, and how U.S. drug policy in Central America and Colombia has increased the global supply of illicit drugs. http://www.amazon.com/The-Politics-Heroin-Complicity-Global/dp/1556524838/ref=pd_sim_b_2
All narcotics, cocaine and drug dealing might soon become legal.
They have a plan for a “free trade zone” or a “borderless one world market” very soon.
That would fit perfect with the U.S. government, the MI5, MI6 and the illuminati’s global cocaine trade.
The EU and US also has a plan for a transatlantic free trade zone within a few years.
Mary Mahoney murdered -she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown. The murder happened just as she was to go public with her story of sexual harassment in the White House. http://www.alamo-girl.com/03159.htm
Drug War Profiteers Offer To Buy ALL State Owned Prisons In 48 States
I think it’s obvious that they are going to legalize narcotics. Then will prices fall. What will the drug dealers live on then? Yes, prison industry of course. They will guard dangerous people like me. Those who speak against their government and companies. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_LlzgdD7E4g&feature=share
CIA, FBI, British and U.S. officials are child sex criminals, pedophiles
SATANISM AND THE CIA part-1
Listen to this woman before CIA removes the movie. Her children was ritual abused in occult satanic rituals. No authority would help her because of the occult satanic circumstances surrounding the matter. The authorities took her car, her job, her money, all her assets, they took everything from her. They wanted to silence her. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSEA7OWo24g
Blair silences the press from publishing child pornographers and paedophiles investigation
In 1999, an international investigation of child pornographers and paedophiles run by Britain’s National Criminal Intelligence Service, code named Operation Ore, resulted in 7,250 suspects being identified in the United Kingdom alone. Some 1850 people were criminally charged in the case and there were 1451 convictions. Almost 500 people were interviewed “under caution” by police, meaning they were suspects. Some 900 individuals remain under investigation. In early 2003, British police began to close in on some top suspects in the Operation Ore investigation, including senior members of Blair’s government. However, Blair issued a D-Notice, resulting in a gag order on the press from publishing any details of the investigation. http://www.tpuc.org/blair-covering-up-paedophile-scandal
Peter Ball arrested by Police investigating child abuse. He is a friend to Prince Andrew
The Right Reverend Peter Ball, a “loyal friend” of Prince Charles – has been arrested by Police investigating child abuse in the Church of England. A church which is headed by our Monarch! And Prince Andrew and his paedophilic friend. NOW, we have Prince Charles giving refuge to a PAEDOPHILE PRIEST! Ball, of Langport, Somerset, resigned as Bishop in 1993, only two years after he was appointed. He quit after receiving a police caution for committing an act of gross indecency against a trainee teenage monk. Shortly afterwards he was given sanctuary by the Prince of Wales who personally invited him to live in Manor Lodge, in the village of Aller, Somerset, a Duchy of Cornwall property. http://earthlinggb.wordpress.com
Jimmy Savile investigation closed down
“I find it extraordinary that the decision to close down the Jimmy Savile investigation could have been taken without the knowledge of the director general, who is the editor-in-chief, because this was not any run-of-the-mill investigation. “It was one of the highest importance, involving some very grave criminal allegations about someone who had been a BBC employee for decades.” http://tvnz.co.nz/entertainment-news/paedophile-ring-claims-deepen-savile-bbc-scandal-5158874
More Powerful then NIXON (The Demmink Gate) (1)
Unknown to the American public is the man Joris Demmink, the most powerful man of the Royal Kingdom of the Netherlands. He find´s himself in the center of a scandal that is far more powerful, evil and far reaching then the Watergate Scandal ever became. This documentary is about a Dutch nightmarish tale of corruption, abduction, child pornography and murder. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLYmH5-dEgk